Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseasePhase 4NCT01865500
Two Different Dosages of Nebulized Steroid Versus Parenteral Steroid in the Management of COPD Exacerbations
A Phase 4 study testing Budesonide 4 mg, Budesonide 8 mg and Metil prednisolone in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Ataturk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease that has a chronic and progressive course. Patients with COPD may have exacerbations one to four times in a year. Numbers of exacerbations are important because of increased morbidity and mortality and healthcare costs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Budesonide 4 mg, Budesonide 8 mg and Metil prednisolone
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to May 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with moderate or severe COPD exacerbation who are older than 40-years-old
- A smoking history of at least 10-pack-years
- Requiring hospitalization because of COPD exacerbation
Who cannot join
- Presence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopy or any systemic disease (such as diabetes mellitus or hypertension)
- Exposed to systemic corticosteroids in the preceding month or used more than 1,500 microg/d of inhaled beclomethasone equivalent
- Admission to the intensive care unit (pH<7.30 and/or PaCO2 > 70 mm Hg, and/or PaO2 < 50 mm Hg despite supplemental oxygen)
- If a specific cause for the exacerbation, such as pneumonia, pneumothorax, or heart failure, was diagnosed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Ataturk University Faculty of Medicine Pulmonary Disease Department
Erzurum, 25240
About this study
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease that has a chronic and progressive course. Patients with COPD may have exacerbations one to four times in a year. Numbers of exacerbations are important because of increased morbidity and mortality and healthcare costs.
Systemic corticosteroids (SC) are recommended in the management of exacerbations of COPD as well as bronchodilator, oxygen and antibacterial treatment by all international guidelines. However, there are still some concerns about systemic corticosteroid use because COPD patients are older and relatively immobilized. In addition, exacerbation rate is significantly higher in a group of COPD patients, and these patients need higher amounts of SC in order to control of exacerbation. It results in some adverse effects such as osteoporosis and bone fractures, thinning of the skin, posterior subcapsular cataract formation, glucose intolerance and myopathy. Thus, this condition leads clinicians to seek alternative options. However, there are few studies showing that nebulized steroids (NS) are as effective as SC in exacerbations of COPD and the optimal NS dose is not certain.
The investigators aimed to determine the optimal NS dose and evaluate the efficacy and safety of NS compared with SC in the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization.
Read the detailed description
Study Population One hundred twenty patients with moderate or severe COPD exacerbation who are older than 40-years-old, had a smoking history of at least 10-pack-years and requiring hospitalization were included in the study. COPD diagnosis was based on clinical evaluation as defined by the American Thoracic Society (ATS). The patients were excluded if they had a presence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopy or any systemic disease (such as diabetes mellitus or hypertension); were exposed to systemic corticosteroids in the preceding month; used more than 1,500 microg/d of inhaled beclomethasone equivalent; were admission to the intensive care unit (pH<7.30 and/or arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) > 70 mm Hg, and/or arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) < 50 mm Hg despite supplemental oxygen); if a specific cause for the exacerbation, such as pneumonia, pneumothorax, or heart failure, was diagnosed.
Study Design The study was as a randomized, double-blind, parallel design trial. The randomization order was determined using a computer-generated list of random numbers. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups, that is, parenteral corticosteroid (PS), 4 mg nebulized budesonide (NB) or 8 mg NB. The efficacy of the study medications was assessed at hospitalization, 24 h, 48 h and before discharge. Patients were monitored during the hospitalization. Patients were withdrawn from the study if they required intubation and managed in intensive care unit.
Treatments Treatment in the PS group consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg (intravenous ampoule); treatment in the NB groups consisted of nebulized budesonide suspension (Pulmicort nebuampul® 0.5 mg/ml; Astra-Zeneca Pharmaceutical Production) for 10 days. Budesonide were given as 2 mg twice daily or 4 mg twice daily; methylprednisolone were given once daily intravenously.
Nebulization procedures were performed by jet nebulizer (Porta Neb® Ventstream® 1803; Medic-Aid) with 80% of output of less than 5 micron. Patients received standard treatment with a nebulized ß-agonist (salbutamol 3.01 mg) and anticholinergic (ipratropium bromide 0.5 mg) combination every 6 hours, intravenous aminophylline (0.5 mg/kg/h) and oral or intravenous antibacterial at the discretion of the attending physician. Supplementary oxygen therapy was used to maintain oxygen saturation (SaO2) >90%.
Measurements Patients were assessed every 12 h during the acute phase (from H0 to H48), and at hospital discharge. Arterial blood samples were taken at baseline, 24, 48 h and before discharge for the determination of PaO2, PaCO2, and pH, regardless of whether the patient was on room air or on supplementary oxygen. Spirometry (Sensor Medics, Vmax22) was carried out before and 15 to 20 min after bronchodilator nebulization (ß2-agonist and ipratropium bromide) according to ATS standards. Dyspnea was assessed according to the modified Borg scale. Complete blood cell counts were obtained at entry, and blood glucose, sodium, potassium were measured at H0 and H48.
Endpoints The primary endpoint was to assess treatment efficacy by the change of arterial blood gases from H0 to H24, H48 and before discharge. Secondary endpoints included the changes in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), dyspnea score, duration of hospitalization, and occurrence of adverse events. An adverse event was defined as any medical event reported by the attending physician and events resulting in treatment change, discontinuation study medication or prolonged of hospitalization.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- Budesonide 4 mg, Budesonide 8 mg, Metil prednisolone
- Keywords
- COPD exacerbation, Nebulized budesonide, Parenteral steroid
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Budesonide 4 mgDrug
It will be evaluated at baseline, 24 h, 48 h and before discharge
Budesonide 8 mgDrug
Baseline FEV1 and before discharge FEV1 were evaluated
Metil prednisoloneDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Metil prednisolone & Budesonide 4mg | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Budesonide 4 mg; Drug: Metil prednisolone |
| Metil prednisolone & Budesonide 8 mg | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Budesonide 8 mg; Drug: Metil prednisolone |
| Budesonide 4 mg & Budesonide 8 mg | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Budesonide 4 mg; Drug: Budesonide 8 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
change of arterial blood gases from H0 to H24, H48 and before discharge
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Changes in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), dyspnea score.
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ataturk UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ataturk University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elif Yilmazel Ucar, Ataturk University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01865500
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EUcar
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 20 May 2013
- Last updated
- 31 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Maltais F, Ostinelli J, Bourbeau J, Tonnel AB, Jacquemet N, Haddon J, Rouleau M, Boukhana M, Martinot JB, Duroux P. Comparison of nebulized budesonide and oral prednisolone with placebo in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Mar 1;165(5):698-703. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.5.2109093.
PubMed 11874817Gaude GS, Nadagouda S. Nebulized corticosteroids in the management of acute exacerbation of COPD. Lung India. 2010 Oct;27(4):230-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.71957.
PubMed 21139721Gunen H, Mirici A, Meral M, Akgun M. Steroids in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: are nebulized and systemic forms comparable? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009 Mar;15(2):133-7. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32832185da.
PubMed 19532028
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Two Different Dosages of Nebulized Steroid Versus Parenteral Steroid in the Management of COPD Exacerbations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01865500
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EUcar
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- COPD exacerbation, Nebulized budesonide, Parenteral steroid
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ataturk UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease that has a chronic and progressive course. Patients with COPD may have exacerbations one to four times in a year. Numbers of exacerbations are important because of increased morbidity and mortality and healthcare costs.
Systemic corticosteroids (SC) are recommended in the management of exacerbations of COPD as well as bronchodilator, oxygen and antibacterial treatment by all international guidelines. However, there are still some concerns about systemic corticosteroid use because COPD patients are older and relatively immobilized. In addition, exacerbation rate is significantly higher in a group of COPD patients, and these patients need higher amounts of SC in order to control of exacerbation. It results in some adverse effects such as osteoporosis and bone fractures, thinning of the skin, posterior subcapsular cataract formation, glucose intolerance and myopathy. Thus, this condition leads clinicians to seek alternative options. However, there are few studies showing that nebulized steroids (NS) are as effective as SC in exacerbations of COPD and the optimal NS dose is not certain.
The investigators aimed to determine the optimal NS dose and evaluate the efficacy and safety of NS compared with SC in the treatment of patients with COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization.
Detailed description
Study Population One hundred twenty patients with moderate or severe COPD exacerbation who are older than 40-years-old, had a smoking history of at least 10-pack-years and requiring hospitalization were included in the study. COPD diagnosis was based on clinical evaluation as defined by the American Thoracic Society (ATS). The patients were excluded if they had a presence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopy or any systemic disease (such as diabetes mellitus or hypertension); were exposed to systemic corticosteroids in the preceding month; used more than 1,500 microg/d of inhaled beclomethasone equivalent; were admission to the intensive care unit (pH<7.30 and/or arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) > 70 mm Hg, and/or arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) < 50 mm Hg despite supplemental oxygen); if a specific cause for the exacerbation, such as pneumonia, pneumothorax, or heart failure, was diagnosed.
Study Design The study was as a randomized, double-blind, parallel design trial. The randomization order was determined using a computer-generated list of random numbers. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to one of the three treatment groups, that is, parenteral corticosteroid (PS), 4 mg nebulized budesonide (NB) or 8 mg NB. The efficacy of the study medications was assessed at hospitalization, 24 h, 48 h and before discharge. Patients were monitored during the hospitalization. Patients were withdrawn from the study if they required intubation and managed in intensive care unit.
Treatments Treatment in the PS group consisted of methylprednisolone 40 mg (intravenous ampoule); treatment in the NB groups consisted of nebulized budesonide suspension (Pulmicort nebuampul® 0.5 mg/ml; Astra-Zeneca Pharmaceutical Production) for 10 days. Budesonide were given as 2 mg twice daily or 4 mg twice daily; methylprednisolone were given once daily intravenously.
Nebulization procedures were performed by jet nebulizer (Porta Neb® Ventstream® 1803; Medic-Aid) with 80% of output of less than 5 micron. Patients received standard treatment with a nebulized ß-agonist (salbutamol 3.01 mg) and anticholinergic (ipratropium bromide 0.5 mg) combination every 6 hours, intravenous aminophylline (0.5 mg/kg/h) and oral or intravenous antibacterial at the discretion of the attending physician. Supplementary oxygen therapy was used to maintain oxygen saturation (SaO2) >90%.
Measurements Patients were assessed every 12 h during the acute phase (from H0 to H48), and at hospital discharge. Arterial blood samples were taken at baseline, 24, 48 h and before discharge for the determination of PaO2, PaCO2, and pH, regardless of whether the patient was on room air or on supplementary oxygen. Spirometry (Sensor Medics, Vmax22) was carried out before and 15 to 20 min after bronchodilator nebulization (ß2-agonist and ipratropium bromide) according to ATS standards. Dyspnea was assessed according to the modified Borg scale. Complete blood cell counts were obtained at entry, and blood glucose, sodium, potassium were measured at H0 and H48.
Endpoints The primary endpoint was to assess treatment efficacy by the change of arterial blood gases from H0 to H24, H48 and before discharge. Secondary endpoints included the changes in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), dyspnea score, duration of hospitalization, and occurrence of adverse events. An adverse event was defined as any medical event reported by the attending physician and events resulting in treatment change, discontinuation study medication or prolonged of hospitalization.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Metil prednisolone & Budesonide 4mg | Active comparator | Drug: Budesonide 4 mg, Drug: Metil prednisolone |
| Metil prednisolone & Budesonide 8 mg | Active comparator | Drug: Budesonide 8 mg, Drug: Metil prednisolone |
| Budesonide 4 mg & Budesonide 8 mg | Active comparator | Drug: Budesonide 4 mg, Drug: Budesonide 8 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with moderate or severe COPD exacerbation who are older than 40-years-old
- A smoking history of at least 10-pack-years
- Requiring hospitalization because of COPD exacerbation
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Presence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopy or any systemic disease (such as diabetes mellitus or hypertension)
- Exposed to systemic corticosteroids in the preceding month or used more than 1,500 microg/d of inhaled beclomethasone equivalent
- Admission to the intensive care unit (pH<7.30 and/or PaCO2 > 70 mm Hg, and/or PaO2 < 50 mm Hg despite supplemental oxygen)
- If a specific cause for the exacerbation, such as pneumonia, pneumothorax, or heart failure, was diagnosed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Budesonide 4 mgIt will be evaluated at baseline, 24 h, 48 h and before discharge | Drug | Budesonide 4 mg & Budesonide 8 mg, Metil prednisolone & Budesonide 4mg |
| Budesonide 8 mgBaseline FEV1 and before discharge FEV1 were evaluated | Drug | Budesonide 4 mg & Budesonide 8 mg, Metil prednisolone & Budesonide 8 mg |
| Metil prednisolone | Drug | Metil prednisolone & Budesonide 4mg, Metil prednisolone & Budesonide 8 mg |
Primary outcome
change of arterial blood gases from H0 to H24, H48 and before discharge
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days.
1 secondary outcome
Changes in FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in 1 second), dyspnea score.
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2013.
- Background: PubMed 11874817Maltais F, Ostinelli J, Bourbeau J, Tonnel AB, Jacquemet N, Haddon J, Rouleau M, Boukhana M, Martinot JB, Duroux P. Comparison of nebulized budesonide and oral prednisolone with placebo in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Mar 1;165(5):698-703. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.5.2109093.
- Background: PubMed 21139721Gaude GS, Nadagouda S. Nebulized corticosteroids in the management of acute exacerbation of COPD. Lung India. 2010 Oct;27(4):230-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.71957.
- Results publication: PubMed 19532028Gunen H, Mirici A, Meral M, Akgun M. Steroids in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: are nebulized and systemic forms comparable? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009 Mar;15(2):133-7. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32832185da.
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Budesonide 4 mg, Budesonide 8 mg and Metil prednisolone in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, run by Ataturk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
change of arterial blood gases from H0 to H24, H48 and before discharge (time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 10 days.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01865500, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2013.