AzTrials
AzTrials

Gestational DiabetesEGGONCT01864564

Early Gestational Diabetes Screening in the Gravid Obese Woman

A study testing Early Screen in people with Gestational Diabetes and Obesity, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved perinatal outcomes. Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Gestational Diabetes, Obesity
What is being tested?
Early Screen
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
962 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
18 Jun 2013to 31 Aug 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pregnant
  • 18 years and older
  • Body mass index >=30.0
  • <20 weeks gestation at presentation for care

Who cannot join

  • Prior cesarean
  • History of bariatric surgery
  • Major maternal medical illness (cardiac disease, HIV, hemoglobinopathy, oxygen requirement)
  • Chronic prednisone use
  • Known fetal anomalies
  • Multifetal gestation

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35233

  • Ochsner Health System

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121

Other trials in United States

About this study

Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved perinatal outcomes.

Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the need for third-trimester testing.

Specific Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a sensitive marker of hyperglycemia, can be used as a simple and sensitive serum test for GDM in the obese population.

Read the detailed description

Over 1/3 of reproductive age women are obese. Obese women have higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirth, fetal growth disorders, diabetes, hypertensive diseases and maternal death. Although weight loss prior to pregnancy is the ideal, a significant proportion of obese women do not present to care until after conception. Consequently, developing a comprehensive plan for managing the obese gravida is imperative. One component of such a plan must include screening and treating for gestational diabetes (GDM), which is associated with macrosomia, cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Obesity substantially increases the risk of GDM (odds ratio 2-5). GDM treatment has been shown to improve pregnancy outcomes,but obese women with GDM continue to have worsened outcomes compared to normal weight women with GDM, with more cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, macrosomia and stillbirths occurring in obese women. This is perhaps due to pre-existing insulin resistance in obese women that, when coupled with the normal insulin resistance of pregnancy, leads to earlier onset of GDM in obese women compared to normal weight women, with consequently longer fetal exposure to hyperglycemic episodes prior to diagnosis and treatment.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends screening obese women for gestational diabetes (GDM) in the first trimester or upon presentation. However, due to lack of supporting data, this recommendation is not widely followed and the majority of obese women do not undergo GDM screening until 24-28 weeks gestation. Postponing testing may delay the diagnosis and treatment of GDM by 10 weeks or more, resulting in fetal hyperglycemia during critical periods of fetal growth and development. Early screening, between 14-18 weeks gestation, in this high-risk population will allow for earlier recognition and treatment of GDM, thereby improving perinatal outcomes.

Additionally, little is known about screening and diagnostic standards for GDM early in pregnancy. Currently, when GDM testing is performed early in pregnancy, the criteria used to diagnose GDM at 24-28 weeks are applied. However, these thresholds were developed for a test performed at 24-28 weeks; applying these same thresholds at 14-18 weeks may not be appropriate. As insulin resistance increases throughout pregnancy, lowering the criteria for glucose tolerance testing earlier in gestation may improve GDM detection and avoid the need for re-testing later in pregnancy. Alternatively, as GDM is the new-onset of insulin resistance with resulting hyperglycemia, biomarkers that reflect metabolic markers of recent hyperglycemic episodes may perform well in screening for GDM and may decrease the patient burden of, while increasing compliance with, glucose tolerance testing. One such marker that has been evaluated in Type 2 diabetes is 1,5-anhydroglucitol (AG), an unmetabolized monosaccharide. AG has a fairly stable steady-state concentration in the blood that is unaffected by fasting, dietary changes and pregnancy; it is reabsorbed in the renal tubules by the same transporter that reabsorbs glucose. During a hyperglycemic episode, the presence of glucose in the urine competitively inhibits the reabsorption of AG, resulting in a precipitous decline in AG levels. AG levels recover slowly in the presence of continued hyperglycemia. The rapid fall of AG with the onset of hyperglycemia and its slow recovery in situations of on-going hyperglycemia suggest it as both a sensitive and specific marker for new-onset glucose intolerance requiring treatment. As perinatal outcomes are closely linked to hyperglycemic excursions, (18) AG may be the most sensitive and specific marker for determining the GDM patient who will benefit most from treatment.

This study is potentially practice changing and could greatly reduce the disparities in perinatal outcomes seen in obese women. Early GDM screening of obese women may reduce the risk of cesarean delivery, macrosomia, stillbirth, preterm birth, and preeclampsia in this population. This study has 3 specific aims:

Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved composite perinatal outcomes.

Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the need for third-trimester testing.

Specific Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a sensitive marker of recent hyperglycemic excursions, can be used as a simple and sensitive serum test for GDM in the obese population.

Being tested
Early Screen
Keywords
Gestational diabetes, Screening, Obesity, Anhydroglucitol
Medical subject headings
Diabetes, Gestational, Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Early ScreenOther

    Women will be randomized to be screened for gestational diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks gestation (early=intervention) versus routine screening at 24-28 weeks.

Study groups in NCT01864564
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Routine ScreeningNo interventionObese women will be screened at 24-28 weeks of gestation for gestational diabetes using the standard U.S. screening method of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test if abnormal. Women identified as having diabetes will be treated according to standards of care. All women will have a hemoglobin A1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol checked at 14-18 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation.
Early ScreeningExperimentalObese women will be randomized to be screened at 14-19.9 weeks of gestation for gestational diabetes using the standard U.S. screening method of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test if abnormal. Women identified as having diabetes will be treated according to standards of care. Women who do not have diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks will be re-screened at 24-28 weeks per the standard of care. All women will have a hemoglobin A1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol checked at 14-18 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation.
Receives: Other: Early Screen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With a Composite Perinatal Outcome

    Any one of the following: Macrosomia (birth weight > 4000 g), primary cesarean, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL)

    Measured: Baseline to within 6 weeks of delivery

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Number of Participants With Macrosomia

    Number of infants with Birth weight >4000 g

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of delivery

  2. Primary Cesarean Delivery

    Primary cesarean : delivery via cesarean, first cesarean (does not include repeat cesarean deliveries)

    Measured: Delivery

  3. Pregnancy Induced Hypertension

    Includes gestational hypertension and preeclampsia

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of delivery

  4. Shoulder Dystocia

    Shoulder dystocia as identified by delivering physician

    Measured: At birth

  5. Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia

    serum bilirubin level above the 95th percentile for gestational age

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of delivery

  6. Neonatal Hypoglycemia

    Blood sugar level <40 mg/dL

    Measured: Within 6 weeks of delivery

  7. Gestational Age at Delivery

    Gestational age in weeks as calculated by ACOG criteria

    Measured: at delivery

  8. Any Diabetic Medication

    includes the use of any diabetic medication

    Measured: baseline to delivery

  9. Insulin Medication

    Includes the use of Insulin

    Measured: baseline to delivery

  10. Large for Gestational Age

    defined as >= the 90th percentile by Duryea et al

    Measured: at delivery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start18 Jun 2013
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
962 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01864564
Sponsor's protocol ID
F121008004
Other IDs
K12HD001258
Acronym
EGGO
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
22 May 2013
Last updated
23 Jun 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Harper LM, Jauk V, Longo S, Biggio JR, Szychowski JM, Tita AT. Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):495.e1-495.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

    PubMed 31926951

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Early Screen in people with Gestational Diabetes and Obesity, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jun 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With a Composite Perinatal Outcome (time frame: Baseline to within 6 weeks of delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01864564, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in