Gestational DiabetesEGGONCT01864564
Early Gestational Diabetes Screening in the Gravid Obese Woman
A study testing Early Screen in people with Gestational Diabetes and Obesity, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved perinatal outcomes. Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Gestational Diabetes, Obesity
- What is being tested?
- Early Screen
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 962 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Jun 2013to 31 Aug 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant
- 18 years and older
- Body mass index >=30.0
- <20 weeks gestation at presentation for care
Who cannot join
- Prior cesarean
- History of bariatric surgery
- Major maternal medical illness (cardiac disease, HIV, hemoglobinopathy, oxygen requirement)
- Chronic prednisone use
- Known fetal anomalies
- Multifetal gestation
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Ochsner Health System
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
About this study
Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved perinatal outcomes.
Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the need for third-trimester testing.
Specific Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a sensitive marker of hyperglycemia, can be used as a simple and sensitive serum test for GDM in the obese population.
Read the detailed description
Over 1/3 of reproductive age women are obese. Obese women have higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirth, fetal growth disorders, diabetes, hypertensive diseases and maternal death. Although weight loss prior to pregnancy is the ideal, a significant proportion of obese women do not present to care until after conception. Consequently, developing a comprehensive plan for managing the obese gravida is imperative. One component of such a plan must include screening and treating for gestational diabetes (GDM), which is associated with macrosomia, cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Obesity substantially increases the risk of GDM (odds ratio 2-5). GDM treatment has been shown to improve pregnancy outcomes,but obese women with GDM continue to have worsened outcomes compared to normal weight women with GDM, with more cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, macrosomia and stillbirths occurring in obese women. This is perhaps due to pre-existing insulin resistance in obese women that, when coupled with the normal insulin resistance of pregnancy, leads to earlier onset of GDM in obese women compared to normal weight women, with consequently longer fetal exposure to hyperglycemic episodes prior to diagnosis and treatment.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends screening obese women for gestational diabetes (GDM) in the first trimester or upon presentation. However, due to lack of supporting data, this recommendation is not widely followed and the majority of obese women do not undergo GDM screening until 24-28 weeks gestation. Postponing testing may delay the diagnosis and treatment of GDM by 10 weeks or more, resulting in fetal hyperglycemia during critical periods of fetal growth and development. Early screening, between 14-18 weeks gestation, in this high-risk population will allow for earlier recognition and treatment of GDM, thereby improving perinatal outcomes.
Additionally, little is known about screening and diagnostic standards for GDM early in pregnancy. Currently, when GDM testing is performed early in pregnancy, the criteria used to diagnose GDM at 24-28 weeks are applied. However, these thresholds were developed for a test performed at 24-28 weeks; applying these same thresholds at 14-18 weeks may not be appropriate. As insulin resistance increases throughout pregnancy, lowering the criteria for glucose tolerance testing earlier in gestation may improve GDM detection and avoid the need for re-testing later in pregnancy. Alternatively, as GDM is the new-onset of insulin resistance with resulting hyperglycemia, biomarkers that reflect metabolic markers of recent hyperglycemic episodes may perform well in screening for GDM and may decrease the patient burden of, while increasing compliance with, glucose tolerance testing. One such marker that has been evaluated in Type 2 diabetes is 1,5-anhydroglucitol (AG), an unmetabolized monosaccharide. AG has a fairly stable steady-state concentration in the blood that is unaffected by fasting, dietary changes and pregnancy; it is reabsorbed in the renal tubules by the same transporter that reabsorbs glucose. During a hyperglycemic episode, the presence of glucose in the urine competitively inhibits the reabsorption of AG, resulting in a precipitous decline in AG levels. AG levels recover slowly in the presence of continued hyperglycemia. The rapid fall of AG with the onset of hyperglycemia and its slow recovery in situations of on-going hyperglycemia suggest it as both a sensitive and specific marker for new-onset glucose intolerance requiring treatment. As perinatal outcomes are closely linked to hyperglycemic excursions, (18) AG may be the most sensitive and specific marker for determining the GDM patient who will benefit most from treatment.
This study is potentially practice changing and could greatly reduce the disparities in perinatal outcomes seen in obese women. Early GDM screening of obese women may reduce the risk of cesarean delivery, macrosomia, stillbirth, preterm birth, and preeclampsia in this population. This study has 3 specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved composite perinatal outcomes.
Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the need for third-trimester testing.
Specific Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a sensitive marker of recent hyperglycemic excursions, can be used as a simple and sensitive serum test for GDM in the obese population.
- Conditions
- Gestational Diabetes, Obesity
- Being tested
- Early Screen
- Keywords
- Gestational diabetes, Screening, Obesity, Anhydroglucitol
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes, Gestational, Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Early ScreenOther
Women will be randomized to be screened for gestational diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks gestation (early=intervention) versus routine screening at 24-28 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Routine Screening | No intervention | Obese women will be screened at 24-28 weeks of gestation for gestational diabetes using the standard U.S. screening method of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test if abnormal. Women identified as having diabetes will be treated according to standards of care. All women will have a hemoglobin A1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol checked at 14-18 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation. |
| Early Screening | Experimental | Obese women will be randomized to be screened at 14-19.9 weeks of gestation for gestational diabetes using the standard U.S. screening method of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test if abnormal. Women identified as having diabetes will be treated according to standards of care. Women who do not have diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks will be re-screened at 24-28 weeks per the standard of care.
All women will have a hemoglobin A1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol checked at 14-18 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation. Receives: Other: Early Screen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With a Composite Perinatal Outcome
Any one of the following: Macrosomia (birth weight > 4000 g), primary cesarean, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL)
Measured: Baseline to within 6 weeks of delivery
Secondary outcomes (10)
Number of Participants With Macrosomia
Number of infants with Birth weight >4000 g
Measured: Within 6 weeks of delivery
Primary Cesarean Delivery
Primary cesarean : delivery via cesarean, first cesarean (does not include repeat cesarean deliveries)
Measured: Delivery
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension
Includes gestational hypertension and preeclampsia
Measured: Within 6 weeks of delivery
Shoulder Dystocia
Shoulder dystocia as identified by delivering physician
Measured: At birth
Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia
serum bilirubin level above the 95th percentile for gestational age
Measured: Within 6 weeks of delivery
Neonatal Hypoglycemia
Blood sugar level <40 mg/dL
Measured: Within 6 weeks of delivery
Gestational Age at Delivery
Gestational age in weeks as calculated by ACOG criteria
Measured: at delivery
Any Diabetic Medication
includes the use of any diabetic medication
Measured: baseline to delivery
Insulin Medication
Includes the use of Insulin
Measured: baseline to delivery
Large for Gestational Age
defined as >= the 90th percentile by Duryea et al
Measured: at delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study start18 Jun 2013
- Primary completion31 Aug 2018
- Study completion31 Aug 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gestational DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 962 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Ochsner Health System
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lorie M Harper, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Lorie M Harper, MD, MSCI, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01864564
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- F121008004
- Other IDs
- K12HD001258
- Acronym
- EGGO
- Status last verified
- Jun 2020
- First submitted
- 22 May 2013
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Harper LM, Jauk V, Longo S, Biggio JR, Szychowski JM, Tita AT. Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):495.e1-495.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
PubMed 31926951
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Gestational Diabetes Screening in the Gravid Obese Woman
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01864564
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EGGO / F121008004
- Conditions
- Gestational Diabetes, Obesity
- Keywords
- Gestational diabetes, Screening, Obesity, Anhydroglucitol
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 962 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Ochsner Health System
- Study start
- 18 Jun 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jun 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved perinatal outcomes.
Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the need for third-trimester testing.
Specific Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a sensitive marker of hyperglycemia, can be used as a simple and sensitive serum test for GDM in the obese population.
Detailed description
Over 1/3 of reproductive age women are obese. Obese women have higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, including stillbirth, fetal growth disorders, diabetes, hypertensive diseases and maternal death. Although weight loss prior to pregnancy is the ideal, a significant proportion of obese women do not present to care until after conception. Consequently, developing a comprehensive plan for managing the obese gravida is imperative. One component of such a plan must include screening and treating for gestational diabetes (GDM), which is associated with macrosomia, cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Obesity substantially increases the risk of GDM (odds ratio 2-5). GDM treatment has been shown to improve pregnancy outcomes,but obese women with GDM continue to have worsened outcomes compared to normal weight women with GDM, with more cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, macrosomia and stillbirths occurring in obese women. This is perhaps due to pre-existing insulin resistance in obese women that, when coupled with the normal insulin resistance of pregnancy, leads to earlier onset of GDM in obese women compared to normal weight women, with consequently longer fetal exposure to hyperglycemic episodes prior to diagnosis and treatment.
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends screening obese women for gestational diabetes (GDM) in the first trimester or upon presentation. However, due to lack of supporting data, this recommendation is not widely followed and the majority of obese women do not undergo GDM screening until 24-28 weeks gestation. Postponing testing may delay the diagnosis and treatment of GDM by 10 weeks or more, resulting in fetal hyperglycemia during critical periods of fetal growth and development. Early screening, between 14-18 weeks gestation, in this high-risk population will allow for earlier recognition and treatment of GDM, thereby improving perinatal outcomes.
Additionally, little is known about screening and diagnostic standards for GDM early in pregnancy. Currently, when GDM testing is performed early in pregnancy, the criteria used to diagnose GDM at 24-28 weeks are applied. However, these thresholds were developed for a test performed at 24-28 weeks; applying these same thresholds at 14-18 weeks may not be appropriate. As insulin resistance increases throughout pregnancy, lowering the criteria for glucose tolerance testing earlier in gestation may improve GDM detection and avoid the need for re-testing later in pregnancy. Alternatively, as GDM is the new-onset of insulin resistance with resulting hyperglycemia, biomarkers that reflect metabolic markers of recent hyperglycemic episodes may perform well in screening for GDM and may decrease the patient burden of, while increasing compliance with, glucose tolerance testing. One such marker that has been evaluated in Type 2 diabetes is 1,5-anhydroglucitol (AG), an unmetabolized monosaccharide. AG has a fairly stable steady-state concentration in the blood that is unaffected by fasting, dietary changes and pregnancy; it is reabsorbed in the renal tubules by the same transporter that reabsorbs glucose. During a hyperglycemic episode, the presence of glucose in the urine competitively inhibits the reabsorption of AG, resulting in a precipitous decline in AG levels. AG levels recover slowly in the presence of continued hyperglycemia. The rapid fall of AG with the onset of hyperglycemia and its slow recovery in situations of on-going hyperglycemia suggest it as both a sensitive and specific marker for new-onset glucose intolerance requiring treatment. As perinatal outcomes are closely linked to hyperglycemic excursions, (18) AG may be the most sensitive and specific marker for determining the GDM patient who will benefit most from treatment.
This study is potentially practice changing and could greatly reduce the disparities in perinatal outcomes seen in obese women. Early GDM screening of obese women may reduce the risk of cesarean delivery, macrosomia, stillbirth, preterm birth, and preeclampsia in this population. This study has 3 specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that early GDM screening between 14-18 weeks in obese women (body mass index ≥30.0) will result in improved composite perinatal outcomes.
Specific Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that a lower diagnostic threshold for GDM at 14-18 weeks will result in improved detection of GDM and reduce the need for third-trimester testing.
Specific Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that 1,5-anhydroglucitol, a sensitive marker of recent hyperglycemic excursions, can be used as a simple and sensitive serum test for GDM in the obese population.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Routine Screening | No intervention | –Obese women will be screened at 24-28 weeks of gestation for gestational diabetes using the standard U.S. screening method of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test if abnormal. Women identified as having diabetes will be treated according to standards of care. All women will have a hemoglobin A1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol checked at 14-18 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation. |
| Early Screening | Experimental | Other: Early ScreenObese women will be randomized to be screened at 14-19.9 weeks of gestation for gestational diabetes using the standard U.S. screening method of a 1-hour, 50-g glucose challenge test followed by a 3-hour, 100-g glucose tolerance test if abnormal. Women identified as having diabetes will be treated according to standards of care. Women who do not have diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks will be re-screened at 24-28 weeks per the standard of care. All women will have a hemoglobin A1c and 1,5-anhydroglucitol checked at 14-18 weeks and 24-28 weeks gestation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pregnant
- 18 years and older
- Body mass index >=30.0
- <20 weeks gestation at presentation for care
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Prior cesarean
- History of bariatric surgery
- Major maternal medical illness (cardiac disease, HIV, hemoglobinopathy, oxygen requirement)
- Chronic prednisone use
- Known fetal anomalies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Early ScreenWomen will be randomized to be screened for gestational diabetes at 14-19.9 weeks gestation (early=intervention) versus routine screening at 24-28 weeks. | Other | Early Screening |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With a Composite Perinatal Outcome
Time frame: Baseline to within 6 weeks of delivery
Any one of the following: Macrosomia (birth weight > 4000 g), primary cesarean, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, neonatal hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL)
10 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Macrosomia
Time frame: Within 6 weeks of delivery
Primary Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: Delivery
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension
Time frame: Within 6 weeks of delivery
Shoulder Dystocia
Time frame: At birth
Neonatal Hyperbilirubinemia
Time frame: Within 6 weeks of delivery
Neonatal Hypoglycemia
Time frame: Within 6 weeks of delivery
Gestational Age at Delivery
Time frame: at delivery
Any Diabetic Medication
Time frame: baseline to delivery
Insulin Medication
Time frame: baseline to delivery
Large for Gestational Age
Time frame: at delivery
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31926951Harper LM, Jauk V, Longo S, Biggio JR, Szychowski JM, Tita AT. Early gestational diabetes screening in obese women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;222(5):495.e1-495.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gestational Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), Obstetric Anesthesia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness Study of a Lifestyle Intervention Versus Metformin in Mothers With Recent Gestational Diabetes
Weight Loss, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancy
Not yet recruiting
STRONG: SMART Trial
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Not yet recruiting
A Study to Lower Blood Pressure One Year After Childbirth in Women Who Had Preeclampsia
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, Cardiovascular Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lorie M Harper, MD, MSCI principal investigator
University of Alabama at Birmingham
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Early Screen in people with Gestational Diabetes and Obesity, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jun 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With a Composite Perinatal Outcome (time frame: Baseline to within 6 weeks of delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01864564, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2020.