AzTrials
AzTrials

Arthritis, RheumatoidPhase 3SIRROUND-LTENCT01856309

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Sirukumab in Participants With RA Completing Studies CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003

A Phase 3 study testing Sirukumab 100 mg and Sirukumab 50 mg in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 197 sites in 29 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CNTO 136 (sirukumab) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are unresponsive to treatment with modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or anti-TNF alpha agents. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What is being tested?
Sirukumab 100 mg and Sirukumab 50 mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
1,820 participants
Where
197 sitesin 29 countries
Study dates
7 Aug 2013to 30 Apr 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Completed participation in Studies CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
  • Signed an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study
  • Signed an informed consent form (ICF) for pharmacogenetics research (how a person's genes may affect a drug's effects) in order to participate in the optional pharmacogenetics component of this study. Refusal to give consent for this component does not exclude a participant from participation in this clinical study

Who cannot join

  • Withdraws consent and/or discontinues participation in study CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003
  • Is pregnant
  • Has active diverticulitis
  • Has any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation not be in the best interest (eg, compromise the well-being) of the participant or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments

Trial locations and contacts

197 sites in 29 countries.

197 sites in 29 countries

United States66 sites
  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas

  • Study site

    Aventura, Florida

  • Study site

    Beckley, West Virginia

  • Study site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Study site

    Boca Raton, Florida

  • Study site

    Bowling Green, Kentucky

  • Study site

    Brandon, Florida

  • Study site

    Brooklyn, New York

  • Study site

    Carrollton, Texas

  • Study site

    Cedar Rapids, Iowa

  • Study site

    Charleston, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Study site

    Clarksburg, West Virginia

  • Study site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Study site

    Corpus Christi, Texas

  • Study site

    Covina, California

  • Study site

    Cumberland, Maryland

  • Study site

    Cypress, Texas

  • Study site

    Dallas, Texas

  • Study site

    Dayton, Ohio

  • Study site

    Daytona Beach, Florida

  • Study site

    DeBary, Florida

  • Study site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Edmond, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    El Cajon, California

  • Study site

    Flowood, Mississippi

  • Study site

    Freehold, New Jersey

  • Study site

    Glendale, Arizona

  • Study site

    Glendale, California

  • Study site

    Hagerstown, Maryland

  • Study site

    Hamden, Connecticut

  • Study site

    Hemet, California

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Huntington Beach, California

  • Study site

    Katy, Texas

  • Study site

    La Jolla, California

  • Study site

    La Palma, California

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Study site

    Lubbock, Texas

  • Study site

    Mesa, Arizona

  • Study site

    Mesquite, Texas

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Middleburg Heights, Ohio

  • Study site

    Monroe, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Omaha, Nebraska

  • Study site

    Orlando, Florida

  • Study site

    Palm Harbor, Florida

  • Study site

    Peoria, Arizona

  • Study site

    Phoenix, Arizona

  • Study site

    Placentia, California

  • Study site

    Plantation, Florida

  • Study site

    Rochester, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Sarasota, Florida

  • Study site

    Springfield, Missouri

  • Study site

    St Louis, Missouri

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • Study site

    Upland, California

  • Study site

    Victoria, Texas

  • Study site

    Victorville, California

  • Study site

    Wheaton, Maryland

  • Study site

    Whittier, California

  • Study site

    Wyomissing, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Zephyrhills, Florida

Other trials in United States

Japan37 sites
  • Study site

    Ayauta

  • Study site

    Bunkyō City

  • Study site

    Fukuoka

  • Study site

    Higashihiroshima

  • Study site

    Hiroshima

  • Study site

    Izumo

  • Study site

    Kagoshima

  • Study site

    Katō

  • Study site

    Kawagoe

  • Study site

    Kita-Gun

  • Study site

    Kumamoto

  • Study site

    Kurume

  • Study site

    Matsuyama

  • Study site

    Miyazaki

  • Study site

    Nagano

  • Study site

    Nagasaki

  • Study site

    Nagoya

  • Study site

    Nishimuro-gun

  • Study site

    Nishinomiya

  • Study site

    Okayama

  • Study site

    Osaka

  • Study site

    Sapporo

  • Study site

    Sasebo

  • Study site

    Shibata

  • Study site

    Shimonoseki

  • Study site

    Shimotsuke

  • Study site

    Shinjuku-ku

  • Study site

    Sumida-ku

  • Study site

    Takaoka,Toyama

  • Study site

    Takasaki

  • Study site

    Tokorozawa

  • Study site

    Tokushima

  • Study site

    Tomishiro

  • Study site

    Tonami

  • Study site

    Tsu

  • Study site

    Ureshino

  • Study site

    Yokohama

Other trials in Japan

Russia11 sites
  • Study site

    Barnaul

  • Study site

    Moscow

  • Study site

    Novosibirsk

  • Study site

    Omsk

  • Study site

    Orenburg

  • Study site

    Ryazan

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg

  • Study site

    Saratov

  • Study site

    Smolensk

  • Study site

    Ulyanovsk

  • Study site

    Yaroslavl

Other trials in Russia

South Korea10 sites
  • Study site

    Busan

  • Study site

    Daegu

  • Study site

    Daejeon

  • Study site

    Gwangju

  • Study site

    Incheon

  • Study site

    Jeonju

  • Study site

    Namdong-Gu

  • Study site

    Seongnam-si

  • Study site

    Seoul

  • Study site

    Suwon

Other trials in South Korea

Germany7 sites
  • Study site

    Berlin

  • Study site

    Cologne

  • Study site

    Frankfurt am Main

  • Study site

    Göttingen

  • Study site

    Hamburg

  • Study site

    Vogelsang-Gommern

  • Study site

    Würzburg

Other trials in Germany

Mexico7 sites
  • Study site

    Cuernavaca

  • Study site

    Guadalajara

  • Study site

    Mérida

  • Study site

    Mexicali

  • Study site

    México

  • Study site

    Morelia

  • Study site

    San Luis de Potosi

Other trials in Mexico

Poland7 sites
  • Study site

    Bialystok

  • Study site

    Bydgoszcz

  • Study site

    Elblag

  • Study site

    Lublin

  • Study site

    Poznan

  • Study site

    Ustroń

  • Study site

    Warsaw

Other trials in Poland

Ukraine5 sites
  • Study site

    Kharkiv

  • Study site

    Kyiv

  • Study site

    Odesa

  • Study site

    Vinnytsia

  • Study site

    Zaporizhzhya

Other trials in Ukraine

Lithuania4 sites
  • Study site

    Alytus

  • Study site

    Kaunas

  • Study site

    Klaipėda

  • Study site

    Šiauliai

Other trials in Lithuania

Spain4 sites
  • Study site

    A Coruña

  • Study site

    Barakaldo

  • Study site

    Santander

  • Study site

    Santiago de Compostela

Other trials in Spain

Argentina3 sites
  • Study site

    Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Rosario

  • Study site

    San Miguel de Tucumán

Other trials in Argentina

Canada3 sites
  • Study site

    Edmonton

  • Study site

    Victoria, British Columbia

  • Study site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba

Other trials in Canada

Chile3 sites
  • Study site

    Rancagua

  • Study site

    Santiago

  • Study site

    Valdivia

Other trials in Chile

Colombia3 sites
  • Study site

    Bogotá

  • Study site

    Chía

  • Study site

    Medellín

Other trials in Colombia

Croatia3 sites
  • Study site

    Osijek

  • Study site

    Rijeka

  • Study site

    Zagreb

Other trials in Croatia

Serbia3 sites
  • Study site

    Belgrade

  • Study site

    Kragujevac

  • Study site

    Niška Banja

Other trials in Serbia

South Africa3 sites
  • Study site

    Cape Town

  • Study site

    Port Elizabeth

  • Study site

    Pretoria

Other trials in South Africa

Taiwan3 sites
  • Study site

    Kaohsiung City

  • Study site

    Taichung

  • Study site

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

Bulgaria2 sites
  • Study site

    Plovdiv

  • Study site

    Sofia

Other trials in Bulgaria

Malaysia2 sites
  • Study site

    Kuala Lumpur

  • Study site

    Kuching

Other trials in Malaysia

Romania2 sites
  • Study site

    Bucharest

  • Study site

    Iași

Other trials in Romania

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Study site

    London

  • Study site

    Wigan

Other trials in United Kingdom

Australia1 site
  • Study site

    Victoria Park

Other trials in Australia

Austria1 site
  • Study site

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Belgium1 site
  • Study site

    Liège

Other trials in Belgium

France1 site
  • Study site

    Toulouse

Other trials in France

Netherlands1 site
  • Study site

    Sneek

Other trials in Netherlands

Portugal1 site
  • Study site

    Lisbon

Other trials in Portugal

Puerto Rico1 site
  • Study site

    San Juan

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Parallel-group Study of Long-term Safety and Efficacy of CNTO 136 (Sirukumab) for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Subjects Completing Treatment in Studies CNTO136ARA3002 (SIRROUND-D) and CNTO136ARA3003 (SIRROUND-T)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of CNTO 136 (sirukumab) in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are unresponsive to treatment with modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or anti-TNF alpha agents.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, long-term study of sirukumab (CNTO 136) that will be conducted in two groups of participants at the same time (parallel-group study). The maximum duration of participation in this study is 208 weeks, followed by approximately 16 weeks of safety and efficacy follow-up after the administration of the final study agent injection of sirukumab. Participant safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Being tested
Sirukumab 100 mg, Sirukumab 50 mg, Placebo
Keywords
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Sirukumab, CNTO 136, CNTO136ARA3002, SIRROUND-D, CNTO136ARA3003, SIRROUND-T, SIRROUND-LTE
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sirukumab 100 mgDrug

    Sirukumab 100 mg subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0 (administered as the last dose in CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003), 2, and every 2 weeks through Week 156 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3002 and through Week 208 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3003.

  • Sirukumab 50 mgDrug

    Sirukumab 50 mg SC at Weeks 0 (administered as the last dose in CNTO136ARA3002 or CNTO136ARA3003), 4, and every 4 weeks through Week 156 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3002 and through Week 208 for participants who completed CNTO136ARA3003.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Between sirukumab 50 mg injections, placebo SC injections will be administered at Weeks 2, 6, and every 4 weeks until the study becomes open-label, and placebo injections are discontinued.

Study groups in NCT01856309
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sirukumab 100 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Sirukumab 100 mg
Sirukumab 50 mg / placeboExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Sirukumab 50 mg; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

    Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years

  2. Percentage of Participants With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE)

    MACE was defined as a composite of Myocardial Infarction (MI), stroke, death, hospitalization for unstable angina, and hospitalization for Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA). Adjudication of these events by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC) was performed in a blinded fashion.

    Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years

  3. Percentage of Participants With Malignancies

    Percentage of participants with one or more malignancy was reported.

    Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years

  4. Percentage of Participants With Serious Infections

    Percentage of participants with one or more serious infections was reported.

    Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years

  5. Percentage of Participants With Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforations

    Percentage of participants with one or more GI perforations was reported. GI perforation is a hole that develops through the entire wall of the stomach, small intestine, large bowel, or gallbladder.

    Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years

  6. Percentage of Participants With Hepatobiliary Abnormalities

    Percentage of participants with hepatobiliary abnormalities was reported.

    Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years

  7. Percentage of Participants With Serious or Moderate/Severe Systemic Hypersensitivity Reactions, or Serum Sickness Adverse Events

    Percentage of participants with serious or moderate/severe systemic hypersensitivity reactions, or serum sickness adverse events (AEs) was reported.

    Measured: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Toxicity Grade 4 Decrease in Neutrophils

    Percentage of participants with toxicity grade 4 decrease in neutrophils was reported. As per National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, toxicity grade 4 was defined as decrease in neutrophils less than (<) 500 per Cubic Millimeter (mm^3) or < 0.5 * 10^9 per liter.

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Toxicity Grade 4 Decrease in Platelets

    Percentage of participants with toxicity grade 4 decrease in platelets was reported. As per National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, toxicity grade 4 was defined as decreased in platelets <25000/mm^3 or < 25.0 * 10^9 per liter.

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  3. Percentage of Participants With ALT >= 3*ULN, ALT >= 5*ULN and ALT >= 8*ULN

    Percentage of participants with Alanine Aminotranserase (ALT) >= 3*Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), ALT >= 5*ULN or ALT >= 8*ULN was reported.

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  4. Percentage of Participants With AST >= 3*ULN, AST >= 5*ULN and AST >= 8*ULN

    Percentage of participants with Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) >= 3*ULN, AST >= 5*ULN and AST >= 8*ULN was reported.

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Either ALT >= 3*ULN or AST >= 3*ULN, and Total Bilirubin >= 2*ULN

    Percentage of participants with either ALT >= 3*ULN or AST >= 3*ULN and total bilirubin >= 2*ULN was reported.

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  6. Percentage of Participants With Normal Total Cholesterol Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline

    Percentage of participants with normal total cholesterol value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal total cholesterol value was defined as total cholesterol value more than (>) 200 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  7. Percentage of Participants With Normal Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline

    Percentage of participants with normal LDL value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal LDL value was defined as LDL value > 130 mg/dL.

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  8. Percentage of Participants With Normal High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline

    Percentage of participants with normal HDL value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal HDL value was defined as HDL value < 40 mg/dL.

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  9. Percentage of Participants With Normal Triglyceride Value at Baseline and at Least 1 Abnormal Value Post-Baseline

    Percentage of participants with normal triglyceride value at baseline and at least 1 abnormal value post-baseline was reported. Abnormal triglyceride value was defined as triglyceride value > 250 mg/dL.

    Measured: From baseline of primary studies through end of this LTE study (Approximately 5.3 years)

  10. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 Response Through Week 260

    ACR 50 response is greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement in both tender joint count (68) and swollen joint count (66) and >= 50% improvement in 3 of following 5 assessments:Participant's assessment of pain using visual analog scale (VAS) (0-10 scale, 0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain),Participant's global assessment of disease activity by using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10, [0 = very well to 10 = very poor]), Physician's global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10, [0=no arthritis activity to 10=extremely active arthritis]), Participant's assessment of physical function as measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (scale ranges from 0= no difficulty to 3= inability to perform a task in that area), and Serum C-reactive protein (CRP). Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260

  11. Percentage of Participants With Boolean-Based American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission Through Week 260

    Boolean based ACR/EULAR remission is achieved if all of the following 4 criteria at that visit are met: tender joint count (68 joints) <=1; swollen joint count (66 joints) <=1; CRP <=1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL); and patient's global assessment of disease activity on visual analog scale (VAS) <=1 on a 0 (very well ) to 10 (extremely bad) scale. Higher scores indicates worst health condition. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260

  12. Percentage of Participants With Disease Activity Index Score 28 (CRP) Remission Through Week 260

    The Disease Activity Index Score 28 (DAS28) based on C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is a statistically derived index combining tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), CRP and patient's global assessment of disease activity. The set of 28 joint count is based on evaluation of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) MCP1 to MCP5, proximal interphalangeal (PIP) PIP1 to PIP5 joints of both the upper right extremity and the upper left extremity as well as the knee joints of lower right and lower left extremities. The values are 0=best to 10=worst. DAS28 (CRP) remission is defined as a DAS28 (CRP) value of less than (<) 2.6 at any study visit. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260

  13. Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score Through Week 260

    The CDAI score is a derived score of 4 components: tender joints (28 joints), swollen joints (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and physician's global assessments of disease activity. The total score ranges from 0 to 76 with a lower score indicating less disease activity. A negative change in CDAI score indicates an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicates a worsening of disease activity. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to the assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of the treatments they actually received.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0 of primary studies), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260

  14. Percentage of Participants With Simplified Disease Activity Index Based (SDAI-based) American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/ European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Remission Through Week 260

    Participant having SDAI-based ACR/EULAR remission at a visit if SDAI score is of <= 3.3. SDAI derived by combining 5 disease assessments: tender joint (28), swollen joint (28) counts, participants global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10 [0 =very well to 10 = very poor]), physicians global assessment of disease activity using VAS (scale ranges from 0 to 10 [0=no arthritis to 10=extremely active arthritis]) and CRP. 28 joints evaluated for swelling and tenderness are same set of 28 joints used in DAS28 includes shoulder, elbow, wrist, MCP1, MCP2, MCP3, MCP4, MCP5, PIP1, PIP2, PIP3, PIP4, PIP5 joints of upper right and left extremities and knee joints of lower right and left extremities. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260

  15. Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score Through Week 260

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) score is an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range: 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0 of primary studies), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260

  16. Percentage of Participants With Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Response Through Week 260

    HAQ-DI response was defined as change of less than -0.22 from baseline in HAQ-DI score. The HAQ-DI score is an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area are scored from 0, indicating no difficulty, to 3, indicating inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Participants were analyzed for efficacy according to assigned treatment groups from the primary studies, regardless of treatments actually received.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 18, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52, 76, 80, 104, 128, 132, 156, 180, 208, 232 and 260

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start7 Aug 2013
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2018
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
1,820 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01856309
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR102023
Other IDs
CNTO136ARA3004, 2012-001176-10
Acronym
SIRROUND-LTE
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
15 May 2013
Last updated
6 May 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Aletaha D, Bingham CO, Karpouzas GA, Takeuchi T, Thorne C, Bili A, Agarwal P, Hsu B, Rao R, Brown K, Tanaka Y. Long-term safety and efficacy of sirukumab for patients with rheumatoid arthritis who previously received sirukumab in randomised controlled trials (SIRROUND-LTE). RMD Open. 2021 Jan;7(1):e001465. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001465.

    PubMed 33526709

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Sirukumab 100 mg and Sirukumab 50 mg in people with Arthritis, Rheumatoid, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 197 sites in 29 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 197 sites in United States, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Germany and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (time frame: From baseline of this LTE study up to 4.3 years). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01856309, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in