Traumatic WoundPhase 1NCT01848821
The Effect of OASIS Ultra on Critical Sized Wound Healing
A Phase 1 study testing OASIS Ultra and Wound VAC Standard Therapy in people with Traumatic Wound and Infective Wound, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the speed and quality with which OASIS® Ultra (Healthpoint Biotherapeutics; Fort Worth, Texas) increases wound healing in the critical sized defect. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Traumatic Wound, Infective Wound, Iatrogenic Critical Sized Wound Defects
- What is being tested?
- OASIS Ultra and Wound VAC Standard Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2013to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- all patients >18 years
- traumatic, infective or iatrogenic critical sized wound defects (50 sq cm or greater)
- quantitative wound culture < 105.
Who cannot join
- Wounds that cannot have a negative pressure wound device applied due to anatomical difficulty (i.e. proximity to perineum/anus) or exposed arteries/veins.
- Patients who are DNR/DNI
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable or requiring pressors
- Patients that are immunodeficient or immunocompromised (ie HIV)
- Patients that have any allergy to porcine products
- Patients that have a religious or ethical necessity to avoid porcine products
Show all 11Show fewer
- Patients whose wounds are derived from extension of mitotic lesions (ie ulcerative squamous cell carcinoma)
- Patients whose wounds are expected to heal in less than seven days or be ready for skin grafting in less than seven days with standard therapy
- Patients with full thickness burns
- Patients with wound surface area of <50 sq cm
- Pregnant patients (as confirmed by serum or urinary beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin sampling or by History).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Official title: Pilot Study of the Effect of OASIS Ultra on Critical Sized Wound Healing
The aim of this study is to evaluate the speed and quality with which OASIS® Ultra (Healthpoint Biotherapeutics; Fort Worth, Texas) increases wound healing in the critical sized defect. The investigators intend on confirming the histological composition of the dermal substitute in order to delineate the amount of cellular recruitment, collagen deposition and neovascularization present compared with control wounds. The investigators hypothesize that OASIS® Ultra will provide a faster healing time as well as the re-establishment of a dermis for further skin graft application. The investigators anticipate that our study will define parameters for the application of OASIS® Ultra as well as potentially demonstrating the advantages in healing time, healed wound quality and hospital stay.
Read the detailed description
The eligible participants for this study include all patients >18 years with traumatic, infective or iatrogenic critical sized wound defects (50 sq cm or greater) with a quantitative wound culture < 105. Accrual of patients will take place at the Massachusetts General Hospital Churchill Surgical Service. All eligible patients will be identified by physician care givers on the Churchill service. Non-study affiliated physicians will then approach the patient and/or his or her healthcare proxy with a consent form and a direct description of the study. If the patient and/or his or her healthcare proxy agree to proceed with inclusion then the described protocol will be followed.
Patients with the following medical diagnoses will be excluded from the study:
- Wounds that cannot have a negative pressure wound device applied due to anatomical difficulty (i.e. proximity to perineum/anus) or exposed arteries/veins.
- Patients who are DNR/DNI
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable or requiring pressors
- Patients that are immunodeficient or immunocompromised (ie HIV)
- Patients that have any allergy to porcine products
- Patients that have a religious or ethical necessity to avoid porcine products
- Patients whose wounds are derived from extension of mitotic lesions (ie ulcerative squamous cell carcinoma)
- Patients whose wounds are expected to heal in less than seven days or be ready for skin grafting in less than seven days with standard therapy
- Patients with full thickness burns
- Patients with wound surface area of <50 sq cm
- Pregnant patients (as confirmed by serum or urinary beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin sampling or by History).
Subject Enrollment:
The study will take place between January 1, 2013 (or IRB approval date) and June 30, 2015. The eligible participants for this study include all patients >18 years with traumatic, infective or iatrogenic critical sized wound defects (50 sq cm or greater) with a quantitative wound culture < 105. Accrual of patients will take place at the Massachusetts General Hospital Churchill Surgical Service. All eligible patients will be identified by physician care givers on the Churchill service. Non-study affiliated physicians will then approach the patient and/or his or her healthcare proxy with a descriptive consent form and a verbal explanation of the study. If the patient and/or his or her healthcare proxy agree to proceed with inclusion then the described protocol will be followed.
Consent The consent form is written in non-medical 'lay' terms in order that all non-medical readers may understand the terminologies and ideas. If the patient is non-English speaking then a certified hospital translator will be obtained in order that the written and verbal discussions can be done in the patient's native language for full comprehension. The PHRC policy on Obtaining and Documenting Informed Consent of Subjects who do not Speak English will be followed. For this study, potential subjects will be given a written translation in a language understandable to them of the "short form" or of the entire English version of the consent form approved by the Partners Human Research Committee (PHRC). Once a patient has been identified as eligible for enrollment by a physician on the team, a verbal discussion will be had with the patient using the sections of the consent form ensuring to cover purpose of research, design of research, procedures, risks, benefits, discomforts, benefits, costs, alternatives and number of patients to be enrolled. After identification of eligible patients, verbal explanation of the study parameters while leaving the patient with the consent form to read, 24 hours will be allowed to pass in order that the patient may think about potential questions and/or issues he or she may have with the study. Upon return by a physician not affiliated with the study, they will answer any patient questions or concerns. If the patient is willing to proceed with consent the co-Investigator or principal investigator will be contacted in order that the patient and the investigator may co-sign the consent form. We will ensure that there are contact details on the patient's consent form should they have any questions or issues. If the patient wishes to withdraw consent prior to the completion of the study they will be allowed to do so and the IRB will be contacted for guidance. The informed consent authorizes the use of medical chart information, historical lab values and consent for photography.
The PHRC recommendations regarding categories of surrogates (listed in general order of preference) that may provide consent in writing on behalf of potential subjects incapable of providing informed consent will be followed:
- court appointed guardian with specific authority to consent to participation in research or authority to make health care decisions for a class of diagnostic and therapeutic decisions inclusive of the proposed research; ii) health care proxy/person with durable power of attorney with specific authority for making health care decisions inclusive of the proposed research; or iii) spouse, adult child, or other close family member who knows the subject well and has been involved in their care. Assent of subjects will be a requirement for participation in the research unless the subject is incapable of giving assent due to his/her medical condition. If the individual objects to participation, s/he should not be enrolled. When surrogate consent is relied upon, the Investigator will ensure that the surrogate understands that his or her decisions should be based on "substituted judgment." This means that the decision reflects a potential subject's own views when s/he had the capacity to express them.
The Investigators will document the relationship of the surrogate to the subject in the research record.
- Being tested
- OASIS Ultra, Wound VAC Standard Therapy
- Keywords
- OASIS ultra, faster healing time, better healing quality, standard of care
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OASIS UltraDevice
Porcine derived intestinal submucosa
Wound VAC Standard TherapyDevice
Also called Negative Pressure Wound Device
Negative pressure wound device aka wound VAC will be placed on the standard therapy half of the wound
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| OASIS half of wound | Other | OASIS will be applied to one half of the wound and standard of care consisting of wound vac only will be applied to the other half. Receives: Device: OASIS Ultra |
| Standard therapy half of wound | Other | Standard therapy to half of wound will consistent of non-stick mesh and wound VAC application. Receives: Device: Wound VAC Standard Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Wound Size From Baseline to Final Wound Evaluation up to 60 Days Later
High-resolution digital photographs of the wound are taken (with a measurement scale included in the picture) at baseline and during serial wound evaluations in the operating room, at the bedside, and in the clinic. The picture is then uploaded into a wound tracing software program (Analyzing Digital images, www.umassk12.net/adki/) and wound area is calculated. Only the Baseline Measure and Final Wound Evaluation are used to calculate the Primary Outcome.
Measured: Baseline, Final Wound Evaluation up to 60 Days Later
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in Histological Acute Inflammation Score From Baseline to Skin Grafting Procedure
At baseline and at every dressing change up to the skin grafting procedure, tissue biopsies for histopathological evaluation are obtained using a disposable dermal biopsy punch (8-mm diameter) or scalpel and locations of the biopsy sites within the wound are systematically rotated.
Only biopsies from the Baseline and Final Skin Grafting Procedure are used to calculate this outcome measure.
Parameters of acute inflammation (polymorphonuclear neutrophil infiltrate, edema, hemorrhage, and necrosis) were semiquantitatively assessed using a scoring system as follows: 0, non/minimal; 1, mild; 2, moderate, 3, marked. Each parameter was assigned a score, for a minimum and maximum total possible score of 0 and 12. A higher score represents a higher degree of acute inflammation.
Measured: Baseline, Final Skin Grafting Procedure
Change in Histological Repair Score From Baseline to Skin Grafting Procedure
At baseline and at every dressing change up to the skin grafting procedure, tissue biopsies for histopathological evaluation are obtained using a disposable dermal biopsy punch (8-mm diameter) or scalpel and locations of the biopsy sites within the wound are systematically rotated.
Parameters of tissue repair (fibroblast proliferation, collagen density, and neovascularization) were semiquantitatively assessed using a scoring system as follows: 0, none/minima; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked. Each parameter was assigned a score for a total minimum and maximum possible score of 0 and 9. A higher score represents more advanced wound healing.
Measured: Baseline, final Skin Grafting procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2013
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Traumatic WoundStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- OASIS
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniel Dante Yeh, Massachusetts General Hospital
- Investigators
- Daniel Dante Yeh, MD, Principal investigator, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01848821
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012-P-001903/1
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 3 May 2013
- Last updated
- 30 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study of the Effect of OASIS Ultra on Critical Sized Wound Healing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01848821
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2012-P-001903/1
- Keywords
- OASIS ultra, faster healing time, better healing quality, standard of care
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Oct 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the speed and quality with which OASIS® Ultra (Healthpoint Biotherapeutics; Fort Worth, Texas) increases wound healing in the critical sized defect. The investigators intend on confirming the histological composition of the dermal substitute in order to delineate the amount of cellular recruitment, collagen deposition and neovascularization present compared with control wounds. The investigators hypothesize that OASIS® Ultra will provide a faster healing time as well as the re-establishment of a dermis for further skin graft application. The investigators anticipate that our study will define parameters for the application of OASIS® Ultra as well as potentially demonstrating the advantages in healing time, healed wound quality and hospital stay.
Detailed description
The eligible participants for this study include all patients >18 years with traumatic, infective or iatrogenic critical sized wound defects (50 sq cm or greater) with a quantitative wound culture < 105. Accrual of patients will take place at the Massachusetts General Hospital Churchill Surgical Service. All eligible patients will be identified by physician care givers on the Churchill service. Non-study affiliated physicians will then approach the patient and/or his or her healthcare proxy with a consent form and a direct description of the study. If the patient and/or his or her healthcare proxy agree to proceed with inclusion then the described protocol will be followed.
Patients with the following medical diagnoses will be excluded from the study:
- Wounds that cannot have a negative pressure wound device applied due to anatomical difficulty (i.e. proximity to perineum/anus) or exposed arteries/veins.
- Patients who are DNR/DNI
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable or requiring pressors
- Patients that are immunodeficient or immunocompromised (ie HIV)
- Patients that have any allergy to porcine products
- Patients that have a religious or ethical necessity to avoid porcine products
- Patients whose wounds are derived from extension of mitotic lesions (ie ulcerative squamous cell carcinoma)
- Patients whose wounds are expected to heal in less than seven days or be ready for skin grafting in less than seven days with standard therapy
- Patients with full thickness burns
- Patients with wound surface area of <50 sq cm
- Pregnant patients (as confirmed by serum or urinary beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin sampling or by History).
Subject Enrollment:
The study will take place between January 1, 2013 (or IRB approval date) and June 30, 2015. The eligible participants for this study include all patients >18 years with traumatic, infective or iatrogenic critical sized wound defects (50 sq cm or greater) with a quantitative wound culture < 105. Accrual of patients will take place at the Massachusetts General Hospital Churchill Surgical Service. All eligible patients will be identified by physician care givers on the Churchill service. Non-study affiliated physicians will then approach the patient and/or his or her healthcare proxy with a descriptive consent form and a verbal explanation of the study. If the patient and/or his or her healthcare proxy agree to proceed with inclusion then the described protocol will be followed.
Consent The consent form is written in non-medical 'lay' terms in order that all non-medical readers may understand the terminologies and ideas. If the patient is non-English speaking then a certified hospital translator will be obtained in order that the written and verbal discussions can be done in the patient's native language for full comprehension. The PHRC policy on Obtaining and Documenting Informed Consent of Subjects who do not Speak English will be followed. For this study, potential subjects will be given a written translation in a language understandable to them of the "short form" or of the entire English version of the consent form approved by the Partners Human Research Committee (PHRC). Once a patient has been identified as eligible for enrollment by a physician on the team, a verbal discussion will be had with the patient using the sections of the consent form ensuring to cover purpose of research, design of research, procedures, risks, benefits, discomforts, benefits, costs, alternatives and number of patients to be enrolled. After identification of eligible patients, verbal explanation of the study parameters while leaving the patient with the consent form to read, 24 hours will be allowed to pass in order that the patient may think about potential questions and/or issues he or she may have with the study. Upon return by a physician not affiliated with the study, they will answer any patient questions or concerns. If the patient is willing to proceed with consent the co-Investigator or principal investigator will be contacted in order that the patient and the investigator may co-sign the consent form. We will ensure that there are contact details on the patient's consent form should they have any questions or issues. If the patient wishes to withdraw consent prior to the completion of the study they will be allowed to do so and the IRB will be contacted for guidance. The informed consent authorizes the use of medical chart information, historical lab values and consent for photography.
The PHRC recommendations regarding categories of surrogates (listed in general order of preference) that may provide consent in writing on behalf of potential subjects incapable of providing informed consent will be followed:
- court appointed guardian with specific authority to consent to participation in research or authority to make health care decisions for a class of diagnostic and therapeutic decisions inclusive of the proposed research; ii) health care proxy/person with durable power of attorney with specific authority for making health care decisions inclusive of the proposed research; or iii) spouse, adult child, or other close family member who knows the subject well and has been involved in their care. Assent of subjects will be a requirement for participation in the research unless the subject is incapable of giving assent due to his/her medical condition. If the individual objects to participation, s/he should not be enrolled. When surrogate consent is relied upon, the Investigator will ensure that the surrogate understands that his or her decisions should be based on "substituted judgment." This means that the decision reflects a potential subject's own views when s/he had the capacity to express them.
The Investigators will document the relationship of the surrogate to the subject in the research record.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- OASIS
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| OASIS half of wound | Other | Device: OASIS UltraOASIS will be applied to one half of the wound and standard of care consisting of wound vac only will be applied to the other half. |
| Standard therapy half of wound | Other | Device: Wound VAC Standard TherapyStandard therapy to half of wound will consistent of non-stick mesh and wound VAC application. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- all patients >18 years
- traumatic, infective or iatrogenic critical sized wound defects (50 sq cm or greater)
- quantitative wound culture < 105.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Wounds that cannot have a negative pressure wound device applied due to anatomical difficulty (i.e. proximity to perineum/anus) or exposed arteries/veins.
- Patients who are DNR/DNI
- Patients who are hemodynamically unstable or requiring pressors
- Patients that are immunodeficient or immunocompromised (ie HIV)
- Patients that have any allergy to porcine products
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| OASIS UltraPorcine derived intestinal submucosa | Device | OASIS half of wound |
| Wound VAC Standard TherapyAlso: Negative Pressure Wound DeviceNegative pressure wound device aka wound VAC will be placed on the standard therapy half of the wound | Device | Standard therapy half of wound |
Primary outcome
Change in Wound Size From Baseline to Final Wound Evaluation up to 60 Days Later
Time frame: Baseline, Final Wound Evaluation up to 60 Days Later
High-resolution digital photographs of the wound are taken (with a measurement scale included in the picture) at baseline and during serial wound evaluations in the operating room, at the bedside, and in the clinic. The picture is then uploaded into a wound tracing software program (Analyzing Digital images, www.umassk12.net/adki/) and wound area is calculated. Only the Baseline Measure and Final Wound Evaluation are used to calculate the Primary Outcome.
2 secondary outcomes
Change in Histological Acute Inflammation Score From Baseline to Skin Grafting Procedure
Time frame: Baseline, Final Skin Grafting Procedure
Change in Histological Repair Score From Baseline to Skin Grafting Procedure
Time frame: Baseline, final Skin Grafting procedure
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Oct 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Traumatic Wound
Recruiting
NightWare and Cardiovascular Health in Women With PTSD
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases
Not yet recruiting
A Transdiagnostic Sleep Health Intervention for Veterans With PTSD
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Epileptogenesis Project (TRACK-TBI EPI)
Traumatic Brain Injury, Post-traumatic Epilepsy
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Women Who Are Victims of Violence: Treatment of PTSD Through Reactivation of Traumatic Memories Using Propranolol
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Pilot Safety and Exploratory Efficacy of PSC-05 for the Treatment of Chronic Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel Dante Yeh, MD principal investigator
Massachusetts General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing OASIS Ultra and Wound VAC Standard Therapy in people with Traumatic Wound and Infective Wound, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Oct 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Wound Size From Baseline to Final Wound Evaluation up to 60 Days Later (time frame: Baseline, Final Wound Evaluation up to 60 Days Later). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2019.