AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic HBV With Severe ExacerbationPhase 3HBSAENCT01848743

Tenofovir Versus Lamivudine for Patients of Chronic Hepatitis B With Severe Acute Exacerbation

A Phase 3 study testing Tenofovir and lamivudine in people with Chronic HBV With Severe Exacerbation, run by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. at 2 sites in Taiwan.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In Taiwan, 15% of general population had hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HBV is the leading cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. After entering immune clearance, 10-30% of patients of chronic HBV develop acute exacerbation (AE) , some are mild but some developed hepatic decompensation or… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic HBV With Severe Exacerbation
What is being tested?
Tenofovir and lamivudine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
120 participants
Where
2 sitesTaiwan
Study dates
Apr 2013to Oct 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • HBsAg (+) > 6 months
  • ALT > 5X ULN
  • Prolongation of prothrombin time > 3 seconds and bilirubin level > 2 mg/dl
  • 20-75 years old

Who cannot join

  • HAV, HCV, HDV and HIV co-infection
  • Concurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Drug, metabolic or alcohol as cause of hepatitis
  • Anti-viral treatment in recent 6 mnths
  • Pregnant woman

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Hoi-Hung Chnan, M.D., PhD contact

886-7-3422121 ext. 2074

hhchan@vghks.gov.tw

Taiwan2 sites, 1 recruiting
  • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospigal

    Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 813

    Wei-Lun Tsai, MD, 886-7-3422121 ext. 2075, tsaiwl@yahoo.com.tw

    Hi-Hung Chan, MD, PhD, 886-7-3422121 ext. 2074, hhchan@vghks.gov.tw

    Recruiting
  • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

    Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 813

    Active, not recruiting

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

In Taiwan, 15% of general population had hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, HBV is the leading cause of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan. After entering immune clearance, 10-30% of patients of chronic HBV develop acute exacerbation (AE) , some are mild but some developed hepatic decompensation or even death.

Previous study found that early use of lamivudine before bilirubin level is above 20 mg/dl can improve survival in chornic HBV with severe AE. From the study from Hongkong, lamivudine was found to have better survival than entecavir in chronic HBV with severe AE. Recent study from India found that tenofovir is able to improve survival in chronic HBV with severe AE. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of lamivudine and tenofovir for chronic HBV with severe AE.

The study aims to enroll 120 patients with chronic HBV defined as persistence of HBsAg for more than 6 months. Severe AE was defined as ALT > 400 U/L, prolongation of prothrombin time > 3 seconds, bilirubin > 2 mg/dl. Patients with hepatitis A, C, D or HIV infection, drug or alcoholic liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, under immuno-suppressive agents use, or previous use of anti-HBV agents are excluded. All enrolled patients are randomized into group A who received tenofovir 300 mg qd for 3 years and group B who received lamivuidne 100 mg qd for 6 months, followed by tenofovir 300mg qd for 30 months. Mortality rate and virological, biochemical and serological response were evaluated at 1,2,4,48,96 and 144 weeks. The values are expressed as mean + SD. Categorical variables were analyzed with Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test as appropriate and continuous variables were analyzed by Mann-Whitney test. Logistic regression test was applied to analyze the independent association of various variables with outcome. A p value < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Being tested
Tenofovir, lamivudine
Keywords
tenofovir, lamivudine, hepatitis B, acute exacerbation
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis B

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TenofovirDrug

    Also called viread

  • lamivudineDrug

    Also called zeffix

Study groups in NCT01848743
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TenofovirActive comparatorAll enrolled patients are randomized to tenofovir arm who receives tenofovir 300 mg qd for 36 months
Receives: Drug: Tenofovir
lamivudinePlacebo comparatorAll enrolled patients are randomized to lamivudine arm who received lamivudine 100 mg qd for 6 months, followed by tenofovir for another 30 months.
Receives: Drug: lamivudine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 6 months survival

    6 months survival after treatment begins

    Measured: 6 months after treatment begins

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. rapid virological response

    Evaluate the relationship of rapid virological response ( at 1,2 and 4 weeks) and survival

    Measured: 1,2 and 4 weeks after treatment

  2. HBeAg seroconversion and virological response 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment

    To evaluate the rate of HBeAg seroconversion and virological response 1, 2, and 3 years after treatment in the two arms

    Measured: 1,2 and 3 years after treatment

  3. Safety profile

    Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

    Measured: during and 6 months after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionApr 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01848743
Sponsor's protocol ID
Gilead IN-US-174- 0190
Acronym
HBSAE
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
24 Apr 2013
Last updated
16 Sep 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Lu CM, Cheng JS, Sun WC, Chen WC, Tsay FW, Wang HM, Tsai TJ, Kao SS, Li YD, Li YR, Lin HS, Yin CH, Tsai WL. Randomized Controlled Study of Tenofovir versus Lamivudine Followed by Tenofovir in Severe Exacerbation of Hepatitis B. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Feb 15;66(2):e0166421. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01664-21. Epub 2021 Nov 22.

    PubMed 34807763

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Tenofovir and lamivudine in people with Chronic HBV With Severe Exacerbation, run by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. at 2 sites in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Wei-Lun Tsai, M.D. (886-7-3422121 ext. 2075, tsaiwl@yahoo.com.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

6 months survival (time frame: 6 months after treatment begins). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01848743, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in