AzTrials
AzTrials

Mediastinal Lymph Node EnlargementNCT01836822

Bronchoscopic Sampling Techniques in Sarcoidosis

A study testing EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB), EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and large bore (19G) histologic needle biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes in people with Mediastinal Lymph Node Enlargement and Sarcoidosis, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The development of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has improved the safety and diagnostic accuracy of the mediastinal lymph node (MLN) sampling. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB), EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and large bore (19G) histologic needle biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
Mar 2013to May 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • provided informed consent
  • mediastinal lymph node enlargement that requires bronchoscopy and transbronchial sampling
  • clinical presentation that might be consistent with sarcoidosis

Who cannot join

  • age below 18 years
  • known contraindications for bronchoscopy and/or mediastinal sampling, e.g. coagulation disorders
  • lung or extrapulmonary tumors with suspicion of malignant mediastinal lymph node involvement

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Rafal Krenke, MD, PhD contact

rafalkrenke@interia.pl

Piotr Korczynski, MD, PhD contact

drkorczynski@gmail.com

Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumonology and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw

    Warsaw, 02-097

    Rafal Krenke, MD, PhD, +48225992562, rafalkrenke@interia.pl

    Piotr Korczynski, MD, PhD, +48225992562, drkorczynski@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Diagnostic Accuracy of Different Bronchoscopic Sampling Techniques in Patients With Mediastinal Lymph Node Enlargement Suspected of Sarcoidosis

The development of endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has improved the safety and diagnostic accuracy of the mediastinal lymph node (MLN) sampling. Still, in some diseases routine cytological specimens are considered insufficient and histological sampling is preferred. The aim of the study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of EBUS-TBNA and two other, more invasive procedures to obtain histological samples from MLN in patients with clinical and radiological features of sarcoidosis.

Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), EBUS-TBNA, EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB), large bore (19G) histology TBNA as well as endobronchial forceps biopsy will be performed in 90 consecutive patients with mediastinal lymph node enlargement and clinical and radiological features of sarcoidosis.

Diagnostic accuracy of each sampling technique will be calculated and compared to other techniques. Diagnostic yield of different technique combinations will also be calculated and the most efficient diagnostic approach will be defined.

Being tested
EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB), EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), large bore (19G) histologic needle biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes, Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), Endobronchial forceps biopsy
Keywords
mediastinal lymph node enlargement, sarcoidosis, bronchoscopy, EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy EBUS-TBFB)
Medical subject headings
Sarcoidosis, Tuberculosis, Lymphoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB)Procedure or surgery

    Also called EBUS guided miniforceps biopsy

  • EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA)Procedure or surgery

  • large bore (19G) histologic needle biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodesProcedure or surgery

  • Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL)Procedure or surgery

  • Endobronchial forceps biopsyProcedure or surgery

Study groups in NCT01836822
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bronchoscopic lymph node samplingExperimentalSeveral different sampling techniques will be used in each patient. They include: EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB), large bore (19G) histologic needle biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes, forceps biopsy of bronchial mucosa in central and peripheral bronchi
Receives: Procedure: EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB); Procedure: EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA); Procedure: large bore (19G) histologic needle biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes; Procedure: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL); Procedure: Endobronchial forceps biopsy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy of different bronchoscopic sampling methods in making the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

    Comparison of the diagnostic yield of the cytologic and histologic specimens collected by EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-TBFB, large bore TBNA, endobronchial forceps biopsy and BAL in terms of making the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

    Measured: Approximately ten days after the procedure, when the results of the cytological and histopathological examination will be available

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Adequacy of cytologic and histopathologic specimens collected by different sampling method as the diagnostic samples enabling confirmation of granulomatous lymph node disease.

    Comparison of the number of patients in whom the specific sampling method has been undertaken (e.g. BAL, EBUS-TBNA, EBUS-TBFB and large bore TBNA) with the number of patients in whom the specific sampling method provided the adequate specimens, containing the elements of granulomas (also the relationship between the mediastinal lymph node dimension and the quality of the samples collected with different techniques)

    Measured: up to 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Apr 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2013
  3. Primary completionMar 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01836822
Sponsor's protocol ID
IPU-DIMPA-WUM13(1)
Status last verified
Feb 2014
First submitted
17 Apr 2013
Last updated
12 Feb 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EBUS guided transbronchial forceps biopsy (EBUS-TBFB), EBUS guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and large bore (19G) histologic needle biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes in people with Mediastinal Lymph Node Enlargement and Sarcoidosis, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rafal Krenke, MD, PhD (rafalkrenke@interia.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy of different bronchoscopic sampling methods in making the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. (time frame: Approximately ten days after the procedure, when the results of the cytological and histopathological examination will be available). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in