Polycythemia VeraMOSAICCNCT01831635
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: an In-depth Case-control Study
An observational study of Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia, run by Queen's University, Belfast at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
There is a paucity of data on the aetiology of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The investigators conducted a systematic review of the literature which identified several cohort and case-control studies that have investigated a wide range of potential medical, environmental and occupational risk factors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Polycythemia Vera, Essential Thrombocythemia, Primary Myelofibrosis
- What is being tested?
- Methodological pens, Methodological compensation and Methodological trolley tokens
- How many people
- 234 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2013to 30 Jun 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Hematology clinic Primary Care clinic Non-blood relatives/ friends of cases
Who may be able to join
- Clinical diagnosis of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia or primary myelofibrosis based on the WHO diagnostic criteria.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Randomly selected, frequency matched to the distribution of cases by 5-year age band, geographic location (Belfast and Southampton) and gender.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Non-blood relative/friend of a case participating in the study.
- Aged 18 years or older.
Who cannot join
- younger than 18 years old.
- where the clinician/General Practitioner (GP) does not provide consent.
- incapable of giving informed consent.
- physically or cognitively incapable of completing the questionnaire.
- too ill to participate
- General Practice Controls
Show all 17Show fewer
- younger than 18 years old.
- where the clinician/GP does not provide consent.
- incapable of giving informed consent.
- physically or cognitively incapable of completing the questionnaire.
- too ill to participate.
- Relative/Friend Controls
- younger than 18 years old.
- where the clinician/GP does not provide consent.
- incapable of giving informed consent.
- physically or cognitively incapable of completing the questionnaire.
- too ill to participate.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom3 sites
Belfast Health And Social Care Trust
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT12 6BJ
Queen's University Belfast
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT389EX
University Hospitals Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, England, SO16 6YD
About this study
There is a paucity of data on the aetiology of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The investigators conducted a systematic review of the literature which identified several cohort and case-control studies that have investigated a wide range of potential medical, environmental and occupational risk factors. However, these studies have been limited by a wide variation in case definition and small sample sizes limiting the potential to detect modest risk differences between cases and controls. The research group propose an exploratory case-control study of 100 patients with classic MPNs and 200 controls to determine the optimal methods for roll out of this study to a multi-centred UK-based case-control study that will investigate the aetiology of MPN subtypes. The objectives of the study are to evaluate recruitment procedures, response rates and the development of a telephone administered questionnaire. The findings of this exploratory study will form the basis of a protocol for a large United Kingdom (UK)-wide case-control study of MPNs.
Read the detailed description
MPNs are a group of haematopoietic malignancies resulting from a transformed haematopietic progenitor cell. They are characterised by overproduction of mature functional blood cells. MPNs were historically termed myeloproliferative disorders and have undergone numerous amendments in classification. The 2008 World Health Organisation (WHO) classifies a number of related disorders as MPNs including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary/idiopathic myelofibrosis (PMF)2. Reported incidence rates vary from 0.02 to 2.8 per 100,000 persons3-5 but are not well characterised with half of patients asymptomatic at diagnosis6. In Northern Ireland (NI) the prevalence of ET is reported to be 18 per 100,000 persons (by correspondence, Mary McMullin). PV and ET are indolent neoplasms with better prognosis (88% and 92% 3-year survival, respectively) compared to PMF which has a 63% 3-year survival in the United States5.
The main study objectives are to:
- Develop a telephone-based questionnaire to investigate potential risk factors associated with MPNs.
- Assess the reliability and validity of the study questionnaire.
- Determine which control group to investigate by investigating:
- Response rates.
- Representativeness of control groups.
- Assess recruitment procedures.
- Determine if offering reimbursement of expenses (£10 per person) encourages control participation and improved representativeness to the general population.
A case-control approach was chosen as it is the most cost-efficient method of obtaining information on the aetiology of rare diseases such as MPNs. A prospective cohort study would require participation from millions of individuals followed over a long period of time. A hospital-based approach was chosen over a population-based approach to ensure the study was more feasible and could be rolled out to a number of centres in the UK.
The disorders under investigation are:
- Polycythaemia vera
- Essential Thrombocythaemia
- Primary myelofibrosis
Initially there will be one site in Belfast, Northern Ireland and one in Southampton, England. Cases will be identified and recruited through Prof Mary Frances McMullin at the Belfast City Hospital (BCH), Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland and Dr Andrew Duncombe, at the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS), Southampton, England.
Following completion of the exploratory study it is planned that other sites across the UK will be invited to participate through the Clinical Research Network.
. CASE ASCERTAINMENT Recruitment will run over a 12 month period. It is estimated that at least 100 incident and prevalent MPN cases will be recruited from the two sites during this time frame; 50 from Belfast, NI and 50 from Southampton, England. The targeted distribution of cases projected as feasible is 40 PV, 40 ET and 20 PMF cases. Fewer PMF cases are expected as the incidence is lower than PV and ET. Both incident and prevalent cases will be recruited in the exploratory case-control study and the distribution of time since diagnosis evaluated. One of the main limitations of including prevalent cases is that risk factors may differ in those who survive for a long period after diagnosis compared to those who die soon after diagnosis. Since PV and ET have low mortality rates it is expected that this will not impact the evaluation of the aetiology of these conditions to a large extent. However for PMF, which has a higher mortality rate than PV or ET, cases will be recruited as close to diagnosis as possible.
Eligible cases will be identified by the two lead clinicians Prof McMullin (Belfast) and Dr Duncombe (Southampton) during attendance at their routine clinics. Prof McMullin and Dr Duncombe will ensure that potential cases meet the study inclusion criteria (section 2.5) and provide detailed information on the categorisation of the case (PV, ET, PMF), which diagnostic criteria have been met and the clinical history of the patient.
Patients will be invited to participate in the study by letter from their lead clinician with an information sheet. Non-respondents will be randomised to either receive a reminder letter or a telephone contact from their health care team.
The choice of control group is an important consideration in any case-control study. Controls recruited from the general population through General Practitioners, population registers, neighbourhood controls or random digit dialling are ideal at identifying a representative sample of the population from which the case population was identified. However, these groups often have low response rates and selection bias is inferably encountered. Other control groups such as friend, family or hospital controls have much higher response rates but the factors associated with friendship, family or being in hospital may mean that these groups are less representative of the general population. For the purposes of this study two control groups will be recruited; GP controls and non-blood relatives (including spouses) or friend controls. The study will investigate response rates, differences in study characteristics between control groups and generalisability to the population using population-based statistics.
2.8.1 GP Controls Within each study site 5 GPs, reflective of the geographic distribution of MPN cases, will be approached to facilitate the identification and recruitment of controls and for performing phlebotomy. Each practice will be offered £200 for participation in the study.
2.8.1.1 Northern Ireland Control Recruitment in Northern Ireland will be conducted with the help of the Northern Ireland Clinical Research Network (Primary Care) (NICRN (PC)) who work in partnership with GP practices to provide support, guidance and facilitate research. The NICRN nurses who work with practices hold a Confidentiality Agreement and honorary contract with the practice. Practices are supplied with a study file, which is kept in a secure location at the practice and contains the study protocol and all relevant study information including the completed Research Governance form and contact details of researchers and NICRN (PC) staff.
With prior arrangement and agreement with the practice partners the research nurse will make an appointment with the practice manager (PM) who will either facilitate practice staff to conduct a computer search to randomly select potential controls or supply the nurse with their own unique user name and password to do so. The search will be conducted using the practice computer system's inbuilt randomisation programme, based on a numbered list of age and gender-matched patients (approximating 2 per MPN case, calculated on the basis of an attrition rate of 40-50%). The GP will be asked to confirm the eligibility of each potential control patient prior to them receiving study information from the practice.
Study information will be mailed to eligible control patients from the practice on practice headed paper and with a letter, signed by the GP, inviting them to participate. In order to track patient replies, each envelope will have a unique code number written on the front. A patient tracker form with the unique code number written beside the relevant name on the list of control patients is kept in the practice study file to track responders and non-responders for follow up purposes. No patient identifiable data will be removed from the practice at any time.
Non-respondents will be randomised to either receive a reminder letter approx two weeks after the first mail shot or to have a telephone call from practice staff using the follow-up telephone transcript.
2.8.1.2 Southampton The research nurse in Southampton will work in partnership with GP practices to provide support, guidance and facilitate research. An honorary contract and confidentiality agreement will be arranged with the practices.. This will include the nurses NMC number and copies of GCP training certificates. Practices are supplied with a study file, which is kept in a secure location at the practice and contains the study protocol and all relevant study information including the completed Research Governance form and contact details of researchers and NICRN (PC) staff.
With prior arrangement and agreement with the practice partners the research nurse will make an appointment with the practice manager (PM) who will either facilitate practice staff to conduct a computer search to randomly select potential controls or supply the nurse with their own unique user name and password to do so. The search will be conducted using the practice computer system's inbuilt randomisation programme, based on a numbered list of age and gender-matched patients (approximating 2 per MPN case, calculated on the basis of an attrition rate of 40-50%). The GP will be asked to confirm the eligibility of each potential control patient prior to them receiving study information from the practice.
Study information will be mailed to eligible control patients from the practice on practice headed paper and with a letter, signed by the GP, inviting them to participate. In order to track patient replies, each envelope will have a unique code number written on the front. A patient tracker form with the unique code number written beside the relevant name on the list of control patients is kept in the practice study file to track responders and non-responders for follow up purposes. No patient identifiable data will be removed from the practice at any time.
Non-respondents will be randomised to either receive a reminder letter approx two weeks after the first mail shot or to have a telephone call from practice staff using the follow-up telephone transcript.
2.8.2 Relative/Friend Controls Recruitment of 100 non-blood relative/friend controls will be undertaken by asking cases to pass on a flyer to up to 2 or 3 non-blood relatives/friends aged 18 years or older. Controls meeting the exclusion, section 2.7, will not be eligible for participation. Controls will not be individually matched to cases but must reside in the study area (Belfast or Southampton). Blood relatives will not be eligible for participation. Partners or friends MPN cases attending outpatient appointments in Belfast City Hospital or UHS will also be approached to participate in the study as study flyers will be available. A reminder to follow-up with recruitment of non-blood relatives/controls will be undertaken at the time of telephone interview with the cases. Those interested in participating in the study can contact the study team for the information sheet, consent form and other documentation by completing the tear off contact details strip on the flyer and posting (in the FREEPOST envelope that will be attached to the flyer) to the study team or by telephone or e-mail.
INFORMED CONSENT All cases and controls will be contacted by letter with a patient information leaflet, a consent form, patient contact form and work/residence history calendar. A pen will be included in the envelope in addition to a MPD Voice charity information sheet and a trolley token (for 50% of cases and controls). The number of subjects who refuse to participate will be documented. Subjects who refuse to participate at telephone contact will be asked whether they are willing to answer a short questionnaire to assess the representativeness of the recruited subjects. Subjects will be given the opportunity to withdraw from the study at any time however the information provided up to that point will be retained and used within the study. Subjects will be asked for verbal consent at time of telephone interview to have the interview recorded both before and after (if agreeable) the recording device is activated.
- Being tested
- Methodological pens, Methodological compensation, Methodological trolley tokens
- Keywords
- case-control, recruitment, response rates, incentives
- Medical subject headings
- Polycythemia Vera, Thrombocythemia, Essential, Primary Myelofibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Methodological pensOther
Randomisation of branded pen, non-branded pen and no pen
Methodological compensationOther
Randomisation of a £10 monetary reimbursement for expenses on completion of the study
Methodological trolley tokensOther
Trolley tokens to be randomly assigned to half of cases and General Practice controls.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Myeloproliferative neoplasm case | Patients with Polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) will be recruited based on the WHO diagnostic criteria.
Exclusion Criteria
* younger than 18 years old.
* where the clinician/General Practitioner (GP) does not provide consent.
* incapable of giving informed consent.
* physically or cognitively incapable of completing the questionnaire.
* too ill to participate.
We will assess whether a pen (branded, non-branded or none), a £10 cheque and/or a charity branded trolley token will affect uptake rates in the study. Receives: Other: Methodological pens; Other: Methodological compensation; Other: Methodological trolley tokens | |
| General Practice Control | GP controls will be randomly selected and frequency matched to the distribution of cases by 5-year age band, geographic location (Belfast and Southampton) and gender.
The following patient groups will be excluded. Those:
* younger than 18 years old.
* where the clinician/GP does not provide consent.
* incapable of giving informed consent.
* physically or cognitively incapable of completing the questionnaire.
* too ill to participate.
We will assess whether a pen (branded, non-branded or none), a £10 cheque (at study completion) and/or a charity branded trolley token will affect uptake rates in the study. Receives: Other: Methodological pens; Other: Methodological compensation; Other: Methodological trolley tokens | |
| Non-blood relative or family Control | Recruitment of 100 non-blood relative/friend controls will be undertaken by asking cases to pass on a flyer to up to 2 or 3 non-blood relatives/friends aged 18 years or older.
We will assess whether a pen (branded, non-branded or none) and/or a £10 cheque (at study completion) will affect uptake rates in the study. Only a limited number of trolley tokens were available so not assessed in this group. Receives: Other: Methodological pens; Other: Methodological compensation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Influence of Pre- and Post- Incentives on Participation Rates.
- Difference in participation rates in those receiving:
- vs. not receiving a pen at initial contact.
- vs. not receiving a trolley token at initial contact.
- vs. not receiving a monetary incentive at initial contact.
- a MOSAICC pen vs. a non-branded pen following second contact.
- vs. not receiving a trolley token following second contact.
- a MOSAICC branded Pen +/or trolley token alone vs no non-monetary incentive following a second invite.
- a MOSAICC branded Pen +/or trolley token alone vs no incentive following a second invite.
- a MOSAICC branded Pen +/or trolley token alone vs pen/no pen \&/or money following a second invite (branded vs unbranded incentive)
- 0/1 of these incentives vs. receiving 2/3 incentives following a second invite.
- Difference in proportion of patients completing study elements comparing:
- 0/1 vs 2/3 incentives.
- those receiving pre vs post invitation incentives.
Measured: average 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study start1 Apr 2013
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completion30 Jun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Polycythemia VeraStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen's University, Belfast
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, Mayo Clinic
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Lesley Anderson, University of Aberdeen
- Investigators
- Lesley A Anderson, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Aberdeen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01831635
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B12/24
- Other IDs
- MPDVOICE001
- Acronym
- MOSAICC
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Researchers can contact the study lead (Prof Anderson) to request a data access form. Once a data access form has been completed it will be reviewed by the study team and a decision made. If sharing of data has been agreed by the study team the contracts department and legal teams will review the proposed sharing of data to ensure that it meets with international standards.
Publications
Anderson LA, Duncombe AS, Hughes M, Mills ME, Wilson JC, McMullin MF. Environmental, lifestyle, and familial/ethnic factors associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol. 2012 Feb;87(2):175-82. doi: 10.1002/ajh.22212. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
PubMed 22076943James G, McMullin MF, Duncombe AS, Clarke M, Anderson LA. The MOSAICC study: Assessing feasibility for biological sample collection in epidemiology studies and comparison of DNA yields from saliva and whole blood samples. Ann Hum Genet. 2018 Mar;82(2):114-118. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12227. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
PubMed 29076129Anderson LA, James G, Duncombe AS, Mesa R, Scherber R, Dueck AC, de Vocht F, Clarke M, McMullin MF. Myeloproliferative neoplasm patient symptom burden and quality of life: evidence of significant impairment compared to controls. Am J Hematol. 2015 Oct;90(10):864-70. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24098. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
PubMed 26113113
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: an In-depth Case-control Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01831635
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MOSAICC / B12/24
- Keywords
- case-control, recruitment, response rates, incentives
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 234 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen's University, BelfastUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Western Australian Institute for Medical Research, Mayo Clinic
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jan 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is a paucity of data on the aetiology of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). The investigators conducted a systematic review of the literature which identified several cohort and case-control studies that have investigated a wide range of potential medical, environmental and occupational risk factors. However, these studies have been limited by a wide variation in case definition and small sample sizes limiting the potential to detect modest risk differences between cases and controls. The research group propose an exploratory case-control study of 100 patients with classic MPNs and 200 controls to determine the optimal methods for roll out of this study to a multi-centred UK-based case-control study that will investigate the aetiology of MPN subtypes. The objectives of the study are to evaluate recruitment procedures, response rates and the development of a telephone administered questionnaire. The findings of this exploratory study will form the basis of a protocol for a large United Kingdom (UK)-wide case-control study of MPNs.
Detailed description
MPNs are a group of haematopoietic malignancies resulting from a transformed haematopietic progenitor cell. They are characterised by overproduction of mature functional blood cells. MPNs were historically termed myeloproliferative disorders and have undergone numerous amendments in classification. The 2008 World Health Organisation (WHO) classifies a number of related disorders as MPNs including polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary/idiopathic myelofibrosis (PMF)2. Reported incidence rates vary from 0.02 to 2.8 per 100,000 persons3-5 but are not well characterised with half of patients asymptomatic at diagnosis6. In Northern Ireland (NI) the prevalence of ET is reported to be 18 per 100,000 persons (by correspondence, Mary McMullin). PV and ET are indolent neoplasms with better prognosis (88% and 92% 3-year survival, respectively) compared to PMF which has a 63% 3-year survival in the United States5.
The main study objectives are to:
- Develop a telephone-based questionnaire to investigate potential risk factors associated with MPNs.
- Assess the reliability and validity of the study questionnaire.
- Determine which control group to investigate by investigating:
- Response rates.
- Representativeness of control groups.
- Assess recruitment procedures.
- Determine if offering reimbursement of expenses (£10 per person) encourages control participation and improved representativeness to the general population.
A case-control approach was chosen as it is the most cost-efficient method of obtaining information on the aetiology of rare diseases such as MPNs. A prospective cohort study would require participation from millions of individuals followed over a long period of time. A hospital-based approach was chosen over a population-based approach to ensure the study was more feasible and could be rolled out to a number of centres in the UK.
The disorders under investigation are:
- Polycythaemia vera
- Essential Thrombocythaemia
- Primary myelofibrosis
Initially there will be one site in Belfast, Northern Ireland and one in Southampton, England. Cases will be identified and recruited through Prof Mary Frances McMullin at the Belfast City Hospital (BCH), Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland and Dr Andrew Duncombe, at the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (UHS), Southampton, England.
Following completion of the exploratory study it is planned that other sites across the UK will be invited to participate through the Clinical Research Network.
. CASE ASCERTAINMENT Recruitment will run over a 12 month period. It is estimated that at least 100 incident and prevalent MPN cases will be recruited from the two sites during this time frame; 50 from Belfast, NI and 50 from Southampton, England. The targeted distribution of cases projected as feasible is 40 PV, 40 ET and 20 PMF cases. Fewer PMF cases are expected as the incidence is lower than PV and ET. Both incident and prevalent cases will be recruited in the exploratory case-control study and the distribution of time since diagnosis evaluated. One of the main limitations of including prevalent cases is that risk factors may differ in those who survive for a long period after diagnosis compared to those who die soon after diagnosis. Since PV and ET have low mortality rates it is expected that this will not impact the evaluation of the aetiology of these conditions to a large extent. However for PMF, which has a higher mortality rate than PV or ET, cases will be recruited as close to diagnosis as possible.
Eligible cases will be identified by the two lead clinicians Prof McMullin (Belfast) and Dr Duncombe (Southampton) during attendance at their routine clinics. Prof McMullin and Dr Duncombe will ensure that potential cases meet the study inclusion criteria (section 2.5) and provide detailed information on the categorisation of the case (PV, ET, PMF), which diagnostic criteria have been met and the clinical history of the patient.
Patients will be invited to participate in the study by letter from their lead clinician with an information sheet. Non-respondents will be randomised to either receive a reminder letter or a telephone contact from their health care team.
The choice of control group is an important consideration in any case-control study. Controls recruited from the general population through General Practitioners, population registers, neighbourhood controls or random digit dialling are ideal at identifying a representative sample of the population from which the case population was identified. However, these groups often have low response rates and selection bias is inferably encountered. Other control groups such as friend, family or hospital controls have much higher response rates but the factors associated with friendship, family or being in hospital may mean that these groups are less representative of the general population. For the purposes of this study two control groups will be recruited; GP controls and non-blood relatives (including spouses) or friend controls. The study will investigate response rates, differences in study characteristics between control groups and generalisability to the population using population-based statistics.
2.8.1 GP Controls Within each study site 5 GPs, reflective of the geographic distribution of MPN cases, will be approached to facilitate the identification and recruitment of controls and for performing phlebotomy. Each practice will be offered £200 for participation in the study.
2.8.1.1 Northern Ireland Control Recruitment in Northern Ireland will be conducted with the help of the Northern Ireland Clinical Research Network (Primary Care) (NICRN (PC)) who work in partnership with GP practices to provide support, guidance and facilitate research. The NICRN nurses who work with practices hold a Confidentiality Agreement and honorary contract with the practice. Practices are supplied with a study file, which is kept in a secure location at the practice and contains the study protocol and all relevant study information including the completed Research Governance form and contact details of researchers and NICRN (PC) staff.
With prior arrangement and agreement with the practice partners the research nurse will make an appointment with the practice manager (PM) who will either facilitate practice staff to conduct a computer search to randomly select potential controls or supply the nurse with their own unique user name and password to do so. The search will be conducted using the practice computer system's inbuilt randomisation programme, based on a numbered list of age and gender-matched patients (approximating 2 per MPN case, calculated on the basis of an attrition rate of 40-50%). The GP will be asked to confirm the eligibility of each potential control patient prior to them receiving study information from the practice.
Study information will be mailed to eligible control patients from the practice on practice headed paper and with a letter, signed by the GP, inviting them to participate. In order to track patient replies, each envelope will have a unique code number written on the front. A patient tracker form with the unique code number written beside the relevant name on the list of control patients is kept in the practice study file to track responders and non-responders for follow up purposes. No patient identifiable data will be removed from the practice at any time.
Non-respondents will be randomised to either receive a reminder letter approx two weeks after the first mail shot or to have a telephone call from practice staff using the follow-up telephone transcript.
2.8.1.2 Southampton The research nurse in Southampton will work in partnership with GP practices to provide support, guidance and facilitate research. An honorary contract and confidentiality agreement will be arranged with the practices.. This will include the nurses NMC number and copies of GCP training certificates. Practices are supplied with a study file, which is kept in a secure location at the practice and contains the study protocol and all relevant study information including the completed Research Governance form and contact details of researchers and NICRN (PC) staff.
With prior arrangement and agreement with the practice partners the research nurse will make an appointment with the practice manager (PM) who will either facilitate practice staff to conduct a computer search to randomly select potential controls or supply the nurse with their own unique user name and password to do so. The search will be conducted using the practice computer system's inbuilt randomisation programme, based on a numbered list of age and gender-matched patients (approximating 2 per MPN case, calculated on the basis of an attrition rate of 40-50%). The GP will be asked to confirm the eligibility of each potential control patient prior to them receiving study information from the practice.
Study information will be mailed to eligible control patients from the practice on practice headed paper and with a letter, signed by the GP, inviting them to participate. In order to track patient replies, each envelope will have a unique code number written on the front. A patient tracker form with the unique code number written beside the relevant name on the list of control patients is kept in the practice study file to track responders and non-responders for follow up purposes. No patient identifiable data will be removed from the practice at any time.
Non-respondents will be randomised to either receive a reminder letter approx two weeks after the first mail shot or to have a telephone call from practice staff using the follow-up telephone transcript.
2.8.2 Relative/Friend Controls Recruitment of 100 non-blood relative/friend controls will be undertaken by asking cases to pass on a flyer to up to 2 or 3 non-blood relatives/friends aged 18 years or older. Controls meeting the exclusion, section 2.7, will not be eligible for participation. Controls will not be individually matched to cases but must reside in the study area (Belfast or Southampton). Blood relatives will not be eligible for participation. Partners or friends MPN cases attending outpatient appointments in Belfast City Hospital or UHS will also be approached to participate in the study as study flyers will be available. A reminder to follow-up with recruitment of non-blood relatives/controls will be undertaken at the time of telephone interview with the cases. Those interested in participating in the study can contact the study team for the information sheet, consent form and other documentation by completing the tear off contact details strip on the flyer and posting (in the FREEPOST envelope that will be attached to the flyer) to the study team or by telephone or e-mail.
INFORMED CONSENT All cases and controls will be contacted by letter with a patient information leaflet, a consent form, patient contact form and work/residence history calendar. A pen will be included in the envelope in addition to a MPD Voice charity information sheet and a trolley token (for 50% of cases and controls). The number of subjects who refuse to participate will be documented. Subjects who refuse to participate at telephone contact will be asked whether they are willing to answer a short questionnaire to assess the representativeness of the recruited subjects. Subjects will be given the opportunity to withdraw from the study at any time however the information provided up to that point will be retained and used within the study. Subjects will be asked for verbal consent at time of telephone interview to have the interview recorded both before and after (if agreeable) the recording device is activated.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Myeloproliferative neoplasm case | – | Other: Methodological pens, Other: Methodological compensation, Other: Methodological trolley tokensPatients with Polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) will be recruited based on the WHO diagnostic criteria. Exclusion Criteria * younger than 18 years old. * where the clinician/General Practitioner (GP) does not provide consent. * incapable of giving informed consent. * physically or cognitively incapable of completing the questionnaire. * too ill to participate. We will assess whether a pen (branded, non-branded or none), a £10 cheque and/or a charity branded trolley token will affect uptake rates in the study. |
| General Practice Control | – | Other: Methodological pens, Other: Methodological compensation, Other: Methodological trolley tokensGP controls will be randomly selected and frequency matched to the distribution of cases by 5-year age band, geographic location (Belfast and Southampton) and gender. The following patient groups will be excluded. Those: * younger than 18 years old. * where the clinician/GP does not provide consent. * incapable of giving informed consent. * physically or cognitively incapable of completing the questionnaire. * too ill to participate. We will assess whether a pen (branded, non-branded or none), a £10 cheque (at study completion) and/or a charity branded trolley token will affect uptake rates in the study. |
| Non-blood relative or family Control | – | Other: Methodological pens, Other: Methodological compensationRecruitment of 100 non-blood relative/friend controls will be undertaken by asking cases to pass on a flyer to up to 2 or 3 non-blood relatives/friends aged 18 years or older. We will assess whether a pen (branded, non-branded or none) and/or a £10 cheque (at study completion) will affect uptake rates in the study. Only a limited number of trolley tokens were available so not assessed in this group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Hematology clinic Primary Care clinic Non-blood relatives/ friends of cases
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Clinical diagnosis of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythaemia or primary myelofibrosis based on the WHO diagnostic criteria.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Randomly selected, frequency matched to the distribution of cases by 5-year age band, geographic location (Belfast and Southampton) and gender.
- Aged 18 years or older.
- Non-blood relative/friend of a case participating in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- younger than 18 years old.
- where the clinician/General Practitioner (GP) does not provide consent.
- incapable of giving informed consent.
- physically or cognitively incapable of completing the questionnaire.
- too ill to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Methodological pensRandomisation of branded pen, non-branded pen and no pen | Other | General Practice Control, Myeloproliferative neoplasm case, Non-blood relative or family Control |
| Methodological compensationRandomisation of a £10 monetary reimbursement for expenses on completion of the study | Other | General Practice Control, Myeloproliferative neoplasm case, Non-blood relative or family Control |
| Methodological trolley tokensTrolley tokens to be randomly assigned to half of cases and General Practice controls. | Other | General Practice Control, Myeloproliferative neoplasm case |
Primary outcome
Influence of Pre- and Post- Incentives on Participation Rates.
Time frame: average 2 weeks
* Difference in participation rates in those receiving: * vs. not receiving a pen at initial contact. * vs. not receiving a trolley token at initial contact. * vs. not receiving a monetary incentive at initial contact. * a MOSAICC pen vs. a non-branded pen following second contact. * vs. not receiving a trolley token following second contact. * a MOSAICC branded Pen +/or trolley token alone vs no non-monetary incentive following a second invite. * a MOSAICC branded Pen +/or trolley token alone vs no incentive following a second invite. * a MOSAICC branded Pen +/or trolley token alone vs pen/no pen \&/or money following a second invite (branded vs unbranded incentive) * 0/1 of these incentives vs. receiving 2/3 incentives following a second invite. * Difference in proportion of patients completing study elements comparing: * 0/1 vs 2/3 incentives. * those receiving pre vs post invitation incentives.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22076943Anderson LA, Duncombe AS, Hughes M, Mills ME, Wilson JC, McMullin MF. Environmental, lifestyle, and familial/ethnic factors associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Am J Hematol. 2012 Feb;87(2):175-82. doi: 10.1002/ajh.22212. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
- Background: PubMed 29076129James G, McMullin MF, Duncombe AS, Clarke M, Anderson LA. The MOSAICC study: Assessing feasibility for biological sample collection in epidemiology studies and comparison of DNA yields from saliva and whole blood samples. Ann Hum Genet. 2018 Mar;82(2):114-118. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12227. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
- Results publication: PubMed 26113113Anderson LA, James G, Duncombe AS, Mesa R, Scherber R, Dueck AC, de Vocht F, Clarke M, McMullin MF. Myeloproliferative neoplasm patient symptom burden and quality of life: evidence of significant impairment compared to controls. Am J Hematol. 2015 Oct;90(10):864-70. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24098. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Researchers can contact the study lead (Prof Anderson) to request a data access form. Once a data access form has been completed it will be reviewed by the study team and a decision made. If sharing of data has been agreed by the study team the contracts department and legal teams will review the proposed sharing of data to ensure that it meets with international standards.
Related trials for Polycythemia Vera
RecruitingPhase 3
MITHRIDATE: Ruxolitinib Versus Hydroxycarbamide or Interferon as First Line Therapy in High Risk Polycythemia Vera
Polycythemia Vera
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study of Pelabresib (DAK539) and Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis (MF)
Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), Post-polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis (PPV-MF)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Phase 2 Study of Oral Epetraborole in Adults With Polycythemia Vera
Polycythemia Vera (SNOMED CT: 109992005)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Infection Prophylaxis and Management in Treating Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Previously Treated With Donor Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic/Lymphoid Cancer, Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of DISC-0974 (RALLY-MF) in Participants With Myelofibrosis or Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Anemia
Myelofibrosis; Anemia, Anemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lesley A Anderson, PhD principal investigator
University of Aberdeen
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia, run by Queen's University, Belfast at 3 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jan 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Influence of Pre- and Post- Incentives on Participation Rates. (time frame: average 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01831635, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2026.