AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3NCT01828099

LDK378 Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With ALK Rearranged Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Ceritinib, Pemetrexed and Cisplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 167 sites in 29 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the efficacy and safety of ceritinib with standard first-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin) in patients with stage IIIB (not candidates for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a confirmed anaplastic lymphoma… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
Ceritinib, Pemetrexed and Cisplatin
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
376 participants
Where
167 sitesin 29 countries
Study dates
9 Jul 2013to 7 Jan 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The patient had a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of non-squamous Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive as assessed by the Ventana Immunohistochemistry (IHC) test. The test was performed at Novartis designated central laboratories.
  • The patient had a newly diagnosed stage IIIB (who was not a candidate for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV NSCLC or relapsed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not previously treated with any systemic anti-cancer therapy (e.g. cytotoxic drugs, monoclonal antibody therapy, crizotinib or other ALK inhibitors, or other targeted therapies, either experimental or not), with the exception of neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy.
  • The patient had at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1.

Who cannot join

  • The patient had known hypersensitivity to any of the excipients of LDK378 (microcrystalline cellulose, mannitol, crospovidone, colloidal silicon dioxide, and magnesium stearate).
  • The patient had a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction to platinum-containing drugs, pemetrexed, or any known excipients of these drugs.
  • The patient had symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases and was neurologically unstable or had required increasing doses of steroids within the 2 weeks prior to screening to manage CNS symptoms.

Trial locations and contacts

167 sites in 29 countries.

167 sites in 29 countries

Spain24 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    A Coruña, Galicia, 15006

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Alicante, Valencia, 03010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Badajoz, Extremadura, 06080

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Granada, Andalusia, 18014

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lleida, Catalonia, 25198

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lugo, Galicia, 27003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28033

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28040

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madrid, 28050

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Málaga, Andalusia, 29010

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mataró, Catalonia, 08301

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33011

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pamplona, Navarre, 31008

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Reus, Catalonia, 43201

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, 38320

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seville, Andalusia, 41013

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seville, Andalusia, 41014

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Valencia, Valencia, 46014

Other trials in Spain

Italy18 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ancona, AN, 60126

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Aviano, PN, 33081

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bergamo, BG, 24125

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Genova, GE, 16132

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan, MI, 20132

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan, MI, 20141

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Milan, MI, 20162

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Monza, MB, 20900

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Naples, 80131

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Orbassano, TO, 10043

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Parma, PR, 43100

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Perugia, PG, 06129

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pisa, PI, 56124

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Reggio Emilia, RE, 42123

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Roma, RM, 00152

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Roma, RM, 00189

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rozzano, MI, 20089

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Udine, UD, 33100

Other trials in Italy

China14 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 100730

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Beijing, 101149

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Changchun, Jilin, 130012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Changchun, Jilin, 130021

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chongqing, 400037

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Chongqing, 400042

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guang Dong Province, 510120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tianjin, 300052

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Xi’an, Shanxi, 710038

Other trials in China

India11 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 095

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Delhi, 110 085

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 034

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302017

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kochi, Kerala, 682 041

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kolkata, West Bengal, 700160

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Madurai, Tamil Nadu, 625107

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Mumbai, 400 012

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 004

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110076

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632 004

Other trials in India

Brazil10 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Barretos, São Paulo, 14784 400

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Fortaleza, Ceará, 60336-045

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Itajaí, Santa Catarina, 88301-229

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59075 740

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Recife, Pernambuco, 50070-550

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rio de Janiero, Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40170-110

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090 000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000

Other trials in Brazil

France10 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Caen, 14033

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lille, 59037

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Limoges, Haute Vienne, 87000

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Paris, 75475

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pierre-Bénite, 69495

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Rennes, 35043

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Strasbourg, 67091

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Toulon, Val De Marne, 83800

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Villejuif, 94800

Other trials in France

Germany10 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Cologne, 50937

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Coswig, 01640

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Essen, 45147

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Göttingen, 37075

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Großhansdorf, 22947

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oldenburg, 26121

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Tübingen, 72076

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ulm, 89081

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Wiesbaden, D-65199

Other trials in Germany

Japan7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Akashi, Hyōgo, 673-8558

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kashiwa, Chiba, 277 8577

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Koto Ku, Tokyo, 135 8550

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464 8681

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Niigata, 951 8520

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Osaka, Osaka, 541-8567

Other trials in Japan

Netherlands7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Amersfroort, 3818 ES

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Enschede, 7512 KZ

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Groningen, 9713 GZ

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Groningen, 9728 NZ

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Maastricht, 6229 HX

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zoetermeer, NL-2722 EP

Other trials in Netherlands

Taiwan6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kaohsiung City, 83301

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Taichung, 40447

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Taichung, 407219

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Taipei, 10002

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Taipei, 11217

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Taoyuan, 33305

Other trials in Taiwan

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    London, NW1 2BU

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Manchester, M20 2BX

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nottingham, NG5 1PB

Other trials in United Kingdom

South Korea5 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bundang Gu, Gyeonggi-do, 13620

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 10408

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seoul, 03722

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seoul, 05505

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Seoul, 06351

Other trials in South Korea

Hungary4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Budapest, 1121

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Nyíregyháza, 4400

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Veszprém, 8200

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Zalaegerszeg, Zala County, 8900

Other trials in Hungary

Sweden4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Linköping, SE 581 85

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lund, 221 85

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Stockholm, 171 76

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Uppsala, 751 85

Other trials in Sweden

Thailand4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bangkok, 10330

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bangkok, 10400

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Khon Kaen, THA, 40002

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Songkhla, Hat Yai, 90110

Other trials in Thailand

Argentina3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1050AAK

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1180AAX

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    La Rioja, 5300

Other trials in Argentina

Australia3 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Auckland, 92024

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102

Other trials in Australia

Austria2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Salzburg, 5020

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vienna, 1210

Other trials in Austria

Colombia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Bogota, Cundinamarca, 110111

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Montería, 230004

Other trials in Colombia

Denmark2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Herlev, DK-2730

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Odense C, DK 5000

Other trials in Denmark

Greece2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Athens, GR, 115 27

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Heraklion Crete, 71110

Other trials in Greece

Lebanon2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    El Achrafiyé, 166830

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saida, 652

Other trials in Lebanon

Poland2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Szczecin, 70-891

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Warsaw, 02 781

Other trials in Poland

Russia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Moscow, 115478

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Saint Petersburg, 197022

Other trials in Russia

Singapore2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Singapore, 119228

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Singapore, 168583

Other trials in Singapore

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Ankara, 06230

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Istanbul, 35100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Ireland1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Dublin, DO4

Other trials in Ireland

Mexico1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280

Other trials in Mexico

Norway1 site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Oslo, 0310

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized Study of Oral LDK378 Versus Standard Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive), Stage IIIB or IV, Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

To compare the efficacy and safety of ceritinib with standard first-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin) in patients with stage IIIB (not candidates for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a confirmed anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, using the Ventana immunohistochemistry (IHC) test.

Read the detailed description

This was an open-label, randomized, global, Phase III study that compared the efficacy and safety of ceritinib to standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced (NSCLC) harboring ALK rearrangement. The confirmation of ALK rearrangement was done using the ICH test by a Novartis designated central laboratory. Prior to the study, patients had not received any previous systemic, anti-cancer therapy, including ALK inhibitors, for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either receive ceritinib (750 mg once daily, fasted) or chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a platinum-based doublet with pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed maintenance in patients without progressive disease after 4 cycles.

Treatment was continued until the blinded independent review committee (BIRC) confirmed disease progression based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), occurrence of unacceptable toxicity, or meeting other discontinuation criteria. Patients in either arm were permitted to continue the assigned study treatment beyond BIRC-confirmed disease progression in case of continued clinical benefit, as determined by the Investigator.

All patients who discontinued treatment during the treatment phase for reasons other than death, lost to follow-up, pregnancy or disease progression entered the post-treatment follow-up period until disease progression, withdrawal of consent or death.

In the chemotherapy arm, patients were allowed to switch and receive ceritinib after BIRC-confirmed disease progression (extension-treatment period).

Being tested
Ceritinib, Pemetrexed, Cisplatin, Carboplatin
Keywords
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC, ALK, LDK378, Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), treatment of lung cancer after first metastasis, lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, Non small cell lung carcinoma, Non small cell lung cancer, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Lung Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma of Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CeritinibDrug

    Also called LDK378

    Ceritinib was administered orally once-daily fasted at a dose of 750 mg capsules on a continuous dosing schedule.

  • PemetrexedDrug

    Pemetrexed was administered at a dose of 500 mg/m^2 as an intravenous (iv) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle

  • CisplatinDrug

    Cisplatin was administered by iv infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m^2 every 21 days for up to 4 cycles.

  • CarboplatinDrug

    Carboplatin was administered as iv infusion (AUC 5-6) every 21 days up to 4 cycles

Study groups in NCT01828099
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CeritinibExperimentalCeritinib administered continuously through oral dosing at a dosage of 750 mg once daily in fasted state.
Receives: Drug: Ceritinib
ChemotherapyActive comparatorPemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin (based on Investigator's choice) for 4 cycles (Induction) followed by pemetrexed as single agent (Maintenance)
Receives: Drug: Pemetrexed; Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Carboplatin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)

    PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression (as assessed by BIRC per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. A patient who had not progressed or died at the date of the analysis cut-off or had received another anticancer therapy had their PFS censored at the time of the last adequate tumor evaluation before the earlier of the cut-off date or the anticancer therapy date. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 34 months

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    OS defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause.

    If the patient was alive at the date of the analysis cut-off or lost to follow-up, then OS was censored at the last contact date prior to data cut-off date. The distribution of OS was estimated using the KM method.

    Measured: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR) by BIRC Assessment

    ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response defined as complete response (CR) or or partial response (PR) measured by BIRC per RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Measured: Up to approximately 34 months

  3. Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment

    ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response defined as complete response (CR) or or partial response (PR) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1.

    CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Measured: Up to approximately 120 months

  4. Duration of Response (DOR) by BIRC Assessment

    DOR is defined as the time from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression (measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    If a patient had not had an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Patients who had never achieved a best overall response of CR or PR were excluded from the analysis. The distribution function of DOR was estimated using the KM method.

    Measured: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months

  5. Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator Assessment

    DOR is defined as the time from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression (measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    If a patient had not had an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Patients who had never achieved a best overall response of CR or PR were excluded from the analysis. The distribution function of DOR was estimated using the KM method.

    Measured: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 120 months

  6. Disease Control Rate (DCR) by BIRC Assessment

    DCR is defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.

    Measured: Up to approximately 34 months

  7. Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Investigator Assessment

    DCR is defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.

    Measured: Up to approximately 120 months

  8. Time to Response (TTR) by BIRC Assessment

    TTR is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented response (CR or PR) measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Patients who had not achieved a confirmed CR or PR were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment date when they had not had a PFS event or at maximum follow-up when they had had a PFS event.

    Measured: From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 34 months

  9. Time to Response (TTR) by Investigator Assessment

    TTR is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented response (CR or PR) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Patients who had not achieved a confirmed CR or PR were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment date when they had not had a PFS event or at maximum follow-up when they had had a PFS event

    Measured: From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 120 months

  10. PFS by Investigator Assessment

    PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression (as assessed by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause.

    A patient who had not progressed or died at the date of the analysis cut-off or had received another anticancer therapy had their PFS censored at the time of the last adequate tumor evaluation before the earlier of the cut-off date or the anticancer therapy date. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the KM method.

    Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months

  11. Overall Intracranial Response Rate (OIRR)

    OIRR is defined as the ORR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated as the percentage of patients with a best overall confirmed response of CR or PR in the brain per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuroradiologist.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Measured: Up to approximately 34 months

  12. Intracranial Disease Control Rate (IDCR)

    IDCR is defined as the DCR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated as the percentage of patients with a best overall response of CR or PR or SD (or non-CR/nonPD) in the brain per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuro-radiologist.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease

    Measured: Up to approximately 34 months

  13. Duration of Intracranial Response (DOIR)

    DOIR is defined as the DOR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated from the time of first documented response of CR or PR to the date of the first documented disease progression in the brain or death due to any cause per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuro-radiologist.

    CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Measured: From first documented response to first documented disease progression in the brain or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months

  14. Time to Definitive 10 Point Deterioration in the Composite Endpoint of Pain, Cough or Dyspnea in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ)- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 Questionnaire

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 complemented the QLQ-C30 and measured disease symptoms and treatment-related adverse effects. The lung cancer module incorporated one multi-item scale to assess dyspnea and 9 single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All of the domain scores ranged from 0 to 100. A high score indicated a high level of symptoms.

    Time to definitive symptom deterioration for the composite endpoint was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest date when the patient's score showed a 10 point or higher increase from baseline in any of the symptoms (pain, cough or dyspnea) as per EORTC QLQ-LC13 (with no later change below this threshold i.e., <10 points was observed or if this increase was observed at the last assessment for the patient) or death due to any cause.

    Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months

  15. Time to Definitive Deterioration in the Composite Endpoint of Pain, Cough or Dyspnea in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)

    The LCSS patient scale used a 24-hour recall period and contained nine items: six measuring major symptoms for lung cancer (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain), and three summary items related to total symptom distress, normal activity status, and overall quality of life. The LCSS used a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) to measure the intensity of patient responses, with zero corresponding to the lowest rating (best status) and 100 representing the highest rating (worst status).

    Time to definitive deterioration for the composite endpoint was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest date when the patient's score showed a 10 point or higher increase from baseline in any of the LCSS scores related to pain in the chest, cough, or dyspnea (with no later change below this threshold i.e., <10 points was observed or if this increase was observed at the last assessment for the patient) or death due to any cause.

    Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months

  16. Least Squares Mean Scores on the EORTC-QLQ C30

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 contained 30 items and was of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties), and a global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) scale. Items were assessed on a 4- or 7-level Likert scale, ranging from 1="very poor" to 7= "excellent" for GHS items and 1= "not at all" to 4= "very much" for all other items. The scores of the scales were averaged from the scores of the component items, transformed, and analyzed on a 0 - 100 scale. A high score represented a higher response level. The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained

    Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months

  17. Least Squares Mean Scores on the EORTC QLQ- LC13

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 was used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and provided information on an additional 13 items specifically related to lung cancer. The lung cancer module incorporated one multi-item scale to assess dyspnea, and 9 single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="very much". For the multi-item scale, the scores were averaged from the scores of the component items, transformed, and then analyzed on a 0 - 100 scale. For the single item scale, raw scores were transformed and analyzed on a 0-100 scale. A high score indicated a high level of symptoms The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained.

    Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months

  18. Least Squares Mean Scores on the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)

    The LCSS consisted of 9 individual items; 6 measured lung cancer symptoms (appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, and pain); the remaining 3 items measured general lung cancer symptom distress, interference with daily activities and overall QoL. Each item was scored on a 100-millimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = best outcome).

    Total score was calculated as the average of the aggregate score of all 9 items. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher total scores indicating a greater overall impact of symptoms on the patient's QoL. The Symptom Burden Index (SBI) was calculated as the average of the six symptom items. It also ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden.

    Scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained.

    Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months

  19. Least Squares Mean Scores on the EQ-5D-5L Index

    The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of these dimensions, the participant self-assigned a score: from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The 5 digit health states obtained for each dimension was converted into a single mean index value based on the EQ-5D crosswalk value set for the UK using the time trade-off method. This index ranges from -0.594 (worst health) to 1.0 (best health).

    The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained.

    Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months

  20. Least Squares Mean Scores on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Score (VAS)

    The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of the 5 following dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Along with the five dimensions of health, the EQ-5D-5L includes a VAS where respondents rate their overall health status on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible health state and 100 represents the best possible health state. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

    The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained.

    Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months

  21. Cmax of LDK378

    The observed maximum plasma concentration following administration

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days

  22. Tmax of LDK378

    The time to reach peak or maximum concentration (Tmax) was assessed. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days

  23. Tlast of LDK378

    The time to last quantifiable concentration. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days

  24. AUC0-24 of LDK378

    The area under the plasma concentration-time curve calculated from time zero to 24 hours

    Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Apr 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 Jul 2013
  3. Primary completion24 Jun 2016
  4. Study completion7 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
376 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01828099
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLDK378A2301
Other IDs
2013-000319-26
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
3 Apr 2013
Last updated
16 Jan 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

Publications

  • Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, Wu YL, Paz-Ares L, Wolf J, Geater SL, Orlov S, Cortinovis D, Yu CJ, Hochmair M, Cortot AB, Tsai CM, Moro-Sibilot D, Campelo RG, McCulloch T, Sen P, Dugan M, Pantano S, Branle F, Massacesi C, de Castro G Jr. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):917-929. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

    PubMed 28126333
  • Lin YT, Yu CJ, Yang JC, Shih JY. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Kinase Domain Mutation Following ALK Inhibitor(s) Failure in Advanced ALK Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis and Literature Review. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):e77-e94. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

    PubMed 27130468

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ceritinib, Pemetrexed and Cisplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 167 sites in 29 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 167 sites in Spain, Italy, China, India, Brazil and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Sep 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) (time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 34 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01828099, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in