Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3NCT01828099
LDK378 Versus Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Patients With ALK Rearranged Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Ceritinib, Pemetrexed and Cisplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 167 sites in 29 countries.
Trial summary
To compare the efficacy and safety of ceritinib with standard first-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin) in patients with stage IIIB (not candidates for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a confirmed anaplastic lymphoma… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Ceritinib, Pemetrexed and Cisplatin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 376 participants
- Where
- 167 sitesin 29 countries
- Study dates
- 9 Jul 2013to 7 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient had a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of non-squamous Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive as assessed by the Ventana Immunohistochemistry (IHC) test. The test was performed at Novartis designated central laboratories.
- The patient had a newly diagnosed stage IIIB (who was not a candidate for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV NSCLC or relapsed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not previously treated with any systemic anti-cancer therapy (e.g. cytotoxic drugs, monoclonal antibody therapy, crizotinib or other ALK inhibitors, or other targeted therapies, either experimental or not), with the exception of neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy.
- The patient had at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1.
Who cannot join
- The patient had known hypersensitivity to any of the excipients of LDK378 (microcrystalline cellulose, mannitol, crospovidone, colloidal silicon dioxide, and magnesium stearate).
- The patient had a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction to platinum-containing drugs, pemetrexed, or any known excipients of these drugs.
- The patient had symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases and was neurologically unstable or had required increasing doses of steroids within the 2 weeks prior to screening to manage CNS symptoms.
Trial locations and contacts
167 sites in 29 countries.
167 sites in 29 countries
Spain24 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
A Coruña, Galicia, 15006
Novartis Investigative Site
Alicante, Valencia, 03010
Novartis Investigative Site
Badajoz, Extremadura, 06080
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08003
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, 08041
Novartis Investigative Site
Granada, Andalusia, 18014
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Novartis Investigative Site
Lleida, Catalonia, 25198
Novartis Investigative Site
Lugo, Galicia, 27003
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28033
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28040
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28041
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28050
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, 29010
Novartis Investigative Site
Mataró, Catalonia, 08301
Novartis Investigative Site
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33011
Novartis Investigative Site
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, 07120
Novartis Investigative Site
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Novartis Investigative Site
Reus, Catalonia, 43201
Novartis Investigative Site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, 38320
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41013
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41014
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46014
Italy18 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ancona, AN, 60126
Novartis Investigative Site
Aviano, PN, 33081
Novartis Investigative Site
Bergamo, BG, 24125
Novartis Investigative Site
Genova, GE, 16132
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20132
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20141
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20162
Novartis Investigative Site
Monza, MB, 20900
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80131
Novartis Investigative Site
Orbassano, TO, 10043
Novartis Investigative Site
Parma, PR, 43100
Novartis Investigative Site
Perugia, PG, 06129
Novartis Investigative Site
Pisa, PI, 56124
Novartis Investigative Site
Reggio Emilia, RE, 42123
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00152
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00189
Novartis Investigative Site
Rozzano, MI, 20089
Novartis Investigative Site
Udine, UD, 33100
China14 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100730
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 101149
Novartis Investigative Site
Changchun, Jilin, 130012
Novartis Investigative Site
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
Novartis Investigative Site
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, 400037
Novartis Investigative Site
Chongqing, 400042
Novartis Investigative Site
Guang Dong Province, 510120
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433
Novartis Investigative Site
Tianjin, 300052
Novartis Investigative Site
Xi’an, Shanxi, 710038
India11 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 095
Novartis Investigative Site
Delhi, 110 085
Novartis Investigative Site
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 034
Novartis Investigative Site
Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302017
Novartis Investigative Site
Kochi, Kerala, 682 041
Novartis Investigative Site
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700160
Novartis Investigative Site
Madurai, Tamil Nadu, 625107
Novartis Investigative Site
Mumbai, 400 012
Novartis Investigative Site
Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 004
Novartis Investigative Site
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110076
Novartis Investigative Site
Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632 004
Brazil10 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784 400
Novartis Investigative Site
Fortaleza, Ceará, 60336-045
Novartis Investigative Site
Itajaí, Santa Catarina, 88301-229
Novartis Investigative Site
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59075 740
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
Novartis Investigative Site
Recife, Pernambuco, 50070-550
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janiero, Rio de Janeiro, 20231-050
Novartis Investigative Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40170-110
Novartis Investigative Site
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, 15090 000
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000
France10 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Caen, 14033
Novartis Investigative Site
Grenoble, 38043
Novartis Investigative Site
Lille, 59037
Novartis Investigative Site
Limoges, Haute Vienne, 87000
Novartis Investigative Site
Paris, 75475
Novartis Investigative Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Novartis Investigative Site
Rennes, 35043
Novartis Investigative Site
Strasbourg, 67091
Novartis Investigative Site
Toulon, Val De Marne, 83800
Novartis Investigative Site
Villejuif, 94800
Germany10 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, 50937
Novartis Investigative Site
Coswig, 01640
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45147
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, 37075
Novartis Investigative Site
Großhansdorf, 22947
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, 69120
Novartis Investigative Site
Oldenburg, 26121
Novartis Investigative Site
Tübingen, 72076
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89081
Novartis Investigative Site
Wiesbaden, D-65199
Japan7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Akashi, Hyōgo, 673-8558
Novartis Investigative Site
Hirakata, Osaka, 573-1191
Novartis Investigative Site
Kashiwa, Chiba, 277 8577
Novartis Investigative Site
Koto Ku, Tokyo, 135 8550
Novartis Investigative Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464 8681
Novartis Investigative Site
Niigata, 951 8520
Novartis Investigative Site
Osaka, Osaka, 541-8567
Netherlands7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Amersfroort, 3818 ES
Novartis Investigative Site
Enschede, 7512 KZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Groningen, 9728 NZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA
Novartis Investigative Site
Maastricht, 6229 HX
Novartis Investigative Site
Zoetermeer, NL-2722 EP
Taiwan6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 83301
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, 40447
Novartis Investigative Site
Taichung, 407219
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 10002
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 11217
Novartis Investigative Site
Taoyuan, 33305
United Kingdom6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Birmingham, B9 5SS
Novartis Investigative Site
Exeter, Devon, EX2 5DW
Novartis Investigative Site
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF
Novartis Investigative Site
London, NW1 2BU
Novartis Investigative Site
Manchester, M20 2BX
Novartis Investigative Site
Nottingham, NG5 1PB
South Korea5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bundang Gu, Gyeonggi-do, 13620
Novartis Investigative Site
Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 10408
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03722
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 05505
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 06351
Hungary4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1121
Novartis Investigative Site
Nyíregyháza, 4400
Novartis Investigative Site
Veszprém, 8200
Novartis Investigative Site
Zalaegerszeg, Zala County, 8900
Sweden4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Linköping, SE 581 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Lund, 221 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Stockholm, 171 76
Novartis Investigative Site
Uppsala, 751 85
Thailand4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10330
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10400
Novartis Investigative Site
Khon Kaen, THA, 40002
Novartis Investigative Site
Songkhla, Hat Yai, 90110
Argentina3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1050AAK
Novartis Investigative Site
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1180AAX
Novartis Investigative Site
La Rioja, 5300
Australia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Auckland, 92024
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084
Novartis Investigative Site
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Austria2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Salzburg, 5020
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, 1210
Colombia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bogota, Cundinamarca, 110111
Novartis Investigative Site
Montería, 230004
Denmark2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Herlev, DK-2730
Novartis Investigative Site
Odense C, DK 5000
Greece2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, GR, 115 27
Novartis Investigative Site
Heraklion Crete, 71110
Lebanon2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
El Achrafiyé, 166830
Novartis Investigative Site
Saida, 652
Poland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Szczecin, 70-891
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02 781
Russia2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Moscow, 115478
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197022
Singapore2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Singapore, 119228
Novartis Investigative Site
Singapore, 168583
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, 06230
Novartis Investigative Site
Istanbul, 35100
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized Study of Oral LDK378 Versus Standard Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive), Stage IIIB or IV, Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
To compare the efficacy and safety of ceritinib with standard first-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin) in patients with stage IIIB (not candidates for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a confirmed anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, using the Ventana immunohistochemistry (IHC) test.
Read the detailed description
This was an open-label, randomized, global, Phase III study that compared the efficacy and safety of ceritinib to standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced (NSCLC) harboring ALK rearrangement. The confirmation of ALK rearrangement was done using the ICH test by a Novartis designated central laboratory. Prior to the study, patients had not received any previous systemic, anti-cancer therapy, including ALK inhibitors, for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC.
The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either receive ceritinib (750 mg once daily, fasted) or chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a platinum-based doublet with pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed maintenance in patients without progressive disease after 4 cycles.
Treatment was continued until the blinded independent review committee (BIRC) confirmed disease progression based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), occurrence of unacceptable toxicity, or meeting other discontinuation criteria. Patients in either arm were permitted to continue the assigned study treatment beyond BIRC-confirmed disease progression in case of continued clinical benefit, as determined by the Investigator.
All patients who discontinued treatment during the treatment phase for reasons other than death, lost to follow-up, pregnancy or disease progression entered the post-treatment follow-up period until disease progression, withdrawal of consent or death.
In the chemotherapy arm, patients were allowed to switch and receive ceritinib after BIRC-confirmed disease progression (extension-treatment period).
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Ceritinib, Pemetrexed, Cisplatin, Carboplatin
- Keywords
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC, ALK, LDK378, Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), treatment of lung cancer after first metastasis, lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, Non small cell lung carcinoma, Non small cell lung cancer, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Lung Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma of Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CeritinibDrug
Also called LDK378
Ceritinib was administered orally once-daily fasted at a dose of 750 mg capsules on a continuous dosing schedule.
PemetrexedDrug
Pemetrexed was administered at a dose of 500 mg/m^2 as an intravenous (iv) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
CisplatinDrug
Cisplatin was administered by iv infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m^2 every 21 days for up to 4 cycles.
CarboplatinDrug
Carboplatin was administered as iv infusion (AUC 5-6) every 21 days up to 4 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ceritinib | Experimental | Ceritinib administered continuously through oral dosing at a dosage of 750 mg once daily in fasted state. Receives: Drug: Ceritinib |
| Chemotherapy | Active comparator | Pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin (based on Investigator's choice) for 4 cycles (Induction) followed by pemetrexed as single agent (Maintenance) Receives: Drug: Pemetrexed; Drug: Cisplatin; Drug: Carboplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression (as assessed by BIRC per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. A patient who had not progressed or died at the date of the analysis cut-off or had received another anticancer therapy had their PFS censored at the time of the last adequate tumor evaluation before the earlier of the cut-off date or the anticancer therapy date. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 34 months
Secondary outcomes (24)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS defined as time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause.
If the patient was alive at the date of the analysis cut-off or lost to follow-up, then OS was censored at the last contact date prior to data cut-off date. The distribution of OS was estimated using the KM method.
Measured: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by BIRC Assessment
ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response defined as complete response (CR) or or partial response (PR) measured by BIRC per RECIST 1.1. CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: Up to approximately 34 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with a best overall response defined as complete response (CR) or or partial response (PR) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1.
CR=Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR= At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: Up to approximately 120 months
Duration of Response (DOR) by BIRC Assessment
DOR is defined as the time from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression (measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
If a patient had not had an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Patients who had never achieved a best overall response of CR or PR were excluded from the analysis. The distribution function of DOR was estimated using the KM method.
Measured: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months
Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator Assessment
DOR is defined as the time from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression (measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
If a patient had not had an event, DOR was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. Patients who had never achieved a best overall response of CR or PR were excluded from the analysis. The distribution function of DOR was estimated using the KM method.
Measured: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 120 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR) by BIRC Assessment
DCR is defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.
Measured: Up to approximately 34 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Investigator Assessment
DCR is defined as the percentage of patients with best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.
Measured: Up to approximately 120 months
Time to Response (TTR) by BIRC Assessment
TTR is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented response (CR or PR) measured by BIRC assessment per RECIST 1.1.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Patients who had not achieved a confirmed CR or PR were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment date when they had not had a PFS event or at maximum follow-up when they had had a PFS event.
Measured: From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 34 months
Time to Response (TTR) by Investigator Assessment
TTR is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented response (CR or PR) measured by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Patients who had not achieved a confirmed CR or PR were censored at the last adequate tumor assessment date when they had not had a PFS event or at maximum follow-up when they had had a PFS event
Measured: From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 120 months
PFS by Investigator Assessment
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression (as assessed by investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause.
A patient who had not progressed or died at the date of the analysis cut-off or had received another anticancer therapy had their PFS censored at the time of the last adequate tumor evaluation before the earlier of the cut-off date or the anticancer therapy date. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the KM method.
Measured: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months
Overall Intracranial Response Rate (OIRR)
OIRR is defined as the ORR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated as the percentage of patients with a best overall confirmed response of CR or PR in the brain per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuroradiologist.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: Up to approximately 34 months
Intracranial Disease Control Rate (IDCR)
IDCR is defined as the DCR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated as the percentage of patients with a best overall response of CR or PR or SD (or non-CR/nonPD) in the brain per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuro-radiologist.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease
Measured: Up to approximately 34 months
Duration of Intracranial Response (DOIR)
DOIR is defined as the DOR based on lesions in brain (target, non-target lesions and new lesions, if applicable) and calculated from the time of first documented response of CR or PR to the date of the first documented disease progression in the brain or death due to any cause per modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BIRC neuro-radiologist.
CR: Disappearance of all lesions with lymph nodes measuring < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: From first documented response to first documented disease progression in the brain or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months
Time to Definitive 10 Point Deterioration in the Composite Endpoint of Pain, Cough or Dyspnea in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ)- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 Questionnaire
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 complemented the QLQ-C30 and measured disease symptoms and treatment-related adverse effects. The lung cancer module incorporated one multi-item scale to assess dyspnea and 9 single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All of the domain scores ranged from 0 to 100. A high score indicated a high level of symptoms.
Time to definitive symptom deterioration for the composite endpoint was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest date when the patient's score showed a 10 point or higher increase from baseline in any of the symptoms (pain, cough or dyspnea) as per EORTC QLQ-LC13 (with no later change below this threshold i.e., <10 points was observed or if this increase was observed at the last assessment for the patient) or death due to any cause.
Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Time to Definitive Deterioration in the Composite Endpoint of Pain, Cough or Dyspnea in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
The LCSS patient scale used a 24-hour recall period and contained nine items: six measuring major symptoms for lung cancer (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain), and three summary items related to total symptom distress, normal activity status, and overall quality of life. The LCSS used a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS) to measure the intensity of patient responses, with zero corresponding to the lowest rating (best status) and 100 representing the highest rating (worst status).
Time to definitive deterioration for the composite endpoint was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest date when the patient's score showed a 10 point or higher increase from baseline in any of the LCSS scores related to pain in the chest, cough, or dyspnea (with no later change below this threshold i.e., <10 points was observed or if this increase was observed at the last assessment for the patient) or death due to any cause.
Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EORTC-QLQ C30
The EORTC QLQ-C30 contained 30 items and was of both multi-item scales and single-item measures, including 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties), and a global health status (GHS)/quality of life (QoL) scale. Items were assessed on a 4- or 7-level Likert scale, ranging from 1="very poor" to 7= "excellent" for GHS items and 1= "not at all" to 4= "very much" for all other items. The scores of the scales were averaged from the scores of the component items, transformed, and analyzed on a 0 - 100 scale. A high score represented a higher response level. The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained
Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EORTC QLQ- LC13
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 was used in conjunction with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and provided information on an additional 13 items specifically related to lung cancer. The lung cancer module incorporated one multi-item scale to assess dyspnea, and 9 single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. Items were scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="very much". For the multi-item scale, the scores were averaged from the scores of the component items, transformed, and then analyzed on a 0 - 100 scale. For the single item scale, raw scores were transformed and analyzed on a 0-100 scale. A high score indicated a high level of symptoms The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained.
Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
The LCSS consisted of 9 individual items; 6 measured lung cancer symptoms (appetite, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, and pain); the remaining 3 items measured general lung cancer symptom distress, interference with daily activities and overall QoL. Each item was scored on a 100-millimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (0 = best outcome).
Total score was calculated as the average of the aggregate score of all 9 items. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher total scores indicating a greater overall impact of symptoms on the patient's QoL. The Symptom Burden Index (SBI) was calculated as the average of the six symptom items. It also ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater symptom burden.
Scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained.
Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EQ-5D-5L Index
The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of these dimensions, the participant self-assigned a score: from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems). The 5 digit health states obtained for each dimension was converted into a single mean index value based on the EQ-5D crosswalk value set for the UK using the time trade-off method. This index ranges from -0.594 (worst health) to 1.0 (best health).
The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained.
Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status. The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system comprises of the 5 following dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Along with the five dimensions of health, the EQ-5D-5L includes a VAS where respondents rate their overall health status on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible health state and 100 represents the best possible health state. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
The scores were analyzed using repeated measurement model for longitudinal data, including terms for visit, treatment, treatment by time interaction, strata and baseline score. Overall mean and standard error were obtained.
Measured: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Cmax of LDK378
The observed maximum plasma concentration following administration
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
Tmax of LDK378
The time to reach peak or maximum concentration (Tmax) was assessed. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
Tlast of LDK378
The time to last quantifiable concentration. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
AUC0-24 of LDK378
The area under the plasma concentration-time curve calculated from time zero to 24 hours
Measured: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study start9 Jul 2013
- Primary completion24 Jun 2016
- Study completion7 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 376 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01828099
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLDK378A2301
- Other IDs
- 2013-000319-26
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, Wu YL, Paz-Ares L, Wolf J, Geater SL, Orlov S, Cortinovis D, Yu CJ, Hochmair M, Cortot AB, Tsai CM, Moro-Sibilot D, Campelo RG, McCulloch T, Sen P, Dugan M, Pantano S, Branle F, Massacesi C, de Castro G Jr. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):917-929. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
PubMed 28126333Lin YT, Yu CJ, Yang JC, Shih JY. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Kinase Domain Mutation Following ALK Inhibitor(s) Failure in Advanced ALK Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis and Literature Review. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):e77-e94. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
PubMed 27130468
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized Study of Oral LDK378 Versus Standard Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Adult Patients With ALK Rearranged (ALK-positive), Stage IIIB or IV, Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01828099
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CLDK378A2301
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, NSCLC, ALK, LDK378, Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), treatment of lung cancer after first metastasis, lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 376 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 21 Sep 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To compare the efficacy and safety of ceritinib with standard first-line chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin) in patients with stage IIIB (not candidates for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a confirmed anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement, using the Ventana immunohistochemistry (IHC) test.
Detailed description
This was an open-label, randomized, global, Phase III study that compared the efficacy and safety of ceritinib to standard first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced (NSCLC) harboring ALK rearrangement. The confirmation of ALK rearrangement was done using the ICH test by a Novartis designated central laboratory. Prior to the study, patients had not received any previous systemic, anti-cancer therapy, including ALK inhibitors, for newly diagnosed advanced non-squamous NSCLC.
The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either receive ceritinib (750 mg once daily, fasted) or chemotherapy. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of a platinum-based doublet with pemetrexed followed by pemetrexed maintenance in patients without progressive disease after 4 cycles.
Treatment was continued until the blinded independent review committee (BIRC) confirmed disease progression based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), occurrence of unacceptable toxicity, or meeting other discontinuation criteria. Patients in either arm were permitted to continue the assigned study treatment beyond BIRC-confirmed disease progression in case of continued clinical benefit, as determined by the Investigator.
All patients who discontinued treatment during the treatment phase for reasons other than death, lost to follow-up, pregnancy or disease progression entered the post-treatment follow-up period until disease progression, withdrawal of consent or death.
In the chemotherapy arm, patients were allowed to switch and receive ceritinib after BIRC-confirmed disease progression (extension-treatment period).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ceritinib | Experimental | Drug: CeritinibCeritinib administered continuously through oral dosing at a dosage of 750 mg once daily in fasted state. |
| Chemotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: Pemetrexed, Drug: Cisplatin, Drug: CarboplatinPemetrexed plus cisplatin or carboplatin (based on Investigator's choice) for 4 cycles (Induction) followed by pemetrexed as single agent (Maintenance) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The patient had a histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of non-squamous Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive as assessed by the Ventana Immunohistochemistry (IHC) test. The test was performed at Novartis designated central laboratories.
- The patient had a newly diagnosed stage IIIB (who was not a candidate for definitive multimodality therapy) or stage IV NSCLC or relapsed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC not previously treated with any systemic anti-cancer therapy (e.g. cytotoxic drugs, monoclonal antibody therapy, crizotinib or other ALK inhibitors, or other targeted therapies, either experimental or not), with the exception of neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapy.
- The patient had at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The patient had known hypersensitivity to any of the excipients of LDK378 (microcrystalline cellulose, mannitol, crospovidone, colloidal silicon dioxide, and magnesium stearate).
- The patient had a history of severe hypersensitivity reaction to platinum-containing drugs, pemetrexed, or any known excipients of these drugs.
- The patient had symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases and was neurologically unstable or had required increasing doses of steroids within the 2 weeks prior to screening to manage CNS symptoms.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CeritinibAlso: LDK378Ceritinib was administered orally once-daily fasted at a dose of 750 mg capsules on a continuous dosing schedule. | Drug | Ceritinib |
| PemetrexedPemetrexed was administered at a dose of 500 mg/m^2 as an intravenous (iv) infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle | Drug | Chemotherapy |
| CisplatinCisplatin was administered by iv infusion at a dose of 75 mg/m^2 every 21 days for up to 4 cycles. | Drug | Chemotherapy |
| CarboplatinCarboplatin was administered as iv infusion (AUC 5-6) every 21 days up to 4 cycles | Drug | Chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 34 months
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression (as assessed by BIRC per RECIST 1.1) or death due to any cause. A patient who had not progressed or died at the date of the analysis cut-off or had received another anticancer therapy had their PFS censored at the time of the last adequate tumor evaluation before the earlier of the cut-off date or the anticancer therapy date. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method.
24 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From date of randomization to date of death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by BIRC Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 34 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 120 months
Duration of Response (DOR) by BIRC Assessment
Time frame: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months
Duration of Response (DOR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: From first documented response to first documented disease progression or death, assessed up to approximately 120 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR) by BIRC Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 34 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to approximately 120 months
Time to Response (TTR) by BIRC Assessment
Time frame: From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 34 months
Time to Response (TTR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: From randomization to date of first documented response, up to approximately 120 months
PFS by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 120 months
Overall Intracranial Response Rate (OIRR)
Time frame: Up to approximately 34 months
Intracranial Disease Control Rate (IDCR)
Time frame: Up to approximately 34 months
Duration of Intracranial Response (DOIR)
Time frame: From first documented response to first documented disease progression in the brain or death, assessed up to approximately 34 months
Time to Definitive 10 Point Deterioration in the Composite Endpoint of Pain, Cough or Dyspnea in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ)- Lung Cancer (LC) 13 Questionnaire
Time frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Time to Definitive Deterioration in the Composite Endpoint of Pain, Cough or Dyspnea in the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Time frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EORTC-QLQ C30
Time frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EORTC QLQ- LC13
Time frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS)
Time frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EQ-5D-5L Index
Time frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Least Squares Mean Scores on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time frame: Screening, treatment phase (Cycles 2, 3 then every 2nd cycle until Month 33; after Month 33, every 9 or 12 weeks, end of treatment); follow-up phase (Every 6 weeks until Month 33; after Month 33 every 9 or 12 weeks) up to approximately 120 months
Cmax of LDK378
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
Tmax of LDK378
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
Tlast of LDK378
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
AUC0-24 of LDK378
Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-dose, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose. Cycle=21 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28126333Soria JC, Tan DSW, Chiari R, Wu YL, Paz-Ares L, Wolf J, Geater SL, Orlov S, Cortinovis D, Yu CJ, Hochmair M, Cortot AB, Tsai CM, Moro-Sibilot D, Campelo RG, McCulloch T, Sen P, Dugan M, Pantano S, Branle F, Massacesi C, de Castro G Jr. First-line ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):917-929. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27130468Lin YT, Yu CJ, Yang JC, Shih JY. Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Kinase Domain Mutation Following ALK Inhibitor(s) Failure in Advanced ALK Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis and Literature Review. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016 Sep;17(5):e77-e94. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
167 sites in 29 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ceritinib, Pemetrexed and Cisplatin in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 167 sites in 29 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 167 sites in Spain, Italy, China, India, Brazil and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Sep 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC) (time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause, up to approximately 34 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01828099, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2025.