Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical VentilationRESTUSNCT01826890
Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in Adults at Risk of Delayed Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
A study testing NAVA Technology in people with Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Many patients admitted to intensive care have heart or lung problems. Patients with these conditions often require longer durations of support from breathing machines. Survival and long-term recovery are improved if the investigators can remove the breathing support quickly. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
- What is being tested?
- NAVA Technology
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- May 2013to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ICU admissions who are likely to remain intubated and ventilated for greater than 48 hours with a diagnosis of one or a combination of:
- COPD
- Left and/or right ventricular heart failure
- Mild, moderate or severe (Berlin criteria) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
- All diagnoses must be documented in the medical notes. There must be evidence of a specialist consultant diagnosis, or a non-specialist doctor diagnosis with either objective test results (spirometry, CT, lung biopsy, cardiac echo) and/or prescribed treatment.
Who cannot join
- Less than 18 years old or pregnant
- Inability to conduct protocol (e.g. research staff or NAVA technology unavailable)
- No personal or nominated consultee available or assent declined
- Greater than 96 hours from intubation
- Greater than 24 hours in the weaning phase
- Patient likely to die/have treatment withdrawal within 48 hours
Show all 15Show fewer
- Contraindication to passing NG tube
- Patients with primary neurological cause of ventilator dependence
- High spinal injury above C6; severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score < 8)
- Suspected or proven hypoxic brain injury
- Physician refusal / physician wishes to use NAVA
- Hepatic encephalopathy greater than grade one
- Domiciliary ventilation (except CPAP/BIPAP used for sleep disordered breathing)
- Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial in the last 30 days
- Non-English speakers where inadequate translation available to allow informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE5 9RS
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Feasibility Study Examining Neurally-adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) in Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Ventilatory Failure During Recovery From Critical Illness.
Many patients admitted to intensive care have heart or lung problems. Patients with these conditions often require longer durations of support from breathing machines. Survival and long-term recovery are improved if the investigators can remove the breathing support quickly. In this study, the investigators will focus on patients with severe lung or heart disease to examine whether a particular type of breathing machine (NAVA ventilator) will allow us to remove breathing support more quickly and with less need for sedative medications, when compared to current practice.
Read the detailed description
In this study, we will compare the use of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist technology (the NAVA ventilation mode and the monitoring capabilities) against standard care in patients who are at risk of prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation.
Study aim
To inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) by undertaking feasibility testing, evaluation of the proposed NAVA intervention and evaluation of the proposed outcomes.
Feasibility outcomes
- Number of eligible patients
- Assessment of screening and recruitment methods
- The willingness of clinicians to allow recruitment
- The willingness of participants to be randomised
- Assessment of the randomisation process
- Staff attitudes and training needs
- Protocol compliance (barriers to the use of NAVA ventilation)
Intended primary outcomes of the main study
*Ventilator-free days (day 28)
There are a number of secondary outcomes that include:
- Total sedation / hypnotic / analgesic dose
- Ventilator free days (day 90)
- Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV)
- Duration of MV (including Non-invasive ventilation (NIV))
- Duration of post extubation NIV
- Incidence of delirium (CAM-ICU)
- Change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 3, 7, 14 and 28
- ICU and hospital length of stay
- Day 28, ICU discharge, hospital discharge and 90 day post randomisation survival
- Agitation / comfort (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (RASS) plus Visual *Analogue Scale where possible)
- Frequency of sedation / analgesic / hypnotic bolus doses
- Ventilator associated pneumonia (developed 48 hours after study entry)
- Unplanned device removal (eg. ET tubes, catheters etc.)
- Patient-ventilator asynchrony
- Duration in each ventilation mode
- Change in the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi)
- Health Resource Group costs
- Quality of life at 90 days - SF36 questionnaire
STUDY DESIGN
A pilot feasibility, single centre, open label randomised controlled study. In summary, group one will receive standard care and group two will receive standard care with the addition of NAVA technology.
POPULATION
Intubated, critically ill or high-risk elective peri-operative adult patients who are at greatest risk of difficult or prolonged weaning: those with pre-existing cardiopulmonary dysfunction.
Inclusions
ICU admissions who are likely to remain intubated and ventilated for greater than 48 hours with a diagnosis of one or a combination of:
- COPD
- Left and/or right ventricular heart failure
- Mild, moderate or severe (Berlin criteria) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
All diagnoses must be documented in the medical notes. There must be evidence of a specialist consultant diagnosis, or a non-specialist doctor diagnosis with either objective test results (spirometry, CT, lung biopsy, cardiac echo) and/or prescribed treatment.
Exclusions
- Less than 18 years old or pregnant.
- Inability to conduct protocol (e.g. research staff or NAVA technology unavailable).
- No personal or nominated consultee available or assent declined.
- Greater than 96 hours from intubation.
- Greater than 24 hours in the weaning phase.
- Patient likely to die/have treatment withdrawal within 48 hours.
- Contraindication to passing NG tube.
- Patients with primary neurological cause of ventilator dependence.
- High spinal injury above C6; severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score < 8).
- Suspected or proven hypoxic brain injury.
- Physician refusal / physician wishes to use NAVA.
- Hepatic encephalopathy greater than grade one.
- Domiciliary ventilation (except Continuous Positive Pressure (CPAP)or Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) used for sleep disordered breathing).
- Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial in the last 30 days.
- Non-English speakers where inadequate translation available to allow informed consent.
STUDY SITE
Three adult ICUs at KCH NHS Foundation Trust, London.
SAMPLE SIZE
76 patients will be recruited to estimate an anticipated compliance of 75% (95% confidence interval of +/- 10%).
FOLLOW-UP SF-36 will occur at 90 days post ICU discharge.
- Conditions
- Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
- Being tested
- NAVA Technology
- Keywords
- Ventilator Weaning, Mechanical Ventilation, Critical Care, Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Diaphragm
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NAVA TechnologyOther
Also called Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, NAVA
Use of NAVA technology: Diaphragmatic monitoring and NAVA ventilation mode
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NAVA technology | Experimental | Following randomisation, a NAVA catheter will be introduced. The Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (EAdi) will be viewed primarily to ensure a minimum level of diaphragm activation during the weaning phase. NAVA mode suitability/safety assessments will be conducted in all patients prior to the first initiation of the NAVA mode. The NAVA preview function on the Maquet Servo-i ventilators will be used to transfer from the previous mode to the NAVA mode, and the assessment will last for a maximum of 30 minutes. We are recommending the use of the NAVA ventilation mode during the weaning period. Following the commencement of weaning, sedation holds and spontaneous breathing trials will be conducted according to local protocols. Receives: Other: NAVA Technology |
| Standard Care | No intervention | A NAVA catheter will be inserted following randomisation. The NAVA capabilities of the ventilator will be disabled. Patients will be ventilated according to local weaning protocol as per current standard care with either Pressure Support, Synchronised Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation, Volume Controlled Ventilation, Pressure Controlled Ventilation or Pressure Regulated Volume Controlled Ventilation. Following the commencement of weaning, sedation holds and spontaneous breathing trials will be conducted according to local protocols. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Protocol compliance
Total time in the NAVA ventilation mode as a proportion of total time in an assisted spontaneous weaning ventilation mode within 28 days from randomisation.
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2013
- Primary completionMar 2018
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical VentilationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by King's College Hospital NHS TrustThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King's College Hospital NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, JP Moulton Charitable Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Daniel J Hadfield, Principal investigator, King's College Hospital NHS TrustPhillip A Hopkins, Study chair, King's College Hopspital NHS Foundation TrustNicholas Hart, Study director, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustGerrard F Rafferty, Study director, King's College Hospital NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01826890
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13/LO/0012
- Acronym
- RESTUS
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2013
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hadfield DJ, Rose L, Reid F, Cornelius V, Hart N, Finney C, Penhaligon B, Molai J, Harris C, Saha S, Noble H, Clarey E, Thompson L, Smith J, Johnson L, Hopkins PA, Rafferty GF. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation: a randomized controlled feasibility trial performed in patients at risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2020 May 14;24(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02923-5.
PubMed 32408883
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Feasibility Study Examining Neurally-adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) in Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Ventilatory Failure During Recovery From Critical Illness.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01826890
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RESTUS / 13/LO/0012
- Conditions
- Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
- Keywords
- Ventilator Weaning, Mechanical Ventilation, Critical Care, Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, Diaphragm
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King's College Hospital NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, JP Moulton Charitable Foundation
- Study start
- May 2013
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many patients admitted to intensive care have heart or lung problems. Patients with these conditions often require longer durations of support from breathing machines. Survival and long-term recovery are improved if the investigators can remove the breathing support quickly. In this study, the investigators will focus on patients with severe lung or heart disease to examine whether a particular type of breathing machine (NAVA ventilator) will allow us to remove breathing support more quickly and with less need for sedative medications, when compared to current practice.
Detailed description
In this study, we will compare the use of Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist technology (the NAVA ventilation mode and the monitoring capabilities) against standard care in patients who are at risk of prolonged periods of mechanical ventilation.
Study aim
To inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT) by undertaking feasibility testing, evaluation of the proposed NAVA intervention and evaluation of the proposed outcomes.
Feasibility outcomes
- Number of eligible patients
- Assessment of screening and recruitment methods
- The willingness of clinicians to allow recruitment
- The willingness of participants to be randomised
- Assessment of the randomisation process
- Staff attitudes and training needs
- Protocol compliance (barriers to the use of NAVA ventilation)
Intended primary outcomes of the main study
*Ventilator-free days (day 28)
There are a number of secondary outcomes that include:
- Total sedation / hypnotic / analgesic dose
- Ventilator free days (day 90)
- Duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV)
- Duration of MV (including Non-invasive ventilation (NIV))
- Duration of post extubation NIV
- Incidence of delirium (CAM-ICU)
- Change in sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score from baseline to day 3, 7, 14 and 28
- ICU and hospital length of stay
- Day 28, ICU discharge, hospital discharge and 90 day post randomisation survival
- Agitation / comfort (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (RASS) plus Visual *Analogue Scale where possible)
- Frequency of sedation / analgesic / hypnotic bolus doses
- Ventilator associated pneumonia (developed 48 hours after study entry)
- Unplanned device removal (eg. ET tubes, catheters etc.)
- Patient-ventilator asynchrony
- Duration in each ventilation mode
- Change in the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi)
- Health Resource Group costs
- Quality of life at 90 days - SF36 questionnaire
STUDY DESIGN
A pilot feasibility, single centre, open label randomised controlled study. In summary, group one will receive standard care and group two will receive standard care with the addition of NAVA technology.
POPULATION
Intubated, critically ill or high-risk elective peri-operative adult patients who are at greatest risk of difficult or prolonged weaning: those with pre-existing cardiopulmonary dysfunction.
Inclusions
ICU admissions who are likely to remain intubated and ventilated for greater than 48 hours with a diagnosis of one or a combination of:
- COPD
- Left and/or right ventricular heart failure
- Mild, moderate or severe (Berlin criteria) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
All diagnoses must be documented in the medical notes. There must be evidence of a specialist consultant diagnosis, or a non-specialist doctor diagnosis with either objective test results (spirometry, CT, lung biopsy, cardiac echo) and/or prescribed treatment.
Exclusions
- Less than 18 years old or pregnant.
- Inability to conduct protocol (e.g. research staff or NAVA technology unavailable).
- No personal or nominated consultee available or assent declined.
- Greater than 96 hours from intubation.
- Greater than 24 hours in the weaning phase.
- Patient likely to die/have treatment withdrawal within 48 hours.
- Contraindication to passing NG tube.
- Patients with primary neurological cause of ventilator dependence.
- High spinal injury above C6; severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Score < 8).
- Suspected or proven hypoxic brain injury.
- Physician refusal / physician wishes to use NAVA.
- Hepatic encephalopathy greater than grade one.
- Domiciliary ventilation (except Continuous Positive Pressure (CPAP)or Bi-level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) used for sleep disordered breathing).
- Enrollment in another interventional clinical trial in the last 30 days.
- Non-English speakers where inadequate translation available to allow informed consent.
STUDY SITE
Three adult ICUs at KCH NHS Foundation Trust, London.
SAMPLE SIZE
76 patients will be recruited to estimate an anticipated compliance of 75% (95% confidence interval of +/- 10%).
FOLLOW-UP SF-36 will occur at 90 days post ICU discharge.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NAVA technology | Experimental | Other: NAVA TechnologyFollowing randomisation, a NAVA catheter will be introduced. The Electrical Activity of the Diaphragm (EAdi) will be viewed primarily to ensure a minimum level of diaphragm activation during the weaning phase. NAVA mode suitability/safety assessments will be conducted in all patients prior to the first initiation of the NAVA mode. The NAVA preview function on the Maquet Servo-i ventilators will be used to transfer from the previous mode to the NAVA mode, and the assessment will last for a maximum of 30 minutes. We are recommending the use of the NAVA ventilation mode during the weaning period. Following the commencement of weaning, sedation holds and spontaneous breathing trials will be conducted according to local protocols. |
| Standard Care | No intervention | –A NAVA catheter will be inserted following randomisation. The NAVA capabilities of the ventilator will be disabled. Patients will be ventilated according to local weaning protocol as per current standard care with either Pressure Support, Synchronised Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation, Volume Controlled Ventilation, Pressure Controlled Ventilation or Pressure Regulated Volume Controlled Ventilation. Following the commencement of weaning, sedation holds and spontaneous breathing trials will be conducted according to local protocols. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ICU admissions who are likely to remain intubated and ventilated for greater than 48 hours with a diagnosis of one or a combination of:
- COPD
- Left and/or right ventricular heart failure
- Mild, moderate or severe (Berlin criteria) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
- All diagnoses must be documented in the medical notes. There must be evidence of a specialist consultant diagnosis, or a non-specialist doctor diagnosis with either objective test results (spirometry, CT, lung biopsy, cardiac echo) and/or prescribed treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Less than 18 years old or pregnant
- Inability to conduct protocol (e.g. research staff or NAVA technology unavailable)
- No personal or nominated consultee available or assent declined
- Greater than 96 hours from intubation
- Greater than 24 hours in the weaning phase
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NAVA TechnologyAlso: Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist, NAVAUse of NAVA technology: Diaphragmatic monitoring and NAVA ventilation mode | Other | NAVA technology |
Primary outcome
Protocol compliance
Time frame: 28 days
Total time in the NAVA ventilation mode as a proportion of total time in an assisted spontaneous weaning ventilation mode within 28 days from randomisation.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32408883Hadfield DJ, Rose L, Reid F, Cornelius V, Hart N, Finney C, Penhaligon B, Molai J, Harris C, Saha S, Noble H, Clarey E, Thompson L, Smith J, Johnson L, Hopkins PA, Rafferty GF. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus pressure support ventilation: a randomized controlled feasibility trial performed in patients at risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care. 2020 May 14;24(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02923-5.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel J Hadfield principal investigator
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
Phillip A Hopkins study chair
King's College Hopspital NHS Foundation Trust
Nicholas Hart study director
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing NAVA Technology in people with Adults With Cardiopulmonary Disease at Risk of Prolonged Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Protocol compliance (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01826890, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2019.