Balanced Chromosomal TranslocationEarly Phase 1NCT01826708
Breakpoint Analysis of de Novo Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Translocations
A Early Phase 1 study testing Identification of breakpoints in people with Balanced Chromosomal Translocation, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
For every child with developmental delay, the investigators do a constitutional karyotype. This karyotype can reveal an apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (no visible loss or gain of genetic material), such as a translocation between two or more chromosomes of accidental occurrence (not transmitted by… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Balanced Chromosomal Translocation
- What is being tested?
- Identification of breakpoints
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to 8 Jan 2015
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patient with syndromic psychomotor delay
- patient with a apparently balanced de novo chromosomal translocation
- patient with health insurance
- informed consent signed by patient or by parents or by the legal representative for children
Who cannot join
- patient with an inherited translocation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Laboratory of Chromosomal Genetics - Universitary Hospital
Montpellier, 34295
About this study
Official title: Development of a Technique to Identify New Genes by Studying and Cloning the Breakpoints of de Novo Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Translocations in Patients Presenting With Syndromic Psychomotor Retardation
For every child with developmental delay, the investigators do a constitutional karyotype. This karyotype can reveal an apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (no visible loss or gain of genetic material), such as a translocation between two or more chromosomes of accidental occurrence (not transmitted by parents). However, an apparently balanced translocation does not explain the phenotype of the child. Among the hypotheses that could explain the child's symptoms, there is the possibility of another chromosomal abnormality at the translocation breakpoints, another defect elsewhere on the chromosomes or gene disruption at or near the breakpoints. Because the resolution of a constitutional karyotype is limited, these microanomalies can go undiagnosed. The goal of this study is to look for a microanomaly on a chromosome using a technology of higher resolution than that of the conventional karyotype. The proposed study uses DNA microarray technology on DNA extracted from blood lymphocytes to perform high-resolution analysis of all chromosomes to search for an unbalanced microrearrangement (such as loss or gain of chromosomal material). If no microrearrangement is found, the investigators will pursue by looking for a gene disruption defect at or near the breakpoints involved in the translocation. This will be done by first isolating the chromosomes involved in the translocation by flow cytometry and then hybridizing each of the isolated chromosomes on a new microarray. The purpose of this study is to find a possible cause to explain the phenotype (microrearrangement or gene disruption).
Read the detailed description
Psychomotor delay is observed in approximately 3% of the general population and has various causes: environmental, genetic (gene or chromosome) or unknown. Chromosomal abnormalities have been identified in 15% of syndromic psychomotor delay (ie. associated with another symptom). Balanced chromosomal translocations are observed in one out of every 1000 individuals and only 6% of patients with de novo apparently balanced translocations have an abnormal phenotype (Warburton, 1991). Review of the literature, concerning the microarray analysis of de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients with psychomotor delay, reveals:* in 40% of cases: an abnormality not identified on the karyotype, either at the translocation breakpoints or at a different location on the genome,* in 60% of cases: no abnormalities are found with a resolution of up to 25kb (Schluth-Bolard et al., 2009). The technique generally used to clone a breakpoint and identify a disrupted gene is a "walk" on the chromosome. This technique uses fluorescent probes, such as BACs or PACs, located on the derivative chromosomes on both sides of the breakpoints. This technique is labor-intensive, time-consuming and expensive because one must probe along the derivative chromosomes, closer and closer to the breakpoint, in order to find the probe overlapping the breakpoint. The investigators propose an original, innovative and quick technique to map chromosome translocation breakpoints in patients with psychomotor delay and no abnormalities on microarray analysis. The main aim is to develop a technique to identify new genes by cloning and mapping chromosome translocation breakpoints. These genes would then be candidate to explain the phenotype of the patient.The study covers a 24 month period and includes 10 patients. The feasibility of the technique, as well as its application to routine laboratory diagnosis, will be evaluated. The study was approved by our local Bioethics Committee and respects french law of bioethics.Methodology:Patients well be selected during staff meetings including clinicians and biologists. An initial microarray analysis well be performed to identify a gain or loss of genetic material. Samples for which no gain or loss is identified well then undergo flow cytometry to isolate the derivative chromosomes. Each derivative chromosome well then be hybridised to a new microarray, thus revealing the breakpoint. The breakpoints will be confirmed by FISH technique and molecular biology techniques well be applied to clone and sequence the breakpoints. Databases well be used to check for genes located in or around the breakpoints. Required information: Administrative data (3 first letters of the last name and 2 first letters of the first name, date of birth, identification of parents, informed consent). Clinical and biological data (phenotype, karyotype, other genetic studies). Expected results: Development of rapid and less expensive technique to clone translocation breakpoints, Identification of genes potentially involved in mental delay and anomalies of embryo development, Evaluation of the distribution of various causes of syndromic mental delay (unbalanced translocation on microarray, additional rearrangement on microarray, gene disruption, or unidentified cause).
- Conditions
- Balanced Chromosomal Translocation
- Being tested
- Identification of breakpoints
- Keywords
- Chromosomal translocations, psychomotor delay
- Medical subject headings
- Translocation, Genetic, Learning Disabilities
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Identification of breakpointsBiological
Identification of breakpoints in Molecular Biology : demonstration of a chimeric sequence corresponding to a junction region between the two chromosomes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Psychomotor retardation syndromic | No intervention | Psychomotor retardation syndromic by Identification of breakpoints Receives: Biological: Identification of breakpoints |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation of the proportion of cases for which a cause explaining the phenotype is found for patients with a apparently balance de novo translocation
Evaluation of the proportion of cases for which a cause explaining the phenotype is found for patients with a apparently balance de novo translocation
Measured: 6 months and 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completion8 Jan 2015
- Study completion8 Jan 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Balanced Chromosomal TranslocationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, MontpellierThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jacques MD Puechberty, PHD, Principal investigator, Laboratory of Chromosomal Genetics - Universitary Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01826708
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 8688
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2012
- Last updated
- 12 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Gribble SM, Prigmore E, Burford DC, Porter KM, Ng BL, Douglas EJ, Fiegler H, Carr P, Kalaitzopoulos D, Clegg S, Sandstrom R, Temple IK, Youings SA, Thomas NS, Dennis NR, Jacobs PA, Crolla JA, Carter NP. The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes. J Med Genet. 2005 Jan;42(1):8-16. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024141.
PubMed 15635069Yauy K, Schneider A, Ng BL, Gaillard JB, Sati S, Coubes C, Wells C, Tournaire M, Guignard T, Bouret P, Genevieve D, Puechberty J, Pellestor F, Gatinois V. Disruption of chromatin organisation causes MEF2C gene overexpression in intellectual disability: a case report. BMC Med Genomics. 2019 Aug 2;12(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0558-8.
PubMed 31375103
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development of a Technique to Identify New Genes by Studying and Cloning the Breakpoints of de Novo Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Translocations in Patients Presenting With Syndromic Psychomotor Retardation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01826708
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 8688
- Conditions
- Balanced Chromosomal Translocation
- Keywords
- Chromosomal translocations, psychomotor delay
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, MontpellierUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- 8 Jan 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 Jan 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
For every child with developmental delay, the investigators do a constitutional karyotype. This karyotype can reveal an apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (no visible loss or gain of genetic material), such as a translocation between two or more chromosomes of accidental occurrence (not transmitted by parents). However, an apparently balanced translocation does not explain the phenotype of the child. Among the hypotheses that could explain the child's symptoms, there is the possibility of another chromosomal abnormality at the translocation breakpoints, another defect elsewhere on the chromosomes or gene disruption at or near the breakpoints. Because the resolution of a constitutional karyotype is limited, these microanomalies can go undiagnosed. The goal of this study is to look for a microanomaly on a chromosome using a technology of higher resolution than that of the conventional karyotype. The proposed study uses DNA microarray technology on DNA extracted from blood lymphocytes to perform high-resolution analysis of all chromosomes to search for an unbalanced microrearrangement (such as loss or gain of chromosomal material). If no microrearrangement is found, the investigators will pursue by looking for a gene disruption defect at or near the breakpoints involved in the translocation. This will be done by first isolating the chromosomes involved in the translocation by flow cytometry and then hybridizing each of the isolated chromosomes on a new microarray. The purpose of this study is to find a possible cause to explain the phenotype (microrearrangement or gene disruption).
Detailed description
Psychomotor delay is observed in approximately 3% of the general population and has various causes: environmental, genetic (gene or chromosome) or unknown. Chromosomal abnormalities have been identified in 15% of syndromic psychomotor delay (ie. associated with another symptom). Balanced chromosomal translocations are observed in one out of every 1000 individuals and only 6% of patients with de novo apparently balanced translocations have an abnormal phenotype (Warburton, 1991). Review of the literature, concerning the microarray analysis of de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients with psychomotor delay, reveals:* in 40% of cases: an abnormality not identified on the karyotype, either at the translocation breakpoints or at a different location on the genome,* in 60% of cases: no abnormalities are found with a resolution of up to 25kb (Schluth-Bolard et al., 2009). The technique generally used to clone a breakpoint and identify a disrupted gene is a "walk" on the chromosome. This technique uses fluorescent probes, such as BACs or PACs, located on the derivative chromosomes on both sides of the breakpoints. This technique is labor-intensive, time-consuming and expensive because one must probe along the derivative chromosomes, closer and closer to the breakpoint, in order to find the probe overlapping the breakpoint. The investigators propose an original, innovative and quick technique to map chromosome translocation breakpoints in patients with psychomotor delay and no abnormalities on microarray analysis. The main aim is to develop a technique to identify new genes by cloning and mapping chromosome translocation breakpoints. These genes would then be candidate to explain the phenotype of the patient.The study covers a 24 month period and includes 10 patients. The feasibility of the technique, as well as its application to routine laboratory diagnosis, will be evaluated. The study was approved by our local Bioethics Committee and respects french law of bioethics.Methodology:Patients well be selected during staff meetings including clinicians and biologists. An initial microarray analysis well be performed to identify a gain or loss of genetic material. Samples for which no gain or loss is identified well then undergo flow cytometry to isolate the derivative chromosomes. Each derivative chromosome well then be hybridised to a new microarray, thus revealing the breakpoint. The breakpoints will be confirmed by FISH technique and molecular biology techniques well be applied to clone and sequence the breakpoints. Databases well be used to check for genes located in or around the breakpoints. Required information: Administrative data (3 first letters of the last name and 2 first letters of the first name, date of birth, identification of parents, informed consent). Clinical and biological data (phenotype, karyotype, other genetic studies). Expected results: Development of rapid and less expensive technique to clone translocation breakpoints, Identification of genes potentially involved in mental delay and anomalies of embryo development, Evaluation of the distribution of various causes of syndromic mental delay (unbalanced translocation on microarray, additional rearrangement on microarray, gene disruption, or unidentified cause).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Psychomotor retardation syndromic | No intervention | Biological: Identification of breakpointsPsychomotor retardation syndromic by Identification of breakpoints |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- patient with syndromic psychomotor delay
- patient with a apparently balanced de novo chromosomal translocation
- patient with health insurance
- informed consent signed by patient or by parents or by the legal representative for children
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patient with an inherited translocation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Identification of breakpointsIdentification of breakpoints in Molecular Biology : demonstration of a chimeric sequence corresponding to a junction region between the two chromosomes | Biological | Psychomotor retardation syndromic |
Primary outcome
Evaluation of the proportion of cases for which a cause explaining the phenotype is found for patients with a apparently balance de novo translocation
Time frame: 6 months and 2 years
Evaluation of the proportion of cases for which a cause explaining the phenotype is found for patients with a apparently balance de novo translocation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 15635069Gribble SM, Prigmore E, Burford DC, Porter KM, Ng BL, Douglas EJ, Fiegler H, Carr P, Kalaitzopoulos D, Clegg S, Sandstrom R, Temple IK, Youings SA, Thomas NS, Dennis NR, Jacobs PA, Crolla JA, Carter NP. The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes. J Med Genet. 2005 Jan;42(1):8-16. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.024141.
- Results publication: PubMed 31375103Yauy K, Schneider A, Ng BL, Gaillard JB, Sati S, Coubes C, Wells C, Tournaire M, Guignard T, Bouret P, Genevieve D, Puechberty J, Pellestor F, Gatinois V. Disruption of chromatin organisation causes MEF2C gene overexpression in intellectual disability: a case report. BMC Med Genomics. 2019 Aug 2;12(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0558-8.
Related trials for Balanced Chromosomal Translocation
Active, not recruiting
Insulin Balanced Infusion System
Hyperglycemia, Diabetes
Not yet recruiting
NutrImmune: Precision Nutrition to Improve Immunity in Individuals With Obesity
Obesity (BMI>30), Immune Abnormalities
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Effect of Balcinrenone/Dapagliflozin in Patients With CKD Stage 3b and 4 (BalanceD-CKD)
Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
Not yet recruiting
Bioelectrical Response to Preoperative Hydration in Colorectal Surgery
Postoperative Complications
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Propofol-Dexmedetomine Adjunction in Balanced Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Valve Surgery :Effect on Anesthetic Consumption ,Perioperative Outcomes,and Early Recovery
Balanced Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Valve Surgery
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacques MD Puechberty, PHD principal investigator
Laboratory of Chromosomal Genetics - Universitary Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Identification of breakpoints in people with Balanced Chromosomal Translocation, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation of the proportion of cases for which a cause explaining the phenotype is found for patients with a apparently balance de novo translocation (time frame: 6 months and 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01826708, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2026.