Cerebral Amyloid AngiopathyPhase 2NCT01821118
Study Evaluating the Safety,Tolerability and Efficacy of PF-04360365 in Adults With Probable Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
A Phase 2 study testing Ponezumab in people with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, run by Pfizer at 13 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA) is a condition caused by the build-up of a protein called amyloid, predominantly Aβ40, within the walls of brain blood vessels, especially those blood vessels in the occipital lobe of the brain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
- What is being tested?
- Ponezumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to Sep 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients diagnosed with probable CAA using the Boston criteria; with no clinical cognitive impairment
- In general good health
Who cannot join
- Co-morbid diagnosis of clinically documented Alzheimer's disease or significant cognitive impairment
- Clinically significant syncope, epilepsy, head trauma or clinically significant unexplained loss of consciousness within the last 5 years
- Subject's body weight exceeding 100kg
- Women of childbearing potential.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 5 countries.
13 sites in 5 countries
United States7 sites
MGH Stroke Research Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Boston Medical Center - Menino Pavilion
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Boston Medical Center - Shapiro Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Anthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
Charlestown, Massachusetts, 02129
UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Columbia University
New York, New York, 10032
Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Canada2 sites
University of Calgary/Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
France2 sites
CHRU de Lille - Hôpital Roger Salengro
Lille, NAP, 59037
CHRU de Lille
Lille, NAP, 59037
Netherlands1 site
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584 CX
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial To Evaluate The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics And Efficacy Of Pf-04360365 (Ponezumab) In Adult Subjects With Probable Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA) is a condition caused by the build-up of a protein called amyloid, predominantly Aβ40, within the walls of brain blood vessels, especially those blood vessels in the occipital lobe of the brain. Probable CAA may be defined as two or more hemorrhages in the brain cortex in individuals 55 years of age or older. This study will examine the study drug (PF-04360365) vs. placebo (saline) at 10 mg/kg - Day 1 and the maintenance dose of the study drug (PF-04360365) vs. placebo (saline) at 7.5mg/kg on Days 30 and 60. Subjects will be followed for 6 months after receiving the last dose of study medication.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
- Being tested
- Ponezumab, placebo
- Keywords
- Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), cerebrovascular reactivity, functional MRI, randomized, double blind, safety, efficacy
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PonezumabBiological
Infusion of Ponezumab (Day 1=10mg/kg; Day 30 and Day 60 dose = 7.5mg/kg) or placebo (saline); administered via infusion for a total infusion time of 20 minutes.
placeboOther
placebo (saline)- given via infusion total infusion time of 20 minutes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Biological: Ponezumab |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Slope (Amplitude Over Time to Peak) From Visual Task-evoked Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Blood Oxygen Level Dependant (BOLD) fMRI was performed at Screening (Baseline) and on Days 2 and 90. During each of these sessions, BOLD fMRI images were acquired in rapid succession as a flashing radial black and white checkerboard was presented alternately with a gray screen. This well established visual stimulus is known to produce a reliable increase in BOLD fMRI signal within the visual cortex region of the occipital lobe. The time course of the BOLD fMRI signal was used to assess the vascular reactivity. Imaging sites also acquired cerebral blood flow data using Arterial Spin Labeled (ASL) scans at Screening and on Days 2 and 90. A standard T1-weighted image was also acquired to aid image analysis. All efficacy scans were analyzed centrally. Geometric means are presented in the original scale and standard errors (SE) are presented in logarithmic (log e) scale.
Measured: Baseline, Day 2
Change From Baseline to Day 90 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Slope (Amplitude Over Time to Peak) From Visual Task-evoked fMRI
BOLD fMRI was performed at Screening (Baseline) and on Days 2 and 90. During each of these sessions, BOLD fMRI images were acquired in rapid succession as a flashing radial black and white checkerboard was presented alternately with a gray screen. This well established visual stimulus is known to produce a reliable increase in BOLD fMRI signal within the visual cortex region of the occipital lobe. The time course of the BOLD fMRI signal was used to assess the vascular reactivity. Imaging sites also acquired cerebral blood flow data using ASL scans at Screening and on Days 2 and 90. A standard T1-weighted image was also acquired to aid image analysis. All efficacy scans were analyzed centrally. Geometric means are presented in the original scale and SEs are presented in log e scale.
Measured: Baseline, Day 90
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change From Baseline to Day 2 and Day 90 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Time to Peak From Visual Task-evoked fMRI
BOLD fMRI was performed at Screening (Baseline) and on Days 2 and 90. During each of these sessions, BOLD fMRI images were acquired in rapid succession as a flashing radial black and white checkerboard was presented alternately with a gray screen. This well established visual stimulus is known to produce a reliable increase in BOLD fMRI signal within the visual cortex region of the occipital lobe. The time course of the BOLD fMRI signal was used to assess the vascular reactivity. Imaging sites also acquired cerebral blood flow data using ASL scans at Screening and on Days 2 and 90. A standard T1-weighted image was also acquired to aid image analysis. All efficacy scans were analyzed centrally. Geometric means are presented in the original scale and SEs are presented in log e scale.
Measured: Baseline, Day 2, Day 90
Change From Baseline to Day 2 and Day 90 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Amplitude From Visual Task-evoked fMRI
BOLD fMRI was performed at Screening (Baseline) and on Days 2 and 90. During each of these sessions, BOLD fMRI images were acquired in rapid succession as a flashing radial black and white checkerboard was presented alternately with a gray screen. This well established visual stimulus is known to produce a reliable increase in BOLD fMRI signal within the visual cortex region of the occipital lobe. The time course of the BOLD fMRI signal was used to assess the vascular reactivity. Imaging sites also acquired cerebral blood flow data using ASL scans at Screening and on Days 2 and 90. A standard T1-weighted image was also acquired to aid image analysis. All efficacy scans were analyzed centrally. All values are presented in log e scale.
Measured: Baseline, Day 2, Day 90
Change From Baseline to Day 2 and Day 90 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Time to Return to Baseline From Visual Task-evoked fMRI
BOLD fMRI was performed at Screening (Baseline) and on Days 2 and 90. During each of these sessions, BOLD fMRI images were acquired in rapid succession as a flashing radial black and white checkerboard was presented alternately with a gray screen. This well established visual stimulus is known to produce a reliable increase in BOLD fMRI signal within the visual cortex region of the occipital lobe. The time course of the BOLD fMRI signal was used to assess the vascular reactivity. Imaging sites also acquired cerebral blood flow data using ASL scans at Screening and on Days 2 and 90. A standard T1-weighted image was also acquired to aid image analysis. All efficacy scans were analyzed centrally. All values are presented in log e scale.
Measured: Baseline, Day 2, Day 90
Change From Baseline in Concentration of Total Plasma Amyloid Beta (AB)
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is caused by the progressive deposition of amyloid, predominantly AB40, within the walls of cerebral blood vessels with a predisposition for the vessels of the occipital lobe. As such, it is of interest to investigate the effect of PF-04360365 on AB concentrations. AB1-x and AB1-40 were investigated.
Measured: Baseline, 8 hours post dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 30, 90 and 240
Number of Participants With Brain Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI) Abnormalities
Brain sMRI abnormalities included cerebral edema and total infarcts (including cortical infarcts, white matter infarcts, and subcortical gray matter infarcts). "Total infarcts" is the total number of participants with at least 1 type of infarct.
Measured: Baseline/Screening, Day 15, Day 45, Day 90,
Mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score Over Time
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used as a safety outcome measure to assess any changes in cognition. The MoCA is a 1-page 30-point test administered in approximately 10 minutes. The MoCA assessed short term memory, visuospatial abilities, multiple aspects of executive functions, attention, concentration, working memory, and language, as well as orientation to time and place. The total scale ranges from 0 to 30, with lower numbers indicating lower cognition performance.
Measured: Screening; Days 0, 1, 30, 60, 90, and 240
Number of Participants With All Causality and Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. AEs comprised both SAEs and non-SAEs. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as newly occurring AEs or those worsening after first dose.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 240
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Number of participants with laboratory test abnormalities without regard to baseline abnormality. Laboratory test parameters included hematology, liver function (including Hy's Law Criteria), renal function, electrolytes, clinical chemistry, and urinalysis (dipstick and microscopy).
Measured: Baseline up to Day 240
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Values Meeting Categorical Summarization Criteria
Categorical summarization criteria in vital signs included: supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) of less than (<)90 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or more than (>) 160 mm Hg; supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <50 mm Hg or >100 mm Hg; supine pulse rate of <60 beats per minute (bpm) or >100 bpm; maximum changes (increase or decrease) from baseline in supine SBP of >=20 mm Hg; maximum increase from baseline in supine DBP of >=20 mm Hg; and maximum decrease from baseline in supine DBP of >=10 mm Hg.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 240
Overall Number of Participants With Positive Responses to Questions on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
C-SSRS assessed whether participant responded "yes" to the following: completed suicide, suicide attempt, preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent.
Measured: Baseline up to Day 240
Number of Participants With Significant Changes From Baseline in Physical Examination at Final Visit
A complete physical examination included head, ears, eyes, nose, mouth, skin, heart and lung examinations, lymph nodes, gastrointestinal, skeletal, and neurological systems.
Measured: Baseline up to Final Visit (Day 240)
Number of Participants With Significant Changes in Neurological Examination Results
A complete/full neurological examination included assessment of the cranial nerves; muscle strength, tone, cortical drift, abnormal movements; deep tendon reflexes; sensory exam, coordination, gait and station.
Measured: Baseline up till Day 240
Number of Participants With Anti-PF-04360365 Antibodies
Blood samples were collected from participants who received active treatment to assess for presence/absence of anti-PF-04360365 antibodies.
Measured: Day 1 up to Day 240
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completionSep 2015
- Study completionSep 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Cerebral Amyloid AngiopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01821118
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A9951024
- Other IDs
- 2013-001557-27
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 10 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Randomized, Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial To Evaluate The Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics And Efficacy Of Pf-04360365 (Ponezumab) In Adult Subjects With Probable Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01821118
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A9951024
- Conditions
- Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
- Keywords
- Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), cerebrovascular reactivity, functional MRI, randomized, double blind, safety, efficacy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Nov 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA) is a condition caused by the build-up of a protein called amyloid, predominantly Aβ40, within the walls of brain blood vessels, especially those blood vessels in the occipital lobe of the brain. Probable CAA may be defined as two or more hemorrhages in the brain cortex in individuals 55 years of age or older. This study will examine the study drug (PF-04360365) vs. placebo (saline) at 10 mg/kg - Day 1 and the maintenance dose of the study drug (PF-04360365) vs. placebo (saline) at 7.5mg/kg on Days 30 and 60. Subjects will be followed for 6 months after receiving the last dose of study medication.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Biological: Ponezumab |
| 2 | Placebo comparator | Other: placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients diagnosed with probable CAA using the Boston criteria; with no clinical cognitive impairment
- In general good health
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Co-morbid diagnosis of clinically documented Alzheimer's disease or significant cognitive impairment
- Clinically significant syncope, epilepsy, head trauma or clinically significant unexplained loss of consciousness within the last 5 years
- Subject's body weight exceeding 100kg
- Women of childbearing potential.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PonezumabInfusion of Ponezumab (Day 1=10mg/kg; Day 30 and Day 60 dose = 7.5mg/kg) or placebo (saline); administered via infusion for a total infusion time of 20 minutes. | Biological | 1 |
| placeboplacebo (saline)- given via infusion total infusion time of 20 minutes | Other | 2 |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Slope (Amplitude Over Time to Peak) From Visual Task-evoked Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2
Blood Oxygen Level Dependant (BOLD) fMRI was performed at Screening (Baseline) and on Days 2 and 90. During each of these sessions, BOLD fMRI images were acquired in rapid succession as a flashing radial black and white checkerboard was presented alternately with a gray screen. This well established visual stimulus is known to produce a reliable increase in BOLD fMRI signal within the visual cortex region of the occipital lobe. The time course of the BOLD fMRI signal was used to assess the vascular reactivity. Imaging sites also acquired cerebral blood flow data using Arterial Spin Labeled (ASL) scans at Screening and on Days 2 and 90. A standard T1-weighted image was also acquired to aid image analysis. All efficacy scans were analyzed centrally. Geometric means are presented in the original scale and standard errors (SE) are presented in logarithmic (log e) scale.
Change From Baseline to Day 90 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Slope (Amplitude Over Time to Peak) From Visual Task-evoked fMRI
Time frame: Baseline, Day 90
BOLD fMRI was performed at Screening (Baseline) and on Days 2 and 90. During each of these sessions, BOLD fMRI images were acquired in rapid succession as a flashing radial black and white checkerboard was presented alternately with a gray screen. This well established visual stimulus is known to produce a reliable increase in BOLD fMRI signal within the visual cortex region of the occipital lobe. The time course of the BOLD fMRI signal was used to assess the vascular reactivity. Imaging sites also acquired cerebral blood flow data using ASL scans at Screening and on Days 2 and 90. A standard T1-weighted image was also acquired to aid image analysis. All efficacy scans were analyzed centrally. Geometric means are presented in the original scale and SEs are presented in log e scale.
13 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Day 2 and Day 90 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Time to Peak From Visual Task-evoked fMRI
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, Day 90
Change From Baseline to Day 2 and Day 90 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Amplitude From Visual Task-evoked fMRI
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, Day 90
Change From Baseline to Day 2 and Day 90 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Time to Return to Baseline From Visual Task-evoked fMRI
Time frame: Baseline, Day 2, Day 90
Change From Baseline in Concentration of Total Plasma Amyloid Beta (AB)
Time frame: Baseline, 8 hours post dose on Day 1, Day 2, Day 30, 90 and 240
Number of Participants With Brain Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging (sMRI) Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline/Screening, Day 15, Day 45, Day 90,
Mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score Over Time
Time frame: Screening; Days 0, 1, 30, 60, 90, and 240
Number of Participants With All Causality and Treatment-related Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 240
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 240
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Values Meeting Categorical Summarization Criteria
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 240
Overall Number of Participants With Positive Responses to Questions on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
Time frame: Baseline up to Day 240
Number of Participants With Significant Changes From Baseline in Physical Examination at Final Visit
Time frame: Baseline up to Final Visit (Day 240)
Number of Participants With Significant Changes in Neurological Examination Results
Time frame: Baseline up till Day 240
Number of Participants With Anti-PF-04360365 Antibodies
Time frame: Day 1 up to Day 240
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Trial of ALN-APP in Patients With Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
RecruitingPhase 3
Jiedu Huayu Oral Prescription in the Treatment of Intracranial Hemorrhage Associated With Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of the Mediterranean Diet in Patients Affected by CADASIL and Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, CAA - Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
Recruiting
Application of Digital Twins' Technology in Patients Who Had a Stroke, With Moyamoya Disease and With Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy (CAA) During the Secondary Prevention Phase: A Proof of Concept Using a Randomized Control Trial (Clinical Study 6, STRATIF-AI Project)
Stroke, Moyamoya Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of NPI-001 in Patients With Hereditary Cystatin C Amyloid Angiopathy (HCCAA)
Hereditary Cystatin C Amyloid Angiopathy (HCCAA), Hemorrhage Brain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
13 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Ponezumab in people with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, run by Pfizer at 13 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United States, Canada, France, Netherlands, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Nov 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Day 2 in Cerebrovascular Reactivity as Measured by the Slope (Amplitude Over Time to Peak) From Visual Task-evoked Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) (time frame: Baseline, Day 2). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2017.