Critical Lower Limb IschemiaPhase 2/3DIALEGNCT01818310
Safety and Efficacy Study of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for No-Option Critical Limb Ischemia
A Phase 2/3 study testing Group A: Intramuscular, Group B: Intraarterial and Group C: Intravenous in people with Critical Lower Limb Ischemia and Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
The aim of the presented clinical trial is to evaluate a hypothesis, that BMAC prepared from bone marrow aspirate and injected intramuscularly into ischemic areas of the lower extremity in patients with diabetes mellitus type II., intraarterially into the defect of the limb or with an intravenous application only, has… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Lower Limb Ischemia, Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Group A: Intramuscular, Group B: Intraarterial and Group C: Intravenous
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- type 2 diabetes mellitus
- diagnosis of critical limb ischemia
- non-healing defect on the study limb
- ABI value < 50 mmHg or ABI< 0.4
- TBI value < 40 mmHg or TBI < 0.4
- TcPO2 < 20 mmHg in supine position
Show all 9Show fewer
- no other suitable surgical or re-vascularization procedure
- age > 18 years
- signed Informed Consent
Who cannot join
- non-signing of the Informed Consent
- anticipated life expectancy < 6 months
- history of bone-marrow disease
- renal failure or dialysis dependency
- known malignant disease
- health risks excluding the possibility of general anaesthesia or sedation
Show all 11Show fewer
- life-threatening ischaemic heart disease
- vast necrosis of the index limb
- active infectious disease, or ATB treatment
- treatment with immunosupressives
- pregnancy, breastfeeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomised Clinical Study of Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) for No-option_critical Limb Ischemia in Type-II Diabetes Mellitus Patients. (DIALEG)
The aim of the presented clinical trial is to evaluate a hypothesis, that BMAC prepared from bone marrow aspirate and injected intramuscularly into ischemic areas of the lower extremity in patients with diabetes mellitus type II., intraarterially into the defect of the limb or with an intravenous application only, has a greater potential to improve the perfusion in the ischemic limbs than standard treatment of NO-CLI. Another aim of the study is to find out differences among three different therapeutic types of BMAC application, to define their effectiveness and safety and to compare the impact of different means of application to the speed of healing of the limb defects and the improvement of perfusion parameters.
Read the detailed description
Secondary hypothesis assumes, that the intravenous application of BMAC in patients with T2DM older than 30 years of age, with a dose of insulin exceeding 0.7 U/kg/day or 50U/day will result in decreasing the insulin dose in the course of 6-month follow-up and in an improvement of the glycHBA1c levels, improvement of the liver and kidney function, decrease of the cholesterol levels and improvement of the immune response parameters, i.e. parameters of lymphocytar blastic transformation, more than in case of patients with intramuscular or intraarterial application of BMAC.
- Being tested
- Group A: Intramuscular, Group B: Intraarterial, Group C: Intravenous, Group D: Surgical endovascular treatment with maximum medicamentous treatment
- Keywords
- ischemia, diabetes mellitus, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC)
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemia, Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group A: IntramuscularBiological
Intramuscular BMAC application The study subjects in the Group A will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intramuscularly into the affected limb, in individual punctures of 1 ml.
The punctures will be applied into the crural muscle around the defect, the procedure takes approx. 60 minutes.
Group B: IntraarterialBiological
Intraarterial BMAC application The study subjects in the Group B will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intraarterially into the affected limb.
Group C: IntravenousBiological
Group C: Intravenous The study subjects in the Group C will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intravenously into the affected limb.
Group D: Surgical endovascular treatment with maximum medicamentous treatmentProcedure or surgery
Group D: Control Group Control Group - no experimental intervention, standard endovascular treatment or bypass surgery or maximum medicamentous treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Intramuscular | Experimental | Intramuscular BMAC application The study subjects in the Group A will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intramuscularly into the affected limb, in individual punctures of 1 ml.
The punctures will be applied into the crural muscle around the defect, the procedure takes approx. 60 minutes. Receives: Biological: Group A: Intramuscular |
| Group B: Intraarterial | Experimental | Intraarterial BMAC application The study subjects in the Group B will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intraarterially into the affected limb. Receives: Biological: Group B: Intraarterial |
| Group C: Intravenous | Experimental | Group C: Intravenous The study subjects in the Group C will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intravenously into the affected limb. Receives: Biological: Group C: Intravenous |
| Group D: Control-standard treatment | Other | Group D: Control Group Study subjects in Group D will receive a standard treatment for NO-option CLI. Receives: Procedure: Group D: Surgical endovascular treatment with maximum medicamentous treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Amputation-free survival
The data for Primary outcome will be collected throughout the first 18 months of the study. The assessed parameters will include amputation-free survival in order to verify the safety and efficacy of the treatment.
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Tissue perfusion parameters
The efficacy of BMAC application will be evaluated throughout the whole course of the clinical trial, with final assessment at the end of the trial.
- Increase of the monitored parameters of the tissue perfusion measured with LDP-Periflux 5000 (Perimed), i.e. increase of the ABI - ankle-brachial index, TP - toe pressure, TBI- Toe Brachial index and TcpO2- transcutaneous oxygen pressure.
- Decrease of the SPP perfusion parameter - skin perfusion pressure reflecting an inflammatory activity of the affected limb.
Measured: 4 years
Clinical outcome classification
The efficacy of BMAC application will be evaluated throughout the whole course of the clinical trial, with final assessment at the end of the trial.
- Improvement of the Rutherford scale of CLI
Measured: 4 years
Functional angiogenesis imaging outcome
The efficacy of BMAC application will be evaluated throughout the whole course of the clinical trial, with final assessment at the end of the trial.
- Increase of the number and quality of newly created vessels measured according to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or MR-angiography (in allergic patients)
Measured: 4 years
Quality of life outcome
The efficacy of BMAC application will be evaluated throughout the whole course of the clinical trial, with final assessment at the end of the trial.
- Measurable decrease of pain measured on the scale and QOL questionnaire (RAND-36).
- Healing of the defect or gangrene (size and state of the wound)
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completionSep 2018
- Study completionOct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Critical Lower Limb IschemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Ostrava
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, Regional Council of the Moravian-Silesian region, KU MSK
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vaclav Prochazka, MD, PhD, MSc, Principal investigator, University Hospital Ostrava
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01818310
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012-T2DM-CLI
- Other IDs
- 2012-001825-28
- Acronym
- DIALEG
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 27 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dormandy J, Heeck L, Vig S. The natural history of claudication: risk to life and limb. Semin Vasc Surg. 1999 Jun;12(2):123-37.
PubMed 10777239Clair DG, Dayal R, Faries PL, Bernheim J, Nowygrod R, Lantis JC 2nd, Beavers FP, Kent KC. Tibial angioplasty as an alternative strategy in patients with limb-threatening ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005 Jan;19(1):63-8. doi: 10.1007/s10016-004-0136-0.
PubMed 15714369
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Clinical Study of Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate (BMAC) for No-option_critical Limb Ischemia in Type-II Diabetes Mellitus Patients. (DIALEG)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01818310
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DIALEG / 2012-T2DM-CLI
- Keywords
- ischemia, diabetes mellitus, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC)
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital OstravaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, Regional Council of the Moravian-Silesian region, KU MSK
- Study start
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the presented clinical trial is to evaluate a hypothesis, that BMAC prepared from bone marrow aspirate and injected intramuscularly into ischemic areas of the lower extremity in patients with diabetes mellitus type II., intraarterially into the defect of the limb or with an intravenous application only, has a greater potential to improve the perfusion in the ischemic limbs than standard treatment of NO-CLI. Another aim of the study is to find out differences among three different therapeutic types of BMAC application, to define their effectiveness and safety and to compare the impact of different means of application to the speed of healing of the limb defects and the improvement of perfusion parameters.
Detailed description
Secondary hypothesis assumes, that the intravenous application of BMAC in patients with T2DM older than 30 years of age, with a dose of insulin exceeding 0.7 U/kg/day or 50U/day will result in decreasing the insulin dose in the course of 6-month follow-up and in an improvement of the glycHBA1c levels, improvement of the liver and kidney function, decrease of the cholesterol levels and improvement of the immune response parameters, i.e. parameters of lymphocytar blastic transformation, more than in case of patients with intramuscular or intraarterial application of BMAC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: Intramuscular | Experimental | Biological: Group A: IntramuscularIntramuscular BMAC application The study subjects in the Group A will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intramuscularly into the affected limb, in individual punctures of 1 ml. The punctures will be applied into the crural muscle around the defect, the procedure takes approx. 60 minutes. |
| Group B: Intraarterial | Experimental | Biological: Group B: IntraarterialIntraarterial BMAC application The study subjects in the Group B will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intraarterially into the affected limb. |
| Group C: Intravenous | Experimental | Biological: Group C: IntravenousGroup C: Intravenous The study subjects in the Group C will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intravenously into the affected limb. |
| Group D: Control-standard treatment | Other | Procedure: Group D: Surgical endovascular treatment with maximum medicamentous treatmentGroup D: Control Group Study subjects in Group D will receive a standard treatment for NO-option CLI. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- type 2 diabetes mellitus
- diagnosis of critical limb ischemia
- non-healing defect on the study limb
- ABI value < 50 mmHg or ABI< 0.4
- TBI value < 40 mmHg or TBI < 0.4
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- non-signing of the Informed Consent
- anticipated life expectancy < 6 months
- history of bone-marrow disease
- renal failure or dialysis dependency
- known malignant disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: IntramuscularIntramuscular BMAC application The study subjects in the Group A will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intramuscularly into the affected limb, in individual punctures of 1 ml. The punctures will be applied into the crural muscle around the defect, the procedure takes approx. 60 minutes. | Biological | Group A: Intramuscular |
| Group B: IntraarterialIntraarterial BMAC application The study subjects in the Group B will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intraarterially into the affected limb. | Biological | Group B: Intraarterial |
| Group C: IntravenousGroup C: Intravenous The study subjects in the Group C will receive a treatment of 35ml BMAC administered intravenously into the affected limb. | Biological | Group C: Intravenous |
| Group D: Surgical endovascular treatment with maximum medicamentous treatmentGroup D: Control Group Control Group - no experimental intervention, standard endovascular treatment or bypass surgery or maximum medicamentous treatment | Procedure or surgery | Group D: Control-standard treatment |
Primary outcome
Amputation-free survival
Time frame: 18 months
The data for Primary outcome will be collected throughout the first 18 months of the study. The assessed parameters will include amputation-free survival in order to verify the safety and efficacy of the treatment.
4 secondary outcomes
Tissue perfusion parameters
Time frame: 4 years
Clinical outcome classification
Time frame: 4 years
Functional angiogenesis imaging outcome
Time frame: 4 years
Quality of life outcome
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2021.
- Background: PubMed 10777239Dormandy J, Heeck L, Vig S. The natural history of claudication: risk to life and limb. Semin Vasc Surg. 1999 Jun;12(2):123-37.
- Background: PubMed 15714369Clair DG, Dayal R, Faries PL, Bernheim J, Nowygrod R, Lantis JC 2nd, Beavers FP, Kent KC. Tibial angioplasty as an alternative strategy in patients with limb-threatening ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005 Jan;19(1):63-8. doi: 10.1007/s10016-004-0136-0.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Critical Lower Limb Ischemia
Recruiting
FastWire REvascularisation of Extremities, (For LOWer Limbs) - FREEFLOW
Chronic Total Occlusion of Artery of the Extremities
RecruitingObservational study
Use of Thermal Imaging Camera to Assess Perfusion Before and After Vascular Intervention
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Critical Limb Ischemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
An All-Comers Observational Study of the MicroStent™ Peripheral Vascular Stent System in Subjects With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Critical Lower Limb Ischemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Cell Therapy for Lower Limb Ulcers in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Leg Ulcer
RecruitingObservational study
Peripheral Extreme Revascularization in "No-option" Patiens With Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vaclav Prochazka, MD, PhD, MSc principal investigator
University Hospital Ostrava
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Group A: Intramuscular, Group B: Intraarterial and Group C: Intravenous in people with Critical Lower Limb Ischemia and Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus, run by University Hospital Ostrava at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Amputation-free survival (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01818310, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2021.