AzTrials
AzTrials

Preconception Care"Gabby"NCT01812824

Study of Virtual Patient Advocate for Preconception Care for African American Women

A study testing Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) in people with Preconception Care, run by Boston Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is to examine the effectiveness of a health communication system (Gabby) that assesses preconception health risks and tailors the intervention to each subject, based on her health risks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Preconception Care
What is being tested?
Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2011to Jan 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • female
  • African American
  • ages 18-25
  • access to telephone and agrees to receive study-related calls
  • access to computer with high-speed internet

Who cannot join

  • Does not speak English
  • Is currently pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Boston Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02118

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Using Innovative Communication Technology to Improve the Health of Young African American Women

This study is to examine the effectiveness of a health communication system (Gabby) that assesses preconception health risks and tailors the intervention to each subject, based on her health risks.

There is a need to develop practical tools that can be used to identify preconception health risks and will facilitate the initiation of intervention for these risks; this project specifically targets young Black or African American women in order to reduce major disparities in birth outcomes. Clinicians do not have time to assess for over 100 preconception health risks that can impact birth outcomes; this system can streamline that assessment and create a personalized list of risks. Patients can then share their list with clinicians to make their healthcare visits more effective.

This study involves a pilot of the system through the Preconception Peer Educator (PPE) Program, which is a program created by the Office of Minority Health. The program began in historically black colleges in the United States, with the purpose of training students to reach out to their community to educate about the increased risk of preterm birth, low birth weight and infant mortality among African Americans. The PPEs teach about preconception health, or getting healthy before pregnancy, to increase the chances of having a healthy baby. Now the PPE program has expanded to colleges in over 20 states across the country.

Read the detailed description

Overview After the development phase, the investigators will first test the Shared Decision Making module with a group of 50 women from the Boston community. Then, a group of 20 other women from the Boston Community will serve as pre-testers of the full system and will then be invited to participate in a focus group to share additional feedback. Then, the investigators will conduct a six month randomized control trial (RCT) of PPEs from across the country to test whether the Gabby system will result in a lower rate of preconception health risks compared to the control group. In the RCT, half of the participants who sign up will use the Gabby system (interventions) and the other half will not use the Gabby system (controls). Outcomes will be assessed via a 6 month follow-up phone call, which will take approximately one hour. Secondary outcomes include: pregnancy rate, Risk Profile for participants who become pregnant, participant satisfaction, and number of stories written and heard.

Pre-Testing Protocol Pre-Testing subjects will be recruited from 3 sources (Family Medicine and Ob/Gyn Clinics, ReSPECT Registry, and local stores and restaurants). Each session will last up to two hours and will take place in the BMC research offices. Subjects will complete the same demographic form that will be used in the RCT, test various components of the system - including the risk assessment, risk dialogue ("scripts" from Gabby), My Health To-Do List, and story authoring. This will allow the investigators to fully test the completed system with members of the target group, debug it, populate the system with additional stories and receive feedback on what works and what does not. The objective is to perform a check of the system logic, content, and usability of the software. The goal is to ensure that the system works as designed. Northeastern investigators will be present for the full system pre-testing in order to assist with technical issues and in order to observe the system in use and identify problems to fix prior to the RCT.

After each user tests the system, Dr. Yinusa-Nyahkoon, an experienced African American investigator, will conduct a one-on-one interview with each subject that will last approximately 30 minutes. Dr. Yinusa-Nyahkoon will use a semi-structured interview guide to ask questions about the subjects' perceptions of the system and gather suggestions for improvement.

All focus group and individual interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed verbatim; participants will be informed about the audio recording prior to signing the consent form. Research team members will review transcripts to change subject names and alter identifying information in order to honor subject confidentiality. Audio files of all interviews will be password protected, and paper copies of interview transcripts will be assigned subject identification numbers. Analysis of interview data will begin after the first focus group interview is completed; therefore, data collection and analysis will occur simultaneously, and new points of inquiry for subsequent interviews are generated. Grounded theory techniques will be used to analyze interview data. Content categories, patterns, and themes will be identified across the interview data, and supporting evidence from transcripts will be reviewed with research team members to corroborate these findings. This process, referred to as researcher triangulation, provides a mechanism to reflect on, confirm, and expand data interpretations.

The following information will be collected from each Pretesting subject: (1) Screening Form to determine eligibility(Form A); (2) Signed consent form; (3) Contact Information Sheet (Form C); (4) Subject sociodemographics (Form C); (5) Health literacy will be tested with the 66 word version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM); (6) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; (7) Everyday Discrimination Scale; (8) Social Networking Immersion Measure; (9) General Self-Efficacy Scale; (10) Contraceptive Knowledge Pre-Test; and (11) Nutrition Knowledge Pre-Test.

Randomized Control Trial Protocol Subject Identification and Recruitment: Subjects will be recruited from the Preconception Peer Educator (PPE) program in the Office of Minority Health (OMH). The investigators will work with OMH, who will send recruitment emails to their contact list of those who have completed the PPE training, to inform them of the study and provide the contact information of the Program Manager. If interested, potential subjects can email the Program Manager to receive more information about the study and set up a phone call to complete the screening and enrollment process and give verbal consent. Potential subjects will be emailed the consent form and REALM form prior to the phone call, as well as a flyer with basic study information, and instructed to have access to their computer during the phone call.

Inclusion and Enrollment Procedures. The investigators will enroll women age 18 years and older, who self-identify as "Black or African American," meet all other eligibility criteria and who have participated in the OMH-PPE program. During enrollment the investigators will ask them to select their race and ethnicity from a list based on the US standard census categories and a list of ethnicities, based on the demographic information used US Census Bureau. Participants will be eligible if they choose "Black or African American." Prior to obtaining verbal consent, the research staff will then explain: (1) the purpose of the project; (2) potential risks and benefits to enrolling in the study; (3) possible randomization to a control group; and (4) IRB safeguards. BUMC investigators will obtain verbal consent from all participants and fill out enrollment forms.

Baseline Data Collection. Before randomization, the following information will be collected: (1) Eligibility Form A to determine eligibility; (2) Verbal consent; (3) Contact Information Sheet (Form C); (4) Demographic Form B; (5) Health literacy will be tested with the 66 word version of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM); (6) Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support; (7) Everyday Discrimination Scale; (8) Social Networking Immersion Measure; (9) General Self-Efficacy Scale; (10) Contraceptive Knowledge Pre-Test; and (11) Nutrition Knowledge Pre-Test.

Randomization. Using a random numbers table, the statistician will prepare a numbered set of sealed study allocation envelopes prior to study start that will be used to determine the 75 subjects who are in the intervention group and the 75 who are in the control group. The control group will receive a letter listing the preconception risks identified in the risk assessment and they will be encouraged to see their clinician to discuss them.

Being tested
Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)
Keywords
Preconception Health, Health Information Technology, Reproductive Life Plan, Healthcare Disparities, Low birth-weight, Preterm Delivery
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)Behavioural

    Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) participants will have access to the "Gabby" system for 6 months. There is no required "dose" or frequency that they have to log on to the system, but the investigators will suggest that they log on once a week.

Study groups in NCT01812824
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)ExperimentalParticipants assigned to the Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) arm will have access to the Virtual Patient Advocate system on-line for 6 months; they will be encouraged, but not required, to log on once a week.
Receives: Behavioral: Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate)
Control (Letter)No interventionParticipants in the Control (Letter) arm will take the online Preconception Risk Assessment at baseline, but not have access to the Virtual Patient Advocate system during the 6 month study period. They will be sent a list of the Preconception Risks identified through their answers to the Risk Assessment, which they can choose to share with their healthcare provider(s).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction in number of Preconception Health Risks

    Number of preconception risks will be tallied for each participant at baseline and 6 months after enrollment. Participants will complete the Preconception Risk assessment at both time points.

    Measured: Baseline and at 6 months after enrollment

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Pregnancy Rate

    During the outcome phone call the investigators will assess whether or not the participant has become pregnant during the study period.

    Measured: Assessed 6 months after enrollment

  2. Subject Satisfaction with Virtual Patient Advocate

    During the follow-up phone call, the investigators will ask all intervention participants a series of satisfaction questions about various features of the Virtual Patient Advocate system.

    Measured: Assessed at 6 months after enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Mar 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2011
  3. Primary completionFeb 2014
  4. Study completionJan 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01812824
Sponsor's protocol ID
H-31014
Other IDs
R40MC21510
Acronym
"Gabby"
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
14 Mar 2013
Last updated
28 Jul 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Gardiner P, Hempstead MB, Ring L, Bickmore T, Yinusa-Nyahkoon L, Tran H, Paasche-Orlow M, Damus K, Jack B. Reaching women through health information technology: the Gabby preconception care system. Am J Health Promot. 2013 Jan-Feb;27(3 Suppl):eS11-20. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.1200113-QUAN-18.

    PubMed 23286652

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intervention (Virtual Patient Advocate) in people with Preconception Care, run by Boston Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction in number of Preconception Health Risks (time frame: Baseline and at 6 months after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01812824, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in