AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Gastric CancerNCT01806753

Performance of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection According to the Sedation Method

A study testing Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration in people with Early Gastric Cancer and Gastric Adenoma, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Although proper sedation is mandatory for endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, the effects of sedation on ESD performance and complications have not been fully evaluated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Early Gastric Cancer, Gastric Adenoma
What is being tested?
Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
157 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Mar 2013to Jan 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age, between 20 and 80
  • Early gastric cancer or adenoma, which is indicated by endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • ECOG performance status 0 or 1
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status 1, 2, or 3

Who cannot join

  • Previous subtotal gastrectomy
  • Previous gastrostomy
  • Repeated endoscopic submucosal dissection
  • Three or more synchronous lesions
  • Allergy to midazolam, propofol, fentanyl, or remifentanil
  • Pregnancy or breast milk feeding
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Active infection
  • Significant cardiopulmonary disease
  • Active hepatitis or severe hepatic dysfunction
  • Severe renal dysfunction
  • Severe bone marrow dysfunction
  • Severe neurologic or psychotic disorder

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Severance Hospital

    Seoul, Seoul, 120-752

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Although proper sedation is mandatory for endoscopic procedures such as endoscopic submucosal dissection, the effects of sedation on ESD performance and complications have not been fully evaluated. In the investigators previous retrospective study, en bloc resection and complete resection rates, and procedure time could be improved by sedation with continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration by anesthesiologists. However, there are several limitations to the study including retrospective design. The investigators aimed to evaluate the relationship among sedation methods, satisfaction of endoscopists or patients, clinical outcomes, and complications after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia.

Being tested
Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist, Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration
Keywords
Endoscopic submucosal dissection, Sedation, Propofol, Midazolam
Medical subject headings
Stomach Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopistProcedure or surgery

    In this arm1, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by endoscopists.

    First, pethidine 50 mg with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.

    When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, endoscopists should check the Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAAS).

    If MOAAS is 5 or 6, propofol 0.25 mg/kg will be injected. Otherwise, pethidine 12.5 mg will be injected.

  • Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administrationProcedure or surgery

    In this arm2, sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection is controlled by anesthesiologists.

    First, remifentanil 0.5 ug/kg with propofol 0.5 mg/kg are injected in a bolus fashion.

    Then, remifentanil 0.08 ug/kg/min and propofol 2 mg/kg/h are infused continuously.

    When the patient seems to be discomfort or the patient's movements were observed, anesthesiologists should check the MOAAS.

    If MOAAS is 5 or 6, infusion rate of propofol will be increased by 0.5 mg/kg/h. Otherwise, infusion rate of remifentanil will be increased by 0.02 ug/kg/min.

Study groups in NCT01806753
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
midazolam/propofol injectionExperimentalIntermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist
Receives: Procedure: Intermittent midazolam/propofol injection controlled by endoscopist
propofol infusionActive comparatorContinuous propofol infusion with opioid administration
Receives: Procedure: Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Satisfaction of endoscopists

    Measured: Within 10 minutes from the end of the endoscopic submucosal dissection

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2013
  3. Primary completionJan 2014
  4. Study completionJan 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
157 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01806753
Sponsor's protocol ID
4-2012-0661
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
5 Mar 2013
Last updated
30 Jan 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Park CH, Shin S, Lee SK, Lee H, Lee YC, Park JC, Yoo YC. Assessing the stability and safety of procedure during endoscopic submucosal dissection according to sedation methods: a randomized trial. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0120529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120529. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25803441

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Continuous propofol infusion with opioid administration in people with Early Gastric Cancer and Gastric Adenoma, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Satisfaction of endoscopists (time frame: Within 10 minutes from the end of the endoscopic submucosal dissection). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01806753, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in