AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical CancerNCT01806350

Pelvic Floor Muscle Training in Treating Urinary Incontinence in Gynecologic Cancer Survivors

A study testing questionnaire administration, standard follow-up care and educational intervention in people with Cervical Cancer and Endometrial Cancer, run by New Mexico Cancer Research Alliance at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized pilot clinical trial studies pelvic floor muscle training in treating urinary incontinence in gynecologic cancer survivors. Pelvic floor muscle training may help control symptoms and improve physical function and quality of life in gynecologic cancer survivors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
questionnaire administration, standard follow-up care and educational intervention
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Nov 2009to Sep 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • History of uterine, cervical, ovarian or vulvar malignancy
  • Treatment free interval of >= one year and currently have no evidence of cancer
  • Reports urinary incontinence based on screening questionnaire
  • Must have a stable address for the three month period

Who cannot join

  • Current clinical evidence of urinary tract infection
  • Within three months of failed surgery for urinary incontinence
  • Planned surgery for urinary incontinence in the next three months
  • Presence of neurologic condition that may impact bladder symptoms such as multiple sclerosis, stroke
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of New Mexico Cancer Center

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial to Evaluate Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Urinary Incontinence Among Gynecologic Cancer Survivors

This randomized pilot clinical trial studies pelvic floor muscle training in treating urinary incontinence in gynecologic cancer survivors. Pelvic floor muscle training may help control symptoms and improve physical function and quality of life in gynecologic cancer survivors.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. To assess whether pelvic floor muscle training and behavioral therapy in gynecologic cancer survivors results in improvement in incontinence symptoms as measured by a validated questionnaire (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) at three month follow-up when compared to women who do not undergo pelvic floor muscle training.

II. To evaluate whether women who undergo pelvic floor muscle training and behavioral therapy report greater improvement in validated urinary incontinence symptom severity, pelvic floor distress and quality of life measures than women who do not undergo pelvic floor muscle training.

III. To evaluate the acceptability of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) among gynecological cancer survivors and to provide preliminary data to inform a power analysis for a larger randomized trial.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients receive a handout describing behavioral management tips for urinary incontinence, including information and suggestions about optimal volume fluid intake, constipation management, measures to reduce urgency by spreading fluid intake, and avoiding caffeine and other bladder irritants that have proved effective in other intervention trials. Patients undergo PFMT over 20-30 minutes teaching them to contract the pelvic floor muscles correctly and receive feedback to avoid the contraction of abdominal, gluteal or adductor muscles. Patients are asked to perform 3 sets of 10 pelvic muscle contractions with a goal of holding the contraction for 5 seconds daily for 12 weeks and also receive a reminder phone call to address concerns and review the instructions at 4 weeks.

ARM II: Patients receive usual care for urinary incontinence, with an option to join the training program after completion of study.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 3 months.

Being tested
questionnaire administration, standard follow-up care, educational intervention
Keywords
Pelvic floor muscle training; incontinence; quality of life
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Vulvar Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • questionnaire administrationOther

    Ancillary studies

  • standard follow-up careProcedure or surgery

    Receive usual care

  • educational interventionOther

    Also called intervention, educational

    Undergo PFMT

Study groups in NCT01806350
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm I (PFMT)ExperimentalPatients receive a handout describing behavioral management tips for urinary incontinence, including information and suggestions about optimal volume fluid intake, constipation management, measures to reduce urgency by spreading fluid intake, and avoiding caffeine and other bladder irritants that have proved effective in other intervention trials. Patients undergo PFMT over 20-30 minutes teaching them to contract the pelvic floor muscles correctly and receive feedback to avoid the contraction of abdominal, gluteal or adductor muscles. Patients are asked to perform 3 sets of 10 pelvic muscle contractions with a goal of holding the contraction for 5 seconds daily for 12 weeks and also receive a reminder phone call to address concerns and review the instructions at 4 weeks.
Receives: Other: questionnaire administration; Other: educational intervention
Arm II (usual care)Active comparatorPatients receive usual care for urinary incontinence, with an option to join the training program after completion of study.
Receives: Other: questionnaire administration; Procedure: standard follow-up care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) rating

    Fisher's exact test will be used to test whether the chance of success is identical for the two groups (intervention vs. control).

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Changes in the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) score

    The Brinks scale will be used by the trainers for the treatment group follow-up to evaluate the adequacy of the contractions in a qualitative manner. A two sample t-test on the within individual differences will be used. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test will be used if the sample differences are non-normally distributed.

    Measured: Baseline to 3 months

  2. Changes in Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI)

    The Brinks scale will be used by the trainers for the treatment group follow-up to evaluate the adequacy of the contractions in a qualitative manner. A two sample t-test on the within individual differences will be used. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test will be used if the sample differences are non-normally distributed.

    Measured: Baseline to 3 months

  3. Changes in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ), which measures the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life

    The Brinks scale will be used by the trainers for the treatment group follow-up to evaluate the adequacy of the contractions in a qualitative manner. A two sample t-test on the within individual differences will be used. A non-parametric Mann-Whitney test will be used if the sample differences are non-normally distributed.

    Measured: Baseline to 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Mar 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2009
  3. Primary completionSep 2012
  4. Study completionSep 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01806350
Sponsor's protocol ID
INST 0912
Other IDs
NCI-2012-01319
Status last verified
Mar 2013
First submitted
5 Mar 2013
Last updated
7 Mar 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing questionnaire administration, standard follow-up care and educational intervention in people with Cervical Cancer and Endometrial Cancer, run by New Mexico Cancer Research Alliance at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) rating (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in