Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Without Clinically Significant Heart DiseasesPhase 4NCT01803438
Catheter Cryoablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug as First-Line Therapy of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
A Phase 4 study testing cryoballoon ablation system and Antiarrhythmic Drugs in people with Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Without Clinically Significant Heart Diseases, run by Medtronic Cardiac Ablation Solutions at 19 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) performed with the Arctic Front™ Advance Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System as first-line therapy in comparison with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Without Clinically Significant Heart Diseases
- What is being tested?
- cryoballoon ablation system and Antiarrhythmic Drugs
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 220 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to 20 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has been diagnosed with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as defined above and at least two symptomatic episodes in the last six months prior to inclusion.
- At least one episode of AF must be documented during the prior year by any kind of ECG recording.
- Subject has structural normal heart with an LVEF ≥ 50%, thickness of the inter-ventricular septum ≤12 mm and left atrium diameters (short axis) < 46 mm obtained by transthoracic echocardiography.
- Subject has normal ECG parameters (QRS width in the 12 channel surface ECG ≤120 ms, QTc - interval < 440 ms, PQ - interval ≤ 210 ms; all parameters should be measured at sinus rhythm).
- Subject is at least 18 and not older than 75years old.
- Subject is able and willing to give informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Subject developed persistent AF at least once in history (electrical or pharmacological cardioversion after 48h or episode duration >7 days).
- Subject has documented typical atrial flutter.
- Subject has any history of successful or unsuccessful treatment of AF with class I or III antiarrhythmic or sotalol with the intention to prevent an AF recurrence. Patients pretreated with above AAD at maximum 48 hours with the intention to convert an AF episode are allowed.
- Subject had any previous left atrial ablation.
- Subject had any previous cardiac surgery, e.g. prosthetic valves.
- Subject has permanent pacemaker or defibrillator implant.
Show all 34Show fewer
- Subject has 2° type II, 3° degree AV-block or left/right bundle branch block pattern.
- Subject has unstable angina pectoris.
- Subject has history of previous myocardial infarction or percutaneous intervention during the last three months.
- Subject has symptomatic carotid stenosis.
- Subject has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with detected pulmonary hypertension or any other evidence of significant lung disease.
- Subject has any contraindication for oral anticoagulation.
- Subject has any history of previous transient ischemic attack or stroke.
- Subject has known intra-cardiac thrombus formation.
- Subject has any significant congenital heart defect corrected or not (except for patent foramen ovale that is allowed).
- Subject has evidence of congestive heart failure (NYHA class II, III or IV) in sinus rhythm.
- Subject has hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
- Subject has abnormal long or short QT interval, signs of Brugada syndrome, known inheriting ion channel disease on the family, arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia.
- Subject has sarcoidosis.
- Subject has pulmonary vein stent.
- Subject has myxoma. Exclusion criteria based on laboratory abnormalities
- Subject has thrombocytosis (platelet count > 600,000 / μl) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000 / μl).
- Subject has any untreated or uncontrolled hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism.
- Subject has renal dysfunction with glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml / min.
- Subject has known cryoglobulinaemia. General exclusion criteria
- Subject has a reversible causes for AF like hyperthyroidism and alcoholism.
- Subject is a pregnant woman or woman of childbearing potential not on adequate birth control: only woman with a highly effective method of contraception [oral contraception or intra-uterine device] (who must have a negative pregnancy test within 1 week of the start of the therapy) or sterile woman can be enrolled.
- Subject is a breastfeeding woman.
- Subject has an active systemic infection.
- Subject is employed by Medtronic or by the department of any of the investigators or is a close relative of any of the investigators.
- Subject is unwilling or unable to comply fully with study procedures and follow-up due to any disease condition, which can raise doubt about compliance and influencing the study outcome especially any kind of cancer, severe bleeding in history or a suspected pro-coagulant state.
- Legal incapacity or evidence that a subject cannot understand the purpose and risks of the study or inability to comply fully with study procedures and follow up.
- Subject has a life expectancy of ≤ 1 year.
- Subject is currently enrolled or planning to participate in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of this study. Co-enrollment in concurrent trials is only allowed when documented pre-approval is obtained from the Medtronic study manager.
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 9 countries.
19 sites in 9 countries
Germany5 sites
Kerckhoff - Klinik
Bad Nauheim
Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien
Frankfurt, 60431
Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH
Kaiserslautern, 67655
Klinikum Bogenhausen
Munich
France4 sites
NCHU Amiens
Amiens
CHU Grenoble
Grenoble
CHU La Pitié
Paris
CHU Charles Nicolle
Rouen
Croatia2 sites
Klinicki bolnicki centar Sestre Milosrdnice
Zagreb
Klinicki bolnicki centar Sestre
Zagreb
Italy2 sites
Maria Cecilia Hospital
Cotignola, 48033
Ospedale S.S. Giacomo e Cristoforo
Massa
Netherlands2 sites
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, 5623 EJ
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam
Belgium1 site
Heart Rhythm Management Centre, UZ Brussels - VUB Brussel
Brussels
About this study
Official title: Catheter Cryoablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug as First-Line Therapy of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) performed with the Arctic Front™ Advance Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System as first-line therapy in comparison with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
- Being tested
- cryoballoon ablation system, Antiarrhythmic Drugs
- Keywords
- paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Cryoablation, Pulmonary Vein Isolation
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cryoballoon ablation systemDevice
Antiarrhythmic DrugsDrug
AAD therapy based on hospital clinical practice according to ESC Guidelines 2012
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AADs | Active comparator | AAD therapy based on hospital clinical practice according to ESC Guidelines 2012 Receives: Drug: Antiarrhythmic Drugs |
| Cryoablation procedure | Experimental | electrical pulmonary veins isolation performed with cryoballoon ablation system Receives: Device: cryoballoon ablation system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia recurrence
The primary endpoint is freedom from any atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months (at least one episode of AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia with a duration > 30 seconds documented by 7 day Holter ECG or any other printed ECG recording following a blanking period or a dosing optimizing period of 3 months).
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
quality of life
The quality of life of the two arms measured by means of SF-36 Health Survey and Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaires will be compared at 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Hospital or emergency services accesses
Hospital or emergency services accesses due to symptoms caused by documented atrial arrhythmias will be compared in the two arms at 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 Months
Freedom from occurrence of AF
Freedom from occurrence of AF (after 3 months blanking period) will be compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Freedom from occurrence of documented left atrial tachycardia and left atrial flutter
Freedom from occurrence of documented left atrial tachycardia and typical - or atypical left atrial flutter (after 3 months blanking period or AAD optimization period) will be compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Symptomatic palpitations burden
Symptomatic palpitations burden will be evaluated by mean of Patient's diary information and compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Severe adverse events incidence
Severe adverse events incidence will be compared between the two arms during the whole course of the study.
Measured: 12 months
Freedom from persistent AF
Freedom from persistent AF (AF episode lasting longer than 7 days or interrupted by pharmacological or electrical cardioversion after 48h from the onset of the episode) will be compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Echocardiographic left atrial re-modelling
Echocardiographic left atrial parameters will be compared between the two arms at 6 and 12 months follow ups.
Measured: 12 months
health care utilization
Frequency, type and associated cost of health care utilization and utility will be compared between the two arms at 12 months follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completion16 Oct 2019
- Study completion20 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Without Clinically Significant Heart DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medtronic Cardiac Ablation SolutionsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Ablation Solutions
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Malte Kuniss, MD, Principal investigator, Kerckhoff - Klinik, Bad Nauheim, GermanyGianBattista Chierchia, MD, Principal investigator, Heart Rhythm Management Centre, UZ Brussels - VUB Brussel, Belgium
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01803438
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Cryo-FIRST
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Mar 2013
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Andrade JG, Moss JWE, Kuniss M, Sadri H, Wazni O, Sale A, Ismyrloglou E, Chierchia GB, Kaplon R, Mealing S, Bainbridge J, Bromilow T, Lane E, Khaykin Y. The Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cryoablation vs First-Line Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Canadian Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2024 Apr;40(4):576-584. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.11.019. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
PubMed 38007219Pavlovic N, Chierchia GB, Velagic V, Hermida JS, Healey S, Arena G, Badenco N, Meyer C, Chen J, Iacopino S, Anselme F, Dekker L, Scazzuso F, Packer DL, de Asmundis C, Pitschner HF, Piazza FD, Kaplon RE, Kuniss M; Cryo-FIRST Investigators. Initial rhythm control with cryoballoon ablation vs drug therapy: Impact on quality of life and symptoms. Am Heart J. 2021 Dec;242:103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
PubMed 34508694
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Catheter Cryoablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug as First-Line Therapy of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01803438
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Cryo-FIRST
- Keywords
- paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Cryoablation, Pulmonary Vein Isolation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 220 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Ablation SolutionsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- 16 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) performed with the Arctic Front™ Advance Cardiac CryoAblation Catheter System as first-line therapy in comparison with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AADs | Active comparator | Drug: Antiarrhythmic DrugsAAD therapy based on hospital clinical practice according to ESC Guidelines 2012 |
| Cryoablation procedure | Experimental | Device: cryoballoon ablation systemelectrical pulmonary veins isolation performed with cryoballoon ablation system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subject has been diagnosed with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as defined above and at least two symptomatic episodes in the last six months prior to inclusion.
- At least one episode of AF must be documented during the prior year by any kind of ECG recording.
- Subject has structural normal heart with an LVEF ≥ 50%, thickness of the inter-ventricular septum ≤12 mm and left atrium diameters (short axis) < 46 mm obtained by transthoracic echocardiography.
- Subject has normal ECG parameters (QRS width in the 12 channel surface ECG ≤120 ms, QTc - interval < 440 ms, PQ - interval ≤ 210 ms; all parameters should be measured at sinus rhythm).
- Subject is at least 18 and not older than 75years old.
Key exclusion criteria (34 listed)
- Subject developed persistent AF at least once in history (electrical or pharmacological cardioversion after 48h or episode duration >7 days).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cryoballoon ablation system | Device | Cryoablation procedure |
| Antiarrhythmic DrugsAAD therapy based on hospital clinical practice according to ESC Guidelines 2012 | Drug | AADs |
Primary outcome
Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia recurrence
Time frame: 12 months
The primary endpoint is freedom from any atrial arrhythmia recurrence at 12 months (at least one episode of AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia with a duration > 30 seconds documented by 7 day Holter ECG or any other printed ECG recording following a blanking period or a dosing optimizing period of 3 months).
9 secondary outcomes
quality of life
Time frame: 12 months
Hospital or emergency services accesses
Time frame: 12 Months
Freedom from occurrence of AF
Time frame: 12 months
Freedom from occurrence of documented left atrial tachycardia and left atrial flutter
Time frame: 12 months
Symptomatic palpitations burden
Time frame: 12 months
Severe adverse events incidence
Time frame: 12 months
Freedom from persistent AF
Time frame: 12 months
Echocardiographic left atrial re-modelling
Time frame: 12 months
health care utilization
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38007219Andrade JG, Moss JWE, Kuniss M, Sadri H, Wazni O, Sale A, Ismyrloglou E, Chierchia GB, Kaplon R, Mealing S, Bainbridge J, Bromilow T, Lane E, Khaykin Y. The Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cryoablation vs First-Line Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Canadian Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2024 Apr;40(4):576-584. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.11.019. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34508694Pavlovic N, Chierchia GB, Velagic V, Hermida JS, Healey S, Arena G, Badenco N, Meyer C, Chen J, Iacopino S, Anselme F, Dekker L, Scazzuso F, Packer DL, de Asmundis C, Pitschner HF, Piazza FD, Kaplon RE, Kuniss M; Cryo-FIRST Investigators. Initial rhythm control with cryoballoon ablation vs drug therapy: Impact on quality of life and symptoms. Am Heart J. 2021 Dec;242:103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Malte Kuniss, MD principal investigator
Kerckhoff - Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany
GianBattista Chierchia, MD principal investigator
Heart Rhythm Management Centre, UZ Brussels - VUB Brussel, Belgium
19 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing cryoballoon ablation system and Antiarrhythmic Drugs in people with Symptomatic Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Without Clinically Significant Heart Diseases, run by Medtronic Cardiac Ablation Solutions at 19 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 34 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in Germany, France, Croatia, Italy, Netherlands and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Freedom from any atrial arrhythmia recurrence (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01803438, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2025.