AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisPhase 4RebiQoLNCT01791244

A Phase 4 Study to Assess the Impact of Patient Support Program on Health Related Quality of Life and Adherence in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Administered Rebif® With the RebiSmart™ Device

A Phase 4 study testing Rebif® in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Relapsing-Remitting, run by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany at 14 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, comparative, and multicenter study to assess the impact of a patient support program (MinSupport Plus) on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and adherence in subjects with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis administered Rebif® with the RebiSmart™ device. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
What is being tested?
Rebif®
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
93 participants
Where
14 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
28 Feb 2013to 29 Feb 2016
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female, aged 18 or older
  • A diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis according to the revised McDonald Criteria (2010)
  • Treatment with Rebif® 22 or 44 mcg subcutaneously three times a week in accordance to the Summary of product characteristics
  • Rebif® administered by the RebiSmart™ device
  • Provided a signed informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Has received any components, except for technical support, of MinSupport Plus prior to study entry
  • Has difficulty reading and/or understanding Swedish
  • Has a mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude
  • No access to computer
  • Participation in another clinical study

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 2 countries.

14 sites in 2 countries

Sweden13 sites
  • Research site

    Ängelholm

  • Research site

    Angered

  • Research Site

    Danderyd

  • Research Site

    Eksjö

  • Research Site

    Gävle

  • Research Site

    Karlstad

  • Research Site

    KS Huddinge

  • Research Site

    Linköping

  • Research Site

    Malmö/Lund

  • Research Site

    Motala

  • Research Site

    Örnsköldsvik

  • Research Site

    Skövde

  • Research Site

    Trollhättan

Other trials in Sweden

Germany1 site
  • Please contact the Merck Communications Service for Recruiting locations

    Darmstadt

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Phase IV Multicenter Randomized Study to Assess the Impact of a Patient Support Program (MinSupport Plus) on Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Adherence in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Administered Rebif® With the RebiSmart Device

This is a randomized, comparative, and multicenter study to assess the impact of a patient support program (MinSupport Plus) on health related quality of life (HRQoL) and adherence in subjects with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis administered Rebif® with the RebiSmart™ device.

Being tested
Rebif®
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Rebif, RebiSmart, Patient support program
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Rebif®Drug

Study groups in NCT01791244
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Technical support for the RebiSmart™ deviceActive comparatorSubjects will be administered Rebif® by the RebiSmart™ device at a dose of either 22 or 44 microgram (mcg) subcutaneously (SC) 3 times a week in accordance to the summary of product characteristics (SPC) along with technical support for RebiSmart.
Receives: Drug: Rebif®
Subject support program (MinSupport Plus)ExperimentalSubjects will be administered Rebif® by the RebiSmart™ device at a dose of either 22 or 44 mcg SC 3 times a week in accordance to the SPC along with subject support program MinSupport Plus which includes technical support for RebiSmart™ device, personal coaching regarding treatment and understanding of the disease, lifestyle guide and web support.
Receives: Drug: Rebif®

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Psychological Score at Month 12

    Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 was comprised of 9 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Psychological Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 9 questions - 9/0.36. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 12

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Psychological Score at Month 6

    Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 was comprised of 9 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Psychological Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 9 questions - 9/0.36. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.

    Measured: Baseline and Month 6

  2. Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Total Score at Month 6 and 12

    Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) is a validated MS specific questionnaire consisting of 29 questions of which 20 addressed the physical impact component and 9 assessed the psychological impact. A combined score can be generated, or both components can be reported separately. The total score of the MSIS-29 was comprised of all the 29 questions in which subjects rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact. The total Score was calculated using following formula: sum of score for 29 questions - 29/1.45. The total score range ranges from 0-100 where, lower total score indicates less psychologically-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater psychologically-related impact on a subject's functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

  3. Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire With 5 Questions Alternatives (EQ5D-5L) Summary Score at Month 6 and 12

    Quality of life was assessed using the EQ5D-5L score, which is one of the most widely used generic index measures of health-related quality of life. It consists of a 5-item descriptive system that measures 5 dimensions of health, including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension comprises 5 levels with corresponding numeric scores ranging from 1 (no problems) through 5 (extreme problems) in which 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, and 5= extreme problems. A unique EQ5D-5L health state was defined by combining the numeric level scores for each of the 5 dimensions and the total score ranges from 5 to 25. An increase in the EQ5D-5L total score indicates worsening.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Euro Quality of Life Questionnaire With 5 Questions Alternatives (EQ5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale at Month 6 and 12

    EQ-5D-5L VAS was used to record a subject's rating for his/her current health-related quality of life state and captured on a vertical VAS (0-100), where 0 = worst imaginable health state and 100 = best imaginable health state.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

  5. Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Adherence at Month 6 and 12

    According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), treatment adherence is defined as both compliance (taking the medication in the correct dose and according to the schedule prescribed) and persistency (maintenance of the drug regimen over the long-term). Percentage of subjects with <10% missed injections (measured with the software RDS 2.0) during 6 and 12 months were reported.

    Measured: Month 6 and 12

  6. Change From Baseline in Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) Score at Month 6 and 12

    Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a method of evaluating fatigue in multiple sclerosis and is designed to differentiate fatigue from clinical depression, since both share some of the same symptoms. The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item questionnaire developed to assess the level of fatigue due to neurological disease, were each assessed on a 1-7 scale (1= no fatigue and 7= severe fatigue). The total score was calculated as the average of individual 9-items and ranged from 1 to 7 with a higher value indicating greater impairment due to fatigue.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

  7. Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Score at Month 6 and 12

    The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale is a list of 21 statements describing how fatigue may affect a person's functioning. Answers ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Almost always). A total score ranged from a possible 0 (no fatigue impact) to 84 (almost always impacted by fatigue). A lower total score indicates less fatigue-related impact while a higher total score indicates greater fatigue-related impact on a subject's functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

  8. Change From Baseline in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Index at Month 6 and 12

    The Modified Fatigue Impact Index assesses fatigue- severity, distress, or degree of interference. Modified Fatigue Impact Scale Index was expressed in terms of percentage and ranged from 0% (no fatigue) to 100% (almost always impacted by fatigue).

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

  9. Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Score at Month 6 and 12

    Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to measure depression and anxiety in patients. The scale was limited to 14 questions, a practical tool for identifying and quantifying the two most common forms psychological disturbances in medical subjects. 7 of the items relate to anxiety and 7 relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire was scored from 0-3 giving a total score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression where higher score indicates more anxiety/depression.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 6 and 12

  10. Number of Subjects With Working Ability at Month 12

    Working ability was assessed by measuring the number of subjects for the following categories: 1) Subjects with full sickness/disability pension, 2) Subjects who were employed or had their own business, 3) Subjects who were retired, 4) Subjects who were studying, 5) None of the above.

    Measured: Month 12

  11. Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE) up to Month 12

    AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this the study drug. An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.

    Measured: Baseline up to Month 12

  12. Number of Subjects With Response Based on Lifestyle Questionnaire for (MinSupport Plus) at Month 6 and 12

    Lifestyle Questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life for subjects based on following parameters: Stress, Alcohol, Cost, Physical Aspect, Sleep, Activity and Smoking. Subjects provided their responses on the basis of three color codes: Green, Orange and Red, where Green refers to - no problem; Orange refers to - some problem and red refers to - definite/debilitating problem.

    Measured: Month 6 and 12

  13. Number of Subjects With Response Based on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire at Month 12

    The subject satisfaction questionnaire was defined as satisfaction with overall treatment and support from health care providers during the last 12 months. Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction by choosing either "Very discontented, discontented, contented or Very contented".

    Measured: Month 12

  14. Number of Subjects With Response Based on Health Care Personnel Satisfaction Questionnaire at Month 12

    The subject satisfaction questionnaire was defined as satisfaction with overall treatment and support from health care providers during the last 12 months. Subjects were asked to rate their satisfaction by choosing either "Very unsatisfied, unsatisfied, satisfied or very satisfied".

    Measured: Month 12

  15. Number of Subjects With Lifestyle Goals for MinSupport Plus at Month 12

    Subjects defined up to 4 personal lifestyle goals during the first study week. Subjects completed the following questions related to lifestyle goals achieved during this study: 1. Was the goal achieved? (Yes/No) 2. If yes, better than expected or achieved as expected? 3. If better than expected, a lot or a little better than expected? 4. If no, a little or a lot less than expected?

    Measured: Month 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Feb 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start28 Feb 2013
  3. Primary completion29 Feb 2016
  4. Study completion29 Feb 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
93 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01791244
Sponsor's protocol ID
EMR 200136-560
Other IDs
2012-004887-22
Acronym
RebiQoL
Status last verified
Jul 2017
First submitted
12 Feb 2013
Last updated
24 Aug 2017

Publications

  • Landtblom AM, Guala D, Martin C, Olsson-Hau S, Haghighi S, Jansson L, Fredrikson S. RebiQoL: A randomized trial of telemedicine patient support program for health-related quality of life and adherence in people with MS treated with Rebif. PLoS One. 2019 Jul 5;14(7):e0218453. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218453. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31276502

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Rebif® in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Relapsing-Remitting, run by Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany at 14 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in Sweden, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29) Psychological Score at Month 12 (time frame: Baseline and Month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01791244, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in