AzTrials
AzTrials

Open Angle GlaucomaNCT01788319

Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty (532nm) Versus Conventional Laser Trabeculoplasty (532nm)

A study testing lasertrabeculoplasty in people with Open Angle Glaucoma, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will investigate if micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (532nm) is as effecttive as or better than the conventional laser trabeculoplasty (532nm), it might be a new treatment strategy for glaucoma patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Open Angle Glaucoma
What is being tested?
lasertrabeculoplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Feb 2013to Jun 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • individuals over 18 years old
  • willing to sign an informed consent and able to comply the requirements of the study
  • having no other ocular diseases besides glaucoma

Who cannot join

  • history of ocular trauma
  • intraocular surgery (except for phaco)
  • pigment dispersion and exfoliation glaucoma

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Department of Ophthalmology, UZLeuven

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: Micropulse Laser Trabeculoplasty (532nm) Versus Conventional Laser Trabeculoplasty (532nm) in Open Angle Glaucoma Patients

This study will investigate if micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (532nm) is as effecttive as or better than the conventional laser trabeculoplasty (532nm), it might be a new treatment strategy for glaucoma patients. It is done with a laser device that can also be used for many other ophthalmic applications, thus reducing the economic burden of treatment.

Being tested
lasertrabeculoplasty
Keywords
laser trabeculoplasty, glaucoma
Medical subject headings
Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Glaucoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • lasertrabeculoplastyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Conventional (532nm)

Study groups in NCT01788319
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
lasertrabeculoplastyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: lasertrabeculoplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. to compare the intraocular pressure reduction with the micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (532nm) versus the conventional laser trabeculoplasty (532nm)

    Measured: one year of follow-up

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Secondary the complication rate between the two techniques will be compared

    Measured: one year of follow up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Feb 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01788319
Sponsor's protocol ID
S55194
Status last verified
Feb 2013
First submitted
1 Feb 2013
Last updated
23 Jun 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing lasertrabeculoplasty in people with Open Angle Glaucoma, run by Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

to compare the intraocular pressure reduction with the micropulse laser trabeculoplasty (532nm) versus the conventional laser trabeculoplasty (532nm) (time frame: one year of follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in