AzTrials
AzTrials

Liver CirrhosisNCT01773538

Diagnosis of Covert/Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy by Means of Continuous Reaction Time Measurement

A study testing Lactulose and rifaximin and Branched Chain amino acids in people with Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy, run by Mette Munk Lauridsen at 2 sites in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators wish to investigate how the Continuous Reaction Time (CRT) method can be used in the diagnosis and monitoring of covert hepatic encephalopathy (cHE)in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Liver Cirrhosis, Hepatic Encephalopathy
What is being tested?
Lactulose and rifaximin and Branched Chain amino acids
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
136 participants
Where
2 sitesDenmark
Study dates
Jan 2013to Nov 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • For healthy volunteers:
  • Age> 18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Speak and understand Danish
  • For patients:
  • Age > 18 years
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Liver cirrhosis confirmed by biopsy or appropriate clinic and biochemistry, and imaging.
  • Written informed consent
  • Speak and understand Danish

Who cannot join

  • Clinical manifest hepatic encephalopathy
  • Consumption of psychoactive substances within 6 days of test
  • Organic brain disease (i.e. prior stroke, dementia)
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Renal failure (creatinine> 150 mg / dL)
  • Hyponatremia (Na <125 mmol / L)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Sepsis or bleeding within one week prior to testing.
  • Serious sleep disorders
  • Current treatment with lactulose, rifaximin or BCAA

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Denmark2 sites
  • Hospital of South West Jutland

    Esbjerg, 6700

  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense, 5000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

The investigators wish to investigate how the Continuous Reaction Time (CRT) method can be used in the diagnosis and monitoring of covert hepatic encephalopathy (cHE)in patients with cirrhosis of the liver. The hypothesis is that the CRT method (duration 10-2 minutes) can serve as a tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of cHE and is an alternative to using the Portosystemic Encephalopathy Test (PSE)(duration 20-25 minutes).

Read the detailed description

Objective: The aim of this project is to investigate whether continuous reaction time measurements (CRT) are suitable as a screening and monitoring tool for covert hepatic encephalopathy (c/mHE).

Method:

Sub-protocol 1: As a part of this PhD protocol 100 healthy individuals and 50 with chronic disease (not liver cirrhosis) will be tested using the CRT and PSE tests. This is to determine the normal range for the PSE test in the Danish population.

Sub-protocol 2: A total of 120 (aprox. 145 to adjust for drop outs) patients with liver cirrhosis from two Danish hospitals will be examined with both CRT and with the test that is the closest we get to a gold standard, namely portosystemic encephalopathy test (PSE). We wish to examine if the CRT test agrees with the PSE test, which may be to time consuming to perform in everyday clinical practice, and with quality of life scores (SF-36 and Sickness Impact Profile). The relationship between the CRT and PSE test and various blood tests and the Charlston co-morbidity score will also be examined.

Sub-protocol 3: Forty-four of the 120 included patients will, regardless of CRT test result, be randomized to treatment with lactulose, rifaximin and branched chain amino acids (BCAA) or placebo lactulose, rifaximin and BCAA. This is to evaluate whether the CRT method is able to detect a response to treatment, and see if changes in psychometric tests (PSE and CRT) are in accordance with quality of life scores and predicts subsequent development of overt hepatic encephalopathy.

Perspective: CRT method should, if it proves good enough, continue to be the Danish test of choice and hopefully be more widely used in our country. The validation of tests for the diagnosis of covert hepatic encephalopathy will give cirrhotic patients with covert hepatic encephalopathy and reduced quality of life the best opportunity to be diagnosed and offered appropriate treatment. If the CRT method is not able to identify a population that benefits from anti-encephalopathy treatment other screening and monitoring tests should be used.

Being tested
Lactulose and rifaximin, Branched Chain amino acids, Placebo
Keywords
quality of life
Medical subject headings
Liver Cirrhosis, Hepatic Encephalopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lactulose and rifaximinDrug

    3 months treatment. lactulose 25 Ml x3 per day. Rifaximin (550 mg) x 2 per day.

  • Branched Chain amino acidsDietary supplement

    30 grams of branched chain amino acids (Bramino) per day is given to the patients in the antiHE treatment arm along with lactulose and rifaximin.

  • PlaceboOther

    Patients in the placebo-arm receives both placebo-Bramino, placebo-lactulose and placebo-rifaximin.

Study groups in NCT01773538
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anti cHE treatment armActive comparatorOf 150 included patients aprox. 44 regardless of CRT and PSE test outcome will be offered to enter randomisation and 3 months follow up. Half of 44 patients will receive both lactulose, rifaximin and branched chain aminoacids (Bramino) the other half placebo.
Receives: Drug: Lactulose and rifaximin; Dietary Supplement: Branched Chain amino acids
Placebo armPlacebo comparatorThe goal of this intervention is to investigate whether the CRT method can detect an expected treatment response after initiation of the 3 named drugs know to ameliorate HE symptoms including psychometric test results.
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Continuous Reaction Time Method versus Portosystemic Encephalopathy Test

    The investigators are evaluating if the CRT and PSE test are in accordance at inclusion and after 3 months of treatment.

    Measured: baseline and 3 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in Continuous Reaction Time Method versus Quality of Life (QoL)

    The results from both CRT and PSE test will be compared to the out come of the SF-36 and the SIP (Sickness impact profile) QoL measurements.

    Measured: baseline and 3 months

  2. Correlation between CRT test and PSE test at inclusion

    The investigators wish to evaluate the correlation between the CRT and the PSE test at base line.

    Measured: at baseline

  3. Correlation between psychometric test results and quality of life af base line

    The investigators wish to evaluate the correlation between the psychometric test results (CRT test result and PSE test result) and quality of life. The scientific question is which test correlates best to QoL.

    Measured: at base line

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2013
  3. Primary completionOct 2015
  4. Study completionNov 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01773538
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHECRT
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
7 Jan 2013
Last updated
23 Feb 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lactulose and rifaximin and Branched Chain amino acids in people with Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatic Encephalopathy, run by Mette Munk Lauridsen at 2 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Continuous Reaction Time Method versus Portosystemic Encephalopathy Test (time frame: baseline and 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in