Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT01770106
RA Denosumab on Bone Microstructure Study
A Phase 4 study testing Denosumab and Alendronate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of denosumab and a current standard treatment on cortical and trabecular microarchitecture at the radius and second metacarpal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low bone mineral density using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Denosumab and Alendronate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- with a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 new 2010 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria
- at an age over 18 years old
- have a lumbar spine, or total hip or distal radius T-score lower than -1.5 by DXA
- without severe deformity in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints which would influence the longitudinal assessment of HR-pQCT
- consent to receive alendronate if randomized to standard treatment group.
Who cannot join
- they have previous use of denosumab, teriparatide, alendronate or other anti-resorptive agents;
- they have a history of recent major gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease (e.g. oesophagitis or GI ulceration) or have experienced any previous adverse reaction to bisphosphonate therapy;
- they are receiving other bone-active drugs, such as hormonal replacement therapy, thyroxine, thiazide and diuretics;
- they have conditions affecting bone metabolism; contraindications to alendronate and denosumab (uncorrected hypocalcemia);
- they have unexplained hypocalcemia;
- they have severe renal impairment or serum creatinine level of >200umol/L;
- they are pregnant or breastfeeding;
- they do not understand Chinese or are incompetent in giving consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of the Effect of Denosumab and Alendronate on Bone Density and Microarchitecture in Rheumatoid Arthritis Females With Low Bone Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of denosumab and a current standard treatment on cortical and trabecular microarchitecture at the radius and second metacarpal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low bone mineral density using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) during a 6-month open-label randomized controlled study. Forty ambulatory Chinese females, who consent to receive alendronate as standard treatment subjective to the randomization, will be enrolled in this study. Subjects will be randomized to 2 arms receiving: 1) subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg (Prolia®) every 6 months (n=20), or 2) oral alendronate weekly (Fosamax® once weekly 70 mg, n=20). In addition, all patients will be given a daily calcium supplement (1500mg caltrate /day) and 1 multivitamin tablet per day. Efficacy and safety assessment will be performed at baseline, month 3 and month 6. aBMD of lumbar spine, total hip and non-dominant distal radius will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and microarchitecture of bone is measured at the non-dominant distal radius and the second metacarpal bone of the non-dominant hand using HR-pQCT.
Read the detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease most typical in women. Generalized osteoporosis is common in RA, at axial and appendicular skeleton and in females and males. Denosumab is a fully humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that targets the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). Denosumab prevents the binding and activation of the RANK receptors on the osteoclasts and hence inhibits osteoclasts formation, activation, function and survival. Denosumab results in more rapid and greater reductions in bone remodeling and correspondingly greater increases in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at all skeletal sites. Denosumab was approved by FDA in June 2010 for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. Denosumab (Prolia®) is also licensed in Hong Kong.
A high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) capable of achieving an isotropic voxel size of 80μm at tolerable radiation doses (3μSv) is available for the assessment of trabecular and cortical microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia. This technique bears excellent precision for both density and microstructure measures. Denosumab's greater potency in suppressing bone remodeling and greater effect on areal BMD than alendronate, particularly at predominantly cortical sites such as the distal third of the radius, may reflect the differing mechanism of action of these drugs, which, in turn, influence bone microarchitecture.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of denosumab and a current standard treatment on cortical and trabecular microarchitecture at the radius and second metacarpal in RA patients with low bone mineral density using HR-pQCT during a 6-month open-label randomized controlled study. One bisphosphonate, namely alendronate sodium (or alendronate) is chosen to generate a heterogeneous and comparable active control group. This is a 6-month open-label randomized controlled clinical trial. Forty ambulatory Chinese females, who consent to receive alendronate as standard treatment subjective to the randomization, will be enrolled from the rheumatology clinic of the Prince of Wales Hospital in this study. Subjects will be randomized to 2 groups receiving: 1) subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg (Prolia®) every 6 months (n=20), or 2) a standard treatment: oral alendronate weekly (Fosamax® once weekly 70 mg, n=20). In addition, all patients will be given a daily calcium supplement (1500mg caltrate /day) and 1 multivitamin tablet per day. Efficacy and safety assessment will be performed at baseline, month 3 and month 6. aBMD of lumbar spine, total hip and non-dominant distal radius will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and microarchitecture of bone is measured at the non-dominant distal radius and the second metacarpal bone of the non-dominant hand using HR-pQCT.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Denosumab, Alendronate
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid arthritis, Bone density, Bone microarchitecture, HR-pQCT
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DenosumabDrug
Also called Prolia®
Subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg every 6 months (1 dose for study period)
AlendronateDrug
Also called Fosamax®
Alendronate 70mg once weekly
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Denosumab | Experimental | Patients in this arm will receive subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg every 6 months (1 dose for the study period). Receives: Drug: Denosumab |
| Standard treatment | Active comparator | Patients (n=20) in this arm will receive oral alendronate (Fosamax®)70mg once. Receives: Drug: Alendronate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at distal radius at 6th month
Bone volumetric density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) at distal radius by HR-pQCT
Measured: Baseline to 6th month
Secondary outcomes (13)
Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at distal radius at 6th month
Trabecular bone microarchitecture is characterized by trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) at distal radius by HR-pQCT
Measured: Baseline to 6th month
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at the 2nd metacarpal bone at 6th month
Volumetric bone density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density at the 2nd metacarpal bone measured by HR-pQCT
Measured: Baseline to 6th month
Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at 2nd metacarpal bone at 6th month
Trabecular bone microarchitecture is characterized by trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) at 2nd metacarpal head by HR-pQCT
Measured: Baseline to 6th month
Changes from baseline in areal bone density at total hip at 6th month
Areal bone density at total hip is characterized by areal bone mineral density by DXA.
Measured: Baseline to 6th months
Changes from baseline in areal bone density at lumbar spine at 6th month
Areal bone density at lumbar spine is characterized by areal bone mineral denstiy at lumbar spine by DXA
Measured: Baseline to 6th month
Changes in areal bone density at distal radius at 6th month
Areal bone density is characterized by areal bone mineral density at distal radius by DXA
Measured: Baseline to 6th month
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at distal radius at 3rd month
Bone volumetric density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) at distal radius by HR-pQCT
Measured: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at distal radius at 3rd month
Trabecular bone microarchitecture is characterized by trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) at distal radius by HR-pQCT
Measured: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at the 2nd metacarpal bone at 3rd month
Volumetric bone density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density at the 2nd metacarpal bone measured by HR-pQCT
Measured: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at 2nd metacarpal bone at 3rd month
Trabecular bone microarchitecture is characterized by trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) at 2nd metacarpal head by HR-pQCT
Measured: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in areal bone density at total hip at 3rd month
Areal bone density at total hip is characterized by areal bone mineral density by DXA.
Measured: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in areal bone density at lumbar spine at 3rd month
Areal bone density at lumbar spine is characterized by areal bone mineral denstiy at lumbar spine by DXA
Measured: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes in areal bone density at distal radius at 3rd month
Areal bone density is characterized by areal bone mineral density at distal radius by DXA
Measured: Baseline to 3rd month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Chinese University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lai-Shan Tam, Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Lai-Shan Tam, MD, Principal investigator, Chinese University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01770106
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RA-2011.510
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 3 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Yue J, Griffith JF, Xiao F, Shi L, Wang D, Shen J, Wong P, Li EK, Li M, Li TK, Zhu TY, Hung VW, Qin L, Tam LS. Repair of Bone Erosion in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Denosumab: A High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;69(8):1156-1163. doi: 10.1002/acr.23133. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
PubMed 27768831
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of the Effect of Denosumab and Alendronate on Bone Density and Microarchitecture in Rheumatoid Arthritis Females With Low Bone Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01770106
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RA-2011.510
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Keywords
- Rheumatoid arthritis, Bone density, Bone microarchitecture, HR-pQCT
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2012
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of denosumab and a current standard treatment on cortical and trabecular microarchitecture at the radius and second metacarpal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low bone mineral density using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) during a 6-month open-label randomized controlled study. Forty ambulatory Chinese females, who consent to receive alendronate as standard treatment subjective to the randomization, will be enrolled in this study. Subjects will be randomized to 2 arms receiving: 1) subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg (Prolia®) every 6 months (n=20), or 2) oral alendronate weekly (Fosamax® once weekly 70 mg, n=20). In addition, all patients will be given a daily calcium supplement (1500mg caltrate /day) and 1 multivitamin tablet per day. Efficacy and safety assessment will be performed at baseline, month 3 and month 6. aBMD of lumbar spine, total hip and non-dominant distal radius will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and microarchitecture of bone is measured at the non-dominant distal radius and the second metacarpal bone of the non-dominant hand using HR-pQCT.
Detailed description
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease most typical in women. Generalized osteoporosis is common in RA, at axial and appendicular skeleton and in females and males. Denosumab is a fully humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that targets the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). Denosumab prevents the binding and activation of the RANK receptors on the osteoclasts and hence inhibits osteoclasts formation, activation, function and survival. Denosumab results in more rapid and greater reductions in bone remodeling and correspondingly greater increases in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at all skeletal sites. Denosumab was approved by FDA in June 2010 for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. Denosumab (Prolia®) is also licensed in Hong Kong.
A high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) capable of achieving an isotropic voxel size of 80μm at tolerable radiation doses (3μSv) is available for the assessment of trabecular and cortical microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia. This technique bears excellent precision for both density and microstructure measures. Denosumab's greater potency in suppressing bone remodeling and greater effect on areal BMD than alendronate, particularly at predominantly cortical sites such as the distal third of the radius, may reflect the differing mechanism of action of these drugs, which, in turn, influence bone microarchitecture.
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of denosumab and a current standard treatment on cortical and trabecular microarchitecture at the radius and second metacarpal in RA patients with low bone mineral density using HR-pQCT during a 6-month open-label randomized controlled study. One bisphosphonate, namely alendronate sodium (or alendronate) is chosen to generate a heterogeneous and comparable active control group. This is a 6-month open-label randomized controlled clinical trial. Forty ambulatory Chinese females, who consent to receive alendronate as standard treatment subjective to the randomization, will be enrolled from the rheumatology clinic of the Prince of Wales Hospital in this study. Subjects will be randomized to 2 groups receiving: 1) subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg (Prolia®) every 6 months (n=20), or 2) a standard treatment: oral alendronate weekly (Fosamax® once weekly 70 mg, n=20). In addition, all patients will be given a daily calcium supplement (1500mg caltrate /day) and 1 multivitamin tablet per day. Efficacy and safety assessment will be performed at baseline, month 3 and month 6. aBMD of lumbar spine, total hip and non-dominant distal radius will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and microarchitecture of bone is measured at the non-dominant distal radius and the second metacarpal bone of the non-dominant hand using HR-pQCT.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Denosumab | Experimental | Drug: DenosumabPatients in this arm will receive subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg every 6 months (1 dose for the study period). |
| Standard treatment | Active comparator | Drug: AlendronatePatients (n=20) in this arm will receive oral alendronate (Fosamax®)70mg once. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- with a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 new 2010 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria
- at an age over 18 years old
- have a lumbar spine, or total hip or distal radius T-score lower than -1.5 by DXA
- without severe deformity in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints which would influence the longitudinal assessment of HR-pQCT
- consent to receive alendronate if randomized to standard treatment group.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- they have previous use of denosumab, teriparatide, alendronate or other anti-resorptive agents;
- they have a history of recent major gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease (e.g. oesophagitis or GI ulceration) or have experienced any previous adverse reaction to bisphosphonate therapy;
- they are receiving other bone-active drugs, such as hormonal replacement therapy, thyroxine, thiazide and diuretics;
- they have conditions affecting bone metabolism; contraindications to alendronate and denosumab (uncorrected hypocalcemia);
- they have unexplained hypocalcemia;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DenosumabAlso: Prolia®Subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg every 6 months (1 dose for study period) | Drug | Denosumab |
| AlendronateAlso: Fosamax®Alendronate 70mg once weekly | Drug | Standard treatment |
Primary outcome
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at distal radius at 6th month
Time frame: Baseline to 6th month
Bone volumetric density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) at distal radius by HR-pQCT
13 secondary outcomes
Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at distal radius at 6th month
Time frame: Baseline to 6th month
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at the 2nd metacarpal bone at 6th month
Time frame: Baseline to 6th month
Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at 2nd metacarpal bone at 6th month
Time frame: Baseline to 6th month
Changes from baseline in areal bone density at total hip at 6th month
Time frame: Baseline to 6th months
Changes from baseline in areal bone density at lumbar spine at 6th month
Time frame: Baseline to 6th month
Changes in areal bone density at distal radius at 6th month
Time frame: Baseline to 6th month
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at distal radius at 3rd month
Time frame: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at distal radius at 3rd month
Time frame: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at the 2nd metacarpal bone at 3rd month
Time frame: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at 2nd metacarpal bone at 3rd month
Time frame: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in areal bone density at total hip at 3rd month
Time frame: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes from baseline in areal bone density at lumbar spine at 3rd month
Time frame: Baseline to 3rd month
Changes in areal bone density at distal radius at 3rd month
Time frame: Baseline to 3rd month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27768831Yue J, Griffith JF, Xiao F, Shi L, Wang D, Shen J, Wong P, Li EK, Li M, Li TK, Zhu TY, Hung VW, Qin L, Tam LS. Repair of Bone Erosion in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Denosumab: A High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;69(8):1156-1163. doi: 10.1002/acr.23133. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Frequency and Complications of Major Orthopedic Procedures in Medicare Beneficiaries
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Diseases With Salivary Gland Involvement
Healthy Volunteer, Sjogren's Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingPhase 2
A PHASE II PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-MASKED CONTROLLED STUDY ASSESSING THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF RHPRG4 (450 µG/ML RECOMBINANT HUMAN PROTEOGLYCAN 4) COMPARED TO VEHICLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SJÖGREN'S RELATED DRY EYE DISEASE
Sjögren's Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
COVID-19 Booster and IIV Schedule in Immunocompromised Hosts
COVID 19, Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lai-Shan Tam, MD principal investigator
Chinese University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Denosumab and Alendronate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at distal radius at 6th month (time frame: Baseline to 6th month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01770106, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2014.