AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 4NCT01770106

RA Denosumab on Bone Microstructure Study

A Phase 4 study testing Denosumab and Alendronate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of denosumab and a current standard treatment on cortical and trabecular microarchitecture at the radius and second metacarpal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low bone mineral density using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
What is being tested?
Denosumab and Alendronate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
Dec 2012to Jun 2014
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • with a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 new 2010 American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria
  • at an age over 18 years old
  • have a lumbar spine, or total hip or distal radius T-score lower than -1.5 by DXA
  • without severe deformity in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints which would influence the longitudinal assessment of HR-pQCT
  • consent to receive alendronate if randomized to standard treatment group.

Who cannot join

  • they have previous use of denosumab, teriparatide, alendronate or other anti-resorptive agents;
  • they have a history of recent major gastrointestinal (GI) tract disease (e.g. oesophagitis or GI ulceration) or have experienced any previous adverse reaction to bisphosphonate therapy;
  • they are receiving other bone-active drugs, such as hormonal replacement therapy, thyroxine, thiazide and diuretics;
  • they have conditions affecting bone metabolism; contraindications to alendronate and denosumab (uncorrected hypocalcemia);
  • they have unexplained hypocalcemia;
  • they have severe renal impairment or serum creatinine level of >200umol/L;
  • they are pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • they do not understand Chinese or are incompetent in giving consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Shatin, N.t.

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Effect of Denosumab and Alendronate on Bone Density and Microarchitecture in Rheumatoid Arthritis Females With Low Bone Mass: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of denosumab and a current standard treatment on cortical and trabecular microarchitecture at the radius and second metacarpal in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with low bone mineral density using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) during a 6-month open-label randomized controlled study. Forty ambulatory Chinese females, who consent to receive alendronate as standard treatment subjective to the randomization, will be enrolled in this study. Subjects will be randomized to 2 arms receiving: 1) subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg (Prolia®) every 6 months (n=20), or 2) oral alendronate weekly (Fosamax® once weekly 70 mg, n=20). In addition, all patients will be given a daily calcium supplement (1500mg caltrate /day) and 1 multivitamin tablet per day. Efficacy and safety assessment will be performed at baseline, month 3 and month 6. aBMD of lumbar spine, total hip and non-dominant distal radius will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and microarchitecture of bone is measured at the non-dominant distal radius and the second metacarpal bone of the non-dominant hand using HR-pQCT.

Read the detailed description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disease most typical in women. Generalized osteoporosis is common in RA, at axial and appendicular skeleton and in females and males. Denosumab is a fully humanized IgG monoclonal antibody that targets the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). Denosumab prevents the binding and activation of the RANK receptors on the osteoclasts and hence inhibits osteoclasts formation, activation, function and survival. Denosumab results in more rapid and greater reductions in bone remodeling and correspondingly greater increases in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at all skeletal sites. Denosumab was approved by FDA in June 2010 for the treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture. Denosumab (Prolia®) is also licensed in Hong Kong.

A high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) capable of achieving an isotropic voxel size of 80μm at tolerable radiation doses (3μSv) is available for the assessment of trabecular and cortical microarchitecture at the distal radius and tibia. This technique bears excellent precision for both density and microstructure measures. Denosumab's greater potency in suppressing bone remodeling and greater effect on areal BMD than alendronate, particularly at predominantly cortical sites such as the distal third of the radius, may reflect the differing mechanism of action of these drugs, which, in turn, influence bone microarchitecture.

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of denosumab and a current standard treatment on cortical and trabecular microarchitecture at the radius and second metacarpal in RA patients with low bone mineral density using HR-pQCT during a 6-month open-label randomized controlled study. One bisphosphonate, namely alendronate sodium (or alendronate) is chosen to generate a heterogeneous and comparable active control group. This is a 6-month open-label randomized controlled clinical trial. Forty ambulatory Chinese females, who consent to receive alendronate as standard treatment subjective to the randomization, will be enrolled from the rheumatology clinic of the Prince of Wales Hospital in this study. Subjects will be randomized to 2 groups receiving: 1) subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg (Prolia®) every 6 months (n=20), or 2) a standard treatment: oral alendronate weekly (Fosamax® once weekly 70 mg, n=20). In addition, all patients will be given a daily calcium supplement (1500mg caltrate /day) and 1 multivitamin tablet per day. Efficacy and safety assessment will be performed at baseline, month 3 and month 6. aBMD of lumbar spine, total hip and non-dominant distal radius will be measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and microarchitecture of bone is measured at the non-dominant distal radius and the second metacarpal bone of the non-dominant hand using HR-pQCT.

Being tested
Denosumab, Alendronate
Keywords
Rheumatoid arthritis, Bone density, Bone microarchitecture, HR-pQCT
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DenosumabDrug

    Also called Prolia®

    Subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg every 6 months (1 dose for study period)

  • AlendronateDrug

    Also called Fosamax®

    Alendronate 70mg once weekly

Study groups in NCT01770106
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DenosumabExperimentalPatients in this arm will receive subcutaneous injection of denosumab 60mg every 6 months (1 dose for the study period).
Receives: Drug: Denosumab
Standard treatmentActive comparatorPatients (n=20) in this arm will receive oral alendronate (Fosamax®)70mg once.
Receives: Drug: Alendronate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at distal radius at 6th month

    Bone volumetric density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) at distal radius by HR-pQCT

    Measured: Baseline to 6th month

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at distal radius at 6th month

    Trabecular bone microarchitecture is characterized by trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) at distal radius by HR-pQCT

    Measured: Baseline to 6th month

  2. Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at the 2nd metacarpal bone at 6th month

    Volumetric bone density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density at the 2nd metacarpal bone measured by HR-pQCT

    Measured: Baseline to 6th month

  3. Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at 2nd metacarpal bone at 6th month

    Trabecular bone microarchitecture is characterized by trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) at 2nd metacarpal head by HR-pQCT

    Measured: Baseline to 6th month

  4. Changes from baseline in areal bone density at total hip at 6th month

    Areal bone density at total hip is characterized by areal bone mineral density by DXA.

    Measured: Baseline to 6th months

  5. Changes from baseline in areal bone density at lumbar spine at 6th month

    Areal bone density at lumbar spine is characterized by areal bone mineral denstiy at lumbar spine by DXA

    Measured: Baseline to 6th month

  6. Changes in areal bone density at distal radius at 6th month

    Areal bone density is characterized by areal bone mineral density at distal radius by DXA

    Measured: Baseline to 6th month

  7. Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at distal radius at 3rd month

    Bone volumetric density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) at distal radius by HR-pQCT

    Measured: Baseline to 3rd month

  8. Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at distal radius at 3rd month

    Trabecular bone microarchitecture is characterized by trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) at distal radius by HR-pQCT

    Measured: Baseline to 3rd month

  9. Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at the 2nd metacarpal bone at 3rd month

    Volumetric bone density is characterized by average volumetric bone mineral density at the 2nd metacarpal bone measured by HR-pQCT

    Measured: Baseline to 3rd month

  10. Changes from baseline in trabecular bone microarchitecture at 2nd metacarpal bone at 3rd month

    Trabecular bone microarchitecture is characterized by trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) at 2nd metacarpal head by HR-pQCT

    Measured: Baseline to 3rd month

  11. Changes from baseline in areal bone density at total hip at 3rd month

    Areal bone density at total hip is characterized by areal bone mineral density by DXA.

    Measured: Baseline to 3rd month

  12. Changes from baseline in areal bone density at lumbar spine at 3rd month

    Areal bone density at lumbar spine is characterized by areal bone mineral denstiy at lumbar spine by DXA

    Measured: Baseline to 3rd month

  13. Changes in areal bone density at distal radius at 3rd month

    Areal bone density is characterized by areal bone mineral density at distal radius by DXA

    Measured: Baseline to 3rd month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01770106
Sponsor's protocol ID
RA-2011.510
Status last verified
Sep 2014
First submitted
3 Jan 2013
Last updated
11 Sep 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Yue J, Griffith JF, Xiao F, Shi L, Wang D, Shen J, Wong P, Li EK, Li M, Li TK, Zhu TY, Hung VW, Qin L, Tam LS. Repair of Bone Erosion in Rheumatoid Arthritis by Denosumab: A High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017 Aug;69(8):1156-1163. doi: 10.1002/acr.23133. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

    PubMed 27768831

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Denosumab and Alendronate in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes from baseline in bone volumetric density at distal radius at 6th month (time frame: Baseline to 6th month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01770106, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2014.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
RA Denosumab on Bone Microstructure Study | AzTrials