AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema (PSCME)Phase 2/3TEMPESTNCT01769352

Treatment of Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema With Topical Steroids Trial (TEMPEST-1)

A Phase 2/3 study testing PredA + Kelac in people with Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema (PSCME), run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the change in visual acuity of patients with post surgical cystoid macular edema who will be treated with two different regimens. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
PredA + Kelac
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
42 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Aug 2012to Apr 2016
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age more than or equal to 18 years
  • Diagnosis of PSCME in study eye confirmed by FA showing leakage from retinal vessels resulting in pooling of dye in the fovea and Spectralis SD-OCT showing intraretinal fluid in or around the fovea.
  • BCVA score in the study eye of 20/30 to 20/400 inclusive (Snellen equivalents using the ETDRS protocol at a distance of 4 meters).
  • In the opinion of the investigator, decreased vision in the study eye is due to foveal thickening from PSCME and not to any other reason.

Who cannot join

  • Any patient who has other retinal diseases known to cause macular edema (choroidal neovascularization, vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema in the study eye). Patients with nonexudative Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema can be included in the study.
  • Other reason for decreased visual acuity (such as amblyopia, foveal atrophy, optic atrophy).
  • Pre-existing diagnosis of glaucoma in the study eye
  • Inability to comply with study or follow up procedures
  • Pregnancy (Women of child bearing age will be asked to take a urine pregnancy test prior to enrolling in the study).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Wilmer Eye Institute

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to compare the change in visual acuity of patients with post surgical cystoid macular edema who will be treated with two different regimens.

Read the detailed description

Compare the mean change in BCVA over 12 weeks of Prednisolone Acetate 1% q1h (every hour) WA (While Awake) + Ketorolac 0.5% qid (four times a day) versus Prednisolone Acetate qid + Ketorolac qid for post surgical cystoid macular edema.

Being tested
PredA + Kelac
Keywords
cystoid macular edema
Medical subject headings
Macular Edema

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PredA + KelacDrug

    Also called Acular, Acuvail, Pred Forte, Omnipred, Pred Mild

    At week 12, patients will be determined to be resolved, improving/stabilized or treatment failures. Patients who have complete resolution of edema will begin treatment withdrawl. Improving/stabilizing patients will maintain current therapy. Treatment failure Group 2 patients will move to Group 3 to receive PredA q1h WA + Kelac qid starting at week 12. Treatment failure Group 1 patients will be exited from the trial so that alternative therapy can be given.

Study groups in NCT01769352
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PredA q1h WA + Kelac qidActive comparatorPrednisolone acetate (PredA) 1% ophthalmic solution every 1 hr while awake (WA) and Ketorolac (Kelac) 0.5% ophthlmic solution four times a day (qid)
Receives: Drug: PredA + Kelac
PredA qid + Kelac qidActive comparatorPrednisolone acetate (PredA) 1% ophthalmic solution four times a day (qid) and Ketorolac (Kelac) 0.5% ophthlmic solution four times a day (qid)
Receives: Drug: PredA + Kelac

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity at Week 12 From Baseline

    Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (Letter Score) at Week 12 from Baseline. The Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score is measured on a scale from 5 to 100. The higher the score on this scale, the better is the patients vision.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness at Week 12 From Baseline

    Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness (µm) at Week 12 from Baseline

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure at Week 12 From Baseline

    Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at week 12 from Baseline

    Measured: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity Between Week 12 and Week 48

    Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (Letters Score) between Week 12 and Week 48. The Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score is measured on a scale from 5 to 100. The higher the score on this scale, the better is the patients vision.

    Measured: Week 12 and Week 48

  4. Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between Week 12 and Week 48

    Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CST,µm) between week 12 and week 48

    Measured: Week 12 and Week 48

  5. Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure Between Week 12 and Week 24

    Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) between week 12 and week 24

    Measured: Week 12 and Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2012
  3. Primary completionApr 2016
  4. Study completionApr 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
42 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01769352
Sponsor's protocol ID
NA_00074523
Acronym
TEMPEST
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
14 Jan 2013
Last updated
15 Sep 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing PredA + Kelac in people with Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema (PSCME), run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Sep 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity at Week 12 From Baseline (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in