Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema (PSCME)Phase 2/3TEMPESTNCT01769352
Treatment of Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema With Topical Steroids Trial (TEMPEST-1)
A Phase 2/3 study testing PredA + Kelac in people with Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema (PSCME), run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the change in visual acuity of patients with post surgical cystoid macular edema who will be treated with two different regimens. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema (PSCME)
- What is being tested?
- PredA + Kelac
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age more than or equal to 18 years
- Diagnosis of PSCME in study eye confirmed by FA showing leakage from retinal vessels resulting in pooling of dye in the fovea and Spectralis SD-OCT showing intraretinal fluid in or around the fovea.
- BCVA score in the study eye of 20/30 to 20/400 inclusive (Snellen equivalents using the ETDRS protocol at a distance of 4 meters).
- In the opinion of the investigator, decreased vision in the study eye is due to foveal thickening from PSCME and not to any other reason.
Who cannot join
- Any patient who has other retinal diseases known to cause macular edema (choroidal neovascularization, vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema in the study eye). Patients with nonexudative Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema can be included in the study.
- Other reason for decreased visual acuity (such as amblyopia, foveal atrophy, optic atrophy).
- Pre-existing diagnosis of glaucoma in the study eye
- Inability to comply with study or follow up procedures
- Pregnancy (Women of child bearing age will be asked to take a urine pregnancy test prior to enrolling in the study).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The purpose of this study is to compare the change in visual acuity of patients with post surgical cystoid macular edema who will be treated with two different regimens.
Read the detailed description
Compare the mean change in BCVA over 12 weeks of Prednisolone Acetate 1% q1h (every hour) WA (While Awake) + Ketorolac 0.5% qid (four times a day) versus Prednisolone Acetate qid + Ketorolac qid for post surgical cystoid macular edema.
- Being tested
- PredA + Kelac
- Keywords
- cystoid macular edema
- Medical subject headings
- Macular Edema
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PredA + KelacDrug
Also called Acular, Acuvail, Pred Forte, Omnipred, Pred Mild
At week 12, patients will be determined to be resolved, improving/stabilized or treatment failures. Patients who have complete resolution of edema will begin treatment withdrawl. Improving/stabilizing patients will maintain current therapy. Treatment failure Group 2 patients will move to Group 3 to receive PredA q1h WA + Kelac qid starting at week 12. Treatment failure Group 1 patients will be exited from the trial so that alternative therapy can be given.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PredA q1h WA + Kelac qid | Active comparator | Prednisolone acetate (PredA) 1% ophthalmic solution every 1 hr while awake (WA) and Ketorolac (Kelac) 0.5% ophthlmic solution four times a day (qid) Receives: Drug: PredA + Kelac |
| PredA qid + Kelac qid | Active comparator | Prednisolone acetate (PredA) 1% ophthalmic solution four times a day (qid) and Ketorolac (Kelac) 0.5% ophthlmic solution four times a day (qid) Receives: Drug: PredA + Kelac |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity at Week 12 From Baseline
Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (Letter Score) at Week 12 from Baseline. The Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score is measured on a scale from 5 to 100. The higher the score on this scale, the better is the patients vision.
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (5)
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness at Week 12 From Baseline
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness (µm) at Week 12 from Baseline
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure at Week 12 From Baseline
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at week 12 from Baseline
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity Between Week 12 and Week 48
Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (Letters Score) between Week 12 and Week 48. The Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score is measured on a scale from 5 to 100. The higher the score on this scale, the better is the patients vision.
Measured: Week 12 and Week 48
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between Week 12 and Week 48
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CST,µm) between week 12 and week 48
Measured: Week 12 and Week 48
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure Between Week 12 and Week 24
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) between week 12 and week 24
Measured: Week 12 and Week 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema (PSCME)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Peter A Campochiaro, MD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01769352
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NA_00074523
- Acronym
- TEMPEST
- Status last verified
- Aug 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 15 Sep 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Sep 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Treatment of Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema With Topical Steroids Trial (TEMPEST-1)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01769352
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TEMPEST / NA_00074523
- Keywords
- cystoid macular edema
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Sep 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the change in visual acuity of patients with post surgical cystoid macular edema who will be treated with two different regimens.
Detailed description
Compare the mean change in BCVA over 12 weeks of Prednisolone Acetate 1% q1h (every hour) WA (While Awake) + Ketorolac 0.5% qid (four times a day) versus Prednisolone Acetate qid + Ketorolac qid for post surgical cystoid macular edema.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PredA q1h WA + Kelac qid | Active comparator | Drug: PredA + KelacPrednisolone acetate (PredA) 1% ophthalmic solution every 1 hr while awake (WA) and Ketorolac (Kelac) 0.5% ophthlmic solution four times a day (qid) |
| PredA qid + Kelac qid | Active comparator | Drug: PredA + KelacPrednisolone acetate (PredA) 1% ophthalmic solution four times a day (qid) and Ketorolac (Kelac) 0.5% ophthlmic solution four times a day (qid) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age more than or equal to 18 years
- Diagnosis of PSCME in study eye confirmed by FA showing leakage from retinal vessels resulting in pooling of dye in the fovea and Spectralis SD-OCT showing intraretinal fluid in or around the fovea.
- BCVA score in the study eye of 20/30 to 20/400 inclusive (Snellen equivalents using the ETDRS protocol at a distance of 4 meters).
- In the opinion of the investigator, decreased vision in the study eye is due to foveal thickening from PSCME and not to any other reason.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Any patient who has other retinal diseases known to cause macular edema (choroidal neovascularization, vein occlusion, diabetic macular edema in the study eye). Patients with nonexudative Age Related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) or non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy without macular edema can be included in the study.
- Other reason for decreased visual acuity (such as amblyopia, foveal atrophy, optic atrophy).
- Pre-existing diagnosis of glaucoma in the study eye
- Inability to comply with study or follow up procedures
- Pregnancy (Women of child bearing age will be asked to take a urine pregnancy test prior to enrolling in the study).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PredA + KelacAlso: Acular, Acuvail, Pred Forte, Omnipred, Pred MildAt week 12, patients will be determined to be resolved, improving/stabilized or treatment failures. Patients who have complete resolution of edema will begin treatment withdrawl. Improving/stabilizing patients will maintain current therapy. Treatment failure Group 2 patients will move to Group 3 to receive PredA q1h WA + Kelac qid starting at week 12. Treatment failure Group 1 patients will be exited from the trial so that alternative therapy can be given. | Drug | PredA q1h WA + Kelac qid, PredA qid + Kelac qid |
Primary outcome
Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity at Week 12 From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (Letter Score) at Week 12 from Baseline. The Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score is measured on a scale from 5 to 100. The higher the score on this scale, the better is the patients vision.
5 secondary outcomes
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness at Week 12 From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure at Week 12 From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity Between Week 12 and Week 48
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48
Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Between Week 12 and Week 48
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48
Mean Change in Intraocular Pressure Between Week 12 and Week 24
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 48
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Sep 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter A Campochiaro, MD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing PredA + Kelac in people with Post-surgical Cystoid Macular Edema (PSCME), run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Sep 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity at Week 12 From Baseline (time frame: Baseline and Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Sep 2017.