Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis CPhase 3NCT01762761
Eltrombopag Phase III Study In Chinese Chronic ITP Patients
A Phase 3 study testing eltrombopag in people with Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis C, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 18 sites in China.
Trial summary
This randomized, double-blind and open-label phase III study aimed to determine the efficacy, tolerance and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adult subjects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis C
- What is being tested?
- eltrombopag
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 155 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesChina
- Study dates
- 18 Feb 2013to 22 Nov 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is ≥18 years old.
- Diagnosed with ITP for at least 12 months prior to screening, and have a platelet count of <30 X109/L on Day 1 (or within 48 hours prior to dosing on Day 1).
- Patients who have no response or relapsed after splenectomy. Or patients who have not been splenectomised and have either not responded to one or more prior therapies (except splenectomy), or who have relapsed prior therapy.
- Previous therapy for ITP including rescue must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to randomization.
- Subjects treated with maintenance immunosuppressive therapy must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 1 month.
- No pre-existing cardiac disease within the last 3 months. No arrhythmia known to increase the risk of thrombolic events (e.g. atrial fibrillation), or patients with a Corrected QT interval (QTc) >450msec or QTc >480 for patients with a Bundle Branch Block.
Show all 13Show fewer
- No history of clotting disorder, other than ITP.
- A complete blood count (CBC), within the reference range, with the following exceptions:
- Platelets <30×109/L on Day 1 (or within 48hours of Day 1) is required for inclusion,
- Hemoglobin: females and males 10.0 g/dl are eligible for inclusion,
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥1500/µL (1.5×109/L) is required for inclusion
- Blood chemistry test result no exceed normal by more than 20%. Total albumin must not be below the lower limit of normal (LLN) by more than 10%.
- Subject is non-childbearing potential of childbearing potential and use acceptable methods of contraception from two weeks prior to administration of study medication, throughout the study, and 28 days after completion or premature discontinuation from the study.
Who cannot join
- Patients with any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis, AND ≥ two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, antiphospholipid syndrome, etc).
- Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP,which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study.
- Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
- History of alcohol/drug abuse or dependence within 12 months of the study.
- Treatment with thrombopoietin or an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication.
- Subjects who have previously received eltrombopag or any other thrombopoietin receptor agonist.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Subject has consumed aspirin, aspirin-containing compounds, salicylates, anticoagulants, quinine or non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) for >3 consecutive days within 2 weeks of the study start and until the end of the study.
- Consumption of any herbal or dietary supplements, excluding vitamin or mineral supplements, within 1 week of the study start.
- History of platelet aggregation that prevents reliable measurement of platelet counts.
- An abnormality in bone marrow examination result, other than ITP, identified on the screening examination, which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study (e.g. ≥MF-2 according to EU consensus scale [Thiele, 2005]) or suggests another primary diagnosis (e.g. Thrombocytopenia is secondary to another disease).
- Any laboratory or clinical evidence for HIV infection.
- Any clinical history for hepatitis C infection; chronic hepatitis B infection; or any evidence for active hepatitis at the time of subject screening. Laboratory test shows positive serology for Hepatitis C or Hepatitis B (HB) defined as a positive test for HBsAg. In addition, if negative for HBsAg but HBcAb positive (regardless of HBsAb status), a HB DNA test will be performed and if positive the subject will be excluded.
- Patients expected to require rescue on Day 1 of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country.
18 sites in 1 country
China18 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100034
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100044
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100083
Novartis Investigative Site
Beijing, 100730
Novartis Investigative Site
Changsha, Hunan, 410013
Novartis Investigative Site
Chengdu, 610041
Novartis Investigative Site
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
Novartis Investigative Site
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515
Novartis Investigative Site
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003
Novartis Investigative Site
Jianan, Shandong, 250012
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006
Novartis Investigative Site
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai, 200025
Novartis Investigative Site
Shanghai
Novartis Investigative Site
Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215006
Novartis Investigative Site
Tianjin, 300020
Novartis Investigative Site
Zhongshan, Guangdong, 528403
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind and Open-label Phase III Study To Compare The Efficacy And Safety Of Eltrombopag With Placebo In Chinese Chronic ITP Patients
This randomized, double-blind and open-label phase III study aimed to determine the efficacy, tolerance and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adult subjects. This study was be conducted in Chinese adult chronic ITP subjects who had not responded to or had relapsed after previous treatment of ITP, including first line therapy and /or splenectomy.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of oral eltrombopag as a thrombopoietic agent treating previously treated chronic Chinese ITP patients compared to placebo. The secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of eltrombopag when administered for 6 weeks to previously treated adult chronic ITP patients compared with placebo. In addition, the long-term efficacy and safety of eltrombopag treatment was also evaluated in the 24-week extension open-label phase after the double-blind phase as one of other study objectives. If the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could continue on eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in China. Furthermore, to understand the pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of eltrombopag and to explore the relationship between the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) (platelet response), a PK/PD analysis was embedded in this phase III study and conducted in the same patient population who participated this phase III study.
Read the detailed description
This randomized, double-blind and open-label phase III study aimed to determine the efficacy, tolerance and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adult subjects. This study was conducted in Chinese adult chronic ITP subjects who had not responded to or had relapsed after previous treatment for ITP, including first line therapy and /or splenectomy.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of oral eltrombopag as a thrombopoietic agent treating previously treated chronic Chinese ITP patients compared to placebo. The secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of eltrombopag when administered for 6 weeks to previously treated adult chronic ITP patients compared to placebo. In addition, the long-term efficacy and safety of eltrombopag treatment was also evaluated in the 24-week extension open-label phase after the double-blind phase as one of other study objectives. If the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could continue the eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in China. Furthermore, to understand the pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of eltrombopag and to explore the relationship between the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) (platelet response), a PK/PD analysis was embedded in this phase III study and conducted in the same patient population who participated this phase III study.
155 eligible subjects were randomized to either eltrombopag or matching placebo treatment in 2:1 ratio in stage 1 (the 8-week double blind stage). Randomization for stage 1 was stratified by splenectomy status (Yes/No), use of concomitant maintenance ITP therapy (Yes/No) and baseline platelet count (no more than 15×109/L, or >15×109/L). This study include 3 stages. The stage 1 was an 8-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled treatment period. Following completion of Stage 1 and after completing the data cleanup of the initial 6 weeks, the investigator was be un-blinded to treatment assignment on an individual subject basis to enable appropriate starting dose selection for stage 2, a 24-week open-label treatment period. PK sampling and assessments occurred at the Week 2 visit during stage 2 of the study, when all subjects were receiving eltrombopag. After the completion of stage 2, subjects could continue the the eltrombopag treatment in stage 3, if he/she benefited from the continuous eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's judgement.
The initial dose of eltrombopag administration was an oral 25 mg once daily. During the 8 weeks double-blind treatment, dose of investigational product was adjusted according to the weekly subject platelet count.
The eligible subjects who completed stage 1 (8 weeks of double-blind treatment period: the first 6 weeks data was used for primary endpoint analysis and the last 2 weeks for data cleanup period during which the blinded treatment continued) entered a voluntary open-label stage 2 (24-week open-label extension phase) in which subjects from both the eltrombopag group and placebo group had the opportunity to receive eltrombopag treatment. Subjects unwilling or unqualified (such as the subjects who met the stopping criteria) to participate in extension treatment attended follow-up visits for 4 weeks after the completion of the double-blind phase. During the open-label stage 2 phase all eligible subjects received open label eltrombopag treatment. The dose of eltrombopag was continuously adjusted according to the subject's platelet count.
Following completion of Stage 2, if the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could voluntarily enter stage 3, during which the subject continued eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in C
- Being tested
- eltrombopag, placebo
- Keywords
- eltrombopag, TPO-R agonist, Chronic ITP, ETB115, Chinese chronic ITP patients
- Medical subject headings
- Purpura, Hepatitis C
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
eltrombopagDrug
Also called ETB115
TPO-R agonist
placeboDrug
placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Eltrombopag (ETB115) | Experimental | Thrombopoietin- receptor (TPO-R) agonist Receives: Drug: eltrombopag |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants (Responders) Achieving a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L After the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1
The number of participants (responders) with platelet count >=50x10^9/L after 6 weeks of Stage 1 were compared between treatments using a logistic regression model adjusted for use of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Primary Analysis Data Set: a participant who withdrawals from Stage 1 or is emergently unblinded was classified as a negative response from the time of withdrawal or unblinding date and for all subsequent visits. In the event of a participant dying, information for all subsequent assessments would be considered missing. All intermittent missing data (apart from withdrawals) will be treated as missing.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Secondary outcomes (29)
Number of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L at Least Once During the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1
The number of participants (responders) with platelet count >=50×10^9/L at least once during the first 6 weeks of Stage 1 were compared between treatments using a logistic regression model adjusted for use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Number of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=30×10^9/L and at Least 2 Times the Baseline Platelet Count at Least Once During the 6 Weeks of Stage 1, the Whole Stage 2 and the Whole Stage 3
The number of participants achieving a platelet count >=30×10^9/L and at least 2 times the Baseline platelet count at least once during the first 6 weeks of Stage 1 were analyzed. The Baseline platelet count is defined as the platelet count taken on Day 1 of the study or within 48 hours prior to the first dose of investigational product. Logistic regression analysis was adjusted for use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants With Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale
The WHO Bleeding Scale is a measure of bleeding severity with the following grades: grade 0 = no bleeding, grade 1= petechiae, grade 2= mild blood loss, grade 3 = gross blood loss, and grade 4 = debilitating blood loss. The WHO Bleeding Scale were dichotomized to indicate no bleeding vs bleeding, i.e. 0=grade 0 and 1=grades 1, 2, 3 or 4. Generalized linear mixed model was applied with a Logit canonical link function for repeated binary data, allowing for Baseline dichotomized WHO bleeding grade, use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment as fixed effects, and the participant was treated as a random effect. Bleeding incidences were recorded at Screening, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6 for Stage 1, Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 20, 24 for Stage 2; Baseline, Weeks 25, 29, 73, 97, 121, 145, 169, 193, 217, 241, 265, 284 for Stage 3. Bleeding incidences at these time points are presented.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale
The WHO Bleeding Scale is a measure of bleeding severity with the following grades: grade 0 = no bleeding, grade 1= petechiae, grade 2= mild blood loss, grade 3 = gross blood loss, and grade 4 = debilitating blood loss. The WHO Bleeding Scale grades were dichotomized into the following categories: no clinically significant bleeding = Grade 0 to 1; clinically significant bleeding = Grade 2 to 4. Generalized linear mixed model with a Logit canonical link function for repeated binary data, allowing for Baseline dichotomized WHO bleeding grade, use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment as fixed effects, and the participant was treated as a random effect.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Time to Response
Time to response is defined as time from the startin of treatment to the first time of achieving a platelet count >=50x10^9/L during the first 6 weeks of Stage 1. Time to response is summarized using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared between treatment groups using a stratified log-rank test, stratifying for the use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no). The pike estimator of the treatment hazard ratio is based on the stratified log-rank test. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Number of Participants Who Required Protocol-defined Rescue Treatment During the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1, Whole Stages 2 & 3
Rescue treatment is defined as either a new ITP medication, an increase in dose of concomitant ITP medication from Baseline, a platelet transfusion, or a splenectomy. Logistic regression analysis was adjusted for use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants With a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L During at Least 75% of Their Platelet Count Assessments
The number of participants with a platelet count >=50×10^9/L during at least 75% of their platelet count assessments was analyzed up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1. Logistic regression analysis was adjusted for use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Total Duration of Time a Participant Had a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L
Total duration of time a participant had platelet count >=50 x 10^9/L was analyzed using the van Elteren stratified rank test with stratification factors including the use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no) and Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no). Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Maximum Period of Time a Participant Had a Platelet Count Continuously >= 50 ×10^9/L
Maximum period of time a participant had a platelet count continously >=50 x 10^9/L was analyzed using the van Elteren stratified rank test with stratification factors including the use of ITP medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no) and Baseline platelet count <=15x10^9/L (yes/no). Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants That Reduced or Discontinued Baseline Concomitant ITP Medications During Stage 2 and Stage 3
The number of participants taking concomitant ITP medications on Day 1 of Stage 1 who had a decrease in the dose or frequency of ITP medication or stopped ITP medication at any point during Stage 2 or Stage 3 will be presented. The Baseline concomitant ITP medication for Stage 2 and Stage 3 is defined as ITP medications taken prior to the first dose of investigational product of Stage 1. This study is still ongoing and this endpoint can only be analyzed when the stage 2 and stage 3 complete.
Measured: From the start of Stage 2 to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is associated with protocol specified liver injury and impaired liver function or is any protocol specific AEs.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 8 of Stage 1
Number of Participants With the Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters
Clinical chemistry parameters aspartate amino transferase (AST), alanine amino transferase (ALT), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), total bilirubin, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, calcium, potassium, creatinine, glucose and sodium were evaluated at Baseline, at all on therapy visits, and at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4 visits during the follow-up period and were summarized according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 (NCI CTCAE V4.0): Grade 0, none; Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe or medically significant; Grade 4, life-threatening consequences; Grade 5, death related to AE. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then Screening assessment is taken as Baseline. For creatinine, Baseline is defined as the average of Screening and Day 1 values if available and prior to first dose. Maximum post-Baseline toxicity grade included any scheduled or unscheduled post-Baseline assessment
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Number of Participants With the Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters
Clinical hematology parameters hemoglobin, lymphocytes, platelet count, total neutrophils, white blood cell count evaluations were performed at Baseline, at all on-therapy visits, and at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4 visits during the follow-up period and were summarized according to the NCI CTCAE V4.0: Grade 0, none; Grade 1, mild; Grade 2, moderate; Grade 3, severe or medically significant; Grade 4, life-threatening consequences; Grade 5, death related to AE. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then Screening assessment is taken as Baseline. Maximum post-Baseline toxicity grade included any scheduled or unscheduled post-Baseline assessment.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure
Systolic blood pressure was measured in the sitting position at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then the Screening assessment was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at post-Baseline time point minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Diastolic blood pressure was measured in sitting position at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then the Screening assessment was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at post-Baseline time point minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Pulse rate was measured at Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then the Screening assessment was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at post-Baseline time point minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6
Number of Participants With the Indicated 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Finding at Baseline
Resting 12-lead ECG was obtained at Baseline. Day 1 assessment was considered as Baseline; if Day 1 was not available then the Screening assessment was considered as Baseline. ECG was also obtained when there was clinical symptom that potentially related to cardiac dysfunction based on investigator's judgement.
Measured: Baseline
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity
Visual acuity is a measure of the spatial resolution of the visual processing system. Acuity is a measure of visual performance and is unrelated to the eyeglass prescription required to correct vision. Normal visual acuity is commonly referred to as 20/20 vision. Evaluation was done for oculus sinister (OS) for the left eye, oculus dexter (OD) for the right eye. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at post-Baseline time point minus the value at Baseline.
Measured: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Number of Participants With the Indicated Grading of Myelofibrosis Using Bone Marrow Biopsy at Screening
Bone marrow biopsy was performed at Screening and then obtained when clinically indicated. Whenever a peripheral blood smear confirmed the presence of immature or dysplastic cells, a bone marrow examination was performed. Myelofibrosis (MF) was graded from Grade MF-0 to MF-3 where MF-0=scattered linear reticulin with no intersections (cross-overs) corresponding to normal bone marrow; MF-1=loose network of reticulin with many intersections; especially in perivascular areas; MF-2=diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections, occasionally with only focal bundles of collagen and/or focal osteosclerosis; MF-3=diffuse and dense increase in reticulin with extensive intersections with coarse bundles of collagen, often associated with significant osteosclerosis.
Measured: Screening
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for Apparent Volume of Distribution of Central Compartment (Vc/F), Apparent Volume of Distribution of Peripheral Compartment (Vp/F)
Vc/F is apparent volume of distribution of plasma (VDP) in central compartment and Vp/F is apparent VDP in peripheral compartment. PK assessments were made with one group of serial sampling [Samples collected at pre-dose and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 hr post-dose] and one group of sparse assessment [Samples collected at pre-dose, between 2 to 4 hr and 5 to 8 hr post-dose]. Pre-dose samples were collected within 2 hr prior to dosing, all other samples were collected within 10 minutes(min) for samples collected between 1 and 6 hrs and within 30 mins for samples collected at 8 and 24 hr. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Point estimates of population PK parameters are presented.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Apparent Clearance (CL/F), Apparent Inter-compartmental Clearance (Q/F)
CL/F is defined as the apparent oral clearance from plasma and Q/F is defined as apparent intercompartmental clearance. PK assessments were made with one group of serial sampling [Samples collected at pre-dose and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 hr post-dose] and one group of sparse assessment [Samples collected at pre-dose, between 2 to 4 hr and 5 to 8 hr post-dose]. Pre-dose samples were collected within 2 hr prior to dosing, all other samples were collected within 10 min for samples collected between 1 and 6 hr and within 30 min for samples collected at 8 and 24 hr. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Point estimates of population PK parameters are presented.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Absorption Rate Constant (Ka)
Ka is defined as the absorption rate constant. PK assessments were made with one group of serial sampling [Samples collected at pre-dose and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 hr post-dose] and one group of sparse assessment [Samples collected at pre-dose, between 2 to 4 hr and 5 to 8 hr post-dose]. Pre-dose samples were collected within 2 hrs prior to dosing, all other samples were collected within 10 min for samples collected between 1 and 6 hrs and within 30 mins for samples collected at 8 and 24 hr. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Point estimates of population PK parameter is presented.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Absorption Lag Time (ALAG)
Absorption lag time (ALAG) is defined as the time taken for a drug to appear in the systemic circulation following administration. PK assessments were made with one group of serial sampling [Samples collected at pre-dose and 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 24 hr post-dose] and one group of sparse assessment [Samples collected at pre-dose, between 2 to 4 hrs and 5 to 8 hrs post-dose]. Pre-dose samples were collected within 2 hrs prior to dosing, all other samples were collected within 10 min for samples collected between 1 and 6 hr and within 30 min for samples collected at 8 and 24 hr. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Point estimates of population PK parameter is presented.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Post-hoc Estimates of Plasma Eltrombopag Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over a Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) After 50 mg Once Daily Dose of Eltrombopag
AUC[0-tau] is defined as area under the concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (24 hr) of Eltrombopag atsteady-state after 50 mg once daily dose of eltrombopag. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Post-hoc estimates of steady-state eltrombopag was determined based on the final PK model. Individual PK parameters were derived from the final PK model by an empirical Bayes estimation. Summary of steady-state AUC(0-tau) of eltrombopag is presented here.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Post-hoc Estimates of Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) for Eltrombopag After 50 mg Once Daily Dose of Eltrombopag
Cmax is defined as maximum observed concentration after 50 mg once daily dose of eltrombopag. PK analysis was conducted using a population approach with non-linear mixed effects modeling methods. Post-hoc estimates of steady-state eltrombopag Cmax was determined based on the final PK model. Individual PK parameters were derived from the final PK model by an empirical Bayes estimation. Summary of steady-state Cmax of eltrombopag .is presented here.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Percentage of Participants Estimated as Responders to Eltrombopag by the Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic Model
Responders are participants whose SLOP estimates are larger than zero. The Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic relationship between eltrombopag concentrations and the platelet response was described by a four-compartment life span model, representing one precursor production compartment, two transit/maturation compartments and one blood platelet compartment.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacodynamic Parameter-Linear Proportionality Constant of Drug Effect (SLOP): the Proportional Increase of Platelet Production Rate With Each 1-μg/mL Increase in Eltrombopag Plasma Concentration
The Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic relationship between eltrombopag concentrations and the platelet response was described by a four-compartment life span model, representing one precursor production compartment, two transit/maturation compartments and one blood platelet compartment.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacodynamic Parameter- Production Rate of Platelet Precursors (KIN)
The Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic relationship between eltrombopag concentrations and the platelet response was described by a four-compartment life span model, representing one precursor production compartment, two transit/maturation compartments and one blood platelet compartment. The estimate of KIN was fixed to 1.43x10^9/L.hr.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacodynamic Parameter-Maturation Rate of Platelet Precursors (KOUT)
The Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic relationship between eltrombopag concentrations and the platelet response was described by a four-compartment life span model, representing one precursor production compartment, two transit/maturation compartments and one blood platelet compartment. The estimate of KOUT was fixed to 0.0253 /hr.
Measured: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study start18 Feb 2013
- Primary completion5 Jun 2014
- Study completion22 Nov 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis CStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 155 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01762761
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 113765
- Other IDs
- CETB115B2301
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Dec 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Publications
Liu X, Hou M, Li J, Jin J, Huang M, Yu Z, Xu X, Zhang X, Yang R. Efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: stage 2 results from a multicenter phase III study. Platelets. 2022 Jan 2;33(1):82-88. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1847267. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
PubMed 33251910
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Dec 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind and Open-label Phase III Study To Compare The Efficacy And Safety Of Eltrombopag With Placebo In Chinese Chronic ITP Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01762761
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 113765
- Keywords
- eltrombopag, TPO-R agonist, Chronic ITP, ETB115, Chinese chronic ITP patients
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 155 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 18 Feb 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Nov 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 9 Mar 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized, double-blind and open-label phase III study aimed to determine the efficacy, tolerance and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adult subjects. This study was be conducted in Chinese adult chronic ITP subjects who had not responded to or had relapsed after previous treatment of ITP, including first line therapy and /or splenectomy.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of oral eltrombopag as a thrombopoietic agent treating previously treated chronic Chinese ITP patients compared to placebo. The secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of eltrombopag when administered for 6 weeks to previously treated adult chronic ITP patients compared with placebo. In addition, the long-term efficacy and safety of eltrombopag treatment was also evaluated in the 24-week extension open-label phase after the double-blind phase as one of other study objectives. If the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could continue on eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in China. Furthermore, to understand the pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of eltrombopag and to explore the relationship between the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) (platelet response), a PK/PD analysis was embedded in this phase III study and conducted in the same patient population who participated this phase III study.
Detailed description
This randomized, double-blind and open-label phase III study aimed to determine the efficacy, tolerance and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese chronic primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) adult subjects. This study was conducted in Chinese adult chronic ITP subjects who had not responded to or had relapsed after previous treatment for ITP, including first line therapy and /or splenectomy.
The primary objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of oral eltrombopag as a thrombopoietic agent treating previously treated chronic Chinese ITP patients compared to placebo. The secondary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of eltrombopag when administered for 6 weeks to previously treated adult chronic ITP patients compared to placebo. In addition, the long-term efficacy and safety of eltrombopag treatment was also evaluated in the 24-week extension open-label phase after the double-blind phase as one of other study objectives. If the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could continue the eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in China. Furthermore, to understand the pharmacokinetics (PK) profile of eltrombopag and to explore the relationship between the PK and pharmacodynamics (PD) (platelet response), a PK/PD analysis was embedded in this phase III study and conducted in the same patient population who participated this phase III study.
155 eligible subjects were randomized to either eltrombopag or matching placebo treatment in 2:1 ratio in stage 1 (the 8-week double blind stage). Randomization for stage 1 was stratified by splenectomy status (Yes/No), use of concomitant maintenance ITP therapy (Yes/No) and baseline platelet count (no more than 15×109/L, or >15×109/L). This study include 3 stages. The stage 1 was an 8-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled treatment period. Following completion of Stage 1 and after completing the data cleanup of the initial 6 weeks, the investigator was be un-blinded to treatment assignment on an individual subject basis to enable appropriate starting dose selection for stage 2, a 24-week open-label treatment period. PK sampling and assessments occurred at the Week 2 visit during stage 2 of the study, when all subjects were receiving eltrombopag. After the completion of stage 2, subjects could continue the the eltrombopag treatment in stage 3, if he/she benefited from the continuous eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's judgement.
The initial dose of eltrombopag administration was an oral 25 mg once daily. During the 8 weeks double-blind treatment, dose of investigational product was adjusted according to the weekly subject platelet count.
The eligible subjects who completed stage 1 (8 weeks of double-blind treatment period: the first 6 weeks data was used for primary endpoint analysis and the last 2 weeks for data cleanup period during which the blinded treatment continued) entered a voluntary open-label stage 2 (24-week open-label extension phase) in which subjects from both the eltrombopag group and placebo group had the opportunity to receive eltrombopag treatment. Subjects unwilling or unqualified (such as the subjects who met the stopping criteria) to participate in extension treatment attended follow-up visits for 4 weeks after the completion of the double-blind phase. During the open-label stage 2 phase all eligible subjects received open label eltrombopag treatment. The dose of eltrombopag was continuously adjusted according to the subject's platelet count.
Following completion of Stage 2, if the subject benefited from the eltrombopag treatment based on the investigator's discretion, the subject could voluntarily enter stage 3, during which the subject continued eltrombopag treatment until the commercial launch of eltrombopag in C
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Eltrombopag (ETB115) | Experimental | Drug: eltrombopagThrombopoietin- receptor (TPO-R) agonist |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboPlacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Subject is ≥18 years old.
- Diagnosed with ITP for at least 12 months prior to screening, and have a platelet count of <30 X109/L on Day 1 (or within 48 hours prior to dosing on Day 1).
- Patients who have no response or relapsed after splenectomy. Or patients who have not been splenectomised and have either not responded to one or more prior therapies (except splenectomy), or who have relapsed prior therapy.
- Previous therapy for ITP including rescue must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to randomization.
- Subjects treated with maintenance immunosuppressive therapy must be receiving a dose that has been stable for at least 1 month.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients with any prior history of arterial or venous thrombosis, AND ≥ two of the following risk factors: hormone replacement therapy, systemic contraception (containing estrogen), smoking, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, medication for hypertension, cancer, hereditary thrombophilic disorders (e.g., Factor V Leiden, ATIII deficiency, antiphospholipid syndrome, etc).
- Any clinically relevant abnormality, other than ITP,which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for participation in the study.
- Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
- History of alcohol/drug abuse or dependence within 12 months of the study.
- Treatment with thrombopoietin or an investigational drug within 30 days or five half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| eltrombopagAlso: ETB115TPO-R agonist | Drug | Eltrombopag (ETB115) |
| placeboplacebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants (Responders) Achieving a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L After the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
The number of participants (responders) with platelet count >=50x10^9/L after 6 weeks of Stage 1 were compared between treatments using a logistic regression model adjusted for use of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) medication at Baseline (yes/no), splenectomy (yes/no), Baseline platelet count <=15×10^9/L (yes/no) and treatment. Complete blood count including platelet count was done at Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6. Primary Analysis Data Set: a participant who withdrawals from Stage 1 or is emergently unblinded was classified as a negative response from the time of withdrawal or unblinding date and for all subsequent visits. In the event of a participant dying, information for all subsequent assessments would be considered missing. All intermittent missing data (apart from withdrawals) will be treated as missing.
29 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L at Least Once During the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Number of Participants Achieving a Platelet Count >=30×10^9/L and at Least 2 Times the Baseline Platelet Count at Least Once During the 6 Weeks of Stage 1, the Whole Stage 2 and the Whole Stage 3
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants With Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Bleeding as Assessed Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Bleeding Scale
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Time to Response
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Number of Participants Who Required Protocol-defined Rescue Treatment During the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1, Whole Stages 2 & 3
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants With a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L During at Least 75% of Their Platelet Count Assessments
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Total Duration of Time a Participant Had a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Maximum Period of Time a Participant Had a Platelet Count Continuously >= 50 ×10^9/L
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants That Reduced or Discontinued Baseline Concomitant ITP Medications During Stage 2 and Stage 3
Time frame: From the start of Stage 2 to the end of Stage 3
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 8 of Stage 1
Number of Participants With the Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Clinical Chemistry Parameters
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Number of Participants With the Maximum Toxicity Grade for the Indicated Hematology Parameters
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6
Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 5 and Week 6
Number of Participants With the Indicated 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Finding at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Number of Participants With a Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity
Time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1
Number of Participants With the Indicated Grading of Myelofibrosis Using Bone Marrow Biopsy at Screening
Time frame: Screening
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessments for Eltrombopag for Apparent Volume of Distribution of Central Compartment (Vc/F), Apparent Volume of Distribution of Peripheral Compartment (Vp/F)
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Apparent Clearance (CL/F), Apparent Inter-compartmental Clearance (Q/F)
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Absorption Rate Constant (Ka)
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacokinetic Assessments for Eltrombopag for Absorption Lag Time (ALAG)
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Post-hoc Estimates of Plasma Eltrombopag Area Under the Concentration-time Curve Over a Dosing Interval (AUC[0-tau]) After 50 mg Once Daily Dose of Eltrombopag
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Post-hoc Estimates of Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) for Eltrombopag After 50 mg Once Daily Dose of Eltrombopag
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Percentage of Participants Estimated as Responders to Eltrombopag by the Pharmacokinetic/ Pharmacodynamic Model
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacodynamic Parameter-Linear Proportionality Constant of Drug Effect (SLOP): the Proportional Increase of Platelet Production Rate With Each 1-μg/mL Increase in Eltrombopag Plasma Concentration
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacodynamic Parameter- Production Rate of Platelet Precursors (KIN)
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Pharmacodynamic Parameter-Maturation Rate of Platelet Precursors (KOUT)
Time frame: From the start of study until 24 hours post-dose of Week 2 Visit of Stage 2
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Dec 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33251910Liu X, Hou M, Li J, Jin J, Huang M, Yu Z, Xu X, Zhang X, Yang R. Efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in Chinese patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia: stage 2 results from a multicenter phase III study. Platelets. 2022 Jan 2;33(1):82-88. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1847267. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Related trials for Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis C
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparative Autoantibody and Immunologic Cell Marker Study
Autoimmune Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing eltrombopag in people with Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic and Hepatitis C, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 18 sites in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants (Responders) Achieving a Platelet Count >=50×10^9/L After the First 6 Weeks of Stage 1 (time frame: From the start of study treatment (Day 1) up to the end of Week 6 of Stage 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01762761, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2019.