Neurotrophic KeratitisPhase 1/2REPARONCT01756456
Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of rhNGF in Patients With Stage 2 and 3 Neurotrophic Keratitis.
A Phase 1/2 study testing rhNGF 10 μg/ml and rhNGF 20 μg/ml in people with Neurotrophic Keratitis and Keratitis, run by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A at 34 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
This study is aimed at assessing the safety and the efficacy of two dose regimens of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops solution compared to vehicle for inducing a complete healing of stage 2 (persistent epithelial defect) and 3 (corneal ulcer) neurotrophic keratitis Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neurotrophic Keratitis, Keratitis, Corneal Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- rhNGF 10 μg/ml and rhNGF 20 μg/ml
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 174 participants
- Where
- 34 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to May 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18 years of age or older.
- Patients with stage 2 (persistent epithelial defect, PED) or stage 3 (corneal ulcer) neurotrophic keratitis involving only one eye. . Patients with Controlateral eye affected with stage 1 NK can be enrolled.
- PED or corneal ulceration of at least 2 weeks duration refractory to one or more conventional non-surgical treatments for neurotrophic keratitis (e.g., preservative-free artificial tears, gels or ointments; discontinuation of preserved topical drops and medications that can decrease corneal sensitivity; therapeutic contact lenses).
- Evidence of decreased corneal sensitivity (≤ 4 cm using the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer) within the area of the PED or corneal ulcer and outside of the area of the defect in at least one corneal quadrant.
- Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score ≤ 75 ETDRS letters, (≥ 0.2 LogMAR, ≤ 20/32 Snellen or ≤ 0.625 decimal fraction) in the affected eye.
- No objective clinical evidence of improvement in the PED or corneal ulceration within the 2 weeks prior to study enrolment.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Only patients who satisfy all Informed Consent requirements may be included in the study. The patient and/or his/her legal representative must read, sign and date the Informed Consent document before any study-related procedures are performed. The Informed Consent form signed by patients and/or legal representative must have been approved by the IEC/IRB for the current study.
- Patients must have the ability and willingness to comply with study procedures.
- Patients must be eligible for the National Health Insurance (where applicable).
Who cannot join
- Patients with stage 2 or 3 NK affecting both eyes.
- Any active ocular infection (bacterial, viral, fungal or protozoal) or active ocular inflammation not related to NK in the affected eye.
- Any other ocular disease requiring topical ocular treatment in the affected eye during the course of the study treatment period. No topical treatments other than the study medications provided by the study sponsor or allowed by the study protocol can be administered in the affected eye during the course of the study treatment periods.
- Patients with severe vision loss in the affected eye with no potential for visual improvement in the opinion of the investigator as a result of the study treatment.
- Schirmer test without anesthesia ≤3 mm/5 minutes in the affected eye.
- Patients with severe blepharitis and/or severe meibomian gland disease in the affected eye.
Show all 18Show fewer
- History of any ocular surgery (including laser or refractive surgical procedures) in the affected eye within the three months before study enrolment. (An exception to the preceding statement will be allowed if the ocular surgery is considered to be the cause of the stage 2 or 3 NK). Ocular surgery in the affected eye will not be allowed during the study treatment period and elective ocular surgery procedures should not be planned during the duration of the follow-up period.
- Prior surgical procedure(s) for the treatment of NK (e.g. complete tarsorraphy, conjunctival flap, etc) in the affected eye with the exception of amniotic membrane transplantation. Patients previously treated with amniotic membrane transplantation may only be enrolled two weeks after the membrane has disappeared within the area of the PED or corneal ulcer or at least six weeks after the date of the amniotic membrane transplantation procedure. Patients previously treated with Botox (botulinum toxin) injections used to induce pharmacologic blepharoptosis are eligible for enrolment only if the last injection was given at least 90 days prior to enrolment in the study.
- Use of therapeutic contact lenses or contact lens wear for refractive correction during the study treatment periods in the eye with NK.
- Anticipated need for punctual occlusion during the study treatment period. Patients with punctual occlusion or punctual plugs inserted prior to the study are eligible for enrolment provided that the punctual occlusion is maintained during the study.
- Evidence of corneal ulceration involving the posterior third of the corneal stroma, corneal melting or perforation in the affected eye.
- Presence or history of any ocular or systemic disorder or condition that might hinder the efficacy of the study treatment or its evaluation, could possibly interfere with the interpretation of study results, or could be judged by the investigator to be incompatible with the study visit schedule or conduct (e.g. progressive or degenerative corneal or retinal conditions, uveitis, optic neuritis, poorly controlled diabetes, autoimmune disease, systemic infection, neoplastic diseases).
- Any need for or anticipated change in the dose of systemic medications known to impair the function of the trigeminal nerve (e.g. neuroleptics, antipsychotic and antihistamine drugs). These treatments are allowed during the study if initiated prior to 30 days before study enrolment provided they remain stable throughout the course of the study treatment periods.
- Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study or procedural medications (e.g. fluorescein).
- History of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction.
- Use of any investigational agent within 4 weeks of screening visit.
- Participation in another clinical study at the same time as the present study.
- Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) are excluded from participation in the study if they meet any one of the following conditions: are currently pregnant or have a positive result on the urine pregnancy test at the Randomization Visit or intend to become pregnant during the study treatment period or are breast-feeding or not willing to use highly effective birth control measures, such as: Hormonal contraceptives -oral, implanted, transdermal, or injected and/or Mechanical barrier methods -spermicide in conjunction with a barrier such as a condom or diaphragm or IUD during the entire course of and 30 days after the study treatment periods.
Trial locations and contacts
34 sites in 6 countries.
34 sites in 6 countries
Italy9 sites
Università G. D' Annunzio - Clinica Oftalmologica - Centro regionale di Eccellenza in Oftalmologia
Chieti, 66100
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi
Florence, 50124
Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche Oftalmologia e Genetica - Universtità di Genova
Genoa, 16132
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Messina - Dipartimento Specialità Chirurgiche Ambulatorio Studio delle Malattie dela Superficie Oculare Unità Operativa Complessa di Oftalmologia
Messina, 98125
OSPEDALE SAN RAFFAELE di Milano
Milan, Lombardy, 20132
Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo - U.O. Oculistica
Milan, 20142
Azienda ospedaliera di Padova - Clinica Oculistica Policlinico 7° Piano
Padova, 35128
Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
Rome, 00128
Policlinico Umberto I
Rome, 00161
Spain7 sites
Vissum Corporación Oftalmológica de Alicante
Alicante, 03016
Hospital de Cruces - Oftalmología
Barakaldo, 48903
Barraquer Eye center
Barcelona, 08021
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona - Oftalmología
Barcelona, 08028
Hospital Clínico San Carlos - Oftalmología. Unidad de Superficie Ocular
Madrid, 28040
Instituto Oftalmológico Fernández-Vega - Oftalmología
Oviedo, 33012
Cartuja Visión - Oftalmología
Seville, 41092
Germany6 sites
Universität zu Köln - Zentrum für Augenheilkunde am Universitätsklinikum Köln
Cologne, 50924
University Eye Clinic in Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, 50924
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, 91054
Universitäts-Augenklinik Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Augenklinik und Poliklinik - Department of Ophthalmology
Mainz, 55131
Klinikum der Universität München - Augenklinik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universtiät München
München, 80336
France5 sites
CHU de Dijon - Service ophtalmologie
Dijon, 21000
CHU Dupuytren - Service Ophtalmologie
Limoges, 87042
Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie - Service d'ophtalmologie
Paris, 75 571
"Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild - "Unité de Recherche Clinique
Paris, 75019
"CHU Toulouse-Purpan - Service Ophtalmologie
Toulouse, 31059
United Kingdom5 sites
University of Birmingham - Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, School of Immunity and Infection, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham
Birmingham, "B15 2TT
Moorfields Eye Hospital - Moorfields Eye Hospital
London, EC1V 2PD
Manchester Royal Eye Hospital - Manchester Royal Eye Hospital
Manchester, M13 9WL
Royal Victoria Infirmary - Dept. of Ophthalmology
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP
University of Southampton Southampton General Hospital - MP104, Eye Unit
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Poland2 sites
District Railway Hospital Katowice - Department of Ophthalmology
Katowice, 40-760
"SPKSO Szpital Okulistyczny ul. - SPKSO Szpital Okulistyczny
Warsaw, 03-709
About this study
Official title: An 8-week Phase I/II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Vehicle Controlled Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor in Patients With Stage 2 and 3 of NK
This study is aimed at assessing the safety and the efficacy of two dose regimens of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops solution compared to vehicle for inducing a complete healing of stage 2 (persistent epithelial defect) and 3 (corneal ulcer) neurotrophic keratitis
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and the efficacy of two dose regimens (10 µg/ml or 20 µg/ml 6 times a day) of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops solution compared to vehicle for inducing a complete healing of stage 2 (persistent epithelial defect) and 3 (corneal ulcer) neurotrophic keratitis (NK) as measured by the Reading Center evaluating the clinical pictures of corneal fluorescein staining.
Secondary objectives of the study are to assess the duration of complete healing, improvement in visual acuity and improvement in corneal sensitivity following treatment with rhNGF eye drops solution
This is a combined phase I/II study. The phase I and II segments of the study will be conducted as an 8 week, randomized, double-masked, vehicle controlled, parallel group study (referred to as the controlled treatment period) followed by a 48 or 56 week follow-up period The design of the phase I and phase II segments of the study are identical with the exception that in the phase I segment of the study the randomization scheme is different and patients will be followed with additional safety assessments and blood samples for PK (pharmacokinetic) profiling In the ascending dose Phase I segment of the study two doses of rhNGF 10 and 20 µg/ml will be evaluated in a sequential manner
- Conditions
- Neurotrophic Keratitis, Keratitis, Corneal Ulcer
- Being tested
- rhNGF 10 μg/ml, rhNGF 20 μg/ml, vehicle
- Keywords
- Keratitis, Corneal Ulcer
- Medical subject headings
- Keratitis, Corneal Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rhNGF 10 μg/mlDrug
Also called recombinant human nerve growth factor 10 µg/ml solution
rhNGF 10 μg/ml : one drop 6 times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.35 μg of rhNGF)
rhNGF 20 μg/mlDrug
Also called recombinant human nerve growth factor 20 µg/ml solution
one drop 6 times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.70 μg of rhNGF)
vehicleOther
Also called placebo
ophthalmic solution of the same composition as the test product without rhNGF
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1_rhNGF10_Phase 1_treatment | Experimental | active treatment with rhNGF 10 μg/ml. One drop six times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.35μg of rhNGF). Receives: Drug: rhNGF 10 μg/ml |
| 2_rhNGF20_Phase 1_treatment | Experimental | active treatment with rhNGF 20 μg/ml. One drop 6 times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.70 μg of rhNGF) Receives: Drug: rhNGF 20 μg/ml |
| 3_vehicle group_Phase 1_treatment | Placebo comparator | vehicle control arm. Ophthalmic solution of the same composition as the test product with the exception of rhNGF. One drop six times a day for the entire period Receives: Other: vehicle |
| 4_rhNGF10_Phase 2_treatment | Experimental | active treatment with rhNGF 10 μg/ml. One drop six times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.35 μg of rhNGF) Receives: Drug: rhNGF 10 μg/ml |
| 5_rhNGF20_Phase 2_treatment | Experimental | active treatment with rhNGF 20 μg/ml. One drop 6 times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.70 μg of rhNGF) Receives: Drug: rhNGF 20 μg/ml |
| 6_vehicle group_Phase 2_treatment | Placebo comparator | vehicle control arm. Ophthalmic solution of the same composition as the test product with the exception of rhNGF. One drop six times a day for the entire period Receives: Other: vehicle |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Patients Achieving Healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect (PED) or Corneal Ulcer
Complete healing of the PED or corneal ulcer was determined by corneal fluorescein staining at 4 weeks as defined by the reading center evaluating the clinical pictures.
Complete healing was defined as the greatest diameter of the corneal fluorescein staining in the area of the PED or corneal ulcer being less than 0.5 mm at the Week 4 visit.
The primary efficacy variable was analyzed after 4 weeks of treatment only for the Phase II segment of the study. That's why the Phase I groups/arms are not included in this analysis.
Measured: at 4 weeks of treatment
Secondary outcomes (12)
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect (PED) or Corneal Ulcer
Complete healing of the PED or corneal ulcer at 4 weeks as defined by the Investigator. The complete healing was defined as the greatest diameter of the corneal fluorescein staining in the area of the PED or corneal ulcer, being less than 0.5 mm at the Week 4 visit.
This secondary outcome was analyzed after 4 weeks of treatment only for the Phase II segment of the study. That's why the Phase I groups/arms are not included in this analysis.
Measured: at 4 weeks of study treatment.
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Complete Healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect (PED) or Corneal Ulcer
Complete healing of the PED or corneal ulcer at 6 and 8 weeks measured by both the central reading center and Investigator.
Complete healing was defined as the greatest diameter of the corneal fluorescein staining in the area of the PED or corneal ulcer being less than 0.5 mm.
This outcome was analyzed after 6 and 8 weeks of treatment only for the Phase II segment of the study. That's why the Phase I groups/arms are not included in this analysis.
Measured: at 6 and 8 weeks after start of the treatment
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Complete Corneal Clearing
Complete corneal clearing (grade 0 on the modified Oxford scale) at 4, 6 and 8 weeks.
A patient was considered to have achieved complete corneal clearing if he/she had a Modified Oxford Scale recorded as Grade 0.
The scale has the following grades: 0-1-2-3-4-5, where 5 represents the worst outcome value and 0 the best outcome value.
Measured: at 4, 6 and 8 weeks after start of the treatment
Mean Change in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)
Mean changes in Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) from baseline to Week 8 are calculated as Least Square means. BCDVA consists of letters read at 4 meters only. Patients are scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. Therefore the higher the number of letters, the higher the visual acuity.
Measured: At screening and at week 8
Percentage of Patients That Achieve an Improvement in Corneal Sensitivity
Percentage of patients that achieve an improvement in corneal sensitivity as measured by the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer
Measured: at 4, 6 and 8 weeks.
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Deterioration in Stage 2 or 3 NK
Percentage of patients experiencing deterioration (increase in lesion size ≥ 1mm, decrease in BCDVA by >5 ETDRS letters, progression in lesion depth to corneal melting or perforation, onset of infection) in stage 2 or 3 NK from baseline to Week 4, 6, and 8.
Measured: from baseline to Week 4, 6, and 8.
Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Healing of the PED or Corneal Ulcer by Week 8/16 That Remain Healed at Weeks 20/28, 32/40, 44/52, 56/64
Percentage of patients achieving complete healing of the PED or corneal ulcer by Week 8/16 that remain healed (ie, no recurrence of the PED and/or corneal ulcer) at Weeks 20/28, 32/40, 44/52, 56/64
Measured: at week 20/28, 32/40, 44/52, and 56/64
Percentage of Patients Experiencing a Different Level of Efficacy at 4 and 8 Weeks
Global evaluation of efficacy as assessed by the Investigator at 4 and 8 weeks. The different level of efficacy were: very good; good; moderate; poor; non-evaluable.
Measured: at week 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Ocular Tolerability
Ocular tolerability was recorded by the patient on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where a higher VAS score indicates worse ocular symptoms (0 means no symptoms and 100 means the worst possible discomfort). The overall VAS score for ocular tolerability was calculated as the mean of the individual VAS scores for the 7 different symptoms (foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, ocular pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia).
Results are below reported as per symptoms at week 8 (for treatment period) and week 20 (for Follow Up period).
Measured: at baseline and at weeks 8 and 20
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)
Best-Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by means of the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart at 4 meters (13 feet). Data reported refers to week n° 8 (treatment group) and n°12/20 (FU group).
Measured: at baseline and at period 1 (8 weeks) and 2 (Follow Up period of 12 weeks, until week 20)
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
IOP was measured using a Goldmann applanation tonometer, a handheld applanation tonometer [eg, Tonopen], or other tonometer, after the instillation of a topical anesthetic.
Measured: Baseline, period 1 (8 weeks) and 2 (Follow Up period of 12 weeks, until week 20).
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Eye Structures by Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy
Dilated fundus ophthalmoscopy was performed to assess the vitreous, retina, macula, choroid and optic nerve head after dilation of the pupil.
Percentage of patients is summarized for each eye structure by treatment and visit for the controlled treatment period for Phase I and Phase II separately.
The assessment time points were Baseline, weeks 2, 4 and 8 for Phase 1; Baseline and week 8 for Phase 2; and weeks 12 and 56 for follow up.
Only results for eye structure at week 8 are reported.
Measured: At week 8 (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Neurotrophic KeratitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 174 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Francesco Sinigaglia, MD, Study director, Dompé s.p.a., Milan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01756456
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NGF0212
- Other IDs
- 2012-002527-15
- Acronym
- REPARO
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Yanai R, Nishida T, Chikama T, Morishige N, Yamada N, Sonoda KH. Potential New Modes of Treatment of Neurotrophic Keratopathy. Cornea. 2015 Nov;34 Suppl 11:S121-7. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000587.
PubMed 26448169
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An 8-week Phase I/II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Vehicle Controlled Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Doses of Recombinant Human Nerve Growth Factor in Patients With Stage 2 and 3 of NK
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01756456
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REPARO / NGF0212
- Conditions
- Neurotrophic Keratitis, Keratitis, Corneal Ulcer
- Keywords
- Keratitis, Corneal Ulcer
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 174 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.AIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is aimed at assessing the safety and the efficacy of two dose regimens of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops solution compared to vehicle for inducing a complete healing of stage 2 (persistent epithelial defect) and 3 (corneal ulcer) neurotrophic keratitis
Detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to assess the safety and the efficacy of two dose regimens (10 µg/ml or 20 µg/ml 6 times a day) of recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) eye drops solution compared to vehicle for inducing a complete healing of stage 2 (persistent epithelial defect) and 3 (corneal ulcer) neurotrophic keratitis (NK) as measured by the Reading Center evaluating the clinical pictures of corneal fluorescein staining.
Secondary objectives of the study are to assess the duration of complete healing, improvement in visual acuity and improvement in corneal sensitivity following treatment with rhNGF eye drops solution
This is a combined phase I/II study. The phase I and II segments of the study will be conducted as an 8 week, randomized, double-masked, vehicle controlled, parallel group study (referred to as the controlled treatment period) followed by a 48 or 56 week follow-up period The design of the phase I and phase II segments of the study are identical with the exception that in the phase I segment of the study the randomization scheme is different and patients will be followed with additional safety assessments and blood samples for PK (pharmacokinetic) profiling In the ascending dose Phase I segment of the study two doses of rhNGF 10 and 20 µg/ml will be evaluated in a sequential manner
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1_rhNGF10_Phase 1_treatment | Experimental | Drug: rhNGF 10 μg/mlactive treatment with rhNGF 10 μg/ml. One drop six times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.35μg of rhNGF). |
| 2_rhNGF20_Phase 1_treatment | Experimental | Drug: rhNGF 20 μg/mlactive treatment with rhNGF 20 μg/ml. One drop 6 times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.70 μg of rhNGF) |
| 3_vehicle group_Phase 1_treatment | Placebo comparator | Other: vehiclevehicle control arm. Ophthalmic solution of the same composition as the test product with the exception of rhNGF. One drop six times a day for the entire period |
| 4_rhNGF10_Phase 2_treatment | Experimental | Drug: rhNGF 10 μg/mlactive treatment with rhNGF 10 μg/ml. One drop six times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.35 μg of rhNGF) |
| 5_rhNGF20_Phase 2_treatment | Experimental | Drug: rhNGF 20 μg/mlactive treatment with rhNGF 20 μg/ml. One drop 6 times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.70 μg of rhNGF) |
| 6_vehicle group_Phase 2_treatment | Placebo comparator | Other: vehiclevehicle control arm. Ophthalmic solution of the same composition as the test product with the exception of rhNGF. One drop six times a day for the entire period |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients 18 years of age or older.
- Patients with stage 2 (persistent epithelial defect, PED) or stage 3 (corneal ulcer) neurotrophic keratitis involving only one eye. . Patients with Controlateral eye affected with stage 1 NK can be enrolled.
- PED or corneal ulceration of at least 2 weeks duration refractory to one or more conventional non-surgical treatments for neurotrophic keratitis (e.g., preservative-free artificial tears, gels or ointments; discontinuation of preserved topical drops and medications that can decrease corneal sensitivity; therapeutic contact lenses).
- Evidence of decreased corneal sensitivity (≤ 4 cm using the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer) within the area of the PED or corneal ulcer and outside of the area of the defect in at least one corneal quadrant.
- Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) score ≤ 75 ETDRS letters, (≥ 0.2 LogMAR, ≤ 20/32 Snellen or ≤ 0.625 decimal fraction) in the affected eye.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Patients with stage 2 or 3 NK affecting both eyes.
- Any active ocular infection (bacterial, viral, fungal or protozoal) or active ocular inflammation not related to NK in the affected eye.
- Any other ocular disease requiring topical ocular treatment in the affected eye during the course of the study treatment period. No topical treatments other than the study medications provided by the study sponsor or allowed by the study protocol can be administered in the affected eye during the course of the study treatment periods.
- Patients with severe vision loss in the affected eye with no potential for visual improvement in the opinion of the investigator as a result of the study treatment.
- Schirmer test without anesthesia ≤3 mm/5 minutes in the affected eye.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rhNGF 10 μg/mlAlso: recombinant human nerve growth factor 10 µg/ml solutionrhNGF 10 μg/ml : one drop 6 times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.35 μg of rhNGF) | Drug | 1_rhNGF10_Phase 1_treatment, 4_rhNGF10_Phase 2_treatment |
| rhNGF 20 μg/mlAlso: recombinant human nerve growth factor 20 µg/ml solutionone drop 6 times a day (one 35 μl drop equals to 0.70 μg of rhNGF) | Drug | 2_rhNGF20_Phase 1_treatment, 5_rhNGF20_Phase 2_treatment |
| vehicleAlso: placeboophthalmic solution of the same composition as the test product without rhNGF | Other | 3_vehicle group_Phase 1_treatment, 6_vehicle group_Phase 2_treatment |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Patients Achieving Healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect (PED) or Corneal Ulcer
Time frame: at 4 weeks of treatment
Complete healing of the PED or corneal ulcer was determined by corneal fluorescein staining at 4 weeks as defined by the reading center evaluating the clinical pictures. Complete healing was defined as the greatest diameter of the corneal fluorescein staining in the area of the PED or corneal ulcer being less than 0.5 mm at the Week 4 visit. The primary efficacy variable was analyzed after 4 weeks of treatment only for the Phase II segment of the study. That's why the Phase I groups/arms are not included in this analysis.
12 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect (PED) or Corneal Ulcer
Time frame: at 4 weeks of study treatment.
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Complete Healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect (PED) or Corneal Ulcer
Time frame: at 6 and 8 weeks after start of the treatment
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Complete Corneal Clearing
Time frame: at 4, 6 and 8 weeks after start of the treatment
Mean Change in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)
Time frame: At screening and at week 8
Percentage of Patients That Achieve an Improvement in Corneal Sensitivity
Time frame: at 4, 6 and 8 weeks.
Percentage of Patients Experiencing Deterioration in Stage 2 or 3 NK
Time frame: from baseline to Week 4, 6, and 8.
Percentage of Patients Achieving Complete Healing of the PED or Corneal Ulcer by Week 8/16 That Remain Healed at Weeks 20/28, 32/40, 44/52, 56/64
Time frame: at week 20/28, 32/40, 44/52, and 56/64
Percentage of Patients Experiencing a Different Level of Efficacy at 4 and 8 Weeks
Time frame: at week 4 and 8
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Ocular Tolerability
Time frame: at baseline and at weeks 8 and 20
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA)
Time frame: at baseline and at period 1 (8 weeks) and 2 (Follow Up period of 12 weeks, until week 20)
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Time frame: Baseline, period 1 (8 weeks) and 2 (Follow Up period of 12 weeks, until week 20).
Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Eye Structures by Dilated Fundus Ophthalmoscopy
Time frame: At week 8 (Phase 1 and Phase 2)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26448169Yanai R, Nishida T, Chikama T, Morishige N, Yamada N, Sonoda KH. Potential New Modes of Treatment of Neurotrophic Keratopathy. Cornea. 2015 Nov;34 Suppl 11:S121-7. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000587.
Related trials for Neurotrophic Keratitis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2, Single-Dose, Multicenter, Dose Escalation, Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MR-146: An Open-Label Part 1 in Participants With Stage 1 or 2 Neurotrophic Keratopathy and a Double-Masked Part 2 in Participants With Stage 2 Neurotrophic Keratopathy
Neurotrophic Keratopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
Efficacy of Topical Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Secretome for Ocular Surface Disease
Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defect, Corneal Epithelial Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Cenegermin Ophthalmic Solution Compared With Vehicle in the Treatment of PCED
Persistent Corneal Epithelial Defect
RecruitingPhase 2
A Multicenter, Randomized, Vehicle-Controlled, Double-Masked to Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Lacripep in Subjects With Neurotrophic Keratitis
Neurotrophic Keratitis
RecruitingPhase 4
Effect of Acoltremon Ophthalmic Solution 0.003% on Signs and Symptoms of Ocular Surface Disease in Stage I Neurotrophic Keratopathy Patients With Tear Deficiency
Ocular Surface Disease, Neurotrophic Keratopathy Stage 1
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francesco Sinigaglia, MD study director
Dompé s.p.a., Milan
34 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing rhNGF 10 μg/ml and rhNGF 20 μg/ml in people with Neurotrophic Keratitis and Keratitis, run by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A at 34 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 34 sites in Italy, Spain, Germany, France, United Kingdom and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Patients Achieving Healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect (PED) or Corneal Ulcer (time frame: at 4 weeks of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01756456, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2024.