AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 4IMAGENCT01755663

Comparison of Efficacy of Ivabradine Versus Metoprolol

A Phase 4 study testing Ivabradine and Metoprolol in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Col. Suthee Panichkul at 1 site in Thailand.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Ivabradine may be better than Metoprolol for controlling heart rate before Coronary CTA. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Artery Disease
What is being tested?
Ivabradine and Metoprolol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Dec 2014to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • elective patient on scheduled for 640 slices CT coronary at Phramonkutklao hospital
  • Resting heart rate > 70 BPM
  • age > 18 years and informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Heart rate > 100 BPM
  • BP <100/60 mmHg
  • recent congestive heart failure in 1 mo.
  • SA node, AV node disease and AF
  • on permanent pacemaker
  • CrCL < 15ml/min. , AST or ALT > 3x UNL
  • on HR reducing drug such as diltiazem, verapamil, digitalis
  • contraindication for ivabradine or metoprolol

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Purich Surunchupakorn, M.D. contact

081-988-7390

winnermd57@gmail.com

Thailand1 site
  • Phramonkutklao Hospital

    Bangkok, 10400

    Purich Surunchupakorn, M.D., 081-988-7390, winnermd57@gmail.com

    Purich - Surunchupakorn, M.D.

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ivabradine Versus Metoprolol for Controlling Heart Rate Prior to 640-Slice Computed Tomographic Angiography in Elective Patients

Ivabradine may be better than Metoprolol for controlling heart rate before Coronary CTA.

Being tested
Ivabradine and Metoprolol
Keywords
CT coronary, Coronary arterial disease, ivabradine, metoprolol
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ivabradine and MetoprololDrug

Study groups in NCT01755663
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IvabradineExperimentalPatients will recieved ivabradine(5) 1 tab bid pc for 3 day and the day of CT, and recieve placebo of metoprolol
Receives: Drug: Ivabradine and Metoprolol
metoprololActive comparatorMetoprolol (100) 1/2 tab bid pc for 3 day and the day of CT coronary , and placebo of ivabradine
Receives: Drug: Ivabradine and Metoprolol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Heart rate of patient before CT coronary

    Measured: 1 January 2013 to 31 december 2013

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. safety and side effect of Metoprolol and Ivabradine

    Measured: 1 january 2013 to 31 december 2013

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Dec 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2014
  3. Primary completionDec 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01755663
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pharmongkutklao
Acronym
IMAGE
Status last verified
Oct 2014
First submitted
19 Dec 2012
Last updated
29 Oct 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Ivabradine and Metoprolol in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Col. Suthee Panichkul at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Purich Surunchupakorn, M.D. (081-988-7390, winnermd57@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Heart rate of patient before CT coronary (time frame: 1 January 2013 to 31 december 2013). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in