Urinary Stress IncontinenceNCT01754558
One Year Outcome Using the Ajust System for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence
A study testing Ajust system and TVT/TVT-O in people with Urinary Stress Incontinence, run by Zealand University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
During the last decade numerous new procedures have been presented regarding surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence (1,2). Development of the midurethral tape procedure (TVT) changed the surgical procedure dramatically both regarding the extent of the surgical procedure and also decreased the morbidity… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Stress Incontinence
- What is being tested?
- Ajust system and TVT/TVT-O
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- May 2012to Apr 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. A medical history of stress urinary incontinence, i.e. leakage during coughing, sneezing or leakage during physical exertion. OR 2. A medical history of mixed urinary stress incontinence defined as complaint of involuntary leakage associated with urgency and stress incontinence. Stress incontinence has to the dominating symptom defined as more episodes of leakage due to coughing or physical exertion than with urgency.
- 3. A provocative stress test up to ten coughs at a standardized bladder volume (300 ml) confirming urinary leakage from the urethra while the patient is asked to cough or perform a Valsalva manoeuvre standing or lying (7). Furthermore, the patient has to present hypermobility of the urethra/bladder neck defined as significant downward rotation when coughing or during Valsalva.?
Who cannot join
- Previous anti-incontinence surgery.
- Residual urine volume >100 ml
- Bladder capacity <200ml according to diary.
- Planned or current pregnancy
- Repeated urinary tract infections (>4 cystitis last year )
- Current anticoagulation therapy that can´t be interrupted in due time prior to surgery
Show all 15Show fewer
- Known abnormal coagulation
- Allergy to local anaesthetics
- Co-existing pelvic pathology, such as ovarian mass etc
- Vaginal POPQ anterior prolapse grade >=2
- A medical history of predominantly urge urinary incontinence.
- Patients unable to understand the protocol and a follow up
- Patients younger than 18 and above or equal to 60 years.
- Known or suspected neurological condition
- Patients who have not paused acethylsalicylic acid (ASA) medication 7 days prior to surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
During the last decade numerous new procedures have been presented regarding surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence (1,2). Development of the midurethral tape procedure (TVT) changed the surgical procedure dramatically both regarding the extent of the surgical procedure and also decreased the morbidity remarkably. The success rate of the TVT procedure has been proven to be high (1,2 ). However, the development of the TOT/TVT-O procedures disclosed a new fixation point and further decreased the risk of bladder injury (1,2). Since the introduction of trans-obturator slings several mini-slings have been introduced in order to reduce the need of perforation of the skin and muscles (3,4,5). Although some systems seem promising (5) others have disclosed a long learning curve, pain problems following the procedure and lower success rates, compared to the traditional sling procedures. None of these mini-slings have been adjustable.
Recently the Ajust system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence was introduced. The system is a single incision sling procedure and consists of an adjustable Polypropylene mesh sling with self fixation anchors (6). In a feasibility study (6), the 6 months objective cure rate was 82%, but there is a lack of information regarding adverse events and durability of treatment success. Our preliminary experiences suggest, that the procedure has a rapid learning curve, low pain scores postoperatively and a 94% cure rate at 3 months follow-up (personal observation). Recently, several abstracts have indicated that the cure rate obtained by Ajust is comparable to TVT or TVT-O (10-12).
Read more
The purpose of the present study is (primary outcome):
To test the hypothesis that the Ajust and TVT, TVT-O and TOT, respectively are equal regarding subjective cure rate (cure is defined as subjectively not incontinent at all), i.e. the study is designed as a non-inferiority study. The study is performed as a randomised controlled trial without blinding. The study is powered to detect a 9% difference between the two groups. The subjective cure rate is based on ICIQ measurement
Secondary outcome:
- To test the hypothesis that Ajust is associated with a significantly lower postoperative pain perception.
- To test the hypothesis that antibiotic treatment is not necessary
Read the detailed description
Primary endpoint: A cured patients is defined as no subjective symptoms (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-OAB) and no objective detectable urinary leakage during coughing (300cc in the bladder and no leakage during coughing)
Secondary outcome: Pain-perception is evaluated by VAS scoring daily during the first postoperative week, including assessing the need for painkilling medication
The endpoint regarding the use of antibiotics is based on the number of urinary tract infections and infections related to the vaginal closure during the first postoperative months. All patients will evaluated postoperative by physical examination and by urinary dipstick
- Conditions
- Urinary Stress Incontinence
- Being tested
- Ajust system, TVT/TVT-O
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ajust systemProcedure or surgery
The use of Ajust system for stress incontinence
TVT/TVT-OProcedure or surgery
sling surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ajust sling | Experimental | The sling a a new device for stress urinary incontinence. The sling is ajustable and is not penetrating the skin, i.e. is only attached to the obturator membrane Receives: Procedure: Ajust system; Procedure: TVT/TVT-O |
| TVT/TVT-O, polypropylne slings | Experimental | TVT/TVT-O system. These two systems is wellknown and used for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The sling penetrate the skin in order to secure adjustment. Receives: Procedure: Ajust system; Procedure: TVT/TVT-O |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
A change in number of cured patients
Primary endpoint: A change in number of cured patients. The number of patients cured is anticipated to be equal in each group.
A cured patients is defined as having no subjective symptoms (i.e. no scores on the ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-OAB) and no objective detectable urinary leakage during coughing (300cc in the bladder and no leakage during coughing.
Measured: Up to 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Pain-perception following surgery
Secondary outcome: Pain-perception is evaluated by VAS scoring daily during the first postoperative week, including assessing the need for painkilling medication
The endpoint regarding the use of antibiotics is based on the number of urinary tract infections and infections related to the vaginal closure during the first postoperative months. All patients will evaluated postoperative by physical examination and by urinary dipstick
Measured: Evaluated the first week following surgery, and at three and 12 months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2012
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionApr 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Urinary Stress IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zealand University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Martin Rudnicki, Zealand University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01754558
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SJ-252
- Status last verified
- May 2014
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 2 May 2014
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Temtanakitpaisan T, Buppasiri P, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Rattanakanokchai S. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infection after continence surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD012457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012457.pub2.
PubMed 35349162Rudnicki M, von Bothmer-Ostling K, Holstad A, Magnusson C, Majida M, Merkel C, Prien J, Jakobsson U, Teleman P. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Nov;96(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13205. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
PubMed 28815547
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 May 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- One Year Outcome Using the Ajust System for Treatment of Urinary Stress Incontinence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01754558
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SJ-252
- Conditions
- Urinary Stress Incontinence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zealand University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2012
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
During the last decade numerous new procedures have been presented regarding surgical treatment of urinary stress incontinence (1,2). Development of the midurethral tape procedure (TVT) changed the surgical procedure dramatically both regarding the extent of the surgical procedure and also decreased the morbidity remarkably. The success rate of the TVT procedure has been proven to be high (1,2 ). However, the development of the TOT/TVT-O procedures disclosed a new fixation point and further decreased the risk of bladder injury (1,2). Since the introduction of trans-obturator slings several mini-slings have been introduced in order to reduce the need of perforation of the skin and muscles (3,4,5). Although some systems seem promising (5) others have disclosed a long learning curve, pain problems following the procedure and lower success rates, compared to the traditional sling procedures. None of these mini-slings have been adjustable.
Recently the Ajust system for treatment of stress urinary incontinence was introduced. The system is a single incision sling procedure and consists of an adjustable Polypropylene mesh sling with self fixation anchors (6). In a feasibility study (6), the 6 months objective cure rate was 82%, but there is a lack of information regarding adverse events and durability of treatment success. Our preliminary experiences suggest, that the procedure has a rapid learning curve, low pain scores postoperatively and a 94% cure rate at 3 months follow-up (personal observation). Recently, several abstracts have indicated that the cure rate obtained by Ajust is comparable to TVT or TVT-O (10-12).
The purpose of the present study is (primary outcome):
To test the hypothesis that the Ajust and TVT, TVT-O and TOT, respectively are equal regarding subjective cure rate (cure is defined as subjectively not incontinent at all), i.e. the study is designed as a non-inferiority study. The study is performed as a randomised controlled trial without blinding. The study is powered to detect a 9% difference between the two groups. The subjective cure rate is based on ICIQ measurement
Secondary outcome:
- To test the hypothesis that Ajust is associated with a significantly lower postoperative pain perception.
- To test the hypothesis that antibiotic treatment is not necessary
Detailed description
Primary endpoint: A cured patients is defined as no subjective symptoms (ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-OAB) and no objective detectable urinary leakage during coughing (300cc in the bladder and no leakage during coughing)
Secondary outcome: Pain-perception is evaluated by VAS scoring daily during the first postoperative week, including assessing the need for painkilling medication
The endpoint regarding the use of antibiotics is based on the number of urinary tract infections and infections related to the vaginal closure during the first postoperative months. All patients will evaluated postoperative by physical examination and by urinary dipstick
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ajust sling | Experimental | Procedure: Ajust system, Procedure: TVT/TVT-OThe sling a a new device for stress urinary incontinence. The sling is ajustable and is not penetrating the skin, i.e. is only attached to the obturator membrane |
| TVT/TVT-O, polypropylne slings | Experimental | Procedure: Ajust system, Procedure: TVT/TVT-OTVT/TVT-O system. These two systems is wellknown and used for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. The sling penetrate the skin in order to secure adjustment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 1. A medical history of stress urinary incontinence, i.e. leakage during coughing, sneezing or leakage during physical exertion. OR 2. A medical history of mixed urinary stress incontinence defined as complaint of involuntary leakage associated with urgency and stress incontinence. Stress incontinence has to the dominating symptom defined as more episodes of leakage due to coughing or physical exertion than with urgency.
- 3. A provocative stress test up to ten coughs at a standardized bladder volume (300 ml) confirming urinary leakage from the urethra while the patient is asked to cough or perform a Valsalva manoeuvre standing or lying (7). Furthermore, the patient has to present hypermobility of the urethra/bladder neck defined as significant downward rotation when coughing or during Valsalva.?
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Previous anti-incontinence surgery.
- Residual urine volume >100 ml
- Bladder capacity <200ml according to diary.
- Planned or current pregnancy
- Repeated urinary tract infections (>4 cystitis last year )
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ajust systemThe use of Ajust system for stress incontinence | Procedure or surgery | Ajust sling, TVT/TVT-O, polypropylne slings |
| TVT/TVT-Osling surgery | Procedure or surgery | Ajust sling, TVT/TVT-O, polypropylne slings |
Primary outcome
A change in number of cured patients
Time frame: Up to 1 year
Primary endpoint: A change in number of cured patients. The number of patients cured is anticipated to be equal in each group. A cured patients is defined as having no subjective symptoms (i.e. no scores on the ICIQ-UI SF and ICIQ-OAB) and no objective detectable urinary leakage during coughing (300cc in the bladder and no leakage during coughing.
1 secondary outcome
Pain-perception following surgery
Time frame: Evaluated the first week following surgery, and at three and 12 months follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 May 2014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35349162Temtanakitpaisan T, Buppasiri P, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Rattanakanokchai S. Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing infection after continence surgery in women with stress urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD012457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012457.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28815547Rudnicki M, von Bothmer-Ostling K, Holstad A, Magnusson C, Majida M, Merkel C, Prien J, Jakobsson U, Teleman P. Adjustable mini-sling compared with conventional mid-urethral slings in women with urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Nov;96(11):1347-1356. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13205. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
Related trials for Urinary Stress Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Active, not recruiting
A Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the UrOActive® Artificial Urinary sPHincter (AUS)
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
Recruiting
Comparing the Effect of Two Types of Pelvic Floor Muscle Stimulation Devices to Improve Symptoms of Urinary Incontinence in Women.
Urinary Incontinence, Mixed Urinary Incontinence
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release During Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Recruiting
Effect of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) Technology in the Treatment of SUI in Chinese Men Undergone Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
Urinary Incontinence , Stress, Prostatectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ajust system and TVT/TVT-O in people with Urinary Stress Incontinence, run by Zealand University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
A change in number of cured patients (time frame: Up to 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01754558, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 May 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.