Coronary Artery DiseaseABSORB-IIINCT01751906
ABSORB III Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
A study testing Absorb BVS and XIENCE in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 192 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The ABSORB III RCT is a prospective randomized, single-blind, multi-center trial. It is the pivotal trial to support the US pre-market approval (PMA) of Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS). The ABSORB III includes additional two trials i.e. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Stenosis, Coronary Disease
- What is being tested?
- Absorb BVS and XIENCE
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,008 participants
- Where
- 192 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to Oct 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
General Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject must be at least 18 years of age.
- Subject or a legally authorized representative must provide written Informed Consent prior to any study related procedure, per site requirements.
- Subject must have evidence of myocardial ischemia (e.g., stable, unstable angina, post-infarct angina or silent ischemia) suitable for elective PCI. Subjects with stable angina or silent ischemia and < 70% diameter stenosis must have objectives sign of ischemia as determined by one of the following, echocardiogram, nuclear scan, ambulatory ECG or stress ECG). In the absence of noninvasive ischemia, fractional flow reserve (FFR) must be done and indicative of ischemia.
- Subject must be an acceptable candidate for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
- Female subject of childbearing potential who does not plan pregnancy for up to 1 year following the index procedure. For a female subject of childbearing potential a pregnancy test must be performed with negative results known within 7 days prior to the index procedure per site standard.
- Female subject is not breast-feeding at the time of the screening visit and will not be breast-feeding for up to 1 year following the index procedure.
- Subject agrees to not participate in any other investigational or invasive clinical study for a period of 1 year following the index procedure.
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
- One or two de novo target lesions:
- If there is one target lesion, a second non-target lesion may be treated but the non-target lesion must be present in a different epicardial vessel, and must be treated first with a successful, uncomplicated result prior to randomization of the target lesion.
- If two target lesions are present, they must be present in different epicardial vessels and both must satisfy the angiographic eligibility criteria.
- The definition of epicardial vessels means the LAD, LCX and RCA and their branches. Thus, the patient must not have lesions requiring treatment in e.g. both the LAD and a diagonal branch.
- Target lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with a visually estimated or quantitatively assessed %DS of ≥ 50% and < 100% with a TIMI flow of ≥ 1 and one of the following: stenosis ≥ 70%, an abnormal functional test (e.g., fractional flow reserve, stress test), unstable angina or post-infarct angina.
- Lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with RVD by visual estimation of ≥ 2.50 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm.
- Lesion(s) must be located in a native coronary artery with length by visual estimation of ≤ 24 mm.
- For Lead-In subjects with 3.0x18 mm Absorb BVS: lesions (s) must be located in a native coronary artery with RVD by visual estimation of ≥ 2.75 mm and ≤ 3.25 mm. The lesion length by visual estimation is ≥ 8 mm and ≤ 14 mm.
General Exclusion Criteria:
- Any surgery requiring general anesthesia or discontinuation of aspirin and/or an ADP antagonist is planned within 12 months after the procedure.
- Subject has known hypersensitivity or contraindication to device material and its degradants (everolimus, poly (L-lactide), poly (DL-lactide), lactide, lactic acid) and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated. Subject has a known contrast sensitivity that cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
- Subject has known allergic reaction, hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin; or to clopidogrel and prasugrel and ticagrelor; or to heparin and bivalirudin, and therefore cannot be adequately treated with study medications.
- Subject had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI; STEMI or NSTEMI) within 72 hours of the index procedure and both CK and CK-MB have not returned to within normal limits at the time of index procedure; or subject with stable angina or silent ischemia has CK-MB that is greater than normal limits at the time of the index procedure.
- Subject is currently experiencing clinical symptoms consistent with new onset AMI (STEMI or NSTEMI), such as nitrate-unresponsive prolonged chest pain with ischemic ECG changes.
- Subject has a cardiac arrhythmia as identified at the time of screening for which at least one of the following criteria is met:
- Subject requires coumadin or any other agent for chronic oral anticoagulation.
- Subject is likely to become hemodynamically unstable due to their arrhythmia.
- Subject has poor survival prognosis due to their arrhythmia.
- Subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 30% assessed by any quantitative method, including but not limited to echocardiography, MRI, Multiple-Gated Acquisition (MUGA) scan, contrast left ventriculography, PET scan, etc. LVEF may be obtained within 6 months prior to the procedure for subjects with stable CAD. For subjects presenting with ACS, LVEF must be assessed during the index hospitalization (which may include during the index procedure by contrast left ventriculography) but prior to randomization in order to confirm the subject's eligibility.
- Subject has undergone prior PCI within the target vessel during the last 12 months. Prior PCI within the non-target vessel or any peripheral intervention is acceptable if performed anytime >30 days before the index procedure, or between 24 hours and 30 days before the index procedure if successful and uncomplicated.
- Subject requires future staged PCI either in target or non-target vessels or subject requires future peripheral interventions < 30 days after the index procedure
- Subject has received any solid organ transplants or is on a waiting list for any solid organ transplants.
- At the time of screening, the subject has a malignancy that is not in remission.
- Subject is receiving immunosuppressant therapy or has known immunosuppressive or severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.). Note: corticosteroids are not included as immunosuppressant therapy.
- Subject has previously received or is scheduled to receive radiotherapy to a coronary artery (vascular brachytherapy), or the chest/mediastinum.
- Subject is receiving or will require chronic anticoagulation therapy (e.g., coumadin, dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban or any other agent for any reason).
- Subject has a platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm3 or > 700,000 cells/mm3.
- Subject has a documented or suspected hepatic disorder as defined as cirrhosis or Child-Pugh ≥ Class B.
- Subject has renal insufficiency as defined as an estimated GFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 or dialysis at the time of screening.
- Subject is high risk of bleeding for any reason; has a history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy; has had a significant gastro-intestinal or significant urinary bleed within the past six months.
- Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic neurological attack (TIA) within the past six months, or any prior intracranial bleed, or any permanent neurologic defect, or any known intracranial pathology (e.g. aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, etc.).
- Subject has extensive peripheral vascular disease that precludes safe 6 French sheath insertion. Note: femoral arterial disease does not exclude the patient if radial access may be used.
- Subject has life expectancy < 5 years for any non-cardiac cause or cardiac cause.
- Subject is in the opinion of the Investigator or designee, unable to comply with the requirements of the study protocol or is unsuitable for the study for any reason. This includes completion of Patient Reported Outcome instruments.
- Subject is currently participating in another clinical trial that has not yet completed its primary endpoint.
- Subject is part of a vulnerable population who, in the judgment of the investigator, is unable to give Informed Consent for reasons of incapacity, immaturity, adverse personal circumstances or lack of autonomy. This may include: Individuals with mental disability, persons in nursing homes, children, impoverished persons, persons in emergency situations, homeless persons, nomads, refugees, and those incapable of giving informed consent. Vulnerable populations also may include members of a group with a hierarchical structure such as university students, subordinate hospital and laboratory personnel, employees of the Sponsor, members of the armed forces, and persons kept in detention.
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
All exclusion criteria apply to the target lesion(s) or target vessel(s).
- Lesion which prevents successful balloon pre-dilatation, defined as full balloon expansion with the following outcomes:
- Residual %DS is a maximum < 40% (per visual estimation), ≤ 20% is strongly recommended.
- TIMI Grade-3 flow (per visual estimation).
- No angiographic complications (e.g. distal embolization, side branch closure).
- No dissections NHLBI grade D-F.
- No chest pain lasting > 5 minutes.
- No ST depression or elevation lasting > 5 minutes.
- Lesion is located in left main.
- Aorto-ostial RCA lesion (within 3 mm of the ostium).
- Lesion located within 3 mm of the origin of the LAD or LCX.
- Lesion involving a bifurcation with a:
- side branch ≥ 2 mm in diameter, or
- side branch with either an ostial or non-ostial lesion with diameter stenosis > 50%, or
- side branch requiring dilatation
- Anatomy proximal to or within the lesion that may impair delivery of the Absorb BVS or XIENCE stent:
- Extreme angulation (≥ 90°) proximal to or within the target lesion.
- Excessive tortuosity (≥ two 45° angles) proximal to or within the target lesion.
- Moderate or heavy calcification proximal to or within the target lesion. If IVUS used, subject must be excluded if calcium arc in the vessel prior to the lesion or within the lesion is ≥ 180°.
- Vessel contains thrombus as indicated in the angiographic images or by IVUS or OCT.
- Lesion or vessel involves a myocardial bridge.
- Vessel has been previously treated with a stent at any time prior to the index procedure such that the Absorb BVS or XIENCE would need to cross the stent to reach the target lesion.
- Vessel has been previously treated and the target lesion is within 5 mm proximal or distal to a previously treated lesion.
- Target lesion located within an arterial or saphenous vein graft or distal to any arterial or saphenous vein graft.
Trial locations and contacts
192 sites in 2 countries.
192 sites in 2 countries
United States190 sites
Abington Memorial Hospital
Abington, Pennsylvania, 19001
Presbyterian Hospital
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Northwest Texas Healthcare System
Amarillo, Texas, 79106
AnMed Health
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Piedmont Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
University Hospital
Augusta, Georgia, 30901
Seton Medical Center Austin
Austin, Texas, 78705
Eastern Maine Medical Center
Bangor, Maine, 04401
Bay Regional Medical Center
Bay City, Michigan, 48708
St. Joseph Hospital
Bellingham, Washington, 98225
Baptist Medical Center Princeton
Birmingham, Alabama, 35211
University of Alabama Hospital
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Boston University Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Brandon Regional Hospital
Brandon, Florida, 33511
St. Elizabeth's Medical Center of Boston
Brighton, Massachusetts, 02135
Fletcher Allen Health Care
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Holy Spirit Hospital
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011
Aultman Hospital
Canton, Ohio, 44710
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203
Presbyterian Hospital
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204
Memorial Hospital
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
University Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45206
The Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Tri-Health Good Samaritan Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220
Bethesda North Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Morton Plant Hospital
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
UCH-Memorial Health Systems
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Boone Hospital Center
Columbia, Missouri, 65201
Sisters of Charity Providence Hospital
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Riverside Methodist Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
John Muir Medical Center - Concord Campus
Concord, California, 94520
Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital
Dallas, Texas, 75204
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822
Genesis Medical Center
Davenport, Iowa, 52803
Oakwood Hospital and Medical Center
Dearborn, Michigan, 48124
Harper University Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
St. John Hospital & Medical Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48236
Doylestown Hospital
Doylestown, Pennsylvania, 18901
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27110
Elkhart General Healthcare
Elkhart, Indiana, 46514
EMH Healthcare
Elyria, Ohio, 44035
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631
UPMC Hamot
Erie, Pennsylvania, 16550
Providence Regional Medical Center Everett
Everett, Washington, 98201
Thomas Hospital
Fairhope, Alabama, 36532
Cleveland Cln Fairview Hospital
Fairview Park, Ohio, 44126
Inova Fairfax Hospital
Falls Church, Virginia, 22042
Medical Center of the Rockies
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80538
Holy Cross Hospital
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308
Mary Washington Hospital
Fredericksburg, Virginia, 22401
Washington Hospital
Fremont, California, 94538
Northeast Georgia Medical Center
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Chandler Regional Medical Center
Gilbert, Arizona, 85297
Greenville Memorial Hospital of the Greenville Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
St. Francis Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, 29607
Cooper University Hospital
Haddon Heights, New Jersey, 08035
Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
Haddon Heights, New Jersey, 08035
Memorial Regional Hospital
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Houston, Texas, 77030
St. Mary's Medical Center
Huntington, West Virginia, 25701
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782
Union Memorial Hospital
Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782
Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Franciscan St. Francis Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237
St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290
St. Vincent's Medical Center
Jacksonville, Florida, 32204
Baptist Medical Center - Downtown
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207
University of Florida UF Health
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
Borgess Medical Center
Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49048
The University of Kansas Hospital and Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66106
Kettering Medical Center
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
Turkey Creek Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37934
Scripps Green Hospital
La Jolla, California, 92037
Scripps Memorial Hospital
La Jolla, California, 92037
St. Mary Medical Center
Langhorne, Pennsylvania, 19047
Sparrow Hospital
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, 40503
University of Kentucky Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Nebraska Heart Hospital
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526
Arkansas Heart Hospital
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72211
St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center
Liverpool, New York, 13088
Good Samaritan Hospital
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90043
Jewish Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Long Island Jewish Medical Center
Manhasset, New York, 11030
Wellstar Kennestone Hospital
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Banner Heart Hospital
Mesa, Arizona, 85206
University of Miami Hospital
Miami, Florida, 33136
Baptist Hospital of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33176
Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Winthrop University Hospital
Mineola, New York, 11501
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
St. Patrick Hospital
Missoula, Montana, 59802
Sutter Central Valley Hospitals dba Memorial Medical Center
Modesto, California, 95355
Baptist Medical Center South
Montgomery, Alabama, 36117
Morristown Medical Center
Morristown, New Jersey, 07962
InterMountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84107
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Jersey Shore University Medical Center
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753
Yale-New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
New York Presbyterian Hospital-Cornell University
New York, New York, 10065
Lennox Hill Hospital,
New York, New York, 10075
Christiana Care Health Services
Newark, Delaware, 19718
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Advocate Christ Medical Center
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60453
MediQuest Research Group Inc at Munroe Regional Medical Center
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Integris Baptist Medical Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
Florida Hospital
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33410
Bay County Health Systems
Panama City, Florida, 32401
St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center
Paterson, New Jersey, 07503
Baptist Hospital
Pensacola, Florida, 32501
Saint Francis Medical Center
Peoria, Illinois, 61614
Northern Michigan Hospital
Petoskey, Michigan, 49770
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Pennsylvania Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
UPMC Presbyterian
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
UPMC Shadyside Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15219
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
Plano, Texas, 75093
Maine Medical Center
Portland, Maine, 04102
Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
The Miriam Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Rex Hospital
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
WakeMed
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27610
The Valley Hospital
Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450
Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
North Memorial Medical Center
Robbinsdale, Minnesota, 55422
Rochester General Hospital
Rochester, New York, 14621
Strong Memorial Hospital
Rochester, New York, 14627
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48703
Mercy General Hospital
Sacramento, California, 95816
UC Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Sutter Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95819
Peninsula Regional Medical Center
Salisbury, Maryland, 21804
Methodist Texsan Hospital
San Antonio, Texas, 78201
Sharp Memorial Hospital
San Diego, California, 92123
Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital
Santa Barbara, California, 93105
Scottsdale Healthcare
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85260
Swedish Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98122
Sanford USD Medical Center
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57104
St. John's Hospital
Springfield, Illinois, 62701
Mercy Hospital Springfield
Springfield, Missouri, 65807
PeaceHealth Sacred Heart Medical Center
Springfield, Oregon, 97477
Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
St. Anthony's Medical Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63129
St. Vincent's Medical Center
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
Stanford, California, 94305
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Washington Adventist Hospital
Takoma Park, Maryland, 20912
Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, 33609
Florida Hospital Pepin Heart Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
The Toledo Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43606
Mercy St. Vincent's Medical Center
Toledo, Ohio, 43608
Little Company Of Mary Hospital
Torrance, California, 90503
Torrance Memorial Medical Center
Torrance, California, 90505
Munson Medical Center
Traverse City, Michigan, 49684
Hillcrest Medical Center
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74104
North Mississippi Medical Center Cardiology Associates Research, LLC
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801
East Texas Medical Center
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Trinity Mother Frances Hospital Regional Healthcare Center
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Mercy Medical
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266
Winchester Medical Center
Winchester, Virginia, 22601
Novant Health Forsyth Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
UMass Memorial Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital
Wormleysburg, Pennsylvania, 17043
St. Joseph Medical Center
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
York Hospital
York, Pennsylvania, 17405
St. Joseph Mercy Hospital
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
Genesis-Good Samaritan Hospital
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
Australia2 sites
St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Herston, Queensland, 4029
About this study
Official title: A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb™ BVS, the Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions.
The ABSORB III RCT is a prospective randomized, single-blind, multi-center trial. It is the pivotal trial to support the US pre-market approval (PMA) of Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS).
The ABSORB III includes additional two trials i.e. ABSORB III PK (pharmacokinetics) sub-study and ABSORB IV RCT trial which are maintained under one protocol because both trial designs are related, ABSORB IV is the continuation of ABSORB III and the data from ABSORB III and ABSORB IV will be pooled to support the ABSORB IV primary endpoint. Both the trials will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Absorb BVS.
Read the detailed description
ABSORB III RCT:
- Primary Objective: The pivotal trial to support the US pre-market approval (PMA) of Absorb BVS. ABSORB III will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Absorb BVS System compared to the XIENCE in the treatment of subjects, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease caused by up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in separate epicardial vessels.
- Powered Secondary Objectives:
- Lead-In Phase Objective: To evaluate the applicability and transferability of the didactic Absorb BVS physician training plan to US clinical practice. The lead-in phase is a non-randomized, single-arm, open label group of up to 50 subjects treated with Absorb BVS at up to 35 US sites. The Lead-In phase will enroll/register subjects prior to the randomization phase of ABSORB III. The Lead-In Phase allows the treatment of up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in different epicardial vessels with reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 2.75 mm to ≤ 3.25 mm and lesion lengths ≥ 8 to ≤ 14 mm.
- Imaging Cohort Objective: To evaluate long-term vascular function and patency of the Absorb BVS treated segments compared to XIENCE treated segments in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in separate epicardial vessels.
The imaging cohort-phase is a prospective, randomized (2:1 Absorb BVS to XIENCE), single-blind, multi-center trial, registering approximately 200 subjects. This includes 150 subjects for the angiographic/intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) endpoints analysis and approximately 50 subjects for optical coherence tomography (OCT) endpoints analysis. The 200 subjects are separate from the 2000 subjects included in the primary analysis. Data from two powered secondary endpoints from this cohort will support label claims of superiority of Absorb BVS as compared to XIENCE specific to vasomotion and late lumen enlargement.
All other subjects in ABSORB III unless specified will receive treatment of up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in different epicardial vessels with RVD ≥ 2.5 mm to ≤ 3.75 mm and lesion lengths ≤ 24 mm.
- Being tested
- Absorb BVS, XIENCE
- Keywords
- Absorb™ BVS, Angioplasty, Bioabsorbable, BVS, Bioresorbable, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Endothelial Responsiveness, Coronary artery restenosis, Coronary artery stenosis, Coronary scaffold, Coronary Stent, Drug eluting stents, Everolimus, Myocardial ischemia, Stent thrombosis, Stents
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis, Coronary Disease, Coronary Restenosis, Myocardial Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Absorb BVSDevice
- Scaffold diameters: 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 mm
- Scaffold lengths: 8, 12, 18, and 28 mm The 3.0 x 18 mm Absorb BVS will be used for the Lead-In. Both the 8 mm and 12 mm lengths will be available for the 2.5/3.0 mm diameter Absorb BVS. Only the 12 mm length will be available for the 3.5 mm diameter.
- The commercially approved CE marked device will be used in geographies where it is commercially available. The commercially approved CE marked 23mm Absorb BVS device will not be used in this study.
Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation for improving coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm.
XIENCEDevice
Commercially approved XIENCE Family Stent System, inclusive of XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, XIENCE Xpedition, XIENCE Alpine, XIENCE Pro (OUS only), and XIENCE ProX (OUS only).
- Stent diameters: 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, 3.5 and 4.0 mm
- Stent lengths: 8, 12, 15, 18, 23, and 28 mm. The 3.25 mm is only available for XIENCE Xpedition
- For geographies where these devices are commercially available, the investigational sties may use only their locally approved devices
To improve coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Experimental | Subjects receiving Absorb BVS Receives: Device: Absorb BVS |
| XIENCE | Active comparator | Subjects receiving XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, or XIENCE Xpedition Receives: Device: XIENCE |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Cardiac Death/TV-MI/ID-TLR (TLF)
TLF is defined as composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction (per protocol-defined MI definition), attributable to Target Vessel (TV-MI), or Ischemic-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR).
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (35)
Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: Angina
Angina is defined as the first adverse event resulting in the site diagnosis of angina.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: All Revascularization
This powered secondary endpoint is intended to assess all revascularization at 1 year and test for superiority of Absorb BVS to XIENCE. All revascularizations are comprised of TLR, TVR excluding TLR, and non-TVR.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
This powered secondary endpoint is intended to assess all ID-TVR at 1 year and test for superiority of Absorb BVS to XIENCE.
Measured: 1 year
Acute Success- Device Success (Lesion Level Analysis)
Successful delivery and deployment of the study scaffold/stent at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the delivery system with attainment of final in-scaffold/stent residual stenosis of less than 30% by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable). When bailout scaffold/stent is used, the success or failure of the bailout scaffold/stent delivery and deployment is not one of the criteria for device success.
Measured: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
Acute Success: Procedural Success (Subject Level Analysis)
Achievement of final in-scaffold/stent residual stenosis of less than 30% by QCA (by visual estimation if QCA unavailable) with successful delivery and deployment of at least one study scaffold/stent at the intended target lesion and successful withdrawal of the delivery system for all target lesions without the occurrence of cardiac death, target vessel MI or repeat TLR during the hospital stay (maximum of 7 days).
Measured: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
Number of Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)
DEATH (Per ARC Circulation) : All deaths are considered cardiac unless an unequivocal non-cardiac cause can be established. Specifically, any unexpected death even in patients with coexisting potentially fatal non-cardiac disease (e.g. cancer, infection) should be classified as cardiac.
Cardiac death (CD): Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment.
Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause.
Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma.
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction (MI)
- Attributable to target vessel (TV-MI)
- Not attributable to target vessel (NTV-MI)
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
TLR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel performed for restenosis or other complication of the target lesion. All TLR should be classified prospectively as ischemia driven (ID-TLR) or not ischemia driven (NID-TLR) by the investigator prior to repeat angiography.
The target lesion is defined as the treated segment from 5 mm proximal to the stent and to 5 mm distal to the stent.
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Excluding Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
TVR is defined as any repeat percutaneous intervention or surgical bypass of any segment of the target vessel. The target vessel is defined as the entire major coronary vessel proximal and distal to the target lesion which includes upstream and downstream branches and the target lesion itself.
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With All Revascularization
All revascularization endpoint is comprised of TLR, TVR excluding TLR, and non-TVR.
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Death/All MI
All deaths includes Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment.
Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause.
Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma.
Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG.
-Non-Q wave MI: Those MIs which are not Q-wave MI
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Cardiac Death/All MI
All deaths includes Cardiac death: Any death due to proximate cardiac cause (e.g. MI, low-output failure, fatal arrhythmia), unwitnessed death and death of unknown cause, all procedure related deaths including those related to concomitant treatment.
Vascular death: Death due to non-coronary vascular causes such as cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary embolism, ruptured aortic aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, or other vascular cause.
Non-cardiovascular death: Any death not covered by the above definitions such as death caused by infection, malignancy, sepsis, pulmonary causes, accident, suicide or trauma.
Myocardial Infarction (MI) - Q wave MI: Development of new, pathological Q wave on the ECG.
-Non-Q wave MI: Those MIs which are not Q-wave MI
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Cardiac Death/TV-MI/ID-TLR (TLF)
Target Lesion Failure is composite of Cardiac death/ Target Vessel Myocardial Infarction (TV-MI)/ Ischemic-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR).
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Cardiac Death/All MI/ID-TLR (Major Adverse Cardiac Events-MACE)
Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) is defined as the composite of cardiac death, all myocardial infarction, and ischemic driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR).
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Target Vessel Failure (TVF) is the composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial infarction (MI) or Ischemic-Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR).
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Death/All MI/All Revascularization (DMR)
DMR is the composite of All Death, All Myocardial infarction (MI) and All Revascularization.
Measured: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With Acute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition)
Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing :
Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation.
Evidence:
Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation.
Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Measured: ≤ 1 Day
Number of Participants With Acute/Subacute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition)
Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing :
Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation.
Evidence:
Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation.
Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Measured: 0 to 30 Days
Number of Participants With Subacute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis
Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing :
Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation.
Evidence:
Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation.
Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Measured: >1 to 30 Days
Number of Participants With Late Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition)
Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing :
Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation.
Evidence:
Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation.
Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of
- Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or
- Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Measured: 31 to 365 Days
Number of Participants With Very Late Stent /Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition)
Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing :
Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation.
Evidence:
Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation.
Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of
- Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or
- Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Measured: 366 to 393 Days
Number of Participants With Cumulative Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis
Stent Thrombosis should be reported as a cumulative value at the different time points and with the different separate time points. Time 0 is defined as the time point after the guiding catheter has been removed and the subject left the Catheterization lab.
Timing :
Acute : 0 - 24 hours post stent implantation; Subacute : >24 hours - 30 days post stent implantation; Late : 30 days - 1 year post stent implantation; Very late : >1 year post stent implantation.
Evidence:
Definite stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred by either angiographic or pathologic confirmation.
Probable stent thrombosis is considered to have occurred after intracoronary stenting in case of
- Any unexplained death within the first 30 days or
- Irrespective of the time after the index procedure, any MI that is related to documented acute ischemia in the territory of the implanted stent without angiographic confirmation of stent thrombosis and in the absence of any other obvious cause.
Measured: 0 to 1853 Days
Pre-Procedure Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Angiographic endpoint Minimum lumen diameter is defined as the shortest diameter through the center point of the lumen.
Measured: < or = 1 day
Pre-Procedure Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).
Measured: < or = 1 day
Post-Procedure In-Segment Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Angiographic endpoint. Minimum lumen diameter is defined as the shortest diameter through the center point of the lumen.
In- Segment is defined as, within the margins of the stent or scaffold and 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent or scaffold.
Measured: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Post-Procedure In-Segment Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Angiographic endpoint. Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).
In- Segment is defined as, within the margins of the stent or scaffold and 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent or scaffold.
Measured: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Post-Procedure In-Device Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Angiographic endpoint. Minimum lumen diameter is defined as the shortest diameter through the center point of the lumen.
In- Segment is defined as, within the margins of the stent or scaffold and 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the stent or scaffold
Measured: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Post-Procedure In-Device Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Angiographic endpoint. Percent Diameter Stenosis is defined as the value calculated as 100 * (1 - Minimum Luminal Diameter (MLD)/Reference vessel diameter (RVD)) using the mean values from two orthogonal views (when possible) by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).
Measured: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Post-Procedure In-Device Acute Gain
The acute gain was defined as the difference between post- and pre procedural minimal lumen diameter (MLD).
Measured: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Powered Imaging Cohort Secondary Endpoint: The Instent/Scaffold Mean Lumen Area Change, From Post Procedure to 3 Years by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)
- Mean lumen area measured after nitrate infusions, superiority test, ~300 pooled subjects.
- Pooled IVUS subjects (~300 subjects): 150 subjects from the Imaging Cohort of ABSORB III RCT and 150 subjects from ABSORB Japan RCT.
Measured: From Post procedure to 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Neointimal Area (NIA)
All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions
Measured: 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Device Area, Adluminal
All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions
Measured: 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Lumen Area
All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions
Measured: 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Minimal Lumen Area
All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions
Measured: 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Percentage of Malapposition Struts
All OCT endpoints will be collected for within the device and within the treated segment: Descriptive analysis of strut, lesion and vessel morphology Mean neointimal area (NIA) - Apposed to the vessel wall with neointimal coverage Apposed to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall with neointimal coverage Incomplete apposition to vessel wall without neointimal coverage Lumen area/volume stenosis % Mean/minimal device area Mean/minimal luminal area/volume Mean strut area/volume Persisting incomplete apposition, late incomplete apposition at 3 years (if analyzable) OCT analysis for subjects with jailed side branch Descriptive analyses from 3-dimensional OCT reconstructions
Measured: 3 Years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionOct 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 2,008 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephen G Ellis, MD, Principal investigator, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OHDean J Kereiakes, MD, Principal investigator, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OHGregg W Stone, MD, Study chair, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NYJennifer McMeans Jones, Study director, Abbott Medical Devices
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01751906
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10-392
- Acronym
- ABSORB-III
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Nishi T, Okada K, Kitahara H, Kameda R, Ikutomi M, Imura S, Hollak MB, Yock PG, Popma JJ, Kusano H, Cheong WF, Sudhir K, Fitzgerald PJ, Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Stone GW, Honda Y, Kimura T; ABSORB III and ABSORB Japan Investigators. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of long-term outcomes following ABSORB bioresorbable scaffold implantation: A pooled analysis of the ABSORB III and ABSORB Japan trials. J Cardiol. 2021 Sep;78(3):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
PubMed 33893022Stone GW, Kimura T, Gao R, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Onuma Y, Chevalier B, Simonton C, Dressler O, Crowley A, Ali ZA, Serruys PW. Time-Varying Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold During 5-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Meta-analysis and Individual Patient Data Pooled Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;4(12):1261-1269. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4101.
PubMed 31561250Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, Tan SH, Ediebah DE, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. Clinical Outcomes Before and After Complete Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Resorption: Five-Year Follow-Up From the ABSORB III Trial. Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1895-1903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042584. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
PubMed 31553222Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger C, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, McGreevy R, Zhang Z, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. 3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2852-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PubMed 29100702Ali ZA, Gao R, Kimura T, Onuma Y, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Chevalier B, Vu MT, Zhang Z, Simonton CA, Serruys PW, Stone GW. Three-Year Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold: Individual-Patient-Data Meta-Analysis From the ABSORB Randomized Trials. Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):464-479. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031843. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PubMed 29089314Baron SJ, Lei Y, Chinnakondepalli K, Vilain K, Magnuson EA, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Stone GW, Cohen DJ; ABSORB III Investigators. Economic Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Results From the ABSORB III Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 24;10(8):774-782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.022.
PubMed 28427593Stone GW, Gao R, Kimura T, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Onuma Y, Cheong WF, Jones-McMeans J, Su X, Zhang Z, Serruys PW. 1-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1277-89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01039-9. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
PubMed 26825231Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, McGreevy R, Zhang Z, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1905-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509038. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
PubMed 26457558Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Samady H, Jones-McMeans J, Zhang Z, Cheong WF, Su X, Ben-Yehuda O, Stone GW. Evaluation of a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: design of and rationale for the ABSORB III randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Oct;170(4):641-651.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
PubMed 26386787
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Clinical Evaluation of Absorb™ BVS, the Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold in the Treatment of Subjects With de Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01751906
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ABSORB-III / 10-392
- Keywords
- Absorb™ BVS, Angioplasty, Bioabsorbable, BVS, Bioresorbable, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Endothelial Responsiveness, Coronary artery restenosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,008 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2012
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Feb 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The ABSORB III RCT is a prospective randomized, single-blind, multi-center trial. It is the pivotal trial to support the US pre-market approval (PMA) of Absorb™ Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS).
The ABSORB III includes additional two trials i.e. ABSORB III PK (pharmacokinetics) sub-study and ABSORB IV RCT trial which are maintained under one protocol because both trial designs are related, ABSORB IV is the continuation of ABSORB III and the data from ABSORB III and ABSORB IV will be pooled to support the ABSORB IV primary endpoint. Both the trials will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Absorb BVS.
Detailed description
ABSORB III RCT:
- Primary Objective: The pivotal trial to support the US pre-market approval (PMA) of Absorb BVS. ABSORB III will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Absorb BVS System compared to the XIENCE in the treatment of subjects, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease caused by up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in separate epicardial vessels.
- Powered Secondary Objectives:
- Lead-In Phase Objective: To evaluate the applicability and transferability of the didactic Absorb BVS physician training plan to US clinical practice. The lead-in phase is a non-randomized, single-arm, open label group of up to 50 subjects treated with Absorb BVS at up to 35 US sites. The Lead-In phase will enroll/register subjects prior to the randomization phase of ABSORB III. The Lead-In Phase allows the treatment of up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in different epicardial vessels with reference vessel diameter (RVD) ≥ 2.75 mm to ≤ 3.25 mm and lesion lengths ≥ 8 to ≤ 14 mm.
- Imaging Cohort Objective: To evaluate long-term vascular function and patency of the Absorb BVS treated segments compared to XIENCE treated segments in the treatment of subjects with ischemic heart disease caused by up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in separate epicardial vessels.
The imaging cohort-phase is a prospective, randomized (2:1 Absorb BVS to XIENCE), single-blind, multi-center trial, registering approximately 200 subjects. This includes 150 subjects for the angiographic/intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) endpoints analysis and approximately 50 subjects for optical coherence tomography (OCT) endpoints analysis. The 200 subjects are separate from the 2000 subjects included in the primary analysis. Data from two powered secondary endpoints from this cohort will support label claims of superiority of Absorb BVS as compared to XIENCE specific to vasomotion and late lumen enlargement.
All other subjects in ABSORB III unless specified will receive treatment of up to two de novo native coronary artery lesions in different epicardial vessels with RVD ≥ 2.5 mm to ≤ 3.75 mm and lesion lengths ≤ 24 mm.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS | Experimental | Device: Absorb BVSSubjects receiving Absorb BVS |
| XIENCE | Active comparator | Device: XIENCESubjects receiving XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, or XIENCE Xpedition |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Absorb BVS* Scaffold diameters: 2.5, 3.0 and 3.5 mm * Scaffold lengths: 8, 12, 18, and 28 mm The 3.0 x 18 mm Absorb BVS will be used for the Lead-In. Both the 8 mm and 12 mm lengths will be available for the 2.5/3.0 mm diameter Absorb BVS. Only the 12 mm length will be available for the 3.5 mm diameter. * The commercially approved CE marked device will be used in geographies where it is commercially available. The commercially approved CE marked 23mm Absorb BVS device will not be used in this study. Bioabsorbable drug eluting stent implantation for improving coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm. | Device | Absorb BVS |
| XIENCECommercially approved XIENCE Family Stent System, inclusive of XIENCE V, XIENCE PRIME, XIENCE Xpedition, XIENCE Alpine, XIENCE Pro (OUS only), and XIENCE ProX (OUS only). * Stent diameters: 2.5, 2.75, 3.0, 3.25, 3.5 and 4.0 mm * Stent lengths: 8, 12, 15, 18, 23, and 28 mm. The 3.25 mm is only available for XIENCE Xpedition * For geographies where these devices are commercially available, the investigational sties may use only their locally approved devices To improve coronary luminal diameter in patients, including those with diabetes mellitus, with ischemic heart disease due to de novo native coronary artery lesions (length ≤ 24 mm) with a reference vessel diameter of ≥ 2.5 mm and ≤ 3.75 mm. | Device | XIENCE |
Primary outcome
Number of Cardiac Death/TV-MI/ID-TLR (TLF)
Time frame: 1 year
TLF is defined as composite of Cardiac Death, Myocardial Infarction (per protocol-defined MI definition), attributable to Target Vessel (TV-MI), or Ischemic-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (ID-TLR).
35 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: Angina
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: All Revascularization
Time frame: 1 year
Number of Participants With Powered Secondary Endpoint: Ischemia Driven Target Vessel Revascularization (ID-TVR)
Time frame: 1 year
Acute Success- Device Success (Lesion Level Analysis)
Time frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
Acute Success: Procedural Success (Subject Level Analysis)
Time frame: On day 0 (the day of procedure)
Number of Death (Cardiac, Vascular, Non-cardiovascular)
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With All Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With All Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With All Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Excluding Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With All Revascularization
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Death/All MI
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Cardiac Death/All MI
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Cardiac Death/TV-MI/ID-TLR (TLF)
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Cardiac Death/All MI/ID-TLR (Major Adverse Cardiac Events-MACE)
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With Target Vessel Failure (TVF)
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Death/All MI/All Revascularization (DMR)
Time frame: 0 to 5 years
Number of Participants With Acute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition)
Time frame: ≤ 1 Day
Number of Participants With Acute/Subacute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition)
Time frame: 0 to 30 Days
Number of Participants With Subacute Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis
Time frame: >1 to 30 Days
Number of Participants With Late Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition)
Time frame: 31 to 365 Days
Number of Participants With Very Late Stent /Scaffold Thrombosis (Per ARC Definition)
Time frame: 366 to 393 Days
Number of Participants With Cumulative Stent/Scaffold Thrombosis
Time frame: 0 to 1853 Days
Pre-Procedure Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Time frame: < or = 1 day
Pre-Procedure Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Time frame: < or = 1 day
Post-Procedure In-Segment Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Time frame: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Post-Procedure In-Segment Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Time frame: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Post-Procedure In-Device Minimum Lumen Diameter (MLD)
Time frame: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Post-Procedure In-Device Percent Diameter Stenosis (%DS)
Time frame: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Post-Procedure In-Device Acute Gain
Time frame: ≤ 7 days post index procedure
Powered Imaging Cohort Secondary Endpoint: The Instent/Scaffold Mean Lumen Area Change, From Post Procedure to 3 Years by Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS)
Time frame: From Post procedure to 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Neointimal Area (NIA)
Time frame: 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Device Area, Adluminal
Time frame: 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Mean Lumen Area
Time frame: 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Minimal Lumen Area
Time frame: 3 Years
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Endpoint: Percentage of Malapposition Struts
Time frame: 3 Years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33893022Nishi T, Okada K, Kitahara H, Kameda R, Ikutomi M, Imura S, Hollak MB, Yock PG, Popma JJ, Kusano H, Cheong WF, Sudhir K, Fitzgerald PJ, Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Stone GW, Honda Y, Kimura T; ABSORB III and ABSORB Japan Investigators. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of long-term outcomes following ABSORB bioresorbable scaffold implantation: A pooled analysis of the ABSORB III and ABSORB Japan trials. J Cardiol. 2021 Sep;78(3):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31561250Stone GW, Kimura T, Gao R, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Onuma Y, Chevalier B, Simonton C, Dressler O, Crowley A, Ali ZA, Serruys PW. Time-Varying Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold During 5-Year Follow-up: A Systematic Meta-analysis and Individual Patient Data Pooled Study. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Dec 1;4(12):1261-1269. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4101.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31553222Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, Tan SH, Ediebah DE, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. Clinical Outcomes Before and After Complete Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffold Resorption: Five-Year Follow-Up From the ABSORB III Trial. Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1895-1903. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042584. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29100702Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Metzger C, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, McGreevy R, Zhang Z, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. 3-Year Clinical Outcomes With Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: The ABSORB III Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 12;70(23):2852-2862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29089314Ali ZA, Gao R, Kimura T, Onuma Y, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Chevalier B, Vu MT, Zhang Z, Simonton CA, Serruys PW, Stone GW. Three-Year Outcomes With the Absorb Bioresorbable Scaffold: Individual-Patient-Data Meta-Analysis From the ABSORB Randomized Trials. Circulation. 2018 Jan 30;137(5):464-479. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031843. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28427593Baron SJ, Lei Y, Chinnakondepalli K, Vilain K, Magnuson EA, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Stone GW, Cohen DJ; ABSORB III Investigators. Economic Outcomes of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: 1-Year Results From the ABSORB III Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 24;10(8):774-782. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26825231Stone GW, Gao R, Kimura T, Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Onuma Y, Cheong WF, Jones-McMeans J, Su X, Zhang Z, Serruys PW. 1-year outcomes with the Absorb bioresorbable scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: a patient-level, pooled meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1277-89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01039-9. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26457558Ellis SG, Kereiakes DJ, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Rizik DG, Teirstein PS, Litt MR, Kini A, Kabour A, Marx SO, Popma JJ, McGreevy R, Zhang Z, Simonton C, Stone GW; ABSORB III Investigators. Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds for Coronary Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1905-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509038. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26386787Kereiakes DJ, Ellis SG, Popma JJ, Fitzgerald PJ, Samady H, Jones-McMeans J, Zhang Z, Cheong WF, Su X, Ben-Yehuda O, Stone GW. Evaluation of a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold in patients with coronary artery disease: design of and rationale for the ABSORB III randomized trial. Am Heart J. 2015 Oct;170(4):641-651.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
EDIT-401 in Adults Who Require Additional Lowering of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HeFH)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Coronary Computed Tomography Study to Assess the Effect of Inclisiran in Addition to Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy on Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression in Participants With a Diagnosis of Non-obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Without Previous Cardiovascular Events
Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Patients With Uncommon Presentations and/or Uncommon Diseases Associated With the Cardiovascular System
Metabolic Disease, Obesity
Active, not recruiting
Troponin in Acute Chest Pain to Risk Stratify and Guide EffecTive Use of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial to Investigate the Value of Coronary CT Angiography in the Understanding and Management of Coronary Calcium (The Optimal Trial)
Cardiovascular Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephen G Ellis, MD principal investigator
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH
Dean J Kereiakes, MD principal investigator
The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH
Gregg W Stone, MD study chair
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
192 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Absorb BVS and XIENCE in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 192 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 192 sites in United States, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Cardiac Death/TV-MI/ID-TLR (TLF) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01751906, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2023.