AzTrials
AzTrials

Compression of Spinal Nerve RootNCT01744899

Soleus H-Reflex in Different Sitting Postures

An observational study of Compression of Spinal Nerve Root and Spinal Disorder, run by Texas Woman's University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of prolonged sitting duration and three different sitting postures (erect, slumped, and slouched sitting postures) on spinal nerve root function by measuring the soleus (SOL) H-reflex amplitude. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Sitting posture
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2012to May 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Study population: Healthy adults from both genders.

Who may be able to join

  • Able to read, speak, and understand English

Who cannot join

  • Current complaint of low back pain.
  • Current injury to the ankle and/or foot.
  • Limited ankle movement.
  • Leg length discrepancy.
  • Scoliosis.
  • History of:
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Back surgery.
  • Calf muscle injury/surgery.
  • Radicular symptoms.
  • Peripheral neuropathy.
  • Upper motor neuron lesion.
  • Systemic and metabolic diseases.
  • Cancer.
  • Pregnant at the time of the study.
  • Use of pain medications at the time of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Texas Woman's University

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Influence of Different Sitting Postures on Soleus H-Reflex in Normal Subjects

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of prolonged sitting duration and three different sitting postures (erect, slumped, and slouched sitting postures) on spinal nerve root function by measuring the soleus (SOL) H-reflex amplitude. In addition, the pressure under the ischial tuberosities during the three sitting postures were assessed and correlated with the SOL H-reflex amplitude.

Read the detailed description

Participants were assigned to two groups (prolonged sitting group and controls) based on their daily sitting duration with 15 participants in each group. The outcome measures were recorded during erect, slumped and slouched sitting postures. The differences between the two groups and the three sitting postures in the outcome measures were examined for statistical significance.

Being tested
Sitting posture
Keywords
Lumbosacral spine, Nerve roots, Sitting, H-reflex
Medical subject headings
Radiculopathy, Spinal Diseases, Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sitting postureOther

    The outcomes were measured while the participants assumed erect, slumped and slouched sitting postures.

Study groups in NCT01744899
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Prolonged sittingIncludes individuals who spent an average of at least 6 hours a day sitting over the past year.
Receives: Other: Sitting posture
ControlIncludes individuals who spent 4 hours or less/day sitting over the past year.
Receives: Other: Sitting posture

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Lumbosacral nerve root function by as measured by the soleus H-reflex amplitude

    Measured: The outcome was measured during one session that lasted for an average of 3 hours. No further measurement was performed after that session.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Pressure under the ischial tuberosities

    Pressure under the ischial tuberosities was measured in millimeter of mercury (mmHg), with 0 mmHg representing no ischial pressure and 644 mmHg representing the highest pressure.

    Measured: The outcome was measured during one session that lasted for an average of 3 hours. No further measurement was performed after that session.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Dec 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionMay 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01744899
Sponsor's protocol ID
16518
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
26 Sep 2012
Last updated
7 Dec 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Compression of Spinal Nerve Root and Spinal Disorder, run by Texas Woman's University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Lumbosacral nerve root function by as measured by the soleus H-reflex amplitude (time frame: The outcome was measured during one session that lasted for an average of 3 hours. No further measurement was performed after that session.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2012.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in