OsteoarthritisNCT01733472
General or Regional Anesthesia for Hip Surgery
A study testing GA-arm, remifentanil and RA-arm in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Region Skane at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether general anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia is best for patients undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 46 to 84 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- GA-arm, remifentanil and RA-arm
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Jan 2013to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 46 to 84 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- prior surgery to the same hip
- patients with a history of stroke, neurological or psychiatric disease that potentially could affect the perception of pain
- obesity (BMI > 35)
- active or suspected infection
- patients taking opioids or steroids
- patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis or an immunological depression
- patients who are allergic to any of the drugs being used in this study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Dept Orthopedic Surgey, Hässleholm Hospital, PO Box 351,
Hässleholm, 28125
About this study
Official title: General Versus Intrathecal Anaesthesia for Patients Undergoing Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty
The purpose of this study is to determine whether general anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia is best for patients undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Read the detailed description
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a follow up time of 48 hrs. Patients scheduled for primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. A total of 120 patients randomly assigned to one of the two alternatives (general anaesthesia (GA) or regional anaesthesia (RA)).
General anaesthesia compared to intrathecal anaesthesia will give shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Primary endpoint:
LOS.
Secondary endpoints:
Postoperative pain? Postoperative orthostatic function (dizziness) Time until the patient meets the discharge criteria from PACU How many patients will need at least one urinary bladder catheterisation
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- GA-arm, remifentanil, RA-arm
- Keywords
- anaesthetic techniques, subarachnoid, analgesia
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GA-arm, remifentanilDrug
Also called GA: TCI consisting of remifentanil an propofol
Remifentanil and propofol will be delivered intravenously via TCI pumps according to the "Marsh" and "Minto" algorithm
RA-armDrug
Also called Regional anesthesia
Intrathecal (i.e. spinal) anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine 15 mg administered intrathecally at L4-L5.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RA-arm | Placebo comparator | RA-arm: the patients in this arm will receive intrathecal anaesthesia consisting of bupivacaine 15 mg Receives: Drug: RA-arm |
| GA-arm, remifentanil | Experimental | GA-arm: patients in this arm will receive general anaesthesia consisting of Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) of remifentanil and propofol Receives: Drug: GA-arm, remifentanil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Length of Hospital Stay
Time from the end of surgery until the patients meets the discharge criteria will be evaluated. Discharge criteria: able to get in and out of bed, Able to get dressed. Able to sit down in a chair and get up again. Able to walk 50 meters wit/without crutches. Able to flex knee 70 degrees. Able to walk stairs. Pain manageable with oral analgesics. Acceptance to be discharged
Measured: Up to 4 days after surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Post Operative Pain
Pain will be monitored using a Visual Analogue Scale. Pain will be monitored with the patient in four different positions. VAS 100 mm used for assessment of pain (0 = no pain, 100 = worst imaginable pain). At each time and position the median VAS-pain score was reported (generally the distribution of pain scores are not normally distributed and hence median value was used)
Measured: from end of surgey until 48 hrs later
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2013
- Primary completionFeb 2014
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Region Skane
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Andreas Harsten, Region Skane
- Investigators
- Andreas Harsten, M.D., Principal investigator, Region Skane
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01733472
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hip-CPH-2013
- Other IDs
- Hässleholm2013
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 20 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, Myles PS. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Feb;100(2):154-64. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem373.
PubMed 18211990Marsh BJ, Morton NS, White M, Kenny GN. A computer controlled infusion of propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in children. Can J Anaesth. 1990 May;37(4 Pt 2):S97. No abstract available.
PubMed 2361330Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):24-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199701000-00005.
PubMed 9009936Harsten A, Kehlet H, Ljung P, Toksvig-Larsen S. Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Apr;59(4):542-3. doi: 10.1111/aas.12495. Epub 2015 Mar 3. No abstract available.
PubMed 25736216
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- General Versus Intrathecal Anaesthesia for Patients Undergoing Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01733472
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hip-CPH-2013
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- anaesthetic techniques, subarachnoid, analgesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Region SkaneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2013
- Primary completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Mar 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether general anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia is best for patients undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Detailed description
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a follow up time of 48 hrs. Patients scheduled for primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. A total of 120 patients randomly assigned to one of the two alternatives (general anaesthesia (GA) or regional anaesthesia (RA)).
General anaesthesia compared to intrathecal anaesthesia will give shorter length of hospital stay (LOS) for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA).
Primary endpoint:
LOS.
Secondary endpoints:
Postoperative pain? Postoperative orthostatic function (dizziness) Time until the patient meets the discharge criteria from PACU How many patients will need at least one urinary bladder catheterisation
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RA-arm | Placebo comparator | Drug: RA-armRA-arm: the patients in this arm will receive intrathecal anaesthesia consisting of bupivacaine 15 mg |
| GA-arm, remifentanil | Experimental | Drug: GA-arm, remifentanilGA-arm: patients in this arm will receive general anaesthesia consisting of Target Controlled Infusion (TCI) of remifentanil and propofol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 46 to 84 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- prior surgery to the same hip
- patients with a history of stroke, neurological or psychiatric disease that potentially could affect the perception of pain
- obesity (BMI > 35)
- active or suspected infection
- patients taking opioids or steroids
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| GA-arm, remifentanilAlso: GA: TCI consisting of remifentanil an propofolRemifentanil and propofol will be delivered intravenously via TCI pumps according to the "Marsh" and "Minto" algorithm | Drug | GA-arm, remifentanil |
| RA-armAlso: Regional anesthesiaIntrathecal (i.e. spinal) anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine 15 mg administered intrathecally at L4-L5. | Drug | RA-arm |
Primary outcome
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: Up to 4 days after surgery
Time from the end of surgery until the patients meets the discharge criteria will be evaluated. Discharge criteria: able to get in and out of bed, Able to get dressed. Able to sit down in a chair and get up again. Able to walk 50 meters wit/without crutches. Able to flex knee 70 degrees. Able to walk stairs. Pain manageable with oral analgesics. Acceptance to be discharged
1 secondary outcome
Post Operative Pain
Time frame: from end of surgey until 48 hrs later
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jun 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 18211990Fowler SJ, Symons J, Sabato S, Myles PS. Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Feb;100(2):154-64. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem373.
- Background: PubMed 2361330Marsh BJ, Morton NS, White M, Kenny GN. A computer controlled infusion of propofol for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia in children. Can J Anaesth. 1990 May;37(4 Pt 2):S97. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 9009936Minto CF, Schnider TW, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology. 1997 Jan;86(1):24-33. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199701000-00005.
- Background: PubMed 25736216Harsten A, Kehlet H, Ljung P, Toksvig-Larsen S. Total intravenous general anaesthesia vs. spinal anaesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Apr;59(4):542-3. doi: 10.1111/aas.12495. Epub 2015 Mar 3. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Outpatient Physiotherapy vs. mHealth Exercise and Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis (MOKneeTOR)
Knee Osteoarthristis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Music During Walking on Pain and Muscle Activation in People With Chronic Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
Radio- KO Radiotherapy for Knee Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Opioid Reduction and Enhanced Recovery in Orthopaedic Surgery (OREOS)-Knee
Knee Arthroplasty, Total, Partial Knee Arthroplasty
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training With and Without Hip Abductor Strengthening in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.(BFR)
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andreas Harsten, M.D. principal investigator
Region Skane
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing GA-arm, remifentanil and RA-arm in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Region Skane at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Mar 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Length of Hospital Stay (time frame: Up to 4 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01733472, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jun 2019.