DepressionSCMNCT01731717
Cluster Randomized Trial of Stepped Care Intervention vs. Treatment as Usual for Patients With Depression
A study testing Active monitoring, Bibliotherapy and Online self-help in people with Depression, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The main aim of the project is the implementation and evaluation of a stepped care model (SCM) for patients with depression with 6 treatment options of varying intensity and setting, including innovative technologies (e-mental health, telephone-based psychotherapy). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Depression
- What is being tested?
- Active monitoring, Bibliotherapy and Online self-help
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 737 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to May 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- >4 points on PHQ-D-9 depression scale
- sufficient knowledge of German language
- health situation that allows questionnaire completion
Who cannot join
- insufficient knowledge of German language
- health situation not allowing questionnaire completion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20246
About this study
Official title: Effektivität Und Effizienz Von Behandlungspfaden für Patienten Mit Depressiven Erkrankungen: Stepped Care Als Ansatz für Ein Leitliniengerechtes Und Integriertes Versorgungsmanagement
The main aim of the project is the implementation and evaluation of a stepped care model (SCM) for patients with depression with 6 treatment options of varying intensity and setting, including innovative technologies (e-mental health, telephone-based psychotherapy). Within this complex intervention, patients are treated by a multiprofessional network of health care providers in Hamburg, Germany. The study compares the SCM condition (intervention group) to a control group receiving treatment as usual (cluster randomization on the level of participating general practitioners). It is expected that the SCM condition will show better results regarding reduction of mental symptoms, improvement of quality of life, more efficient access to care and better cost-benefit ratio.
- Conditions
- Depression
- Being tested
- Active monitoring, Bibliotherapy, Online self-help, Outpatient psychotherapy, Psychiatric treatment
- Keywords
- depression, stepped care, evidence-based medicine, health services research, psychotherapy, complex intervention, guideline
- Medical subject headings
- Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Active monitoringBehavioural
General physician performs monitoring every 2 weeks using the PHQ-9 depression scale.
BibliotherapyBehavioural
Patient works with self-help book "Selbsthilfe bei Depressionen" (Görlitz, 2010) under general physician's supervision.
Online self-helpBehavioural
Patient works with online self-help program "Deprexis" under general physician's supervision.
Outpatient psychotherapyBehavioural
Patient receives outpatient psychodynamic or cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy from a psychotherapist participating in the network.
Psychiatric treatmentProcedure or surgery
Patient receives treatment from psychiatrist or general physician participating in the network, this includes psychopharmacotherapy. Treatment takes place within routine care, thus psychiatrists or general physicians individually determine the type of medication and are committed to follow the recommendations of the German S3-Guideline/National Disease Management Guideline for Unipolar Depression.
Combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacological treatmentBehavioural
Patient receives psychotherapy combined with psychopharmacological treatment, if necessary in inpatient setting.
Control group: treatment as usualOther
treatment as usual
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stepped care intervention (SCM) | Experimental | Patients within the stepped care intervention are screened by general physician using the PHQ-9 (inclusion criterion: >4 points) and diagnosed according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) criteria. Patients receive differentially intensive treatment according to depression severity.
Patients with mild depression receive:
Step I: Active monitoring or Step II: II.a. Bibliotherapy or II.b. Online self-help ("Deprexis®") or II+: Telephone-based psychotherapy
Patients with moderate depression receive:
Step III: III.a. Outpatient psychotherapy or III.b. Psychopharmacological treatment
Patients with severe depression receive:
Step IV: Combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacological treatment, optionally in inpatient setting. Receives: Behavioral: Active monitoring; Behavioral: Bibliotherapy; Behavioral: Online self-help; Behavioral: Outpatient psychotherapy; Procedure: Psychiatric treatment; Behavioral: Combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacological treatment |
| Control group: treatment as usual | Active comparator | Patients in the control group are screened by their general physician using the PHQ-D-9 depression scale. Patients included in the study then receive treatment as usual from general physician or other health service providers. Receives: Other: Control group: treatment as usual |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in depression severity (PHQ-D-9)
Change in patient-rated depression symptom severity: Patient Health Questionnaire 9, German version (PHQ-D-9; Löwe, Zipfel \& Herzog, 2002)
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Cost-benefit ratio (QALYs)
Cost-benefit ratio in quality-adjusted life years(QALYs)
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Response/Remission/Relapse (PHQ-D-9)
Response/Remission/Relapse as computed by the difference in pre-post depression severity (PHQ-D-9)
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Quality of life (EQ-5D)
Quality of life as measured by EuroQol's EQ-5D
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Quality of life (SF-12)
Quality of life as measured by the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months
Health service utilization and medication consumption
Non-standardized items regarding the amount and cost of health services utilized in the past 6 months
Measured: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Self-esteem
Rosenberg self-esteem scale
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Therapeutic alliance
Patient-rated therapeutic alliance as measured by the Helping Alliace Questionnaire (HAQ)
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Anxiety symptoms (PHQ-D)
Anxiety as rated by the PHQ-D anxiety scale
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Panic symptoms (PHQ-D)
Panic symptoms as measured by the PHQ-D
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Somatisation (PHQ-D)
Somatisation as measured by the PHQ-D
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
General anxiety disorder (GAD-7)
Symptoms of general anxiety disorder measured by the GAD-7
Measured: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completionMar 2015
- Study completionMay 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 737 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, PD Dr. phil. Birgit Watzke, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Investigators
- Birgit Watzke, Prof. Dr., Study director, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, GermanyMartin Härter, Prof. Dr. Dr., Study director, Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01731717
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 01KQ1002B-TP7
- Acronym
- SCM
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 12 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Brettschneider C, Heddaeus D, Steinmann M, Harter M, Watzke B, Konig HH. Cost-effectiveness of guideline-based stepped and collaborative care versus treatment as usual for patients with depression - a cluster-randomized trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02829-0.
PubMed 32859177Watzke B, Heddaeus D, Steinmann M, Konig HH, Wegscheider K, Schulz H, Harter M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guideline-based stepped care model for patients with depression: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in routine care. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 20;14:230. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0230-y.
PubMed 25182269
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effektivität Und Effizienz Von Behandlungspfaden für Patienten Mit Depressiven Erkrankungen: Stepped Care Als Ansatz für Ein Leitliniengerechtes Und Integriertes Versorgungsmanagement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01731717
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCM / 01KQ1002B-TP7
- Conditions
- Depression
- Keywords
- depression, stepped care, evidence-based medicine, health services research, psychotherapy, complex intervention, guideline
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 737 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2012
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main aim of the project is the implementation and evaluation of a stepped care model (SCM) for patients with depression with 6 treatment options of varying intensity and setting, including innovative technologies (e-mental health, telephone-based psychotherapy). Within this complex intervention, patients are treated by a multiprofessional network of health care providers in Hamburg, Germany. The study compares the SCM condition (intervention group) to a control group receiving treatment as usual (cluster randomization on the level of participating general practitioners). It is expected that the SCM condition will show better results regarding reduction of mental symptoms, improvement of quality of life, more efficient access to care and better cost-benefit ratio.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stepped care intervention (SCM) | Experimental | Behavioral: Active monitoring, Behavioral: Bibliotherapy, Behavioral: Online self-help, Behavioral: Outpatient psychotherapy, Procedure: Psychiatric treatment, Behavioral: Combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacological treatmentPatients within the stepped care intervention are screened by general physician using the PHQ-9 (inclusion criterion: >4 points) and diagnosed according to International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) criteria. Patients receive differentially intensive treatment according to depression severity. Patients with mild depression receive: Step I: Active monitoring or Step II: II.a. Bibliotherapy or II.b. Online self-help ("Deprexis®") or II+: Telephone-based psychotherapy Patients with moderate depression receive: Step III: III.a. Outpatient psychotherapy or III.b. Psychopharmacological treatment Patients with severe depression receive: Step IV: Combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacological treatment, optionally in inpatient setting. |
| Control group: treatment as usual | Active comparator | Other: Control group: treatment as usualPatients in the control group are screened by their general physician using the PHQ-D-9 depression scale. Patients included in the study then receive treatment as usual from general physician or other health service providers. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- >4 points on PHQ-D-9 depression scale
- sufficient knowledge of German language
- health situation that allows questionnaire completion
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- insufficient knowledge of German language
- health situation not allowing questionnaire completion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Active monitoringGeneral physician performs monitoring every 2 weeks using the PHQ-9 depression scale. | Behavioural | Stepped care intervention (SCM) |
| BibliotherapyPatient works with self-help book "Selbsthilfe bei Depressionen" (Görlitz, 2010) under general physician's supervision. | Behavioural | Stepped care intervention (SCM) |
| Online self-helpPatient works with online self-help program "Deprexis" under general physician's supervision. | Behavioural | Stepped care intervention (SCM) |
| Outpatient psychotherapyPatient receives outpatient psychodynamic or cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy from a psychotherapist participating in the network. | Behavioural | Stepped care intervention (SCM) |
| Psychiatric treatmentPatient receives treatment from psychiatrist or general physician participating in the network, this includes psychopharmacotherapy. Treatment takes place within routine care, thus psychiatrists or general physicians individually determine the type of medication and are committed to follow the recommendations of the German S3-Guideline/National Disease Management Guideline for Unipolar Depression. | Procedure or surgery | Stepped care intervention (SCM) |
| Combined psychotherapy and psychopharmacological treatmentPatient receives psychotherapy combined with psychopharmacological treatment, if necessary in inpatient setting. | Behavioural | Stepped care intervention (SCM) |
| Control group: treatment as usualtreatment as usual | Other | Control group: treatment as usual |
Primary outcome
Change in depression severity (PHQ-D-9)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in patient-rated depression symptom severity: Patient Health Questionnaire 9, German version (PHQ-D-9; Löwe, Zipfel \& Herzog, 2002)
11 secondary outcomes
Cost-benefit ratio (QALYs)
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Response/Remission/Relapse (PHQ-D-9)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Quality of life (EQ-5D)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Quality of life (SF-12)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months
Health service utilization and medication consumption
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months
Self-esteem
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Therapeutic alliance
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Anxiety symptoms (PHQ-D)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Panic symptoms (PHQ-D)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Somatisation (PHQ-D)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
General anxiety disorder (GAD-7)
Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32859177Brettschneider C, Heddaeus D, Steinmann M, Harter M, Watzke B, Konig HH. Cost-effectiveness of guideline-based stepped and collaborative care versus treatment as usual for patients with depression - a cluster-randomized trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Aug 28;20(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02829-0.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 25182269Watzke B, Heddaeus D, Steinmann M, Konig HH, Wegscheider K, Schulz H, Harter M. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guideline-based stepped care model for patients with depression: study protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial in routine care. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 20;14:230. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0230-y.
Related trials for Depression
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Recruiting
Cultural Adaptation of an Online Parenting Intervention to Reduce the Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adolescents
Risk of Depression and Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Birgit Watzke, Prof. Dr. study director
Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Martin Härter, Prof. Dr. Dr. study director
Centre for Psychosocial Medicine, Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Active monitoring, Bibliotherapy and Online self-help in people with Depression, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in depression severity (PHQ-D-9) (time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01731717, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2015.