AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive DisorderEarly Phase 1NRRNCT01725048

Pilot Study to Evaluate Individualized Choice of Antidepressants in Patients With Cancer

A Early Phase 1 study testing Mirtazapine and Citalopram in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Neoplasms, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a pilot study to test the hypothesis that the antidepressants mirtazapine and citalopram are effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) in cancer patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Major Depressive Disorder, Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Mirtazapine and Citalopram
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2011to Oct 2013
Phase
Early Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosed with a malignancy
  • Informed consent obtained and signed
  • Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • Life expectancy determined to be greater than or equal to 6 months
  • Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder based on clinical examination and the DSM-IV-TR criteria
  • PHQ-9 depression assessment completed by subject, with a score of 10 or greater
  • Able to take whole or crushed tablets by mouth or by feeding tube

Who cannot join

  • Unable to complete self-report instruments due to illiteracy, neurologic illness, visual problems, inability to speak or read English, or other causes
  • Treatment with antidepressants or antipsychotics within the last 3 months
  • Psychotic or manic behavior
  • Active suicidal ideation or plan
  • Current illicit substance abuse
  • Severe renal impairment as defined by creatinine clearance of <15 milliliters/minute/1.73 meters squared (mL/min/m2)
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Severe hepatic impairment as defined by Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >5x the upper limit of normal, or a total bilirubin > 3.0 milliliters/deciliter (mL/dL)
  • History of congenital long QT syndrome
  • Clinically significant congestive heart failure or bradyarrhythmias
  • Treatment with a concomitant medication that is known to have a strong association with corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation AND a QTc >460 for men or >470 for women. Applicable to the citalopram arm only

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of North Carolina Hospital

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Individualized Choice of Antidepressant in Patients With Cancer

This is a pilot study to test the hypothesis that the antidepressants mirtazapine and citalopram are effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) in cancer patients.

Read the detailed description

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating illness associated with increased mortality and significant impairment in quality of life. The prevalence of MDD is particularly high in patients with cancer, as much as 38% in some studies.

The study of depression in cancer patients is particularly important, as these co-morbid illnesses can frequently complicate the management of each other. In addition to affecting quality of life, poorly controlled depression can affect cancer treatment adherence and can lead to poor treatment outcomes.

Depression can be challenging to diagnose in patients with cancer. A spectrum of depressive symptoms can be seen, ranging from appropriate sadness in response to a life threatening diagnosis, to a major depressive episode. The diagnosis is confounded by the symptoms brought on by the cancer and its treatment, such as fatigue, insomnia, anorexia, and pain. Medications commonly used in cancer patients such as narcotics, benzodiazepines, antihistamines, steroids, antibiotics, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy can all lead to side effects that further confuse the picture. However, while challenging, evidence does suggest that a valid diagnosis of depression can be made in this patient population.

The current standard for diagnosing MDD is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition - Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), which was published in 2000 by the American Psychiatric Association. The diagnosis is made based on an interview between the patient and physician in which nine criteria are assessed, including depressed mood, anhedonia, weight loss or gain, insomnia or hypersomnia, psychomotor agitation or retardation, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, difficulty concentrating, and recurrent thoughts of death. In patients with cancer, the diagnosis of MDD is more often based on anhedonia and feelings of worthlessness, as depressed mood, weight fluctuation, and sleep disturbance can be symptoms of the underlying cancer itself. Once the diagnosis has been made, there are several tools which have been created and validated for the purpose of assessing the severity of depression and for following the severity over time. The tool we intend to use in this study is the PHQ-9.

Therapy for MDD in the general population includes both psychotherapy and pharmacological intervention. However, the optimal therapy of MDD in cancer patients remains uncertain. Very few placebo controlled trials have been performed in this population, and there is currently no uniformly accepted standard of care. Some of the evidence from studies in depressed but otherwise medically healthy patients may be applicable to cancer patients, but there are several factors which complicate the treatment of depression in this group. For example, the overlap of symptoms between depression and the underlying malignancy can confound the diagnosis, as discussed earlier. Simultaneous treatment of the underlying malignancy introduces adverse effects from surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation, as well as an increased likelihood of drug-drug interactions. Finally, co-morbid conditions such as cancer pain can contribute to the depression, requiring simultaneous therapy. As a result of these unique factors, the treatment of MDD in cancer patients cannot necessarily be approached using the standard recommendations for the general population.

There is scant evidence supporting the effectiveness of pharmacologic therapy in cancer patients with MDD. In the last 25 years only four placebo controlled trials have been published, and of these only two have shown a statistically significant improvement in depression scores with active treatment.

Additional studies are needed to evaluate some of the newer antidepressants within the cancer population and to assess whether this strategy of matching side effects to symptoms is beneficial.

Being tested
Mirtazapine, Citalopram
Keywords
Major depressive disorder, Neoplasms
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MirtazapineDrug

    Also called Remeron

    7.5mg by mouth once a day at night. If subject has not had a 50% or greater reduction in the PHQ-9 depression assessment score, and if the subject is not experiencing unacceptable adverse effects, then the dose may be escalated first to 15mg by mouth every night and then to 30mg by mouth every night.

  • CitalopramDrug

    Also called Celexa

    Citalopram 10mg by mouth once daily. If the subject has not had a 50% or greater reduction in PHQ-9 depression assessment score, and if the subject is not experiencing unacceptable side effects, then the dose may be escalated first to 20mg by mouth every day and then to 40mg by mouth once a day.

Study groups in NCT01725048
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MirtazapineActive comparatorTreatment with oral mirtazapine, dosed once daily, for 9 weeks, with starting dose of 7.5 milligrams (mg) daily up to 30mg daily.
Receives: Drug: Mirtazapine
CitalopramActive comparatorTreatment with Citalopram, once daily, for 9 weeks, with dosages starting at 10mg once daily to 40mg once daily.
Receives: Drug: Citalopram

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility

    To determine the feasibility of this pilot study to recruit subjects, as measured by the number of individuals enrolled per month, such that the goal of the study is met in a timely manner.

    Measured: One year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Depression Score

    To assess the short-term (9 week) outcome of mirtazapine or citalopram in cancer patients with major depressive disorder based on mean improvement in depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Measured: 9 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionOct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01725048
Sponsor's protocol ID
LCCC 1021
Acronym
NRR
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
7 Nov 2012
Last updated
13 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Vita G, Compri B, Matcham F, Barbui C, Ostuzzi G. Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub4.

    PubMed 36999619

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Early Phase 1 study testing Mirtazapine and Citalopram in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Neoplasms, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01725048, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in