Major Depressive DisorderEarly Phase 1NRRNCT01725048
Pilot Study to Evaluate Individualized Choice of Antidepressants in Patients With Cancer
A Early Phase 1 study testing Mirtazapine and Citalopram in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Neoplasms, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a pilot study to test the hypothesis that the antidepressants mirtazapine and citalopram are effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) in cancer patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder, Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Mirtazapine and Citalopram
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 21 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to Oct 2013
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with a malignancy
- Informed consent obtained and signed
- Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Life expectancy determined to be greater than or equal to 6 months
- Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder based on clinical examination and the DSM-IV-TR criteria
- PHQ-9 depression assessment completed by subject, with a score of 10 or greater
- Able to take whole or crushed tablets by mouth or by feeding tube
Who cannot join
- Unable to complete self-report instruments due to illiteracy, neurologic illness, visual problems, inability to speak or read English, or other causes
- Treatment with antidepressants or antipsychotics within the last 3 months
- Psychotic or manic behavior
- Active suicidal ideation or plan
- Current illicit substance abuse
- Severe renal impairment as defined by creatinine clearance of <15 milliliters/minute/1.73 meters squared (mL/min/m2)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Severe hepatic impairment as defined by Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >5x the upper limit of normal, or a total bilirubin > 3.0 milliliters/deciliter (mL/dL)
- History of congenital long QT syndrome
- Clinically significant congestive heart failure or bradyarrhythmias
- Treatment with a concomitant medication that is known to have a strong association with corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation AND a QTc >460 for men or >470 for women. Applicable to the citalopram arm only
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina Hospital
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
About this study
Official title: A Pilot Study to Evaluate Individualized Choice of Antidepressant in Patients With Cancer
This is a pilot study to test the hypothesis that the antidepressants mirtazapine and citalopram are effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) in cancer patients.
Read the detailed description
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating illness associated with increased mortality and significant impairment in quality of life. The prevalence of MDD is particularly high in patients with cancer, as much as 38% in some studies.
The study of depression in cancer patients is particularly important, as these co-morbid illnesses can frequently complicate the management of each other. In addition to affecting quality of life, poorly controlled depression can affect cancer treatment adherence and can lead to poor treatment outcomes.
Depression can be challenging to diagnose in patients with cancer. A spectrum of depressive symptoms can be seen, ranging from appropriate sadness in response to a life threatening diagnosis, to a major depressive episode. The diagnosis is confounded by the symptoms brought on by the cancer and its treatment, such as fatigue, insomnia, anorexia, and pain. Medications commonly used in cancer patients such as narcotics, benzodiazepines, antihistamines, steroids, antibiotics, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy can all lead to side effects that further confuse the picture. However, while challenging, evidence does suggest that a valid diagnosis of depression can be made in this patient population.
The current standard for diagnosing MDD is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition - Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), which was published in 2000 by the American Psychiatric Association. The diagnosis is made based on an interview between the patient and physician in which nine criteria are assessed, including depressed mood, anhedonia, weight loss or gain, insomnia or hypersomnia, psychomotor agitation or retardation, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, difficulty concentrating, and recurrent thoughts of death. In patients with cancer, the diagnosis of MDD is more often based on anhedonia and feelings of worthlessness, as depressed mood, weight fluctuation, and sleep disturbance can be symptoms of the underlying cancer itself. Once the diagnosis has been made, there are several tools which have been created and validated for the purpose of assessing the severity of depression and for following the severity over time. The tool we intend to use in this study is the PHQ-9.
Therapy for MDD in the general population includes both psychotherapy and pharmacological intervention. However, the optimal therapy of MDD in cancer patients remains uncertain. Very few placebo controlled trials have been performed in this population, and there is currently no uniformly accepted standard of care. Some of the evidence from studies in depressed but otherwise medically healthy patients may be applicable to cancer patients, but there are several factors which complicate the treatment of depression in this group. For example, the overlap of symptoms between depression and the underlying malignancy can confound the diagnosis, as discussed earlier. Simultaneous treatment of the underlying malignancy introduces adverse effects from surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation, as well as an increased likelihood of drug-drug interactions. Finally, co-morbid conditions such as cancer pain can contribute to the depression, requiring simultaneous therapy. As a result of these unique factors, the treatment of MDD in cancer patients cannot necessarily be approached using the standard recommendations for the general population.
There is scant evidence supporting the effectiveness of pharmacologic therapy in cancer patients with MDD. In the last 25 years only four placebo controlled trials have been published, and of these only two have shown a statistically significant improvement in depression scores with active treatment.
Additional studies are needed to evaluate some of the newer antidepressants within the cancer population and to assess whether this strategy of matching side effects to symptoms is beneficial.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder, Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Mirtazapine, Citalopram
- Keywords
- Major depressive disorder, Neoplasms
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MirtazapineDrug
Also called Remeron
7.5mg by mouth once a day at night. If subject has not had a 50% or greater reduction in the PHQ-9 depression assessment score, and if the subject is not experiencing unacceptable adverse effects, then the dose may be escalated first to 15mg by mouth every night and then to 30mg by mouth every night.
CitalopramDrug
Also called Celexa
Citalopram 10mg by mouth once daily. If the subject has not had a 50% or greater reduction in PHQ-9 depression assessment score, and if the subject is not experiencing unacceptable side effects, then the dose may be escalated first to 20mg by mouth every day and then to 40mg by mouth once a day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mirtazapine | Active comparator | Treatment with oral mirtazapine, dosed once daily, for 9 weeks, with starting dose of 7.5 milligrams (mg) daily up to 30mg daily. Receives: Drug: Mirtazapine |
| Citalopram | Active comparator | Treatment with Citalopram, once daily, for 9 weeks, with dosages starting at 10mg once daily to 40mg once daily. Receives: Drug: Citalopram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility
To determine the feasibility of this pilot study to recruit subjects, as measured by the number of individuals enrolled per month, such that the goal of the study is met in a timely manner.
Measured: One year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Depression Score
To assess the short-term (9 week) outcome of mirtazapine or citalopram in cancer patients with major depressive disorder based on mean improvement in depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Measured: 9 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionOct 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eliza Park, MD, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01725048
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LCCC 1021
- Acronym
- NRR
- Status last verified
- Mar 2017
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Vita G, Compri B, Matcham F, Barbui C, Ostuzzi G. Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub4.
PubMed 36999619
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Pilot Study to Evaluate Individualized Choice of Antidepressant in Patients With Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01725048
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NRR / LCCC 1021
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder, Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Major depressive disorder, Neoplasms
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 21 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a pilot study to test the hypothesis that the antidepressants mirtazapine and citalopram are effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) in cancer patients.
Detailed description
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating illness associated with increased mortality and significant impairment in quality of life. The prevalence of MDD is particularly high in patients with cancer, as much as 38% in some studies.
The study of depression in cancer patients is particularly important, as these co-morbid illnesses can frequently complicate the management of each other. In addition to affecting quality of life, poorly controlled depression can affect cancer treatment adherence and can lead to poor treatment outcomes.
Depression can be challenging to diagnose in patients with cancer. A spectrum of depressive symptoms can be seen, ranging from appropriate sadness in response to a life threatening diagnosis, to a major depressive episode. The diagnosis is confounded by the symptoms brought on by the cancer and its treatment, such as fatigue, insomnia, anorexia, and pain. Medications commonly used in cancer patients such as narcotics, benzodiazepines, antihistamines, steroids, antibiotics, chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy can all lead to side effects that further confuse the picture. However, while challenging, evidence does suggest that a valid diagnosis of depression can be made in this patient population.
The current standard for diagnosing MDD is the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fourth Edition - Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), which was published in 2000 by the American Psychiatric Association. The diagnosis is made based on an interview between the patient and physician in which nine criteria are assessed, including depressed mood, anhedonia, weight loss or gain, insomnia or hypersomnia, psychomotor agitation or retardation, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, difficulty concentrating, and recurrent thoughts of death. In patients with cancer, the diagnosis of MDD is more often based on anhedonia and feelings of worthlessness, as depressed mood, weight fluctuation, and sleep disturbance can be symptoms of the underlying cancer itself. Once the diagnosis has been made, there are several tools which have been created and validated for the purpose of assessing the severity of depression and for following the severity over time. The tool we intend to use in this study is the PHQ-9.
Therapy for MDD in the general population includes both psychotherapy and pharmacological intervention. However, the optimal therapy of MDD in cancer patients remains uncertain. Very few placebo controlled trials have been performed in this population, and there is currently no uniformly accepted standard of care. Some of the evidence from studies in depressed but otherwise medically healthy patients may be applicable to cancer patients, but there are several factors which complicate the treatment of depression in this group. For example, the overlap of symptoms between depression and the underlying malignancy can confound the diagnosis, as discussed earlier. Simultaneous treatment of the underlying malignancy introduces adverse effects from surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation, as well as an increased likelihood of drug-drug interactions. Finally, co-morbid conditions such as cancer pain can contribute to the depression, requiring simultaneous therapy. As a result of these unique factors, the treatment of MDD in cancer patients cannot necessarily be approached using the standard recommendations for the general population.
There is scant evidence supporting the effectiveness of pharmacologic therapy in cancer patients with MDD. In the last 25 years only four placebo controlled trials have been published, and of these only two have shown a statistically significant improvement in depression scores with active treatment.
Additional studies are needed to evaluate some of the newer antidepressants within the cancer population and to assess whether this strategy of matching side effects to symptoms is beneficial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mirtazapine | Active comparator | Drug: MirtazapineTreatment with oral mirtazapine, dosed once daily, for 9 weeks, with starting dose of 7.5 milligrams (mg) daily up to 30mg daily. |
| Citalopram | Active comparator | Drug: CitalopramTreatment with Citalopram, once daily, for 9 weeks, with dosages starting at 10mg once daily to 40mg once daily. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosed with a malignancy
- Informed consent obtained and signed
- Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
- Life expectancy determined to be greater than or equal to 6 months
- Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder based on clinical examination and the DSM-IV-TR criteria
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Unable to complete self-report instruments due to illiteracy, neurologic illness, visual problems, inability to speak or read English, or other causes
- Treatment with antidepressants or antipsychotics within the last 3 months
- Psychotic or manic behavior
- Active suicidal ideation or plan
- Current illicit substance abuse
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MirtazapineAlso: Remeron7.5mg by mouth once a day at night. If subject has not had a 50% or greater reduction in the PHQ-9 depression assessment score, and if the subject is not experiencing unacceptable adverse effects, then the dose may be escalated first to 15mg by mouth every night and then to 30mg by mouth every night. | Drug | Mirtazapine |
| CitalopramAlso: CelexaCitalopram 10mg by mouth once daily. If the subject has not had a 50% or greater reduction in PHQ-9 depression assessment score, and if the subject is not experiencing unacceptable side effects, then the dose may be escalated first to 20mg by mouth every day and then to 40mg by mouth once a day. | Drug | Citalopram |
Primary outcome
Feasibility
Time frame: One year
To determine the feasibility of this pilot study to recruit subjects, as measured by the number of individuals enrolled per month, such that the goal of the study is met in a timely manner.
1 secondary outcome
Depression Score
Time frame: 9 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36999619Vita G, Compri B, Matcham F, Barbui C, Ostuzzi G. Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub4.
- Website for the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
- Website for the National Cancer InstituteLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Therapy for Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eliza Park, MD principal investigator
University of North Carolina
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Mirtazapine and Citalopram in people with Major Depressive Disorder and Neoplasms, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility (time frame: One year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01725048, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2017.