AzTrials
AzTrials

Eye Drops Self-instillationPhase 4NCT01704248

The Effect of "Eye Drop Guide" on the Success Rate of Eye Drops Self-instillation in Glaucoma Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Eye Drop Guide technique and Routine self-instillation technique in people with Eye Drops Self-instillation, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To investigate if the Eye Drop Guide more effective than carefully instructed routine technique for chronic glaucoma patients to self-instill eye drops. And what factors are associated with the failure of self-instillation eye drops with the Eye Drop Guide? Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Eye Drops Self-instillation
What is being tested?
Eye Drop Guide technique and Routine self-instillation technique
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteThailand
Study dates
Oct 2012to Apr 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Have been diagnosed of chronic glaucoma for 3 months or longer
  • Age of 18 years or over
  • Self-administer eye drops regularly

Who cannot join

  • Perioperative patients
  • Patients who were blind from other diseases
  • Patients with ophthalmic conditions that affect the eye drop instillation e.g. nystagmus, ptosis, exophthalmos, enophthalmos, microphthalmos, symblepharon, restrictive ophthalmoplegia
  • Patients whose underlying conditions would affect the patient's adherence to the protocol e.g. dementia, psychosis, mental retardation, neurological conditions resulting in tremor or paralysis, rheumatoid arthritis, hand deformities
  • Patients who are allergic to artificial tears eye drop
  • Patients who are not able to return for the follow-up schedule

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Darin Sakiyalak, MD contact

66204198033-4

darin.sak@mahidol.ac.th

Thailand1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University

    Bangkok, 10700

    Darin Sakiyalak, MD, 6624198033-4, darin.sak@mahidol.ac.th

    Darin Sakiyalak, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Thailand

About this study

Official title: The Effect of "Eye Drop Guide" on the Success Rate of Eye Drops Self-instillation in Glaucoma Patients.

To investigate if the Eye Drop Guide more effective than carefully instructed routine technique for chronic glaucoma patients to self-instill eye drops.

And what factors are associated with the failure of self-instillation eye drops with the Eye Drop Guide?

Read the detailed description

The participants are randomized into 2 groups. For group I; the participants will be instructed to use the Eye Drop Guide first while for group II; the participants will be instructed to use the routine self-instillation technique first. The instruction will be given to all participants by the same investigator. The participants are allowed to practice until confidence in the techniques to which they are assigned. The participants then are instructed to use only that technique to instill eye drops in both eyes every day and keep the diary to document the date, time of practice, and number of bottles use in each eye for practice at home. The investigators make a telephone visit at 1 week to remind the practice routine and the follow up schedule. The 2 week follow up will be scheduled to evaluate the self-instillation performance using the techniques to which they are assigned by the VDO recordings under the same setting as Day 1.

After VDO recordings the participants will be switched to receive the other technique with the same instruction as the other group. Allow the same period of practice in the hospital and at home. The investigators again will make a 1-week telephone visit and 2-week follow up after self-practice at home. At week 4 the VDO recordings of self-instillation performance will be taken again under the same setting as previous records.

Being tested
Eye Drop Guide technique, Routine self-instillation technique
Keywords
eye drops self-instillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Eye Drop Guide techniqueDevice

    1. Wash the hands.
    2. Shake and then uncap the bottle.
    3. Hold the bottle between the thumb, index, and/or middle finger of the dominant hand.
    4. Use the lower lip of the cup to pull the lower lid down like what they normally do with the fingers.
    5. Then place the upper lip down to cover the whole orbital rim area.
    6. Tilt the head back if seated or standing.
    7. Insert the bottle in the device all the way. Hold the bottle gently.
    8. Look upward.
    9. Squeeze the bottle one drop at a time until feel one drop instilled into the eye.
    10. Close the eye 2-3 minutes.

    For the non-seeing eye (best-corrected visual acuity ≤ 20/400) the participants should insert the bottle in the device before cover the eye then proceed with head tilt and look upward.

  • Routine self-instillation techniqueBehavioural

    1. Wash the hands.
    2. Shake and then uncap the bottle.
    3. Hold the bottle between the thumb, index, and/or middle finger of the dominant hand.
    4. Lie down or tilt the head back if seated or standing.
    5. Using the other hand, pull the lower lid down.
    6. Hold the bottle over the eye and look up.
    7. Squeeze the bottle one drop at a time until feel one drop instilled into the eye.
    8. Close the eye 2-3 minutes.

    For the participants using more than one medication after instilling one bottle the participants should wait 3-5 minutes between administering different medications in the same eye.

Study groups in NCT01704248
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Routine self-instillation techniquePlacebo comparatorThe participants first use the Routine self-instillation technique for two weeks and then switch to the Eye Drop Guide technique for another two weeks.
Receives: Device: Eye Drop Guide technique
Eye Drop Guide techniqueExperimentalThe participants first use the Eye Drop Guide technique for two weeks and then switch to the Routine self-instillation technique for another two weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Routine self-instillation technique

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To compare the success rate of self-instillation eye drops between carefully instructed routine technique and the use of Eye Drop Guide.

    Measured: 1 month

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. 1. To compare the total number of drops dispensed and time to instill drop between 2 groups.

    Measured: 1 month

  2. 2. To identify the factors that associated with failure of using the Eye Drop Guide.

    Measured: 1 month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2012
  3. Primary completionFeb 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionApr 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01704248
Sponsor's protocol ID
440/2555 (EC4)
Status last verified
Oct 2012
First submitted
8 Oct 2012
Last updated
11 Oct 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Eye Drop Guide technique and Routine self-instillation technique in people with Eye Drops Self-instillation, run by Mahidol University at 1 site in Thailand.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Thailand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Darin Sakiyalak, MD (66204198033-4, darin.sak@mahidol.ac.th), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To compare the success rate of self-instillation eye drops between carefully instructed routine technique and the use of Eye Drop Guide. (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in