Colorectal CancerNCT01697462
An Observational Study of Xeloda (Capecitabine) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (AXIOM)
An observational study of Colorectal Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 5 sites in Serbia.
Trial summary
This prospective observational study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Xeloda (capecitabine) administered in monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients will be followed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- How many people
- 258 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesSerbia
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Dec 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Metastatic colorectal cancer
- Receiving Xeloda according to registered indication
Who cannot join
- Patients who are not eligible for Xeloda treatment according to the Summary of Product Characteristics
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Serbia5 sites
Study site
Belgrade, 11000
Study site
Belgrade, 11080
Study site
Kamenitz, 21204
Study site
Kragujevac, 34000
Study site
Niš, 18000
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Xeloda in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma
This prospective observational study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Xeloda (capecitabine) administered in monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients will be followed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Number of participants with non-serious AEs was exclusive of serious AEs.
Measured: Baseline up to end of study (up to 42 months)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression
Disease progression was defined as greater than 20 percent (%) increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline to progressive disease or death (up to 42 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the period from study entry until disease progression or death from any cause. Disease progression was defined as greater than 20% increase in sum of longest diameter of target lesions compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseline to progressive disease or death (up to 42 months)
Number of Participants With Hand-Foot Syndrome (HFS)
HFS, also called palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, is a side effect or toxicity associated with specific chemotherapy treatments. The National Cancer Institute (2010) describes it as a condition marked by pain, swelling, numbness, tingling, or redness of the hands or feet.
Measured: Baseline up to end of study (up to 42 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionDec 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 258 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01697462
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML22585
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 28 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 26 Jan 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jan 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Xeloda in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01697462
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML22585
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 258 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Jan 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective observational study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Xeloda (capecitabine) administered in monotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients will be followed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Metastatic colorectal cancer
- Receiving Xeloda according to registered indication
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who are not eligible for Xeloda treatment according to the Summary of Product Characteristics
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (up to 42 months)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Number of participants with non-serious AEs was exclusive of serious AEs.
3 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression
Time frame: Baseline to progressive disease or death (up to 42 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Baseline to progressive disease or death (up to 42 months)
Number of Participants With Hand-Foot Syndrome (HFS)
Time frame: Baseline up to end of study (up to 42 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jan 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Colorectal Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 5 sites in Serbia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jan 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Serbia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Jan 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (time frame: Baseline up to end of study (up to 42 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jan 2016.