AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankylosing SpondylitisNCT01690273

Exercise Therapy Program in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients

A study testing mobility exercise and mobility and elastic resistance exercise in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mobility exercises are used in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients to preserve and restore axial mobility, but there are no data regarding a specific rehabilitation program that includes flexibility alone and its association with resistance exercises in AS patients with stable disease activity. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Ankylosing Spondylitis
What is being tested?
mobility exercise and mobility and elastic resistance exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
55 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Jul 2012to Nov 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ankylosing spondylitis patient
  • Basdai index lower than 4
  • Physical inactive
  • Functional class I to III

Who cannot join

  • Fibromyalgia
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Pain Visual Analogue Scale ("VAS") over 8

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • University of Sao Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-010

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Effect of Two Exercise Therapy Program With and Without Elastic Resistance in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients

Mobility exercises are used in Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) patients to preserve and restore axial mobility, but there are no data regarding a specific rehabilitation program that includes flexibility alone and its association with resistance exercises in AS patients with stable disease activity. So, we assessed the effects of two exercise programs in terms of mobility, functional capacity, quality of life and disease activity in AS patients. Methods. Fifty-five sedentary AS patients with a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI) <4 were included.

Read the detailed description

The AS patients were randomly assigned into three groups, to receive a mobility exercise program (M) or mobility plus elastic resistance exercise program (M+R) or no exercise (C). The exercises group sessions were conducted twice per week for 16 weeks. This supervised program comprised 30 minutes of outdoor stretching and mobility exercises for the spine and limbs (M). After the flexibility program, M+R group carry out more 30 minutes of elastic resistance exercises. The mobility, disease activity and functional parameters were evaluated at baseline and after 16 weeks, with the evaluator blinded to the treatment group.

Being tested
mobility exercise, mobility and elastic resistance exercise
Keywords
exercise, mobility, strengthening, physiotherapy
Medical subject headings
Spondylitis, Ankylosing, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • mobility exerciseOther

    30 minutes, twice a week

  • mobility and elastic resistance exerciseOther

    30 minutes, twice a week each exercises group. (total 1 hour)

Study groups in NCT01690273
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ankylosing spondylitis controlNo interventioncontrol group
mobility exerciseExperimentalmobility exercises
Receives: Other: mobility exercise
mobility and elastic resistance exerciseExperimentalAS patients was submitted to a program mobility exercise plus elastic resistance exercises
Receives: Other: mobility and elastic resistance exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. FUNCTIONAL INDEX

    BASFI - Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. A scale from 0 to 10 (lower scores means better functional capacity), results are measured by mean and standard deviation.

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  2. Mobility Index

    Bath ankylosing spondylitis motion index. A mean of five mobility measures committed by Ankylosing Spondylitis disease. Higher results means higher limitations in mobility (units of measure from 0 to 10)

    Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks

  3. Disease Activity Index

    BASDAI - Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. Scale from 0 to 6. Higher scores means worst disease activity. Numbers are expressed in average (SD)

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  4. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Scale -Disease Activity

    Scores vary from 0 to 10, and higher than 4 scores are indicative of disease activity. Data are expressed by means and SD

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  5. Global Evaluation Self Reported

    Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global is a self reported global score varying from 0 to 10. Higher scores means worst health evaluation. Expressed by means and standard deviation.

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Thoracolumbar Mobility

    Thoracolumbar rotation Pavelka. Measured with a tape in centimeters. Higher number means better thoracolumbar rotation

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  2. Pain Scale

    Pain was evaluated in a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. higher scores means much pain. Data was expressed by means and standard deviation.

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  3. Stiffness Scale

    Stiffness was measured by an VAS varying from 0 to 10. Higher scores means worst stiffness. Data are expressed by mean and SD.

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  4. Short Form-12 (PCS)

    Quality of life was analyzed in a physical component score varying from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health) scale. Data are expressed by mean and SD.

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  5. Short Form-12 (MCS)

    Quality of life was analyzed in a mental component score varying from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health). Data are expressed by mean and SD.

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  6. MASES

    Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) score varying from 0 to 13. Where 0 is no painful point reported and 13 is all tender points reported as painful. Data are expressed by means and standard deviation

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  7. Chin-coronoid Distance

    lateral rotation of the head (chin-coronoid distance) was measured with a tape in centimeters. Highest score means better lateral rotation mobility. Data are expressed by means and standard deviation

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  8. Tragus-coronoid Distance

    lateral flexion of the head (tragus-coronoid distance) was measured with a tape in centimeters. Highest score means better lateral flexion mobility of the head.Data are expressed by means and standard deviation

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  9. Finger Floor Distance

    Distance between third finger of the hand and the floor while in lumbar flexion. It was measured with a tape in centimeters. Highest score means better torso flexion mobility. Data are expressed by means and standard deviation

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

  10. Chest Expansion

    Chest expansion was measured with a tape in centimeters between inspiration and breathing exhaling. Highest score means better chest expansion. Data are expressed by means and standard deviation.

    Measured: Baseline and 16 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionNov 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01690273
Sponsor's protocol ID
8206212
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
18 Sep 2012
Last updated
20 Oct 2016
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: paper is been written

Publications

  • Yigit S, Sahin Z, Demir SE, Aytac DH. Home-based exercise therapy in ankylosing spondylitis: short-term prospective study in patients receiving tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors. Rheumatol Int. 2013 Jan;33(1):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2344-6. Epub 2012 Jan 5.

    PubMed 22218641

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing mobility exercise and mobility and elastic resistance exercise in people with Ankylosing Spondylitis, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Oct 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

FUNCTIONAL INDEX (time frame: Baseline and 16 Weeks). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01690273, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2016.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in