Lung NeoplasmsVILCNCT01684696
Virtual Intervention for Lung Cancer
A study testing Virtual experience and Videos in people with Lung Neoplasms, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. Lung cancer is unique because of racial disparity, persistent mortality rate, and social stigma. Lung cancer stigma (LCS) and difficult patient-clinician communication may be an underlying factor in health disparities in lung cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Virtual experience and Videos
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2016to Sep 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Inclusion criteria are >21 years old with a diagnosis of lung cancer (any type or stage), able to read and write English at 5th grade level, able to sign an IRB approved consent form, and expects to have 4 visits with the same clinician in the next 2 months.
Who cannot join
- Unable to understand or tolerate the battery of questionnaires due to physical or mental health issues (i.e., dementia, active psychosis).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, 94115
About this study
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. Lung cancer is unique because of racial disparity, persistent mortality rate, and social stigma. Lung cancer stigma (LCS) and difficult patient-clinician communication may be an underlying factor in health disparities in lung cancer. The purpose of this study is to PILOT test, in a diverse sample of lung cancer patients the effectiveness of the mHealth Tool for Lung Cancer patients (mHealthTLC), an interactive, immersive 3-dimensional iPad application that allows individuals to experience first person virtual visits with their clinicians, to improve patient-clinician communication, decrease LCS, and promote optimal self-management. The study hypotheses are that patients who receive the mHealth TLC will improve their ability to communicate effectively with their clinicians and will report decreased stigma related to their lung cancer diagnosis compared to the attention control group.
Read the detailed description
This is a two arm experimental design PILOT test of the mHealth Tool for Lung Cancer patients (mHealthTLC) an intervention to improve patient-clinician communication, decrease lung cancer stigma, and decrease lung cancer symptom scores. Patients will be assigned to either the mHealth TLC group or the Attention Control Group (ACG). Interventions in both groups will be delivered online or by iPad in a research office in the clinician's building prior to each visit. Assessments will be done immediately after each visit in the same research room. Intervention and assessment pre-visit is expected to take less than one hour, the intervention is expected to take 30mins, and post assessment is expected to take 30 minutes. A follow-up assessment will be done at 3 months from enrollment.
mhealth TLC group will meet with a nurse just before each of 4 clinician visits and use the mHealth TLC on an iPad with an interactive, immersive 3-dimensional (3-D) intervention that allows individuals to experience virtual visits with their clinicians. The mHealth TLC provides engagement and experiential learning by delivering important information about symptom management and provides the opportunity to practice a new communication strategy in ever increasing complex situations with a virtual coach, receptionist, assistant, and clinician.During the mHealthTLC the patient will enter a virtual clinic office, travel through the different aspects of a typical clinic visit, and interact with office staff and clinicians that are represented by avatars. The avatars will be designed to reflect ethnic and cultural diversity. First person is the preferred format for health teaching because the patient is active as self and not represented as an avatar. The first person vantage point facilitates the immersion and immediacy of the experience. Key aspects of mHealthTLC include informational videos about lung cancer (i.e. etiology, diagnosis, treatment, symptoms) and LCS. Blame and self-blame will be addressed, information about the role of addiction, social/cultural factors, and tobacco industry influence on smoking behaviors will be highlighted. Information and training will be provided and patients will be able to experience practiced interaction in ever increasing complex situations with avatars (i.e., receptionist, medical assistant, and clinician). A "virtual coach" will accompany the patient through the virtual visit and will provide information and coaching (as needed). The advantages to adding a virtual coach or avatar include the availability of an always-live agent and the capability of customizing the coach to represent an ideal social model for a particular user or group of users.Flexibility exists in how to design not only how the coach will appear but also how the coach will sound - with an appropriate voice and engaging non-verbal communication). This approach contributes to cultural and ethnic sensitivity. As the patient attempts to communicate and receive information appropriate for a self-management plan, they will receive "points" for successful communication. A cumulative score and explanation will be given at the end of the virtual visit. During the visit the participant will identify specific topics and questions that they want to address during their visit with their real clinician; they will receive a printout of their priority questions that they can take into the visit with their real clinician. The research nurse will review the score, the priority questions, and the overall virtual experience. Virtual environments for learning are sufficiently promising that further investment and development of this type of research is warranted.
Attention control group (ACG)- Patients assigned to the ACG will meet with a nurse and receive the informational videos from the mHealth TLC on an iPad before 4 clinician visits with assessments after each clinician visit. An effort will be made to match the intervention condition on salience, credibility, and contact time.
- Conditions
- Lung Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Virtual experience, Videos
- Keywords
- Lung cancer, stigma, virtual intervention, mHealth
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Social Stigma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual experienceBehavioural
VideosBehavioural
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| mHealth TLC | Experimental | The mhealth TLC group will meet with a nurse before each of 4 clinician visits and use the mHealth TLC on an iPad with an interactive 3-dimensional intervention that allows individuals to experience virtual visits with their clinicians. Key aspects of mHealthTLC include informational videos about lung cancer and LCS. Blame and self-blame will be addressed, information about the role of addiction, social/cultural factors, and tobacco industry influence on smoking behaviors will be highlighted. Patients will experience practiced interaction in ever increasing complex situations with avatars (i.e., receptionist, medical assistant, and clinician). A "virtual coach" will accompany the patient through the virtual visit and will provide information and coaching (as needed). Receives: Behavioral: Virtual experience |
| Attention Control | Active comparator | Attention control group (ACG) - Patients assigned to the ACG will meet with a nurse and receive only the informational videos on an iPad before 4 clinician visits with assessments after each clinician visit. An effort will be made to match the intervention condition on salience, credibility, and contact time. Receives: Behavioral: Videos |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient-clinician communication scores
The Medical Communication Competence Scale (MCCS) measures patients' perceptions of their competence to effectively communicate. The Patients' Self-Competence Subscale of the MCCS has 16-items with a 5 point Likert-type scaling of 5 (important) to 1 (unimportant). Higher scores indicate greater perceived self-competence. The Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (QQPPI) measures distinct domains that establish a high quality clinician-provider interaction (i.e.,information exchange, patient involvement, and sharing in the decision making process). Fourteen items are summed to yield a total score; higher scores indicate increased quality of communication as perceived by the patient.
Measured: 3 months
Perceived lung cancer stigma
The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) will be used to assess stigma. The CLCSS is a 31 item measure with each item rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Higher values indicate higher levels of LCS.The CLCSS was found to be a reliable and valid measure with a diverse sample of people with lung cancer. Construct validity was supported by expected relationships with related constructs: self-esteem, depression, social support, and social conflict. The total scale Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.96, the Cronbach alphas for the four subscales were: stigma/shame, 0.96; social isolation, 0.95; discrimination, 0.92; and smoking 0.76.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Lung Cancer symptoms
Lung Cancer Symptoms - Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) measures the physical and functional dimensions of persons with lung cancer. The scale has 9 items: six measuring major symptoms for lung cancer (appetite loss, fatigue, cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, pain) and three summary items related to total symptoms. The item scale is 0 (best) and 100 (worst). An average of all 9 items is the total score.
Measured: 3 months
Depression
Depression - Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) is a 20-item scale that is widely used for self-ratings of depression in clinical populations, including people with cancer.
Measured: 3 months
Quality of Life (QOL)
QOL - The QOL Inventory is a 33-item instrument that measures four dimensions of QOL in cancer patients (i.e., symptoms, social concerns, psychological well-being, and physical well being).
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2016
- Primary completionAug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2017 (estimated)
Why it stopped: unable to secure funding
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janine Cataldo, PhD, Principal investigator, UCSF Department of Physiological Nursing
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01684696
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12-09184
- Other IDs
- (pC ID): 237290
- Acronym
- VILC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 5 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Virtual Intervention for Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01684696
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VILC / 12-09184
- Conditions
- Lung Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Lung cancer, stigma, virtual intervention, mHealth
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: unable to secure funding
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2016
- Primary completion
- Aug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in both men and women. Lung cancer is unique because of racial disparity, persistent mortality rate, and social stigma. Lung cancer stigma (LCS) and difficult patient-clinician communication may be an underlying factor in health disparities in lung cancer. The purpose of this study is to PILOT test, in a diverse sample of lung cancer patients the effectiveness of the mHealth Tool for Lung Cancer patients (mHealthTLC), an interactive, immersive 3-dimensional iPad application that allows individuals to experience first person virtual visits with their clinicians, to improve patient-clinician communication, decrease LCS, and promote optimal self-management. The study hypotheses are that patients who receive the mHealth TLC will improve their ability to communicate effectively with their clinicians and will report decreased stigma related to their lung cancer diagnosis compared to the attention control group.
Detailed description
This is a two arm experimental design PILOT test of the mHealth Tool for Lung Cancer patients (mHealthTLC) an intervention to improve patient-clinician communication, decrease lung cancer stigma, and decrease lung cancer symptom scores. Patients will be assigned to either the mHealth TLC group or the Attention Control Group (ACG). Interventions in both groups will be delivered online or by iPad in a research office in the clinician's building prior to each visit. Assessments will be done immediately after each visit in the same research room. Intervention and assessment pre-visit is expected to take less than one hour, the intervention is expected to take 30mins, and post assessment is expected to take 30 minutes. A follow-up assessment will be done at 3 months from enrollment.
mhealth TLC group will meet with a nurse just before each of 4 clinician visits and use the mHealth TLC on an iPad with an interactive, immersive 3-dimensional (3-D) intervention that allows individuals to experience virtual visits with their clinicians. The mHealth TLC provides engagement and experiential learning by delivering important information about symptom management and provides the opportunity to practice a new communication strategy in ever increasing complex situations with a virtual coach, receptionist, assistant, and clinician.During the mHealthTLC the patient will enter a virtual clinic office, travel through the different aspects of a typical clinic visit, and interact with office staff and clinicians that are represented by avatars. The avatars will be designed to reflect ethnic and cultural diversity. First person is the preferred format for health teaching because the patient is active as self and not represented as an avatar. The first person vantage point facilitates the immersion and immediacy of the experience. Key aspects of mHealthTLC include informational videos about lung cancer (i.e. etiology, diagnosis, treatment, symptoms) and LCS. Blame and self-blame will be addressed, information about the role of addiction, social/cultural factors, and tobacco industry influence on smoking behaviors will be highlighted. Information and training will be provided and patients will be able to experience practiced interaction in ever increasing complex situations with avatars (i.e., receptionist, medical assistant, and clinician). A "virtual coach" will accompany the patient through the virtual visit and will provide information and coaching (as needed). The advantages to adding a virtual coach or avatar include the availability of an always-live agent and the capability of customizing the coach to represent an ideal social model for a particular user or group of users.Flexibility exists in how to design not only how the coach will appear but also how the coach will sound - with an appropriate voice and engaging non-verbal communication). This approach contributes to cultural and ethnic sensitivity. As the patient attempts to communicate and receive information appropriate for a self-management plan, they will receive "points" for successful communication. A cumulative score and explanation will be given at the end of the virtual visit. During the visit the participant will identify specific topics and questions that they want to address during their visit with their real clinician; they will receive a printout of their priority questions that they can take into the visit with their real clinician. The research nurse will review the score, the priority questions, and the overall virtual experience. Virtual environments for learning are sufficiently promising that further investment and development of this type of research is warranted.
Attention control group (ACG)- Patients assigned to the ACG will meet with a nurse and receive the informational videos from the mHealth TLC on an iPad before 4 clinician visits with assessments after each clinician visit. An effort will be made to match the intervention condition on salience, credibility, and contact time.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| mHealth TLC | Experimental | Behavioral: Virtual experienceThe mhealth TLC group will meet with a nurse before each of 4 clinician visits and use the mHealth TLC on an iPad with an interactive 3-dimensional intervention that allows individuals to experience virtual visits with their clinicians. Key aspects of mHealthTLC include informational videos about lung cancer and LCS. Blame and self-blame will be addressed, information about the role of addiction, social/cultural factors, and tobacco industry influence on smoking behaviors will be highlighted. Patients will experience practiced interaction in ever increasing complex situations with avatars (i.e., receptionist, medical assistant, and clinician). A "virtual coach" will accompany the patient through the virtual visit and will provide information and coaching (as needed). |
| Attention Control | Active comparator | Behavioral: VideosAttention control group (ACG) - Patients assigned to the ACG will meet with a nurse and receive only the informational videos on an iPad before 4 clinician visits with assessments after each clinician visit. An effort will be made to match the intervention condition on salience, credibility, and contact time. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Inclusion criteria are >21 years old with a diagnosis of lung cancer (any type or stage), able to read and write English at 5th grade level, able to sign an IRB approved consent form, and expects to have 4 visits with the same clinician in the next 2 months.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Unable to understand or tolerate the battery of questionnaires due to physical or mental health issues (i.e., dementia, active psychosis).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual experience | Behavioural | mHealth TLC |
| Videos | Behavioural | Attention Control |
Primary outcome
Patient-clinician communication scores
Time frame: 3 months
The Medical Communication Competence Scale (MCCS) measures patients' perceptions of their competence to effectively communicate. The Patients' Self-Competence Subscale of the MCCS has 16-items with a 5 point Likert-type scaling of 5 (important) to 1 (unimportant). Higher scores indicate greater perceived self-competence. The Quality of Physician-Patient Interaction (QQPPI) measures distinct domains that establish a high quality clinician-provider interaction (i.e.,information exchange, patient involvement, and sharing in the decision making process). Fourteen items are summed to yield a total score; higher scores indicate increased quality of communication as perceived by the patient.
Perceived lung cancer stigma
Time frame: 3 months
The Cataldo Lung Cancer Stigma Scale (CLCSS) will be used to assess stigma. The CLCSS is a 31 item measure with each item rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Higher values indicate higher levels of LCS.The CLCSS was found to be a reliable and valid measure with a diverse sample of people with lung cancer. Construct validity was supported by expected relationships with related constructs: self-esteem, depression, social support, and social conflict. The total scale Cronbach alpha coefficient was 0.96, the Cronbach alphas for the four subscales were: stigma/shame, 0.96; social isolation, 0.95; discrimination, 0.92; and smoking 0.76.
3 secondary outcomes
Lung Cancer symptoms
Time frame: 3 months
Depression
Time frame: 3 months
Quality of Life (QOL)
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2018.
Related trials for Lung Neoplasms
Recruiting
MRD-Guided Postoperative Surveillance and Adaptive Treatment for Resectable Lung Cancer
Lung Neoplasms, Neoadjuvant Therapy
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Intraarterial Therapies Plus Tislelizumab Plus Lenvatinib Versus Tislelizumab Plus Gemcitabine-Cisplatin in Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (Icc)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity Between SB27 and Keytruda in Subjects With Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV
RecruitingObservational study
Label-free Femtosecond Laser Imaging Combined With the Fast Lung Artificial Intelligence Model for Rapid Intraoperative Diagnosis of Lung Surgical Specimens: A Multicentre, Prospective, Parallel-workflow, Non-inferiority Study.
Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Calderasib (MK-1084) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With KRAS G12C Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥50% (MK-1084-004/KANDLELIT-004)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janine Cataldo, PhD principal investigator
UCSF Department of Physiological Nursing
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual experience and Videos in people with Lung Neoplasms, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient-clinician communication scores (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2018.