AzTrials
AzTrials

Health Complaints Attributed to Dental Amalgam RestorationsNCT01682278

Prospective Cohort Study of Health Complaints

An observational study of Health Complaints Attributed to Dental Amalgam Restorations, run by NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate if amalgam removal is associated with improved self-reported health, compared to no amalgam removal. The main target group consists of a group of patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS), which they attribute to dental amalgam restorations. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 70 years
What is being tested?
Removal of dental amalgam restorations
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
118 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
Sep 2012to 30 Jun 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population will be selected from primary care clinics and dental clinics in Norway.

Who may be able to join

  • permanent residents in Norway
  • able to comply with the protocol
  • Amalgam Cohort:
  • Health complaints attributed (by the patient) to dental amalgam restorations
  • duration of the health complaints attributed to amalgam restorations (by the patient) at least 3 months
  • presence of at least one amalgam filling
Show all 21Show fewer
  • the patient has expressed a wish to have all amalgam fillings removed
  • patient examined by patient's physician and dentist according to guidelines from the Norwegian Directorate of Health
  • diagnosed diseases adequately treated
  • patient's general practitioner/family physician and dentist assess that the patient's general health and dental health most likely will not deteriorate due to participation in the project
  • patient's dentist assess that there are no major risks for dental complications following amalgam removal (e.g. need for root canal treatments or extractions)
  • subjective symptoms without corresponding objective findings after medical examination(s), including symptoms not explained by patient's diagnoses,
  • moderate or severe functional impairment (assessed by the physician)
  • MUPS-cohort:
  • duration of unspecific health complaints at least 3 months
  • subjective symptoms without corresponding objective findings after medical examination(s), including symptoms not explained by patient's diagnoses
  • moderate or severe functional impairment (assessed by the physician)
  • diagnosed diseases adequately treated
  • no attribution to amalgam and no explicit wish to remove amalgam
  • Dental cohort:
  • subjectively healthy without diagnosed chronic disease or prescribed medication

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy (or planned pregnancy) and lactation
  • life threatening disease
  • patients with ongoing cancers, severe cardiopulmonary, neurological, or psychiatric diseases (assessed by GP)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Uni Health

    Bergen

Other trials in Norway

About this study

Official title: Amalgam Removal in Patients With Health Complaints Attributed to Amalgam Restorations: A Prospective Cohort Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate if amalgam removal is associated with improved self-reported health, compared to no amalgam removal. The main target group consists of a group of patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS), which they attribute to dental amalgam restorations. The patients should furthermore express the wish to have these amalgam fillings removed. The project is designed as a prospective cohort study, consisting of three groups recruited separately. The main target group will be compared with two comparison groups: one group of patients with MUPS recruited from general practice and one group of healthy study patients, recruited at dental practice. The primary research question is if amalgam removal is associated with improved self-reported health, compared to no amalgam removal, one year after completed amalgam removal.

Read the detailed description

In Norway 5%-8% of the adult population believe that their amalgam fillings have affected their health adversely; and a similar proportion of the adult population has had their amalgam fillings removed for health reasons only. The Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services has decided to fund a project comprising experimental treatment (i.e. removal of amalgam fillings) for patients with health complaints which they attribute to dental amalgam. The aim of this study is to evaluate the intervention by measuring health complaints and quality of life before and after amalgam removal and to compare changes over time with relevant patient groups. Amalgam-attributed health complaints are heterogeneous and a variety of symptoms have been attributed to amalgam. Therefore, amalgam related health complaints are difficult to quantify. However, amalgam-attributed health complaints are largely similar to complaints experienced by patients with so called "medically unexplained physical symptoms" (MUPS). Therefore, in order to operationalize and measure the patient's subjective health complaints, the MUPS criteria and questionnaire will be applied to patients who attribute their health problems to amalgam. Furthermore, this strategy allows for the inclusion of patients suffering from MUPS, however without any attribution to amalgam. This group of patients can serve as a comparison group with a similar symptom load, but no subjective attribution to amalgam. For the interpretation of the study outcome, the natural course of the health complaints in this group is of high importance.

Therefore, the project is designed as a prospective cohort study, consisting of three groups recruited separately. The two comparison groups consist of one group of patients with MUPS recruited from general practice and one group of healthy study patients, recruited at dental practice. These study participants are recruited regardless of amalgam status. The main target group consists of a group of patients with medically unexplained physical symptoms, which they attribute to dental amalgam restorations. The patients should furthermore express the wish to have these amalgam fillings removed ("amalgam cohort"). Patients with amalgam attributed health complaints who suffer from medically explained disease but attribute their diagnosis and course of the disease to amalgam (thus, not included in the amalgam cohort), will be included in a separate case series ("amalgam - case series", to be registered as a separate study).

Patients in the "amalgam cohort" will have all amalgam fillings removed according to pre-defined criteria. Amalgam removal will be performed by the patient's regular dentist or another dentist chosen by the patient. After completed removal, patients in the amalgam groups will be examined at a Regional Dental Center of Competence. The costs of amalgam removal will be reimbursed according to pre-defined rules.

Being tested
Removal of dental amalgam restorations
Keywords
Health complaints, Amalgam, Mercury, Plasma, Cytokine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Removal of dental amalgam restorationsDevice

    Patients in the "amalgam cohort" will have all dental amalgam restorations removed and replaced with other restorative materials used in modern dentistry. Amalgam removal will be performed by the patient's regular dentist or another dentist chosen by the patient.

Study groups in NCT01682278
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Amalgam cohortPatients with medically unexplained physical symptoms attributed to dental amalgam restorations which the patient wish to have removed.
Receives: Device: Removal of dental amalgam restorations
MUPS-cohortPatients with medically unexplained physical symptoms without attribution to amalgam and no explicit wish to remove amalgam.
Dental cohortHealthy comparison group: Subjectively healthy without diagnosed chronic disease or prescribed medication.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Self-reported health complaints - General index

    Primary outcome is the general index from "Self-reported health complaints" (used by Sjursen et al 2011) at 1 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal. Changes from baseline to 1 year follow-up after amalgam removal of the amalgam cohort will be compared with changes in the MUPS-cohort from baseline to 2 year follow-up.

    Measured: 1 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. GBB-24, total score

    Change score at 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  2. SF-36 Health Survey

    Change score at 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  3. Munich amalgam checklist

    Change score at 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  4. Cantril Ladder Scale

    Change score at 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  5. Integrative Medicine Outcomes Scale

    Change score at 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  6. Diagnostic criteria for BDS

    Fulfillment of diagnostic criteria for BDS at baseline and follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  7. Whiteley index

    Change score at 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  8. HADS

    Change score at 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  9. Reclassification of symptoms

    Reclassification of symptoms from MUPS to symptoms from explained organic disease at follow-up

    Measured: 1 and 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  10. Concentration of mercury in plasma

    Change from baseline to 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  11. Concentration of cytokines in plasma

    Change from baseline to 1 and 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 1 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

  12. Self-reported health complaints - General index

    Change from baseline to 5 year follow-up

    Measured: 5 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2012
  3. Primary completionNov 2018
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
118 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01682278
Sponsor's protocol ID
REK2012/331
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
5 Sep 2012
Last updated
31 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Bjorkman L, Musial F, Alraek T, Werner EL, Weidenhammer W, Hamre HJ. Removal of dental amalgam restorations in patients with health complaints attributed to amalgam: A prospective cohort study. J Oral Rehabil. 2020 Nov;47(11):1422-1434. doi: 10.1111/joor.13080. Epub 2020 Aug 30.

    PubMed 32810306
  • Bjorkman L, Musial F, Alraek T, Werner EL, Hamre HJ. Mercury, silver and selenium in serum before and after removal of amalgam restorations: results from a prospective cohort study in Norway. Acta Odontol Scand. 2023 May;81(4):298-310. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2022.2143422. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

    PubMed 36383213
  • Lamu AN, Bjorkman L, Hamre HJ, Alraek T, Musial F, Robberstad B. Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D in patients with health complaints attributed to their amalgam fillings: a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing amalgam removal. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Apr 17;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01762-4.

    PubMed 33865400

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Health Complaints Attributed to Dental Amalgam Restorations, run by NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 21 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Self-reported health complaints - General index (time frame: 1 year follow-up after completed amalgam removal). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01682278, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in