AzTrials
AzTrials

Challenging BehaviourPhase 3PBSNCT01680276

Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Positive Behaviour Support: a Trial

A Phase 3 study testing PBS based staff training and Treatment as Usual in people with Challenging Behaviour, run by University College, London at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Many people with intellectual disability have challenging behaviour which often has serious consequences such as the prescription of long term medication, in-patient admissions and disruption of normal daily activities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Challenging Behaviour
What is being tested?
PBS based staff training and Treatment as Usual
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
246 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Nov 2012to Nov 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Service users: Eligible to receive care from intellectual disability services; mild to severe intellectual disability; aged 18 years and over; total ABC score of at least 15 (indicates a degree of challenging behaviour occurring at least weekly including verbal or physical aggression, hyperactivity, refusal to attend activities, non responsiveness that requires professional input).
  • Service: Willing to participate; availability of at least two staff members willing to train; written agreement by the service manager to participate.

Who cannot join

  • Service users: primary clinical diagnosis of personality disorder or substance misuse; relapse in pre-existing mental disorder; decision by clinical team that a referral to the study would be inappropriate, e.g. there is an open complaint investigation
  • Service: there are no team members willing to train; the service has already received and implements accredited PBS for their service users.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Leicestershire Foundation Trust

    Leicester

  • Camden & Islington Foundation Trust

    London

  • South London and St George's Mental Health Trust

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Staff Training in Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for Treating Challenging Behaviour in People With Intellectual Disability: A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

Many people with intellectual disability have challenging behaviour which often has serious consequences such as the prescription of long term medication, in-patient admissions and disruption of normal daily activities. Community intellectual disability services may have difficulties in helping people with challenging behavior. Available research suggests that Positive Behavior Support (PBS), a training system that teaches staff how to manage these situations, can benefit service users who may show improvements in challenging behavior and quality of life. The investigators do not know of any study so far that has examined the clinical and cost effectiveness of PBS that is provided by staff in routine clinical practice in community intellectual disability services. If PBS proved to be better than treatment as usual, it would have important implications for the management of a very vulnerable group of service users. In this trial, health staff will receive accredited training in PBS available in a manual written by PBS experts. It will give details of how to understand challenging behavior and develop a management plan and how to implement it and monitor whether it has achieved its goals. Twenty community intellectual disability services and 260 service users with mild to severe intellectual disability and challenging behavior will be invited to take part in the study. The sample size calculations are based on our pilot study and allow for non participation of 10% and inflation due to the number of community intellectual disability teams and staff that will take part. The teams will be randomly allocated into one of two conditions. Half will be in the PBS arm (but will also have treatment as usual) and half will be in the treatment as usual only group. The investigators will carry out assessments of challenging behavior, use of services, quality of life, mental health, aggression and family and paid carer burden at six and 12 months. The investigators will monitor treatment fidelity and the investigators will talk to a sample of paid and family carers, service users, staff and managers about what they think of the treatment and how best the investigators can deliver it in routine care. The main outcome is reduction in challenging behavior at one year after the randomization. The investigators will also carry out a health economic evaluation to examine the costs and consequences of staff training in PBS.

Read the detailed description

Please see published protocol at:

http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/14/219

Being tested
PBS based staff training, Treatment as Usual
Keywords
intellectual disability, developmental disability, challenging behaviour, behavioural intervention, training
Medical subject headings
Intellectual Disability, Developmental Disabilities

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PBS based staff trainingBehavioural

    Please see published study protocol for more information:

    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/14/219

  • Treatment as UsualOther

    http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/14/219

Study groups in NCT01680276
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PBS based staff trainingExperimentalThe training, which will be supported by a treatment manual will comprise the following sections: 1. Functional Behavioural Assessment and formulation skills • Brief Behavioural Assessment Tool for brief functional analyses 2. Primary Prevention 3. Secondary Prevention and Reactive Strategies 4. Periodic Service Review and Problem Solving * Developing individualised periodic service reviews * Trouble shooting
Receives: Behavioral: PBS based staff training; Other: Treatment as Usual
Treatment as usualOtherMost community intellectual disability services provide a range of health interventions that include but are not limited to psychiatric assessment and management, nursing support, psychology, speech and language therapy, occupational therapy and counselling. There may be some variation in resources but service users with challenging behaviour are likely to receive a range of broadly defined behavioural management and pharmacological interventions. Staff is routinely supervised by their clinical managers weekly.
Receives: Other: Treatment as Usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Challenging Behaviour

    Reduction in challenging behaviour as measured by the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist (ABC)and change from baseline and 6 months

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Quality of life

    Improvement in Quality of Life measured by the Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Mental health status

    Improvement in mental health measured by the mini-PASADD.

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Family carer burden

    Reduction in family carer burden measured by the Uplift/Burden Scale

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Paid carer burden

    Reduction in burden measured by Caregiving Difficulty Scale-Intellectual Disability

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Family Carer Psychiatric Morbidity

    Reduction in Psychiatric morbidity measured by the General Health Questionnaire (12 item version)

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2012
  3. Primary completionNov 2015
  4. Study completionNov 2016 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
246 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01680276
Sponsor's protocol ID
10/104/13
Acronym
PBS
Status last verified
Jun 2015
First submitted
28 Aug 2012
Last updated
23 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Hassiotis A, Strydom A, Crawford M, Hall I, Omar R, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R, Crabtree J, Cooper V, Biswas A, Howie W, King M. Clinical and cost effectiveness of staff training in Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for treating challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 3;14:219. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0219-6.

    PubMed 25927187
  • Strydom A, Bosco A, Vickerstaff V, Hunter R; PBS study group; Hassiotis A. Clinical and cost effectiveness of staff training in the delivery of Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) for adults with intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder and challenging behaviour - randomised trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 15;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02577-1.

    PubMed 32293383
  • Hunter RM, Vickerstaff V, Poppe M, Strydom A, King M, Hall I, Crabtree J, Omar R, Cooper V, Biswas A, Hassiotis A. Staff training in positive behaviour support for behaviour that challenges in people with intellectual disability: cost-utility analysis of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BJPsych Open. 2020 Feb 5;6(2):e15. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2020.1.

    PubMed 32019635
  • Hassiotis A, Poppe M, Strydom A, Vickerstaff V, Hall I, Crabtree J, Omar R, King M, Hunter R, Bosco A, Biswas A, Ratti V, Blickwedel J, Cooper V, Howie W, Crawford M. Positive behaviour support training for staff for treating challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities: a cluster RCT. Health Technol Assess. 2018 Mar;22(15):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta22150.

    PubMed 29596045
  • Hassiotis A, Poppe M, Strydom A, Vickerstaff V, Hall IS, Crabtree J, Omar RZ, King M, Hunter R, Biswas A, Cooper V, Howie W, Crawford MJ. Clinical outcomes of staff training in positive behaviour support to reduce challenging behaviour in adults with intellectual disability: cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;212(3):161-168. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.34. Epub 2018 Feb 12.

    PubMed 29436314

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing PBS based staff training and Treatment as Usual in people with Challenging Behaviour, run by University College, London at 3 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Challenging Behaviour (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01680276, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in