AzTrials
AzTrials

Other Disorders of Optic Disc, BilateralCAFENCT01673815

Video Diversion During Fundoscopic Exam in Children

A study testing Video (played on a computer monitor) in people with Other Disorders of Optic Disc, Bilateral, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Fundoscopy is an important aspect of the neurological examination, but can be challenging in uncooperative children. This study explored whether viewing a video (selected by patient or caregiver) during eye examination improves the success, duration and ease of pediatric fundoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Other Disorders of Optic Disc, Bilateral
What is being tested?
Video (played on a computer monitor)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Aug 2011to Aug 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 8 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • 1-8 years old
  • Capable of visualizing the video monitor
  • Patient has 2 examinable eyes

Who cannot join

  • Blind patient
  • Patients < 1 or > 8 years old

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • BC Children's Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Video Diversion During Fundoscopic Exam in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Fundoscopy is an important aspect of the neurological examination, but can be challenging in uncooperative children. This study explored whether viewing a video (selected by patient or caregiver) during eye examination improves the success, duration and ease of pediatric fundoscopy.

Hypothesis: Showing a short video clip during a fundoscopic exam will increase the probability of successfully visualizing the optic disk and reduce the amount of time needed to perform a fundoscopic exam in children between 1-8 years old.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to examine whether showing a video clip with sound of the patient's choice can improve the ease of fundoscopic exam as defined by improved success of visualizing the optic disk and the reduction in time needed to perform the exam. The investigators will also examine the physician's and caregiver's perception on whether the video was effective in improving the ease of the exam. The purpose of the video is to capture the visual attention of the patient thereby allowing the physician to swiftly perform the fundoscopic exam. The literature has suggested that young patients are most uncooperative, therefore the investigators will focus our study on younger patients 1-8 years old.

Being tested
Video (played on a computer monitor)
Keywords
optic disk, fundoscopy, pediatric, clinical examination

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Video (played on a computer monitor)Other

    The intervention is a video (of the patient or caregiver's choice) which is played on a computer monitor during the fundoscopic examination.

Study groups in NCT01673815
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1st: R eye video. 2nd: L eye no videoExperimentalThe right eye will be examined first with video, followed by the left eye without video.
Receives: Other: Video (played on a computer monitor)
1st: R eye no video. 2nd: L eye videoExperimentalThe right eye will be examined without video, followed by the left eye with video.
Receives: Other: Video (played on a computer monitor)
1st: L eye video. 2nd: R eye no videoExperimentalThe left eye will be examined first with video, followed by the right eye without video.
Receives: Other: Video (played on a computer monitor)
1st: L eye no video. 2nd: R eye videoExperimentalThe left eye will be examined first without video, followed by the right eye with video.
Receives: Other: Video (played on a computer monitor)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Success rate of visualizing the optic disk within 60 seconds

    To determine whether showing a video clip with sound of the patient's choice can improve the success of fundoscopic exam in children as defined by the ability to visualize the optic disk within 60 seconds.

    Measured: At the time of fundoscopy exam

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Reduction in the amount of time needed to visualize the optic disk.

    To determine whether showing a video clip with sound of the patient's choice can reduce the amount of time needed to perform a successful fundoscopic exam.

    Measured: At the time of fundoscopy exam

  2. Improvement in the physician's and caregiver's (parent/legal guardian) perception of the ease of the fundoscopic exam.

    Improvement in the physician's and caregiver's (parent/legal guardian) perception of the ease of the fundoscopic exam as determined by a 10 point likert scale (1 being easiest and 10 being hardest).

    Measured: At the time of fundoscopy exam

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2011
  3. Primary completionMar 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01673815
Sponsor's protocol ID
H11-01885
Acronym
CAFE
Status last verified
Aug 2012
First submitted
20 Aug 2012
Last updated
4 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Jan MM. Neurological examination of difficult and poorly cooperative children. J Child Neurol. 2007 Oct;22(10):1209-13. doi: 10.1177/0883073807306262.

    PubMed 17940248
  • Cok OY. Anaesthesia for eye examination. Current Anaesthesia & Critical Care 2008 February 2009;20(1):46.

  • de la Barra F, Toledo V, Rodriguez J. Prediction of behavioral problems in Chilean schoolchildren. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2005 Spring;35(3):227-43. doi: 10.1007/s10578-004-6459-9.

    PubMed 15731888
  • Colares V, Richman L. Factors associated with uncooperative behavior by Brazilian preschool children in the dental office. ASDC J Dent Child. 2002 Jan-Apr;69(1):87-91, 13.

    PubMed 12119822
  • Hussein MA, Coats DK, Paysse EA. Use of the RetCam 120 for fundus evaluation in uncooperative children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;137(2):354-5. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00867-5.

    PubMed 14962432

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Video (played on a computer monitor) in people with Other Disorders of Optic Disc, Bilateral, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Success rate of visualizing the optic disk within 60 seconds (time frame: At the time of fundoscopy exam). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01673815, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in