AzTrials
AzTrials

Rheumatoid ArthritisNCT01671059

A Non-Interventional Study Evaluating Rheumatoid Arthritis Participants Treated With Tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra)

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 8 sites in Serbia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This non-interventional study evaluated the use and efficacy of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible participants initiated on tocilizumab treatment according to the approved label were followed for 6 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Rheumatoid Arthritis
How many people
80 participants
Where
8 sitesSerbia
Study dates
Jul 2012to Sep 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants with rheumatoid arthritis initiated on treatment with tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra)

Who may be able to join

  • Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
  • Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
  • Participants in whom the treating physician made the decision to commence tocilizumab treatment (in accordance with the local label); this could include participants who had received tocilizumab treatment within 8 weeks prior to the enrollment visit

Who cannot join

  • Participants who had received tocilizumab more than 8 weeks prior to the enrollment visit
  • Participants who had previously received tocilizumab in a clinical trial or for compassionate use
  • Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever was longer) before starting treatment with tocilizumab
  • History of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

Serbia8 sites
  • Institut Za Reumatologiju; Reumatologiju

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Military Medical Academy; Clinic of Rheumatology

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Study site

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Institute of Rheumatology and Cardiovascular Diseases; Rheumatology

    Niška Banja, 18205

  • Study site

    Niška Banja, 18205

  • Clinical Center Voivodina; Clinic for Immunology and Nephrology

    Novi Sad, 21000

  • Special hospital for rheumatic diseases Novi Sad

    Novi Sad, 21000

  • Study site

    Novi Sad, 21000

Other trials in Serbia

About this study

Official title: A Multi-Center, Non-Interventional Study to Evaluate Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab (ACROSS)

This non-interventional study evaluated the use and efficacy of tocilizumab (RoActemra/Actemra) in participants with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible participants initiated on tocilizumab treatment according to the approved label were followed for 6 months.

Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Rheumatoid

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01671059
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TocilizumabParticipants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving tocilizumab either as combination therapy or monotherapy through routine clinical practice.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab 6 Months After Treatment Initiation

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab After Failing Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs)

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Percentage of Participants Receiving Tocilizumab After Failing Other Biologic Agents

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Reasons for Dose Modifications

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Percentage of Participants With Dose Interruptions

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Percentage of Participants Discontinued From Tocilizumab for Safety Versus Efficacy

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy at Study Entry

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)

    DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; in millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and global health assessment (participant-rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog assessment [VAS]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Percentage of Participants on Combination Therapy Achieving a Response by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category

    Percentage of participants achieving a response by EULAR category, including moderate, good, or no response. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: change from baseline <-1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤3.2; Moderate response: change from baseline <-1.2 with DAS28 scores >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or >5.1, or a change from baseline <-0.6 to ≥-1.2 with DAS28 scores ≤3.2 and >3.2 to ≤5.1; No response: change from baseline <-0.6 to ≥-1.2 with DAS28 score >5.1, or a change from baseline ≥-0.6 with DAS28 scores ≤3.2, >3.2 to ≤ 5.1, or >5.1.

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Percentage of Participants on Monotherapy Achieving a Response by European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Category

    Percentage of participants achieving a response by EULAR category, including moderate, good, or no response. The DAS28-based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as none, good, and moderate, depending on the extent of change from baseline and the level of disease activity reached. Good response: change from baseline <-1.2 with a DAS28 score ≤3.2; Moderate response: change from baseline <-1.2 with DAS28 scores >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or >5.1, or a change from baseline <-0.6 to ≥-1.2 with DAS28 scores ≤3.2 and >3.2 to ≤5.1; No response: change from baseline <-0.6 to ≥-1.2 with DAS28 score >5.1, or a change from baseline ≥-0.6 with DAS28 scores ≤3.2, >3.2 to ≤ 5.1, or >5.1.

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)

    Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) is an index for measuring disease activity in RA and has a good correlation with the DAS28. The index is calculated using the following formula: SDAI: swollen joint count (SJC28) + tender joint count (TJC28) + physician global assessment (PGA) (10 cm visual analogue scale [VAS]) + PhGA (10 cm VAS + C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in milligrams/liter (mg/L). VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). Scores range from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity.

    Measured: 6 months

  12. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score

    Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) is an index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index was calculated using the following formula: CDAI = number of swollen joints using the 28-joint count (SJC28) + number of tender joints using the 28-joint count (TJC28) + patient global assessment of disease (PGA) based on 10 centimeter [cm] Visual Analog Scale [VAS] + physician global assessment of disease (PhGA) based on 10 cm VAS. VAS assessments involved a 10 cm horizontal scale from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (maximum disease activity). Total CDAI scores range from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity.

    Measured: 6 months

  13. Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response

    ACR response was calculated based on total joint count evaluation and other clinical and laboratory assessments. A positive ACR20 response required at least a 20% improvement (reduction) compared to baseline in swollen joint count (28 joints) and tender joint count (28 joints) and at least 3 of the following 5 assessments: patient's global assessment of pain, participant's global assessment of disease activity (PGH), physician's global assessment of disease activity (PhGH) (all 3 assessed at 0 [good] to 100 mm [worst] VAS scale); participant assessment of disability measured by the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (assessed on a 0 to 3 scale, where higher scores represented higher disease activity); acute phase reactant (CRP or ESR). A reduction in the level of and acute phase reactants was considered an improvement. ACR50 and ACR70 require a 50% and 70% improvement from baseline, respectively.

    Measured: 6 months

  14. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and AEs of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An AESI includes serious/medically significant infections; opportunistic infections; cases of elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), in combination with either elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice; suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study drug; myocardial infarction /acute coronary syndrome; gastrointestinal perforations; malignancies; anaphylaxis / hypersensitivity reactions (including injection site reactions); demyelinating disorders; stroke; serious/medically significant bleeding events; or serious/medically significant hepatic events.

    Measured: 6 months

  15. Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Score

    The Patient Global Assessment of disease activity provides an overall assessment of how RA affects the participant using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates they are managing very well and 100 indicates they are managing very poorly. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.

    Measured: 6 months

  16. Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)

    The HAQ is a participant self-reported questionnaire for assessing the extent of the participant's functional ability. It consists of 20 questions in 8 categories (dressing and grooming, rising, eating, walking, reach, grip, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities). Each question has 4 response options, ranging from 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. The HAQ scale is an average of all the scores and ranges from 0 to 3, where higher scores represent higher disease activity.

    Measured: 6 months

  17. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Fatigue

    The VAS-fatigue provides an overall assessment of the level of fatigue that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no fatigue, and 100 indicates extreme fatigue. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.

    Measured: 6 months

  18. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Morning Stiffness

    Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was as limber as he/she would be during a day involving typical activities. Morning stiffness was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0= none and 100= very severe.

    Measured: 6 months

  19. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for Pain

    The VAS-Pain provides an overall assessment of the severity of pain that the participant is experiencing using a visual analogue score, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates unbearable pain. A decrease in the score indicates improvement.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completionSep 2015
  4. Study completionSep 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01671059
Sponsor's protocol ID
ML28314
Status last verified
Jan 2017
First submitted
20 Aug 2012
Last updated
23 Feb 2017

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 8 sites in Serbia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in Serbia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Dec 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab 6 Months After Treatment Initiation (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in