Anxiety DisordersPhase 3NCT01667809
CBT vs RTW Intervention for Patients With Common Subclinical Mental Illness in Primary Care
A Phase 3 study testing Cognitive behavior therapy and Return to work in people with Anxiety Disorders and Major Depression, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
Background: Common mental illness, such as anxiety disorders and depression, is the main cause for sick leave in Sweden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in alleviating target symptoms of these disorders, but its effect on sick leave rates has not been sufficiently addressed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anxiety Disorders, Major Depression, Stress Disorders
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive behavior therapy and Return to work
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Have been on sick leave (at least 50%) for at least 1 month and not more than 6 months
- Have subclinical levels of anxiety disorder diagnosis (obsessive compulsive disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, specific phobia), or/and major depression, or/and maladaptive stress reaction, or/and primary insomnia. Severity measured by clinical severity rating (CSR) 2-3 for mild subclinical level
Who cannot join
- A higer score than 3 on the Clinician severity rating scale
- A lower score than 2 on the Clinician severity rating scale
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Sweden1 site
Karolinska Institutet and Gustavsberg primary care center
Stockholm, Stockholm County, 13440
About this study
Official title: Cognitive Behavior Therapy Versus a Return to Work Intervention for Sick-listed Patients With Subclinical Common Mental Illness in Primary Care: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Common mental illness, such as anxiety disorders and depression, is the main cause for sick leave in Sweden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in alleviating target symptoms of these disorders, but its effect on sick leave rates has not been sufficiently addressed. The investigators have developed an intervention called return to work (RTW), which is based in cognitive behavioral theory, that has a primary aim of helping sick-listed patients with common mental illness return to work. This new treatment has not been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of CBT and RTW for subclinical common mental illness in a randomized controlled trial conducted in primary care. Participants will be randomized to diagnosis specific CBT (n=50), RTW (n=50. Main outcomes are days of sick leave and clinician severity rating of psychiatric symptoms. This study could contribute to new knowledge regarding how to best treat patients on sick leave with mild common mental illness.
- Being tested
- Cognitive behavior therapy, Return to work
- Medical subject headings
- Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive behavior therapyBehavioural
Cognitive behavior therapy entails psychoeducational components, i.e. the patient is learns about the disorder and how to view it from a cognitive behavioral perspective. The most important part of the treatment is systematic behavior changes often targeted at exposure to feared stimuli. This is combined with cognitive interventions targeted at challenging negative automatic thoughts. All treatments will be delivered by licensed psychologists.
Return to workBehavioural
Participants randomized to this arm will receive an experimental treatment, based in cognitive behavioral therapy, with primary aim to help patients return to work. Interventions are aimed at solving work-related problems and comprises problem-solving training and systematic employer-patient meetings aimed at facilitating a gradual return to the workplace. Licensed psychologists deliver all treatments.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Behavior Therapy | Active comparator | As the trial will include several different common subclinical mental disorders, the cognitive behavior therapy used in the study will be based on the protocols with best empirical support. Cognitive behavior therapy entails psychoeducational components, i.e. the patient is learns about the disorder and how to view it from a cognitive behavioral perspective. The most important part of the treatment is systematic behavior changes often targeted at exposure to feared stimuli. This is combined with cognitive interventions targeted at challenging negative automatic thoughts. All treatments will be delivered by licensed psychologists. Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive behavior therapy |
| Return to work | Experimental | Participants randomized to this arm will receive an experimental treatment, based in cognitive behavioral therapy, with primary aim to help patients return to work. Interventions are aimed at solving work-related problems and comprises problem-solving training and systematic employer-patient meetings aimed at facilitating a gradual return to the workplace. Licensed psychologists deliver all treatments. Receives: Behavioral: Return to work |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sick leave
Number of days on sick leave
Measured: 1 year
Clinician Severity Rating (CSR)
Change in CSR at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up compared to baseline.
Measured: Baseine, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Secondary outcomes (14)
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self-report (MADRS-S)
Change in MADRS-S at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Change in ISI at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average) 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI)
Change in HAI at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Change in PSS at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Trimbos and Institute of Technology Cost Questionnaire for Psychiatry (TIC-P)
Change in TIC-P at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)
Change in QOLI at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average) 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ5D)
Change in EQ5D at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average) 26 feel follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Sheehan Disability Scales (SDS)
Change in SDS at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Self-rated health 5 (SRH-5)
Change in SRH-5 at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up and 52 week follow-up
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R)
Change in OCI-R at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self-report (LSAS-SR)
Change in LSAS-SR at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Panic Disorder Severity Scale Self-rated (PDSS-SR)
Change in PDSS-SR at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Penn-State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
Change in PSWQ at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale-Self report (PTSDSS)
Change in PTSDSS at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up. Disorder specific.
Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Anxiety DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska InstitutetThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Region Stockholm
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Erik Hedman, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01667809
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GVC CBT vs RTW II
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Behavior Therapy Versus a Return to Work Intervention for Sick-listed Patients With Subclinical Common Mental Illness in Primary Care: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01667809
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GVC CBT vs RTW II
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska InstitutetUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Region Stockholm
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Common mental illness, such as anxiety disorders and depression, is the main cause for sick leave in Sweden. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in alleviating target symptoms of these disorders, but its effect on sick leave rates has not been sufficiently addressed. The investigators have developed an intervention called return to work (RTW), which is based in cognitive behavioral theory, that has a primary aim of helping sick-listed patients with common mental illness return to work. This new treatment has not been evaluated in a randomized controlled trial.
Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of CBT and RTW for subclinical common mental illness in a randomized controlled trial conducted in primary care. Participants will be randomized to diagnosis specific CBT (n=50), RTW (n=50. Main outcomes are days of sick leave and clinician severity rating of psychiatric symptoms. This study could contribute to new knowledge regarding how to best treat patients on sick leave with mild common mental illness.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Behavior Therapy | Active comparator | Behavioral: Cognitive behavior therapyAs the trial will include several different common subclinical mental disorders, the cognitive behavior therapy used in the study will be based on the protocols with best empirical support. Cognitive behavior therapy entails psychoeducational components, i.e. the patient is learns about the disorder and how to view it from a cognitive behavioral perspective. The most important part of the treatment is systematic behavior changes often targeted at exposure to feared stimuli. This is combined with cognitive interventions targeted at challenging negative automatic thoughts. All treatments will be delivered by licensed psychologists. |
| Return to work | Experimental | Behavioral: Return to workParticipants randomized to this arm will receive an experimental treatment, based in cognitive behavioral therapy, with primary aim to help patients return to work. Interventions are aimed at solving work-related problems and comprises problem-solving training and systematic employer-patient meetings aimed at facilitating a gradual return to the workplace. Licensed psychologists deliver all treatments. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Have been on sick leave (at least 50%) for at least 1 month and not more than 6 months
- Have subclinical levels of anxiety disorder diagnosis (obsessive compulsive disorder, social phobia, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, specific phobia), or/and major depression, or/and maladaptive stress reaction, or/and primary insomnia. Severity measured by clinical severity rating (CSR) 2-3 for mild subclinical level
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- A higer score than 3 on the Clinician severity rating scale
- A lower score than 2 on the Clinician severity rating scale
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive behavior therapyCognitive behavior therapy entails psychoeducational components, i.e. the patient is learns about the disorder and how to view it from a cognitive behavioral perspective. The most important part of the treatment is systematic behavior changes often targeted at exposure to feared stimuli. This is combined with cognitive interventions targeted at challenging negative automatic thoughts. All treatments will be delivered by licensed psychologists. | Behavioural | Cognitive Behavior Therapy |
| Return to workParticipants randomized to this arm will receive an experimental treatment, based in cognitive behavioral therapy, with primary aim to help patients return to work. Interventions are aimed at solving work-related problems and comprises problem-solving training and systematic employer-patient meetings aimed at facilitating a gradual return to the workplace. Licensed psychologists deliver all treatments. | Behavioural | Return to work |
Primary outcome
Sick leave
Time frame: 1 year
Number of days on sick leave
Clinician Severity Rating (CSR)
Time frame: Baseine, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Change in CSR at post-treatment, 26 week follow-up, and 52 week follow-up compared to baseline.
14 secondary outcomes
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale-Self-report (MADRS-S)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average) 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Health Anxiety Inventory (HAI)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Trimbos and Institute of Technology Cost Questionnaire for Psychiatry (TIC-P)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average) 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ5D)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average) 26 feel follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Sheehan Disability Scales (SDS)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Self-rated health 5 (SRH-5)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale Self-report (LSAS-SR)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Panic Disorder Severity Scale Self-rated (PDSS-SR)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Penn-State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale-Self report (PTSDSS)
Time frame: Baseline, post-treatment (12 weeks on average), 26 week follow-up, 52 week follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2016.
Related trials for Anxiety Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Unified Protocol in Penitentiary Facilities
Depression Disorders, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Functional Impact of Psychological Symptoms in Patients With Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome (SSCD): a National Cross-sectional Study
Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cognitive behavior therapy and Return to work in people with Anxiety Disorders and Major Depression, run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sick leave (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2016.