AzTrials
AzTrials

Microvascular AnginaPhase 4NIRVANANCT01665508

Study to Evaluate Effect of Nebivolol on Angina in Women With Microvascular Disease

A Phase 4 study testing Nebivolol in people with Microvascular Angina, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Women have less significant blockages of coronary arteries, however have greater symptoms and worse outcomes compared to their age-matched male counterparts. This paradox has led to the recognition and importance of the microvasculature ( small vessels) as a contributor to symptoms and outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Microvascular Angina
What is being tested?
Nebivolol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2013to May 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • women between the ages of 40-80
  • with evidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction as determined by the presence of rest and or exertional chest tightness and a history of either an elevated troponin level or positive stress test ( EKG criteria or imaging) , as well as non-obstructive coronary artery disease (<50% epicardial obstruction) by either diagnostic catheterization with coronary angiography or CT angiography.

Who cannot join

  • Women who cannot tolerate a beta blocker.
  • Women receiving Hormone Replacement Therapy
  • Women of child-bearing age who are not on a birth-control method.
  • Women with inability to exercise.
  • Women with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF less than 40%)
  • Women who have a medical condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, would expose them to an increased risk of a significant adverse event or interfere with assessments of safety and efficacy during the course of the trial.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Women with any current malignancy, or any clinically significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, gastrointestinal or neurological disease. If there is a history of such disease but the condition has been stable for at least the past year and is judged by the investigator not to interfere with the patient's participation in the study, the patient may be included.
  • Women who are unable to speak, read, and understand English and are judged by the investigator to be unable or unlikely to follow the study protocol and complete all scheduled visits.
  • Women with any contraindications to beta blocker therapy
  • Women with myocardial bridging
  • Women with Prinzmetal's angina

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Nebivolol for the Relief of Microvascular Angina in Women

Women have less significant blockages of coronary arteries, however have greater symptoms and worse outcomes compared to their age-matched male counterparts. This paradox has led to the recognition and importance of the microvasculature ( small vessels) as a contributor to symptoms and outcomes. Nebivolol has unique antioxidant properties and dilates blood vessels and it is therefore proposed that treatment with nebivolol will reduce angina (chest symptoms) in women with microvascular disease as well as improve exercise capacity, reduce resource utilization and improve other measures of artery function.

Read the detailed description

Though women have less obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) they continue to have a greater burden of symptoms, more myocardial ischemia, and a higher rate of adverse outcomes than their age-matched male counterparts. This ostensible paradox has led to the recognition of a distinct pathophysiology of ischemic heart disease, in part related to microvascular dysfunction, and abnormal coronary reactivity. The term primary microvascular angina, (MVA) is used to describe a syndrome among patients who have symptoms suggestive of cardiac ischemia, evidence of electrocardiographic abnormalities, abnormalities on stress imaging or a history of ACS, but no evidence of obstructive epicardial coronary disease. In this population, microvascular angina causes significant morbidity and in some may contribute to increased mortality.

The treatment of microvascular disease remains empirical due to lack of data regarding symptom alleviation, as well as ultimate mortality reduction. Women with ischemic heart disease and microvascular angina continue to report more frequent angina and worse quality of life. They frequently seek medical attention for the evaluation of cardiovascular symptoms including chest pain and shortness of breath. Consequently, these women incur greater healthcare costs, with more office visits, hospitalizations, and myocardial infarctions. In fact, more than one half of women without obstructive coronary disease continue to have ischemic symptoms that lead to further consumption of CAD resources, most often because of diagnostic uncertainty.

In the absence of robust outcomes data to drive the care of these women with microvascular ischemia, various approaches are taken, in addition to the fundamental management of baseline risk factors. Some physicians treat these women as they would treat patients with known obstructive CAD, while some, in the setting of "open" coronary arteries and persistent chest pain, opt for reassurance. Nevertheless, given that these women with microvascular ischemia continue to have higher morbidity and mortality, as well as increased resource consumption, there is a widely recognized need for effective therapeutic agents to reduce symptoms, improve quality of life, decrease resource consumption, and ultimately reduce mortality.

Nebivolol, due to its unique antioxidant and vasodilator properties, via its effect on NO bioactivity, and subsequent effects on the endothelium may be a potentially ideal therapeutic agent for the treatment of microvascular angina among women. For example, one previous study showed that nebivolol improved exercise parameters, as well as endothelial function, more effectively than other beta blockade with metoprolol, among patients with persistent angina and non-obstructive coronary disease.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is an ideal diagnostic test in this study as it will provide unique information on how microvascular ischemia influences functional capacity as measured through sensitive gas exchange parameters. Because it is known that a distinct pathophysiology contributes to microvascular angina among this subset of women, these parameters provided by CPET may provide essential information regarding the mechanism of symptom mitigation should nebivolol confer therapeutic value.

Furthermore, because exercise tolerance is often significantly impaired, objective measures of gas exchange that reflect submaximum and maximum fitness among these women will be useful both at baseline and on nebivolol.

Peripheral arterial tone and pulse wave analysis will also be performed. PAT signal technology provides a widely validated measurement of endothelium-mediated changes in vascular tone, using non-invasive bio-sensors on the fingertips that are elicited by creating a down-stream hyperemic response. This parameter correlates well with endothelial dysfunction in coronary arteries. We will perform endothelial function testing at baseline and after 3 months.

Metabolomics is an emerging field that offers the possibility of using the body's metabolites to both phenotype a disease as well as track its response to isolated perturbations, such as administration of a drug. In this study we will utilize metabolomics to define signatures of microvascular ischemia as well as nebivolol-mediated changes in metabolic profiles. Baseline metabolic profiling, as well as metabolic profiling after 3 months of nebivolol treatment will be performed in this study.

This type of assessment is an ideal complement to the clinical parameters delineated above as it combines targeted mass spectrometry to measures small molecules related to nitric oxide metabolism (ie: arginine, arginosuccinate, citrulline, ornithine, cGMP, ADMA) as well as more unbiased screening of metabolites that are not known to be associated with either nebivolol exposure or microvascular angina.

Being tested
Nebivolol
Keywords
angina, cardiopulmonary testing, metabolomics, nebivolol
Medical subject headings
Microvascular Angina, Angina Pectoris

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NebivololDrug

    Also called Bystolic

    Patient to start nebivolol and have repeat testing in 3 months

Study groups in NCT01665508
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NebivololExperimentalTesting will be performed at baseline (SAQ questionnaire, cardiopulmonary testing, resource utilization, metabolomics and vascular testing). This will be repeated on the same group of patients after 3 months of nebivolol treatment.
Receives: Drug: Nebivolol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score

    Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ):

    The SAQ is a 5 part survey that is widely used and well validated tool to assess angina stability and angina frequency among patients with coronary artery disease.

    The SAQ is a validated, self-administered 19-item questionnaire with 5 different dimensions of health status in patients with CAD including: angina frequency, angina stability, disease-specific quality of life, physical limitations and treatment satisfaction. Each SAQ domain score ranges from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better health status.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Peak VO2 Measured by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

    Assessment of exercise capacity (peak VO2) as determined by CPET

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Resource Utilization Questionnaire

    Resource utilization as determined by patient phone calls, office visits, emergency room visits, and number of hospitalizations, as well an index cost for any hospitalizations

    Measured: 3 months

  3. SF36

    The SF-36v2 is a commonly used instrument to assess HRQoL8. The questionnaire evaluates 8 HRQoL domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The physical component score is a composite of the SF-36v2 physical health domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) and the mental component score a composite of the mental health domains (vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health). Each HRQoL domain score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to a better health status. The SF-36v2 domain scores were calculated using the QualityMetric Health Outcomes Scoring Software version 4.5.

    Measured: baseline and 12 week follow-up

  4. Exercise Duration

    Assessment of exercise duration as determined by CPET

    Measured: 3 months

  5. Peak Heart Rate as Measured by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

    Assessment of peak heart rate as determined by CPET

    Measured: 3 months

  6. Peak O2 Pulse

    peak O2 pulse as measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2013
  3. Primary completionMay 2015
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01665508
Sponsor's protocol ID
BYS-IT-75
Acronym
NIRVANA
Status last verified
Dec 2016
First submitted
9 Aug 2012
Last updated
20 Apr 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Nebivolol in people with Microvascular Angina, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Seattle Angina Questionnaire Score (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in