AzTrials
AzTrials

BK ViremiaNCT01649609

Using mTOR Inhibitors in the Prevention of BK Nephropathy

A study testing Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate acid and Sirolimus in people with BK Viremia and BK Nephropathy, run by Columbia University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

BK virus infections after kidney transplant are increasing and can result in damage to the transplanted kidney. Currently, the universally accepted treatment is to decrease the strength of the antirejection medications but it is unclear what medications should be lowered and to what extent. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
BK Viremia, BK Nephropathy
What is being tested?
Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate acid and Sirolimus
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2012to Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Renal transplant recipients age 18 years or over

Who cannot join

  • Patients with multiorgan transplants
  • Patients on immunosuppressive regimens that include steroids or Sirolimus at the time of detection of viremia
  • ABO incompatible renal transplants
  • Three or more previous renal transplants
  • Patients with contraindications to tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Weill Cornell Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10065

Other trials in United States

About this study

BK virus infections after kidney transplant are increasing and can result in damage to the transplanted kidney. Currently, the universally accepted treatment is to decrease the strength of the antirejection medications but it is unclear what medications should be lowered and to what extent. The investigators propose to perform a study with patients who have BK virus detected in their blood during routine screening that appears to be increasing. The investigators will use two different strategies that involve different combinations of standard anti-rejection medications at lower dosages. Patients will be assigned to one of the two groups in a random manner across the two hospitals participating in the study. Patients will be followed for at least a year to determine if one strategy was more effective than the other in preventing an increase in the number of viruses in the blood stream and whether either one was more effective in reducing the negative impact of the infection on the functioning of the transplanted kidney.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of BK viremia, an early complication after renal transplantation and the associated rates of graft loss resulting from BK nephropathy have been steadily rising since a series of cases that were reported in the mid-1990's. While this is at least partly related to the introduction of newer immunosuppressive agents, recent United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data analyses suggest that there is a continuing rise in the incidence of BK viremia and associated nephropathy with a 3.5% incidence rate in 2009 representing a dramatic rise from just 0.9% only 4 years earlier. Single center data reports have suggested much lower rates of BK viremia and nephropathy in cohorts treated with mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) based immunosuppressive regimens when compared to the overall national incidence rates. Recent data has demonstrated that calcineurin inhibitors at concentrations routinely used in clinical practice interfere with the BK virus specific T cell responses; an interference that is not seen to occur with mTOR inhibitors. Further, recent evidence that inhibition of the mTOR pathway has a direct and consequential negative impact on BK infected cells provides additional insight into the observed benefit associated with mTOR inhibitors. The growing problem of BK viremia among renal transplant patients is further compounded by the absence of effective management strategies that have been tested in a rigorous or controlled setting - a fact that was highlighted in a recent systematic review. The cornerstone for management so far has been the reduction of immunosuppression, largely based on the outcome of a single center study of screening patients for viremia and following with preemptive lowering of immunosuppression. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mTOR inhibitors has been reported in small case series to be an effective measure that appears to be superior to merely lowering immunosuppression; however, this approach has not been tested with a robust clinical study design.

Currently, the diagnosis of BK nephropathy requires a renal biopsy, an invasive procedure with its own risks. In addition, identification of patients with viremia who progress to nephropathy and subsequent graft failure i.e. prognostication does not appear possible with the renal biopsy results at present. Validation of potential non-invasive biomarkers provides a unique opportunity for both detection and risk stratification of patients with BK viremia subsequent failure, which could lead to more informed therapeutic interventions while supporting the development of newer therapies.

Being tested
Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate acid, Sirolimus
Keywords
BK Viremia, BK Nephropathy, mTOR inhibitor, renal transplant

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TacrolimusDrug

    Also called Prograf

    Reduction of standard immunosuppression - The standard of care immunosuppression treatment commonly used for renal transplant patients

  • Mycophenolate acidDrug

    Also called mycophenolate antimetabolite

    Myfortic or CellCept - The standard of care immunosuppression treatment most commonly used for renal transplant patients

  • SirolimusDrug

    Also called Rapamune

    mTOR Substitution - Replacing tacrolimus (a calcineurin inhibitor) with sirolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) along with reduction of mycophenolic acid

Study groups in NCT01649609
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Reduction of standard immunosuppressionActive comparatorLow dose Tacrolimus with low dose Mycophenolate acid
Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate acid
mTOR ArmActive comparatorLow dose Sirolimus with low dose Mycophenolate acid (mTOR Substitution)
Receives: Drug: Mycophenolate acid; Drug: Sirolimus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With BK Viral Load <600 Copies/mL

    A Viral load of <600 copies/mL for at least 3 months indicates sustained clearance of BK viremia, confirmed by blood test

    Measured: Up to 12 months from enrollment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of Participants With Incidence of BK Nephropathy

    The number of people with incidence of BK Nephropathy in each of the two Arms

    Measured: Up to 24 months from randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2016
  4. Study completionDec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01649609
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAI9004
Other IDs
WS2036051
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
23 Jul 2012
Last updated
28 Feb 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate acid and Sirolimus in people with BK Viremia and BK Nephropathy, run by Columbia University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With BK Viral Load <600 Copies/mL (time frame: Up to 12 months from enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in