BK ViremiaNCT01649609
Using mTOR Inhibitors in the Prevention of BK Nephropathy
A study testing Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate acid and Sirolimus in people with BK Viremia and BK Nephropathy, run by Columbia University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
BK virus infections after kidney transplant are increasing and can result in damage to the transplanted kidney. Currently, the universally accepted treatment is to decrease the strength of the antirejection medications but it is unclear what medications should be lowered and to what extent. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- BK Viremia, BK Nephropathy
- What is being tested?
- Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate acid and Sirolimus
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2012to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Renal transplant recipients age 18 years or over
Who cannot join
- Patients with multiorgan transplants
- Patients on immunosuppressive regimens that include steroids or Sirolimus at the time of detection of viremia
- ABO incompatible renal transplants
- Three or more previous renal transplants
- Patients with contraindications to tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10065
About this study
BK virus infections after kidney transplant are increasing and can result in damage to the transplanted kidney. Currently, the universally accepted treatment is to decrease the strength of the antirejection medications but it is unclear what medications should be lowered and to what extent. The investigators propose to perform a study with patients who have BK virus detected in their blood during routine screening that appears to be increasing. The investigators will use two different strategies that involve different combinations of standard anti-rejection medications at lower dosages. Patients will be assigned to one of the two groups in a random manner across the two hospitals participating in the study. Patients will be followed for at least a year to determine if one strategy was more effective than the other in preventing an increase in the number of viruses in the blood stream and whether either one was more effective in reducing the negative impact of the infection on the functioning of the transplanted kidney.
Read the detailed description
The incidence of BK viremia, an early complication after renal transplantation and the associated rates of graft loss resulting from BK nephropathy have been steadily rising since a series of cases that were reported in the mid-1990's. While this is at least partly related to the introduction of newer immunosuppressive agents, recent United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data analyses suggest that there is a continuing rise in the incidence of BK viremia and associated nephropathy with a 3.5% incidence rate in 2009 representing a dramatic rise from just 0.9% only 4 years earlier. Single center data reports have suggested much lower rates of BK viremia and nephropathy in cohorts treated with mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) based immunosuppressive regimens when compared to the overall national incidence rates. Recent data has demonstrated that calcineurin inhibitors at concentrations routinely used in clinical practice interfere with the BK virus specific T cell responses; an interference that is not seen to occur with mTOR inhibitors. Further, recent evidence that inhibition of the mTOR pathway has a direct and consequential negative impact on BK infected cells provides additional insight into the observed benefit associated with mTOR inhibitors. The growing problem of BK viremia among renal transplant patients is further compounded by the absence of effective management strategies that have been tested in a rigorous or controlled setting - a fact that was highlighted in a recent systematic review. The cornerstone for management so far has been the reduction of immunosuppression, largely based on the outcome of a single center study of screening patients for viremia and following with preemptive lowering of immunosuppression. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mTOR inhibitors has been reported in small case series to be an effective measure that appears to be superior to merely lowering immunosuppression; however, this approach has not been tested with a robust clinical study design.
Currently, the diagnosis of BK nephropathy requires a renal biopsy, an invasive procedure with its own risks. In addition, identification of patients with viremia who progress to nephropathy and subsequent graft failure i.e. prognostication does not appear possible with the renal biopsy results at present. Validation of potential non-invasive biomarkers provides a unique opportunity for both detection and risk stratification of patients with BK viremia subsequent failure, which could lead to more informed therapeutic interventions while supporting the development of newer therapies.
- Conditions
- BK Viremia, BK Nephropathy
- Being tested
- Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate acid, Sirolimus
- Keywords
- BK Viremia, BK Nephropathy, mTOR inhibitor, renal transplant
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TacrolimusDrug
Also called Prograf
Reduction of standard immunosuppression - The standard of care immunosuppression treatment commonly used for renal transplant patients
Mycophenolate acidDrug
Also called mycophenolate antimetabolite
Myfortic or CellCept - The standard of care immunosuppression treatment most commonly used for renal transplant patients
SirolimusDrug
Also called Rapamune
mTOR Substitution - Replacing tacrolimus (a calcineurin inhibitor) with sirolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) along with reduction of mycophenolic acid
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Reduction of standard immunosuppression | Active comparator | Low dose Tacrolimus with low dose Mycophenolate acid Receives: Drug: Tacrolimus; Drug: Mycophenolate acid |
| mTOR Arm | Active comparator | Low dose Sirolimus with low dose Mycophenolate acid (mTOR Substitution) Receives: Drug: Mycophenolate acid; Drug: Sirolimus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With BK Viral Load <600 Copies/mL
A Viral load of <600 copies/mL for at least 3 months indicates sustained clearance of BK viremia, confirmed by blood test
Measured: Up to 12 months from enrollment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Incidence of BK Nephropathy
The number of people with incidence of BK Nephropathy in each of the two Arms
Measured: Up to 24 months from randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2012
- Primary completionDec 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for BK ViremiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Columbia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer, Cornell University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sumit Mohan, MD, Columbia University
- Investigators
- Sumit Mohan, MD, Principal investigator, Columbia University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01649609
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAAI9004
- Other IDs
- WS2036051
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Feb 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using mTOR Inhibitors in the Prevention of BK Nephropathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01649609
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AAAI9004
- Conditions
- BK Viremia, BK Nephropathy
- Keywords
- BK Viremia, BK Nephropathy, mTOR inhibitor, renal transplant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer, Cornell University
- Study start
- Mar 2012
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Feb 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
BK virus infections after kidney transplant are increasing and can result in damage to the transplanted kidney. Currently, the universally accepted treatment is to decrease the strength of the antirejection medications but it is unclear what medications should be lowered and to what extent. The investigators propose to perform a study with patients who have BK virus detected in their blood during routine screening that appears to be increasing. The investigators will use two different strategies that involve different combinations of standard anti-rejection medications at lower dosages. Patients will be assigned to one of the two groups in a random manner across the two hospitals participating in the study. Patients will be followed for at least a year to determine if one strategy was more effective than the other in preventing an increase in the number of viruses in the blood stream and whether either one was more effective in reducing the negative impact of the infection on the functioning of the transplanted kidney.
Detailed description
The incidence of BK viremia, an early complication after renal transplantation and the associated rates of graft loss resulting from BK nephropathy have been steadily rising since a series of cases that were reported in the mid-1990's. While this is at least partly related to the introduction of newer immunosuppressive agents, recent United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data analyses suggest that there is a continuing rise in the incidence of BK viremia and associated nephropathy with a 3.5% incidence rate in 2009 representing a dramatic rise from just 0.9% only 4 years earlier. Single center data reports have suggested much lower rates of BK viremia and nephropathy in cohorts treated with mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) based immunosuppressive regimens when compared to the overall national incidence rates. Recent data has demonstrated that calcineurin inhibitors at concentrations routinely used in clinical practice interfere with the BK virus specific T cell responses; an interference that is not seen to occur with mTOR inhibitors. Further, recent evidence that inhibition of the mTOR pathway has a direct and consequential negative impact on BK infected cells provides additional insight into the observed benefit associated with mTOR inhibitors. The growing problem of BK viremia among renal transplant patients is further compounded by the absence of effective management strategies that have been tested in a rigorous or controlled setting - a fact that was highlighted in a recent systematic review. The cornerstone for management so far has been the reduction of immunosuppression, largely based on the outcome of a single center study of screening patients for viremia and following with preemptive lowering of immunosuppression. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitors to mTOR inhibitors has been reported in small case series to be an effective measure that appears to be superior to merely lowering immunosuppression; however, this approach has not been tested with a robust clinical study design.
Currently, the diagnosis of BK nephropathy requires a renal biopsy, an invasive procedure with its own risks. In addition, identification of patients with viremia who progress to nephropathy and subsequent graft failure i.e. prognostication does not appear possible with the renal biopsy results at present. Validation of potential non-invasive biomarkers provides a unique opportunity for both detection and risk stratification of patients with BK viremia subsequent failure, which could lead to more informed therapeutic interventions while supporting the development of newer therapies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Reduction of standard immunosuppression | Active comparator | Drug: Tacrolimus, Drug: Mycophenolate acidLow dose Tacrolimus with low dose Mycophenolate acid |
| mTOR Arm | Active comparator | Drug: Mycophenolate acid, Drug: SirolimusLow dose Sirolimus with low dose Mycophenolate acid (mTOR Substitution) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Renal transplant recipients age 18 years or over
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with multiorgan transplants
- Patients on immunosuppressive regimens that include steroids or Sirolimus at the time of detection of viremia
- ABO incompatible renal transplants
- Three or more previous renal transplants
- Patients with contraindications to tacrolimus, sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil or mycophenolic acid.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TacrolimusAlso: PrografReduction of standard immunosuppression - The standard of care immunosuppression treatment commonly used for renal transplant patients | Drug | Reduction of standard immunosuppression |
| Mycophenolate acidAlso: mycophenolate antimetaboliteMyfortic or CellCept - The standard of care immunosuppression treatment most commonly used for renal transplant patients | Drug | Reduction of standard immunosuppression, mTOR Arm |
| SirolimusAlso: RapamunemTOR Substitution - Replacing tacrolimus (a calcineurin inhibitor) with sirolimus (an mTOR inhibitor) along with reduction of mycophenolic acid | Drug | mTOR Arm |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With BK Viral Load <600 Copies/mL
Time frame: Up to 12 months from enrollment
A Viral load of <600 copies/mL for at least 3 months indicates sustained clearance of BK viremia, confirmed by blood test
1 secondary outcome
Number of Participants With Incidence of BK Nephropathy
Time frame: Up to 24 months from randomization
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Feb 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for BK Viremia
RecruitingPhase 2
A Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of AIC263029 in Kidney Transplant Recipients With BKV Infection
BK Virus Infection, BKV Infection
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
25BT056: Basket Study of Viral Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes
EBV Viremia, CMV Viremia
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial to Treat Polyomavirus Infections (BKPyV) in Kidney and Simultaneous Kidney Pancreas Transplant Recipients
BK Viremia, Kidney Transplant Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Serotype and Genotype of BK Virus in Kidney Transplant Recipients and Their Donors to Identify Individuals at Risk of Nephropathy
Nephropathy, Opportunistic Viral Infection
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Prevalence of BK Viremia in Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplant
Polyomavirus Infections, BK Viremia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sumit Mohan, MD principal investigator
Columbia University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate acid and Sirolimus in people with BK Viremia and BK Nephropathy, run by Columbia University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With BK Viral Load <600 Copies/mL (time frame: Up to 12 months from enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2018.