AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic HemodialysisPhase 4NCT01649102

Impact of Catheter Design on Catheter Survival in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Tunneled Cuffed Catheter (Palindroom, Hemoglide Bard) in people with Chronic Hemodialysis and Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection, run by AZ Sint-Jan AV at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The trial aims to compare the performance of two tunneled cuffed catheters (TCC) in chronic hemodialysis patients. The design of the catheter may affect the propensity for thrombosis and hence intraluminal infection, as well the percentage of recirculation and hence the efficiency of dialysis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Tunneled Cuffed Catheter (Palindroom, Hemoglide Bard)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
302 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Mar 2010to Mar 2013
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients (male or female, age < 18 years) on chronic hemodialysis who require a tunneled cuffed catheter as temporary or definite vascular access are eligible. Written informed consent is required prior to inclusion.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding
  • Life-expectance of < 6 months due to major co-morbid conditions
  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Occlusion or inaccessibility of the right internal jugular vein

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • AZ ST JAn Brugge Oostende AV

    Bruges, B-8000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

The trial aims to compare the performance of two tunneled cuffed catheters (TCC) in chronic hemodialysis patients. The design of the catheter may affect the propensity for thrombosis and hence intraluminal infection, as well the percentage of recirculation and hence the efficiency of dialysis.

Read the detailed description

The use of tunneled cuffed catheters (TCCs) as vascular access is discouraged in the NKF DOQI guidelines, because of their propensity for infection, thrombosis, inadequate and/or irregular blood flow rates and damage to large central veins. In addition, emerging data suggest a link between catheter use and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, they are still frequently used in the hemodialysis population, either because of documented inadequate vascular access anatomy, or as a bridge to a functional permanent access.

A large number of TCC are available, that mainly differ with respect to material type, lumen diameter and design, tip design, as well as presence and design of side holes. There is currently no proven advantage of one long-term catheter design over another.

The design of the catheter tip may affect the propensity for thrombosis and hence intraluminal infection, as well the percentage of recirculation, especially when arterial and venous blood tubing are reversed. Commonly used catheters have a staggered tip design, meaning that the outflow tip extends several centimetres (typically a minimum of 2.5 cm) beyond the inflow tip, to prevent recirculation. Other designs are a split tip, or a symmetrical tip. In the latter type, used in the Palindrome® (Covidien) catheter, a spiral separator is incorporated allowing either lumen to be used as the arterial port.

Many catheters have multiple side holes, to decrease shear rate and increase flow on the arterial side and reflecting the belief that backup inflow is necessary in the case of obstruction. However, side holes can also promote thrombosis and infection due to the irregularity of their cut surfaces. Especially the distal side holes comprise a low flow zone with an increased clotting risk. The Palindrome® (Covidien) catheter has laser cut side holes, which are thought to have a smoother surface and a lower tendency to cause thrombosis.

Inadequate blood flow in a catheter is often mended by reversal of the inlet and outlet lumens. However, reversal of flow leads to a substantial increase of recirculation (from 2%-3% to 10%), affecting the efficiency of treatment. It should therefore never be used except temporarily until the problem is definitively corrected. The symmetrical tip design of the Palindrome® (Covidien) catheter allows lumen reversal without increased recirculation.

The present randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to evaluate in chronic hemodialysis patients the performance of two TCC with different design: the Palindrome® (Covidien), which is a symmetrical spiral z-tip catheter made from carbothane and the Hemoglide® (Bard), which has a 3 cm staggered tip and is made of polyurethane.

Being tested
Tunneled Cuffed Catheter (Palindroom, Hemoglide Bard)
Keywords
Chronic hemodialysis, Tunneled cuffed catheter, Catheter-related bloodstream infection, Mechanical catheter dysfunction, impact of catheter design on outcome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tunneled Cuffed Catheter (Palindroom, Hemoglide Bard)Device

    A tunneled cuffed catheter is inserted, randomization between:

    • Palindroom
    • Hemoglide Bard
Study groups in NCT01649102
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Palindroom catheterExperimentalInsertion of Palindroom catheter
Receives: Device: Tunneled Cuffed Catheter (Palindroom, Hemoglide Bard)
Hemoglide Bard CatheterExperimentalInsertion of Hemoglide Bard Catheter
Receives: Device: Tunneled Cuffed Catheter (Palindroom, Hemoglide Bard)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. overall catheter survival rate

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Mechanical catheter dysfunction: number of dialysis sessions requiring urokinase administration per 1000 catheter days; number of catheter removals for mechanical obstruction

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionMar 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
302 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01649102
Sponsor's protocol ID
B04920108373
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
18 Jul 2012
Last updated
14 Jan 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Tunneled Cuffed Catheter (Palindroom, Hemoglide Bard) in people with Chronic Hemodialysis and Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection, run by AZ Sint-Jan AV at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jan 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

overall catheter survival rate (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jan 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in