AzTrials
AzTrials

HypercholesterolemiaPhase 3ODYSSEY MONONCT01644474

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) Versus Ezetimibe in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

A Phase 3 study testing Alirocumab and Ezetimibe in people with Hypercholesterolemia, run by Sanofi at 8 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9). Primary Objective of the study: To demonstrate the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by alirocumab in comparison with ezetimibe after 24 weeks of treatment in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hypercholesterolemia
What is being tested?
Alirocumab and Ezetimibe
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
103 participants
Where
8 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Jul 2012to Jul 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with hypercholesterolemia

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 or legal age of adulthood, whichever was greater
  • LDL-C < 100 mg/dL (< 2.59 mmol/L) or > 190 mg/dL (> 4.9 mmol/L)
  • Fasting serum triglycerides (TG) > 400 mg/dL (> 4.52 mmol/L)
  • Known history of homozygous or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia
  • The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 4 countries.

8 sites in 4 countries

United States3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 840601

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Investigational Site Number 840603

    Overland Park, Kansas, 66212

  • Investigational Site Number 840602

    Richmond, Virginia, 23227

Other trials in United States

Netherlands3 sites
  • Investigational Site Number 528602

    Groningen, 9711 SG

  • Investigational Site Number 528601

    Rotterdam, 3021 HC

  • Investigational Site Number 528603

    Velp, 6883 ES

Other trials in Netherlands

Belgium1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 056601

    Antwerp, 2060

Other trials in Belgium

Finland1 site
  • Investigational Site Number 246601

    Helsinki, 00290

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy And Safety of SAR236553/REGN727 Over 24 Weeks in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

Alirocumab (SAR236553/REGN727) is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9).

Primary Objective of the study:

To demonstrate the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by alirocumab in comparison with ezetimibe after 24 weeks of treatment in participants with hypercholesterolemia.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To evaluate the effect of alirocumab in comparison with ezetimibe on LDL-C at other time points
  • To evaluate the effect of alirocumab on other lipid parameters
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab
Read the detailed description

The maximum study duration was 34 weeks per participant, including a 24-week randomized treatment period.

Being tested
Alirocumab, Ezetimibe, Placebo (for Alirocumab), Placebo (for Ezetimibe)
Medical subject headings
Hypercholesterolemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AlirocumabDrug

    Also called SAR236553, REGN727

    1 mL subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of the upper arm by self-injection or by another designated person using the autoinjector.

  • EzetimibeDrug

    One over-encapsulated tablet orally once daily at approximately the same time of the day with or without food.

  • Placebo (for Alirocumab)Drug

    1 mL subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of the upper arm by self--injection or by another designated person using the autoinjector.

  • Placebo (for Ezetimibe)Drug

    One capsule orally once daily at approximately the same time of the day with or without food..

Study groups in NCT01644474
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ezetimibe 10 mgActive comparatorOral ezetimibe 10 mg capsule daily and subcutaneous (SC) placebo injection for alirocumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 24 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Ezetimibe; Drug: Placebo (for Alirocumab)
Alirocumab 75/Up to 150 mg Q2WExperimentalSC injection of alirocumab 75 mg Q2W and oral placebo capsule for ezetimibe daily for 24 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg from Week 12 when LDL-C levels ≥70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 8.
Receives: Drug: Alirocumab; Drug: Placebo (for Ezetimibe)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis

    Adjusted Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 24 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  2. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  4. Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Apo B at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  7. Percent Change From Baseline in Total-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted percentages at Week 24 were obtained from multiple imputation approach model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  9. Percentage of Participants Achieving Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted percentages at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  10. Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from a multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  11. Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  12. Percent Change From Baseline in HDL-C at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  14. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 24 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  15. Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  16. Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) at Week 24 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 24 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

  17. Percent Change From Baseline in Apo A-1 at Week 12 - ITT Analysis

    Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 24 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2013
  4. Study completionJul 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
103 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01644474
Sponsor's protocol ID
EFC11716
Other IDs
U1111-1124-1167, 2011-001424-38
Acronym
ODYSSEY MONO
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
17 Jul 2012
Last updated
6 Nov 2015
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Roth EM, Taskinen MR, Ginsberg HN, Kastelein JJ, Colhoun HM, Robinson JG, Merlet L, Pordy R, Baccara-Dinet MT. Monotherapy with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab versus ezetimibe in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a 24 week, double-blind, randomized Phase 3 trial. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Sep;176(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.049. Epub 2014 Jul 2.

    PubMed 25037695
  • Roth EM, McKenney JM. ODYSSEY MONO: effect of alirocumab 75 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks as monotherapy versus ezetimibe over 24 weeks. Future Cardiol. 2015;11(1):27-37. doi: 10.2217/fca.14.82.

    PubMed 25606700
  • Mahmood T, Minnier J, Ito MK, Li QH, Koren A, Kam IW, Fazio S, Shapiro MD. Discordant responses of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) to alirocumab: A pooled analysis from 10 ODYSSEY Phase 3 studies. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Jul 23;28(8):816-822. doi: 10.1177/2047487320915803. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

    PubMed 34298554
  • Leiter LA, Tinahones FJ, Karalis DG, Bujas-Bobanovic M, Letierce A, Mandel J, Samuel R, Jones PH. Alirocumab safety in people with and without diabetes mellitus: pooled data from 14 ODYSSEY trials. Diabet Med. 2018 Dec;35(12):1742-1751. doi: 10.1111/dme.13817. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

    PubMed 30183102
  • Ray KK, Ginsberg HN, Davidson MH, Pordy R, Bessac L, Minini P, Eckel RH, Cannon CP. Reductions in Atherogenic Lipids and Major Cardiovascular Events: A Pooled Analysis of 10 ODYSSEY Trials Comparing Alirocumab With Control. Circulation. 2016 Dec 13;134(24):1931-1943. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024604. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

    PubMed 27777279

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Alirocumab and Ezetimibe in people with Hypercholesterolemia, run by Sanofi at 8 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in United States, Netherlands, Belgium, Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Nov 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 24 - Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Analysis (time frame: From Baseline to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01644474, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in