AzTrials
AzTrials

Delayed HealingNCT01640366

PICO Breast Reduction Clinical Study Looking at Incision Healing Complications

A study testing PICO in people with Delayed Healing, run by Smith & Nephew, Inc. at 6 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to see if the use of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system (NPWT) will have an effect on the reduction of post-surgical incision healing complications following breast reduction surgery and to assess the medium-term aesthetic appearance and quality of the resultant scar… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Delayed Healing
What is being tested?
PICO
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
6 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Jun 2012to Jul 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female patient's ≥ 18 years old
  • The patient is able to understand the trial and is willing to consent to the trial
  • Patient has undergone an elective surgical procedure for bilateral reduction mammoplasty
  • Patients postsurgical incisions are of similar length

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or lactating females
  • Patients on steroids or other immune modulators known to impact healing which may affect scar appearance
  • Patients with tattoos in the area of the incisions
  • Patients with skin conditions (Cutis laxa etc.) that would result in poor healing or widened scars
  • Patients with a known significant history of scar problems i.e. hypertrophic scaring or keloids
  • Patients who in the opinion of the investigator may not complete the study for any reason
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Patients with a known history of poor compliance with medical treatment
  • Patients who have participated in this trial previously and who were withdrawn
  • Patients with known allergies to product components (silicone adhesives and polyurethane films (direct contact with wound), acrylic adhesives (direct contact with skin), polyethylene fabrics and super-absorbent powders (polyacrylates) (within the dressing)
  • Incisions that are actively bleeding
  • Exposure of blood vessels, organs, bone or tendon at the base of the reference wound
  • Incisions > 12 inches (30cm) max linear dimension

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 4 countries.

6 sites in 4 countries

United States3 sites
  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Montefiore

    The Bronx, New York, 10461

Other trials in United States

France1 site
  • CHU de Nantes Hôtel Dieu

    Nantes, 44093

Other trials in France

Netherlands1 site
  • Academisch Ziekenhuis Maastricht (AZM)

    Maastricht, 6202

Other trials in Netherlands

South Africa1 site
  • University of Cape Town

    Cape Town

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Randomized, Intra-patient, Comparative, Open, Multi-centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of a Single-Use NPWT System on the Prevention of Incision Healing Complications in Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammoplasty

The purpose of this study is to see if the use of a single-use negative pressure wound therapy system (NPWT) will have an effect on the reduction of post-surgical incision healing complications following breast reduction surgery and to assess the medium-term aesthetic appearance and quality of the resultant scar, compared with standard of care dressings.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the present study is to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the Single-Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) system (PICO) with regard to the reduction of postsurgical incision healing complications during the immediate postoperative treatment phase, and to assess the medium-term aesthetic appearance and quality of the resultant scar, in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty, compared to standard care.

Conditions
Delayed Healing
Being tested
PICO
Keywords
surgical incision, reduction mammoplasty, healing complications, negative pressure wound therapy
Medical subject headings
Surgical Wound

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PICODevice

    Also called Disposable NPWT

    Single-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System

Study groups in NCT01640366
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PICO negative pressureExperimentalSingle-use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy
Receives: Device: PICO
Standard of care dressing armNo interventionSterile gauze adhesive strips

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Experiencing Incision Healing Complications up to Day 21 Postoperatively

    The primary variable of whether or not the incision developed a healing complication within 21 days of surgery was defined as the presence of at least one of the following:

    1. Infection (superficial or deep),
    2. Dehiscence (partial, superficial or deep),
    3. Delayed healing (defined as incision not closed within 7 days of the first surgical procedure).

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.

    Measured: 21 days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Number of Participants Experiencing Postsurgical Incision Healing Complications (Dehiscence) Occurring up to Day 21 Postoperatively

    Assessment of the number of participants' incisions that experienced dehiscence (superficial, partial, or deep) occurring up to and 21 days postoperatively between incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.

    Measured: 21 days postoperatively

  2. Number of Participants Experiencing Postsurgical Incision Healing Complications (Infection) Occurring up to Day 21 Postoperatively

    Assessment of the number of participants' incisions that experienced an infection (superficial or deep) occurring up to and 21 days postoperatively between incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.

    Measured: 21 days postoperatively

  3. Number of Participants Experiencing Postsurgical Incision Healing Complications (Delayed Healing) Occurring Within 7 Days Postoperatively

    Assessment of the number of participants' incisions that experienced delayed healing within 7 days of surgery between incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.

    Measured: Within 7 days postoperatively

  4. Number of Participants Experiencing Postsurgical Incision Healing Complications (Delayed Healing) Occurring Within 10 Days Postoperatively

    Assessment of the number of participants' incisions that experienced delayed healing within 10 days of surgery between incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.

    Measured: Within 10 days postoperatively

  5. Aesthetic Appearance (Cosmesis) and Scar Quality at 90 Days Postoperatively

    Assessment of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) between postsurgical incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.

    VAS score: Assessed for color, appearance, contour, distortion, and texture. Each score ranged from 5 to 18; 5 being 'excellent' and 18 being 'poor.' Also, a global scar score was included in the total score.

    POSAS score: Scored in 2 parts which added to create a total score, observer score and patient score. The lowest score of 1 showed 'normal' skin and the highest score of 10 showed the 'worst imaginable' result.

    Observer score = 6 categories (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area) each given a score of 1-10.

    Patient score = 6 categories (scar pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity each given a score of 1-10.

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study.

    Measured: 90 days postoperatively

  6. Number of Skin, Nipple and Areola Necrosis Occurring up to and 21 Days Postoperatively

    The nipple and areola areas were not covered by the PICO or standard care dressing as part of the evaluation, they were all dressed the same with Steri-strips and dry gauze pads, which was essentially the standard care dressing regime.

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.

    Measured: 21 days postoperatively

  7. Number of Hematoma's Occurring up to and 21 Days Postoperatively

    Assessment of participants developing a hematoma up to 21 days postoperatively for incisions treated with PICO compared with standard care dressings.

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.

    Measured: 21 days postoperatively

  8. Number of Wounds Showing 100% Closure Occurring up to and 21 Days Postoperatively

    Assessment of wound appearance demonstrating 100% wound closure at 21 days postoperatively for both PICO treatment and standard of care treatment.

    All participants received both PICO and standard care dressings simultaneously during the course of the study; randomized to either right breast for PICO and left breast for standard of care OR right breast standard of care and left breast PICO.

    Measured: 21 days postoperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jul 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionJul 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01640366
Sponsor's protocol ID
CE/US/11/01/PIC
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
3 Jul 2012
Last updated
28 Feb 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PICO in people with Delayed Healing, run by Smith & Nephew, Inc. at 6 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in United States, France, Netherlands, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Feb 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Experiencing Incision Healing Complications up to Day 21 Postoperatively (time frame: 21 days postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in