Urologic DiseasesPhase 3BEYONDNCT01638000
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Patients With Overactive Bladder Who Were Previously Treated With Another Medicine But Were Not Satisfied With That Treatment.
A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron and Solifenacin succinate in people with Urologic Diseases and Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd. at 217 sites in 33 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirabegron 50 mg versus (vs) solifenacin 5 mg in the treatment of patients with OAB who were dissatisfied with their treatment due to lack of efficacy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Urologic Diseases, Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Bladder Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Mirabegron and Solifenacin succinate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,887 participants
- Where
- 217 sitesin 33 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Jun 2012to 24 Apr 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
- Subject has symptoms of OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with or without urgency incontinence) for at least 3 months
- Subject is currently or has previously received at least one antimuscarinic agent intended to treat their OAB. The last antimuscarinic must have been taken for at least 4 weeks and taken within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
Who cannot join
- Female subject is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential is sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
- Subject has neurogenic bladder
- Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urgency incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator (for female subjects confirmed by a cough provocation test)
- Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
- Subject has diabetic neuropathy
- Subject has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
Show all 18Show fewer
- Subject has uncontrolled narrow angle glaucoma, urinary or gastric retention, severe ulcerative colitis, toxic megacolon, myasthenia gravis or any other medical condition which makes the use of anticholinergics contraindicated
- The subject is currently receiving or has a history of treatment with intravesical botulinum toxin (cosmetic use is acceptable) or resiniferatoxin within 9 months prior to screening
- Subject receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy (with the exception of a bladder training program or pelvic floor exercises which started more than 30 days prior to screening)
- Subject has moderate to severe hepatic impairment
- Subject has severe renal impairment or end stage renal disease
- Subject has severe uncontrolled hypertension
- Subject has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) or has a known history of QT prolongation or currently taking medication known to prolong the QT interval
- Subject has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to solifenacin, mirabegron or any of the inactive ingredients
- Subject has a concurrent malignancy or history of cancer (except noninvasive skin cancer) within the last 5 years prior to screening
- Subject has been treated with an experimental device within 30 days or received an experimental agent within the longer of 30 days or five half-lives
- Subject is using prohibited medications which cannot be stopped safely at the Screening Visit. Subject is excluded if using restricted medications not meeting protocol-specified criteria
- Subject's last antimuscarinic treatment was solifenacin
Trial locations and contacts
217 sites in 33 countries.
217 sites in 33 countries
United Kingdom25 sites
Site: 44027
Aberdeen, AB25 2ZN
Site: 44029
Birmingham, B15 2TG
Site: 44025
Cambridge, CB2 2QQ
Site: 44030
Chichester, PO19 4SE
Site: 44028
Croydon, CR7 7YE
Site: 44003
Devon, TQ2 7AA
Site: 44001
Edgbaston, B15 2TH
Site: 44011
Glasgow, G11 6NT
Site: 44023
Harrow, HA 3UJ
Site: 44006
Kent, ME7 5NY
Site: 44012
Leeds, LS 9TF
Site: 44019
Leicester, LE5 4PW
Site: 44008
Liverpool, L8 7SS
Site: 44010
London, SW17 0QT
Site: 44017
London, W2 1NY
Site: 44013
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Site: 44022
Northwood, HA6 2RN
Site: 44021
Nottingham, NG5 1PB
Site: 44009
Plymouth, PL6 8DH
Site: 44007
Reading, RG1 5AN
Site: 44005
Sheffield, S10 2JF
Site: 44020
Southampton, SO16 5YA
Site: 44026
Taunton, TA1 5DA
Site: 44024
West Yorkshire, BD9 6RJ
Site: 44002
West Yorkshire, WF8 1PL
France13 sites
Site: 33010
Angers, 49033
Site: 33007
Colmar, 68024
Site: 33011
Dijon, 21000
Site: 33002
Marseille, 13285
Site: 33006
Marseille, 13385
Site: 33013
Nîmes, 30029
Site: 33004
Orléans, 45067
Site: 33001
Paris, 75970
Site: 33005
Paris, 75970
Site: 33003
Rouen, 76031
Site: 33014
Suresnes, 92151
Site: 33017
Tours, 37044
Site: 33015
Valence, 26953
Russia13 sites
Site: 70007
Moscow, 101000
Site: 70001
Moscow, 105425
Site: 70008
Moscow, 115516
Site: 70005
Moscow, 117815
Site: 70006
Moscow, 117815
Site: 70011
Moscow, 117997
Site: 70002
Moscow, 119435
Site: 70003
Moscow, 125206
Site: 70013
Saint Petersburg, 194175
Site: 70012
Saint Petersburg, 196084
Site: 70004
Saint Petersburg, 197089
Site: 70010
Saint Petersburg, 198103
Site: 70009
Saint Petersburg, 199034
Spain11 sites
Site: 34001
Barcelona, 080200
Site: 34002
Barcelona, 08036
Site: 34009
Bilbao, 48013
Site: 34010
Donostia / San Sebastian, 20014
Site: 34004
Madrid, 28031
Site: 34005
Madrid, 28046
Site: 34003
Madrid, 28049
Site: 34011
Mendaro, 20850
Site: 34013
Murcia, 30008
Site: 34014
Seville, 41014
Site: 34012
Valencia, 46026
Canada10 sites
Site: 10010
Abbotsford British Columbia, V2S 3N5
Site: 10011
Barrie, L4M 7G1
Site: 10001
Bathurst, E2A 4Z2
Site: 10003
Brampton, L6T 4S5
Site: 10005
Brantford, N3R 4N3
Site: 10007
Kingston, K7L 3J7
Site: 10002
Montreal, H4N 3C5
Site: 10009
Sherbrooke, J1H 5N4
Site: 10004
Toronto, M4N 3M5
Site: 10008
Victoria, V8V 3N1
Greece9 sites
Site: 30005
Alexandroupoli, 68100
Site: 30009
Athens, 115 28
Site: 30007
Athens, 166 73
Site: 30001
Athens
Site: 30006
Heraklion, 711 10
Site: 30008
Larissa, 41334
Site: 30004
Pátrai, 26500
Site: 30010
Thessaloniki, 546 42
Site: 30002
Thessaloniki, 56429
Turkey (Türkiye)9 sites
Site: 90005
Ankara, 06500
Site: 90003
Ankara, 6100
Site: 90011
Denizli, 20070
Site: 90007
Diyarbakır, 21080
Site: 90004
Istanbul
Site: 90001
Izmir, 35100
Site: 90008
Izmir, 35340
Site: 90009
Manisa, 45010
Site: 90010
Sivas, 58140
Austria8 sites
Site: 43006
Baden, 2500
Site: 43014
Graz, 9036
Site: 43015
Innsbruck, 6020
Site: 43013
Linz, 4020
Site: 43005
Oberwart, 7400
Site: 43011
Vienna, 1020
Site: 43002
Vienna, 1220
Site: 43003
Wels, 4600
Czechia8 sites
Site: 42004
Bohumín, 73581
Site: 42003
Brno, 602 00
Site: 42001
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Site: 42002
Jihlava, 586 33
Site: 42006
Plzen-Lochotin, 30460
Site: 42005
Prague, 110 00
Site: 42008
Prague, 128 51
Site: 42007
Prague, 14000
Italy8 sites
Site: 39001
Avellino, 83100
Site: 39005
Catanzaro, 88100
Site: 39003
Cinisello Balsamo, 20092
Site: 39002
Florence, 50139
Site: 39008
Milan, 20153
Site: 39010
Pavia, 27100
Site: 39006
Perugia, 06156
Site: 39007
Treviglio, 24047
Bulgaria7 sites
Site: 35902
Burgas, 8000
Site: 35909
Haskovo, 6300
Site: 35901
Lovech, 5500
Site: 35905
Plovdiv, 4003
Site: 35906
Sofia, 1431
Site: 35908
Sofia, 1504
Site: 35903
Sofia, 1606
Netherlands7 sites
Site: 31010
Amsterdam
Site: 31005
Eindhoven, 5623 EJ
Site: 31004
Enschede, 7511 JX
Site: 31007
Nijmegen, 6525 GA
Site: 31001
Tilburg, 5022 GC
Site: 31008
Utrecht, 3584 CX
Site: 31006
Zwolle, 8025 AB
Sweden7 sites
Site: 46007
Gothenburg, 413 45
Site: 46004
Halmstad, 302 46
Site: 46005
Karlshamn, 37435
Site: 46003
Norrtälje, 761 29
Site: 46002
Stockholm, 114 46
Site: 46001
Stockholm, 14186
Site: 46006
Uppsala, 753 35
Belgium6 sites
Site: 32006
Brussels, 1070
Site: 32008
Deurne, 2100
Site: 32001
Edegem, 2650
Site: 32004
Ghent, 9000
Site: 32007
Leuven, 3000
Site: 32005
Liège
Hungary6 sites
Site: 36003
Budapest, 1082
Site: 36004
Budapest, 1237
Site: 36005
Csongrád, H-6640
Site: 36006
Nyíregyháza, H-4400
Site: 36001
Salgótarján, 3100
Site: 36002
Szekszárd, 7100
Ireland6 sites
Site: 35304
Cork
Site: 35302
Dublin, 8
Site: 35306
Dublin, 8
Site: 35301
Dublin, 9
Site: 35303
Tralee
Site: 35305
Waterford
Poland6 sites
Site: 48007
Kolbuszowa Dolna, 36-100
Site: 48006
Krakow, 31-315
Site: 48001
Lublin, 20-632
Site: 48004
Piaseczno, 05-500
Site: 48003
Warsaw, 02-929
Site: 48005
Wroclaw, 01-432
Slovakia6 sites
Site: 42104
Galanta, 924 22
Site: 42106
Martin, 036 59
Site: 42103
Piešťany, 92102
Site: 42101
Poprad, 05801
Site: 42105
Trenčín, 911 01
Site: 42102
Žilina, 010 01
Armenia5 sites
Site: 37406
Yerevan, 0001
Site: 37404
Yerevan, 0014
Site: 37403
Yerevan, 0052
Site: 37401
Yerevan, 0078
Site: 37402
Yerevan, 0078
Denmark5 sites
Site: 45002
Aalborg, 9000
Site: 45001
Aarhus N, 8200
Site: 45005
Frederiksbjerg, 2000
Site: 45004
Hvidovre, 2650
Site: 45003
Odense C, 9000
Portugal5 sites
Site: 35105
Lisbon, 1050-199
Site: 35104
Lisbon, 1649-035
Site: 35102
Matosinhos Municipality, 4454-509
Site: 35103
Porto, 4100-180
Site: 35101
Setúbal, 2910-446
Slovenia5 sites
Site: 38603
Ljubljana, 1000
Site: 38604
Ljubljana, 1000
Site: 38601
Maribor, 2000
Site: 38602
Maribor, 2000
Site: 38606
Novo Mesto, 8000
Ukraine5 sites
Site: 38007
Chernivtsi, 58000
Site: 38004
Dnipro, 49005
Site: 38001
Kharkiv, 61057
Site: 38002
Kiev, 2000
Site: 38003
Lviv, 79044
Kazakhstan4 sites
Site: 77705
Almaty, 050060
Site: 77706
Almaty, 50091
Site: 77703
Astana, 010000
Site: 77702
Astana, 10000
Belarus3 sites
Site: 37502
Minsk, 220119
Site: 37501
Minsk, 223041
Site: 37504
Vitebsk, 210037
Finland3 sites
Site: 35802
Jyväskylä, 40620
Site: 35801
Oulu, 90029
Site: 35804
Tampere, 33521
Georgia3 sites
Site: 99501
Tbilisi, 144
Site: 99502
Tbilisi, 159
Site: 99503
Tbilisi, 159
Latvia3 sites
Site: 37103
Liepāja, LV-3401
Site: 37102
Riga, 1038
Site: 37101
Riga, LV-1002
Norway3 sites
Site: 47002
Hamar, 2317
Site: 47001
Tønsberg, 3103
Site: 47005
Trondheim, 7006
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treated With Antimuscarinics and Dissatisfied Due to Lack of Efficacy
The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirabegron 50 mg versus (vs) solifenacin 5 mg in the treatment of patients with OAB who were dissatisfied with their treatment due to lack of efficacy.
- Being tested
- Mirabegron, Solifenacin succinate
- Keywords
- Vesitrim, Frequency, Urgency, Urgency incontinence, Urinary incontinence, Overactive Bladder (OAB), Micturition, Mirabegron, YM178, Vesicare, Solifenacin
- Medical subject headings
- Urologic Diseases, Urinary Bladder, Overactive, Urinary Bladder Diseases, Urinary Incontinence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MirabegronDrug
Also called Betanis, YM178, Myrbetriq, Betmiga
oral tablet
Solifenacin succinateDrug
Also called Vesicare, YM905, Vesikur, Vesitrim
oral tablet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Experimental | Participants who received mirabegron 50 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Mirabegron |
| Solifenacin 5 mg | Active comparator | Participants who received solifenacin 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Receives: Drug: Solifenacin succinate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
A micturition is any voluntary urination (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Measured: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Secondary outcomes (46)
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment Period
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE; defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered a study drug) that started or worsened in the period from the first double-blind medication intake until 30 days after the last double-blind medication intake. The following TEAEs were selected for inclusion in the analysis: Dry mouth (aptyalism, dry mouth, dry throat), constipation (constipation), blurred vision (vision blurred, myopia, refraction disorder, accommodation disorder).
Measured: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 16 weeks)
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Number of Incontinence Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit
An incontinence episode is any involuntary leakage of urine. The total number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Measured: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
An incontinence episode is any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit
An urgency incontinence episode is any involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency. The total number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Measured: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
An urgency incontinence episode is any involuntary leakage of urine accompanied by or immediately proceeded by urgency. The mean number of urgency incontinence episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
An urgency episode is a sudden compelling desire to pass urine immediately followed by an incontinent event or the patient having to rush to the toilet and make it in time; severity recorded as 3 (severe urgency) or 4 (urgency incontinence) on the Patient Perception of the Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS) validated scale. The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Urgency level was rated by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period using the PPIUS 5-point categorical scale: 0. No urgency; 1. Mild urgency; 2. Moderate urgency; 3. Severe urgency; 4. Urgency incontinence.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Number of Pads Used at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit
The total number of pads per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Measured: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment
The mean number of pads per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8 , Week 12
Number of Nocturia Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit
A nocturia episode is defined as waking at night ≥1 times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the patient goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the patient gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The total number of nocturia episodes were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period prior to each visit.
Measured: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment
A nocturia episode is defined as waking at night ≥1 times to void (i.e., any voiding associated with sleep disturbance between the time the patient goes to bed with the intention to sleep until the time the patient gets up in the morning with the intention to stay awake). The mean number of nocturia episodes per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Normalization of Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Final Visit
A responder is defined as a participant who has ≥8 micturitions at baseline and has <8 micturitions per 24 hours during the treatment period at each specified visit, where change from baseline is <0.
Measured: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Final Visit
A responder is defined as a participant with at least 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the treatment period at specified visit.
Measured: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Final Visit
A responder is defined as a participant who reported incontinence episodes at baseline and reported no incontinence episodes during the treatment period at specified visit.
Measured: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mobility Scores as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
The European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Self-care Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Usual Activities Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pain/Discomfort Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Anxiety/Depression Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mobility Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Self-care Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Usual Activities Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Pain/Discomfort Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Anxiety/Depression Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mobility Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Self-care Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Usual Activities Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pain/Discomfort Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Anxiety/Depression Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mobility Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Self-care Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Usual Activities Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Pain/Discomfort Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Anxiety/Depression Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized nondisease specific (i.e., generic) instrument for use as a measure of health outcome. It has 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. Each dimension has 5 response levels (e.g., no problems with performing activity, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to perform [extreme problems]).
Measured: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and at the Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score as Assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
The Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to symptom bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The symptom bother portion consists of 8 items, scored from 1 to 6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 (least severity) to 100 (worst severity). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and at the Final Visit in Total Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Score as Assessed by the OAB-q
The OAB-q is a self-reported questionnaire with items relating to Symptom Bother and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The HRQoL portion consists of an 25-item HRQoL subscale containing the following domains scored from 1 to 6: coping, concern, sleep, social interaction). The total score is calculated by adding the 4 HRQoL subscale scores and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and at the Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
The Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) questionnaire is a single-item questionnare used to assess participants' perceptions and impressions of their bladder condition. Participants assessed their bladder condition using a 6-point categorical scale: 1. Does not cause me any problems at all; 2. Causes me some very minor problems; 3. Causes me some minor problems; 4. Causes me (some) moderate problems; 5. Causes me severe problems; 6. Causes me many severe problems.
Measured: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and the Final Visit in the Patient's Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (TS)-Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The Treatment Satisfaction (TS)-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was a self-rated scale with the participant answering the question "Are you satisfied with your treatment?" and placing a vertical mark on a line from 0 (No, not at all) to 10 (Yes, completely).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and the Final Visit in the Patient's Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Likert Scale
The Treatment Satisfaction (TS)-Likert Scale was a self-rated scale with the participant answering the question "How satisfied were you with your treatment?" with on a scale from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 7 (extremely satisfied).
Measured: Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Symptom Bother Score as Assessed by the OAB-q: ≥ 10 Points Improvement in OAB-q at Week 12 and Final Visit
A responder is defined as a participant with ≥10 points improvement in symptom bother from baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in HRQoL Scales as Assessed by the OAB-q: ≥10 Points Improvement in OAB-q at Week 12 and Final Visit
A responder is defined as a participant with >=10 points improvement in the total HRQL score from baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Likert Scale: ≥1, ≥2, ≥3, ≥4, ≥5, and 6-point Improvement From Baseline to Week 12
A responder is defined as a participant with ≥1, ≥2, ≥3, ≥4, ≥5 or 6-point improvement from baseline in TS-Likert scale.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire - Likert Scale: ≥1, ≥2, ≥3, ≥4, ≥5, and 6-point Improvement From Baseline to Final Visit
A responder is defined as a participant with >=1 or >=2 or >=3 or >=4 or >=5 or 6-point improvement from baseline in TS-Likert scale.
Measured: Baseline to final visit (up to Week 12)
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in PPBC: ≥1 Point Improvement at Week 12 and Final Visit
A responder is defined as a participant with ≥1 point improvement in PPBC from baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Major Improvement in PPBC: ≥2 Point Improvement at Week 12 and Final Visit
A responder is defined as a participant with ≥2 point improvement in PPBC from baseline.
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study start12 Jun 2012
- Primary completion24 Apr 2013
- Study completion24 Apr 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Urologic DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,887 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Study Manager, Study director, Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01638000
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 178-EC-001
- Other IDs
- 2011-005713-37
- Acronym
- BEYOND
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 21 Nov 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Nov 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treated With Antimuscarinics and Dissatisfied Due to Lack of Efficacy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01638000
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEYOND / 178-EC-001
- Keywords
- Vesitrim, Frequency, Urgency, Urgency incontinence, Urinary incontinence, Overactive Bladder (OAB), Micturition, Mirabegron
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,887 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Jun 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Apr 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Aug 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirabegron 50 mg versus (vs) solifenacin 5 mg in the treatment of patients with OAB who were dissatisfied with their treatment due to lack of efficacy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mirabegron 50 mg | Experimental | Drug: MirabegronParticipants who received mirabegron 50 mg once daily for 12 weeks. |
| Solifenacin 5 mg | Active comparator | Drug: Solifenacin succinateParticipants who received solifenacin 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Subject is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
- Subject has symptoms of OAB (urinary frequency and urgency with or without urgency incontinence) for at least 3 months
- Subject is currently or has previously received at least one antimuscarinic agent intended to treat their OAB. The last antimuscarinic must have been taken for at least 4 weeks and taken within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Female subject is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential is sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
- Subject has neurogenic bladder
- Subject has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urgency incontinence where stress is the predominant factor as determined by the investigator (for female subjects confirmed by a cough provocation test)
- Subject has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
- Subject has diabetic neuropathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MirabegronAlso: Betanis, YM178, Myrbetriq, Betmigaoral tablet | Drug | Mirabegron 50 mg |
| Solifenacin succinateAlso: Vesicare, YM905, Vesikur, Vesitrimoral tablet | Drug | Solifenacin 5 mg |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
A micturition is any voluntary urination (excluding incontinence only episodes). The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours were calculated from the data recorded by the participant during the 3-day micturition diary period.
46 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Reporting at Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event of Dry Mouth, Constipation or Blurred Vision During Double-blind Treatment Period
Time frame: From first dose of study drug up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 16 weeks)
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Number of Incontinence Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 or 4) Per 24 Hours
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Number of Pads Used at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8 , Week 12
Number of Nocturia Episodes at 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment and at the Final Visit
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Normalization of Micturitions at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Final Visit
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Final Visit
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Weeks 4, 8, 12 and Final Visit
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mobility Scores as Assessed by the European Quality of Life 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Self-care Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Usual Activities Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Pain/Discomfort Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Anxiety/Depression Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Mobility Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Self-care Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Usual Activities Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Pain/Discomfort Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Anxiety/Depression Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Mobility Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Self-care Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Usual Activities Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Pain/Discomfort Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Anxiety/Depression Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Mobility Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Self-care Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Usual Activities Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Pain/Discomfort Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in Anxiety/Depression Scores as Assessed by the EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and at the Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score as Assessed by the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and at the Final Visit in Total Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Score as Assessed by the OAB-q
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Weeks 4, 8, 12, and at the Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 4, Week 8, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and the Final Visit in the Patient's Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (TS)-Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 and the Final Visit in the Patient's Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire-Likert Scale
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Nov 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.
Related trials for Urologic Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Population Pharmacokinetics of Temocillin in Acute Enterobacterial Pyelonephritis in Children
Pyelonephritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Study Manager study director
Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd.
217 sites in 33 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Mirabegron and Solifenacin succinate in people with Urologic Diseases and Urinary Bladder, Overactive, run by Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd. at 217 sites in 33 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 217 sites in United Kingdom, France, Russia, Spain, Canada and 28 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in the Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours (time frame: Baseline and final visit (up to Week 12)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Nov 2024.