Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 4EMBRACENCT01632241
Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab in Black Race Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
A Phase 4 study testing Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy and Standard therapy in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company at 96 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belimumab in adult patients of black race with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; lupus). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- What is being tested?
- Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy and Standard therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 503 participants
- Where
- 96 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 19 Feb 2013to 28 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years of age.
- Self-identified black race.
- Have a clinical diagnosis of SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Have active SLE disease defined as a SELENA SLEDAI score >= 8 at screening
- Have 2 unequivocally positive autoantibody test results defined as a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test [i.e., titer >= 1:80 by human epithelial cell line 2 (HEp-2) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and/or positive enzyme immunoassay (EIA)] and/or a positive anti- double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) (>= 30 international units [IU]/milliliter [mL]) serum antibody test as follows:
- From 2 independent time points within the study screening period. Screening results must be based on the study's central laboratory results, OR
Show all 23Show fewer
- One positive historical test result and 1 positive test result during the screening period.
- Historical documentation of a positive ANA test (e.g., HEp-2 IFA or EIA) or anti-dsDNA (eg, anti-dsDNA by any validated commercial assay) must include the date and type of the test, the name of the testing laboratory, numerical reference range, and a key that explains values provided as positive versus negative OR negative, equivocal/borderline positive). Only unequivocally positive values as defined in the laboratory's reference range are acceptable; borderline values will not be accepted.
- On a stable SLE treatment regimen consisting of any of the following medications (alone or in combination) for a period of at least 30 days prior to Day 0 (i.e., day of 1st dose of study agent):
- Corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisone equivalent, up to 40 mg/day): For subjects on SLE combination therapy, their stable steroid dose must be fixed within the range of 0 to 40 mg/day (prednisone or prednisone equivalent). For subjects whose only SLE treatment is steroids, their stable steroid dose must be fixed within the range of 7.5 to 40 mg/day (prednisone or prednisone equivalent). For those subjects on alternating day doses of steroids, use the average of 2 daily doses to calculate the average daily steroid dose.
- Other immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agents including methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, mycophenolate (including mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolate mofetil hydrochloride, and mycophenolate sodium), calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., tacrolimus, cyclosporine), sirolimus, oral cyclophosphamide, 6-mercaptopurine, mizoribine, or thalidomide.
- Anti-malarials (e.g., hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, quinacrine).
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
- Note:
- Pre-existing SLE medications must be stable for at least 30 days prior to Day 0.
- Corticosteroids may be added as new medication or their doses adjusted only up to 30 days prior to Day 0.
- New SLE therapy other than corticosteroids must not be added within 60 days of Day 0.
- A female subject is eligible to enter the study if she is:
- Not pregnant or nursing;
- Of non-childbearing potential defined as: pre-menopausal females with a documented tubal ligation, hysterectomy, documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion, or documented bilateral oophorectomy, OR postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile [e.g., > 45 years, in the absence of hormone replacement therapy or other cause for amenorrhea]; in questionable cases obtain a blood sample for follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol simultaneously to confirm. Diagnostic levels for FSH and estradiol vary by specific laboratories/assays;
- OR is of child-bearing potential with negative pregnancy test as determined by serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) test at screening and urine hCG test prior to dosing AND agrees to use one of the contraception methods for 2 weeks prior to the day of dosing to sufficiently minimize the risk of pregnancy at that point. Female subjects must agree to use contraception until 16 weeks following the last dose of study agent.
- OR has only same-sex partners, when this is her preferred and usual lifestyle.
- Have the ability to understand the requirements of the study, provide written informed consent (including consent for the use and disclosure of research-related health information), and comply with the study protocol procedures (including required study visits).
Who cannot join
- Have received treatment with anti-B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) [belimumab] at any time.
- Have received any of the following within 364 days of Day 0:
- Abatacept
- Other B cell targeted therapy (e.g., rituximab, other anti-cluster of differentiation [CD] 20 agents, anti-CD22 [epratuzumab], anti-CD52 [alemtuzumab], BLyS-receptor fusion protein [BR3], TACI-Fc, or anti-B-cell activating factor [BAFF] (LY2127399).
- A biologic investigational agent other than B cell targeted therapy (e.g., abetimus sodium, anti-CD40L antibody [BG9588/IDEC-131]).
- Have required 3 or more courses of systemic corticosteroids for concomitant conditions (e.g., asthma, atopic dermatitis) within 364 days of Day 0. (Topical or inhaled steroids are permitted.)
Show all 44Show fewer
- Have received any of the following within 90 days of Day 0:
- Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy (eg, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab).
- Intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide
- Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra).
- Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).
- High dose prednisone or equivalent (> 100 mg/day).
- Plasmapheresis.
- Have received any of the following within 60 days of Day 0:
- A non-biologic investigational agent.
- Any new immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory agent, anti-malarial, or NSAID Note: New inhaled and topical steroids and new topical immunosuppressive agents (e.g., eye drops, topical creams) are allowed. Any NSAID use for < 1 week is allowed.
- Any steroid injection (e.g., intramuscular, intraarticular, or intravenous).
- Have received any of the following within 30 days of Day 0:
- A live vaccine.
- A change in dose of a corticosteroid, other immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory agent, anti-malarial, or NSAID
- Have severe lupus kidney disease (defined by proteinuria > 6 grams/24 hour or equivalent using spot urine protein to creatinine ratio, or serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/deciliter [dL]), or have severe active nephritis requiring acute therapy not permitted by protocol (e.g., IV cyclophosphamide within 90 days of Day 0), or have required hemodialysis or high-dose prednisone (> 100 mg/day) within 90 days of Day 0.
- Have severe active central nervous system (CNS) lupus (including seizures, psychosis, organic brain syndrome, cerebrovascular accident [CVA], cerebritis, or CNS vasculitis) requiring therapeutic intervention within 60 days of Day 0.
- Have a history of a major organ transplant (e.g., heart, lung, kidney, liver) or hematopoietic stem cell/marrow transplant.
- Have clinical evidence of significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic diseases not due to SLE (i.e., cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematologic, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, malignancy, or infectious diseases) which, in the opinion of the principal investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk.
- Have a planned surgical procedure or a history of any other medical disease (e.g., cardiopulmonary), laboratory abnormality, or condition (e.g., poor venous access) that, in the opinion of the principal investigator, makes the subject unsuitable for the study.
- Have a history of malignant neoplasm within the last 5 years, except for adequately treated cancers of the skin (basal or squamous cell) or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
- Have required management of acute or chronic infections, as follows:
- Currently on any suppressive therapy for a chronic infection (such as tuberculosis, pneumocystis, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, herpes zoster, and atypical mycobacteria).
- Hospitalization for treatment of infection within 60 days of Day 0.
- Use of parenteral (IV or intramuscular [IM]) antibiotics (antibacterials, antivirals, anti-fungals, or anti-parasitic agents) within 60 days of Day 0.
- Subjects who have evidence of serious suicide risk including any history of suicidal behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation of type 4 or 5 on the screening Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in the last 2 months or who, in the investigator's opinion, pose a significant suicide risk.
- Have current drug or alcohol abuse or dependence, or a history of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence within 364 days prior to Day 0.
- Have a historically positive test or test positive at screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core antibody, or hepatitis C antibody.
- Have an immunoglobulin (Ig)A deficiency (IgA level < 10 mg/dL).
- Have a grade 3 or greater laboratory abnormality based on the adverse event
- Severity grading tables except for the following that are allowed:
- Stable grade 3 prothrombin time (PT) secondary to anticoagulant, e.g., warfarin, treatment.
- Stable grade 3 partial thromboplastin time (PTT) due to lupus anticoagulant and not related to liver disease or anti-coagulant therapy.
- Stable grade 3/4 proteinuria (<=6 grams/24 hour equivalent by spot urine protein to creatinine ratio allowed).
- Stable grade 3 hypoalbuminemia due to lupus nephritis, and not related to liver disease or malnutrition.
- Stable grade 3 gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) elevation due to lupus hepatitis, and not related to alcoholic liver disease, uncontrolled diabetes, or viral hepatitis. If present, any abnormalities in alanine transaminase (ALT) and/or aspartate transaminase (AST) must be <=grade 2.
- Stable grade 3 hemoglobin reduction due to lupus.
- Stable grade 3 neutropenia or stable grade 3 white blood cell count.
- Have a history of an anaphylactic reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins, or monoclonal antibodies.
Trial locations and contacts
96 sites in 6 countries.
96 sites in 6 countries
United States64 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Arlington, Virginia, 22205-3606
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30303
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78705
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78731
GSK Investigational Site
Aventura, Florida, 33180
GSK Investigational Site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35216
GSK Investigational Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
GSK Investigational Site
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606
GSK Investigational Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
GSK Investigational Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
GSK Investigational Site
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
GSK Investigational Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
GSK Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
GSK Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
GSK Investigational Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
GSK Investigational Site
Clifton, New Jersey, 07012
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
GSK Investigational Site
Columbia, South Carolina, 29229
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43203
GSK Investigational Site
Covina, California, 91723
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75390-8550
GSK Investigational Site
DeBary, Florida, 32713
GSK Investigational Site
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
GSK Investigational Site
Duluth, Georgia, 30096
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334
GSK Investigational Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021
GSK Investigational Site
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77004
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77034
GSK Investigational Site
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
GSK Investigational Site
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
GSK Investigational Site
La Palma, California, 90623
GSK Investigational Site
Lakewood, California, 90712
GSK Investigational Site
Lansing, Michigan, 48917
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
GSK Investigational Site
Longwood, Florida, 32750
GSK Investigational Site
Los Alamitos, California, 90720
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90048
GSK Investigational Site
Manhasset, New York, 11030
GSK Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119
GSK Investigational Site
Memphis, Tennessee, 38163
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33144
GSK Investigational Site
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014
GSK Investigational Site
Murrieta, California, 92563
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10016
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10029
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10032
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32804
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806-6264
GSK Investigational Site
Plantation, Florida, 33324
GSK Investigational Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27617
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
GSK Investigational Site
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33603
GSK Investigational Site
The Woodlands, Texas, 77382
GSK Investigational Site
Upland, California, 91786
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20060
GSK Investigational Site
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
GSK Investigational Site
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
Brazil16 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30150-221
GSK Investigational Site
Campinas, São Paulo, 13015-001
GSK Investigational Site
Campo Grande, 79080-190
GSK Investigational Site
Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, 78048-902
GSK Investigational Site
Curitba, Paraná, 80440-080
GSK Investigational Site
Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, 36010-570
GSK Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-001
GSK Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-170
GSK Investigational Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610000
GSK Investigational Site
Rio de Janeiro, 22411-001
GSK Investigational Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 40.050-410
GSK Investigational Site
Santo André, São Paulo, 09190-615
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 01323-020
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 04032-060
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 04039-901
GSK Investigational Site
São Paulo, 05652-900
United Kingdom5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Basildon, Essex, SS165NL
GSK Investigational Site
London, E1 1BB
GSK Investigational Site
London, SE1 7RT
GSK Investigational Site
London, WC1E 6JF
GSK Investigational Site
Manchester, M13 9WL
Colombia4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Barranquilla, 080002
GSK Investigational Site
Bucaramanga, 680005
GSK Investigational Site
Cali, 760007
GSK Investigational Site
Medellín, 574
South Africa4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Diepkloof, 2013
GSK Investigational Site
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4319
GSK Investigational Site
Johannesburg, 2193
GSK Investigational Site
Panorama / Cape Town, 7500
France3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Fort de France, 97261
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75014
GSK Investigational Site
Paris, 75018
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3/4, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab (HGS1006) in Adult Subjects of Black Race With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belimumab in adult patients of black race with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; lupus).
Read the detailed description
Study participants receive stable standard therapy for lupus in addition to receiving either placebo (no active medicine) or belimumab. The controlled period of the study is 52 weeks. The random assignment in this study is "2 to 1" which means that for every 3 participants, 2 will receive belimumab and 1 will receive placebo. Participants who successfully complete the 52-week study may enter into a 6-month open-label extension. All participants in the open-label extension receive belimumab plus standard therapy.
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Being tested
- Placebo plus standard therapy, Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy, Standard therapy
- Keywords
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, African Continental Ancestry Group, Autoimmune Disease, Antibodies, Minority Groups, Black Race, African Americans, SLE, Belimumab, Lupus
- Medical subject headings
- Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Autoimmune Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placebo plus standard therapyBiological
Placebo plus standard therapy
Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapyBiological
Belimumab 10mg/kg plus standard therapy
Standard therapyDrug
Standard therapy comprises any of the following (alone or in combination): corticosteroids, antimalarials, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and immunosuppressives; biologics and intravenous cyclophosphamide are not permitted.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo plus standard therapy | Placebo comparator | Placebo IV plus standard therapy; placebo administered on Days 0, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter through Week 48, with a final evaluation at Week 52 in the double-blind period. In the open-label extension period, placebo patients who opt to participate will receive belimumab 10 mg/kilogram (kg) IV every 28 days for an additional 6 months. Receives: Biological: Placebo plus standard therapy; Drug: Standard therapy |
| Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy | Experimental | Belimumab 10 mg/kg IV plus standard therapy; belimumab administered on Days 0, 14, 28, and then every 28 days thereafter through Week 48, with a final evaluation at Week 52 in the double-blind period. In the open-label extension period, patients who opt to participate will continue to receive belimumab 10 mg/kg IV every 28 days for an additional 6 months. Receives: Biological: Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy; Drug: Standard therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) Response Rate With the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index- 2K (SLEDAI-2K) Scoring for Proteinuria at Week 52 [DB Phase]
SRI response is defined as >=4 point reduction, from Baseline in safety of estrogen in Lupus National Assessment(SELENA)SLEDAI[SS] score (with modified SLEDAI-2K scoring for proteinuria [PU]), no worsening (increase of <0.30 points from Baseline) in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group of SLE clinics(BILAG)A organ domain score [ODS] or 2 new BILAG B ODS compared with Baseline. Drop-outs and treatment failures were set to non-responders. Analysis performed using a logistic regression model for comparison between belimumab and placebo with covariates treatment group, Baseline SS score (with modified SLEDAI-2K scoring for PU) (<=9 versus [vs.] >=10), Baseline complement levels (low C3 and/or C4 vs. no low C3 or C4) and region (United States [US]/Canada vs. Rest of World). The Modified Intention-To-Treat (mITT) population comprised of safety population excluding participants who had any assessment at 3 sites (202196, 202513 or 107286).
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving a SRI Response Rate With the Modified SLEDAI-2K Scoring for Proteinuria at Week 24 of OL Phase
SRI response is defined as >=4 point reduction, from OL Baseline in SS score (with the modified SLEDAI-2K scoring for PU), no worsening (increase of <0.30 points from OL Baseline) in PGA and no new BILAG A ODS or 2 new BILAG B ODS compared with OL Baseline. For participants switching from placebo to belimumab 10 mg/kg IV in the OL phase, Baseline was defined as the last assessment at the end of the double-blind phase (i.e. Week 52) pre-OL treatment. For participants that received belimumab 10 mg/kg IV during the double-blind phase and continued to receive belimumab 10 mg/kg IV during the OL phase, Baseline was defined as Day 1 of the double-blind phase.
Measured: Week 24 of OL phase (Week 76)
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (nSAEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) [OL Phase]
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that; results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, other situations judged by physician, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Number of participants who had common nSAEs (>=5%) and any SAEs are presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Measured: Week 52 to Week 84
Number of Participants With Severe AEs [OL Phase]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with severe AEs have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Measured: Week 52 to Week 84
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation [OL Phase]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with AEs leading to treatment discontinuation have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Measured: Week 52 to Week 84
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade 3 or 4 for Hematology Parameters [OL Phase]
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters. The parameters assessed were activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets and prothrombin time. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life-threatening (Grade 4) according to Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID [Modified from DMID Adult Toxicity Tables, 2001]) AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity Grade 3 or 4 for hematology parameters have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Measured: Week 52 to Week 84
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for Clinical Chemistry Parameters [OL Phase]
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of liver function and other chemistry parameters. The parameters assessed were alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), bilirubin, albumin, creatinine, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and urate. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life-threatening (Grade 4) according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for liver function and other chemistry parameters have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Measured: Week 52 to Week 84
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for Urinalysis Parameters [OL Phase]
Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine protein and protein/creatinine. Urine samples were collected for the measurement of urinalysis parameters by dipstick method. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life-threatening (Grade 4) according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity grade of 3 or 4 for urinalysis parameters have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Measured: Week 52 to Week 84
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 of Immunoglobulins [OL Phase]
Serum samples were obtained for the measurement of immunoglobulin G. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life threatening (Grade 4) according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity grade of 3 or 4 of immunoglobulin G have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Measured: Week 52 to Week 84
Secondary outcomes (12)
Percentage of Participants Achieving SRI-SS Response Rate at Week 52 [DB Phase]
SRI is defined as >=4 point reduction, from Baseline in SS score, no worsening (increase of <0.30 points from Baseline) in PGA and no new BILAG A organ domain score or 2 new BILAG B organ domain scores compared with Baseline. Drop-outs and Treatment failures were set to non-responders. Analysis was performed using a logistic regression model for the comparison between belimumab and placebo with covariates treatment group, Baseline SS score (<=9 vs. >=10), Baseline complement levels (low C3 and/or C4 vs. no low C3 or C4) and region (US/Canada vs. Rest of World).
Measured: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving SRI-SS Response Rate With the SELENA SLEDAI for Scoring of Proteinuria at Week 24 of OL Phase
SRI response is defined as >=4 point reduction, from OL Baseline in SS scoring for PU, no worsening (increase of <0.30 points from OL Baseline) in PGA and no new BILAG A ODS or 2 new BILAG B ODS compared with OL Baseline. For participants switching from placebo to belimumab 10 mg/kg IV in the open-label phase, Baseline was defined as the last assessment at the end of the double-blind phase (i.e. Week 52) pre-OL treatment. For participants that received belimumab 10 mg/kg IV during the double-blind phase and continued to receive belimumab 10 mg/kg IV during the open-label phase, Baseline was defined as Day 1 of the double-blind phase.
Measured: Week 24 of OL phase (Week 76)
Time to First Severe Flare (as Measured by the Modified SLE Flare Index) up to 52 Weeks [DB Phase]
Time to first severe SLE flare is defined as the number of days from treatment start date until the participant met an event (event date - treatment start date +1). Analyses of severe SLE flare was performed on modified SS SLE flare index that excludes severe flares (SF) that were triggered only by an increase in SS score to >12 (this may only represent a modest increase in disease activity). Treatment failures were imputed as SF. For participants who died, data were censored at date of death if no SF occurred before death. Only post-Baseline SF were considered. Analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards model for the comparison between belimumab and placebo adjusting for Baseline SS-S2K score (<=9 vs. >=10), baseline complement levels (at least 1 C3/C4 low vs. no C3/C4 low), and region (US/Canada vs. Rest of World). Median and inter-Quartile range (1st and 3rd Quartiles) have been presented.
Measured: Up to 52 Weeks
Time to First Severe Flare (as Measured by the Modified SLE Flare Index) [OL Phase]
Time to first severe SLE flare is defined as the number of days from OL treatment start date until the participant met an event (event date - OL treatment start date +1). Analyses of severe SLE flare was performed on modified SS SLE flare index that excludes SF that were triggered only by an increase in SS score to >12. For participants who died, data were censored at date of death if no SF occurred before death. Only post first OL treatment SF were considered. Median and inter-Quartile range (25th and 75th percentile) have been presented.
Measured: Up to Week 24 of OL Phase (Week 76)
Percent of Participants Whose Average Prednisone Dose Had Been Reduced by >=25% From Baseline to <=7.5 mg/Day During Week 40 Through 52, in Participants Receiving Greater Than 7.5 mg/Day at Baseline [DB Phase]
Average (avg.) daily prednisone (PRED.) dose was calculated taking into account all steroids taken intravenously, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, intradermally and orally for both Systemic Lupus Erythema (SLE) and non-SLE reasons. A responder was defined as having a PRED. reduction [REDN.] by >=25% from Baseline to <=7.5 mg/day during Weeks 40 through 52. Drop-outs and Treatment failures were imputed as having no REDN. in PRED. (if Baseline PRED. >7.5 mg/day). At Baseline, the avg. daily prednisone dose [PD] was the sum of all PDs over 7 consecutive days [excluding Day 0], divided (DIV.) by 7. For analysis, the avg. PD was the total PD during Weeks 40 through 52 DIV. by the number of days during Weeks 40 through 52. Analysis was performed using a logistic regression model with covariates treatment group, Baseline PD, Baseline SS-S2K score, (<=9 vs >=10), Baseline complement levels (low C3 and/or C4 vs. no low C3 or C4) and region (US/Canada vs. Rest of World).
Measured: Baseline and Week 40 through Week 52
Percent of Participants Whose Average Prednisone Dose Had Been Reduced to <=7.5 mg/Day in Participants Receiving Greater Than 7.5 mg/Day at Pre-belimumab Baseline (at Week 28 of OL Phase)
Average daily prednisone dose was calculated taking into account all steroids taken intravenously, intramuscularly, subcutaneously, intradermally and orally for both SLE and non-SLE reasons. A responder was defined as a participant who decreased their daily prednisone dose to <=7.5 mg/day from an OL Baseline dose >7.5 mg/day. The OL Baseline was defined as the last available value prior to the initiation of treatment with belimumab. The average daily prednisone dose was the sum of all PDs over 7 consecutive days including OL Week 28 divided by 7. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
Measured: OL Baseline and Week 28 of OL Phase (Week 80)
Number of Participants With nSAEs and SAEs [DB Phase]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that; results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, other situations judged by physician, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Safety population was defined as all participants who were randomized and treated with at least one dose of study treatment. Number of participants who had common nSAEs (>=5%) and any SAEs are presented.
Measured: Up to 52 Weeks
Number of Participants With Severe AEs [DB Phase]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with severe AEs have been presented.
Measured: Up to 52 Weeks
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation [DB Phase]
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with AEs leading to treatment discontinuation have been presented.
Measured: Up to 52 Weeks
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade 3 or 4 for Hematology Parameters [DB Phase]
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters up to 52 Weeks. The parameters assessed were APTT, hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets and prothrombin time. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life threatening according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for hematology parameters have been presented.
Measured: Up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for Clinical Chemistry Parameters [DB Phase]
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of liver function and other chemistry parameters up to 52 Weeks. The parameters assessed were ALT, AST, GGT, albumin, hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life threatening according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Only those participants with worst toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for other chemistry parameters have been presented.
Measured: Up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for Urinalysis Parameters [DB Phase]
Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine protein and protein/creatinine. Urine samples were collected for the measurement of urinalysis parameters by dipstick method up to 52 Weeks. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life threatening according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Only those participants with worst toxicity grade of 3 or 4 for urinalysis parameters have been presented.
Measured: Up to 52 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study start19 Feb 2013
- Primary completion18 Jun 2018
- Study completion28 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Systemic Lupus ErythematosusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 503 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01632241
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 115471
- Other IDs
- HGS1006-C1112, 2011-005672-42, U1111-1139-9723
- Acronym
- EMBRACE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2021
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 8 Sep 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site
Publications
Ellen Ginzler, Luiz Barbosa, David D'Cruz, Richard Furie, Kathleen Maksimowicz-McKinnon, James Oates, Mittermayer Barreto Santiago, Amit Saxena, Saira Sheikh, Damon Bass, Susan Burriss, Jennifer Gilbride, James Groark, Michelle Miller, Amy Pierce, David Roth, Beulah Ji. EMBRACE: Phase 3/4, Randomized, 52-Week Study of Belimumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients of Black African Ancestry With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; DOI: 10.1002/art.41900 PMID: 34164944
Parodis I, Lindblom J, Levy RA, Zen M, Cetrez N, Gomez A, Oon S, Henning C, Khamashta M, Quasny HA, Chauhan D, Askanase A, van Vollenhoven R, Nikpour M. Attainment of remission and low disease activity after treatment with belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from five randomised clinical trials. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024 Nov;6(11):e751-e761. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00162-0. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
PubMed 39208825Nikolopoulos D, Cetrez N, Lindblom J, Parodis I. Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus contributes to organ damage beyond the nervous system: a post-hoc analysis of 5 phase III randomized clinical trials. Rheumatol Int. 2024 Sep;44(9):1679-1689. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05667-5. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
PubMed 39115551Arends EJ, Zlei M, Tipton CM, Cotic J, Osmani Z, de Bie FJ, Kamerling SWA, van Maurik A, Dimelow R, Gregan YI, Fox NL, Rabelink TJ, Roth DA, Sanz I, van Dongen JJM, van Kooten C, Teng YKO. Disruption of memory B-cell trafficking by belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Sep 1;63(9):2387-2398. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae286.
PubMed 38775637Rendas-Baum R, Chen WH, Gairy K, Anderson S, Henning C, Hammer A, Kosinski M. SF-36v2 and FACIT-Fatigue quality of life improvements with organ-specific SELENA-SLEDAI response and belimumab treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med. 2024 May 8;11(1):e001118. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-001118.
PubMed 38724182Brunner HI, Abud-Mendoza C, Mori M, Pilkington CA, Syed R, Takei S, Viola DO, Furie RA, Navarra S, Zhang F, Bass DL, Eriksson G, Hammer AE, Ji BN, Okily M, Roth DA, Quasny H, Ruperto N. Efficacy and safety of belimumab in paediatric and adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an across-study comparison. RMD Open. 2021 Sep;7(3):e001747. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001747.
PubMed 34531304Ginzler E, Guedes Barbosa LS, D'Cruz D, Furie R, Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Oates J, Santiago MB, Saxena A, Sheikh S, Bass DL, Burriss SW, Gilbride JA, Groark JG, Miller M, Pierce A, Roth DA, Ji B. Phase III/IV, Randomized, Fifty-Two-Week Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab in Patients of Black African Ancestry With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Jan;74(1):112-123. doi: 10.1002/art.41900. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
PubMed 34164944
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Sep 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3/4, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 52-Week Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab (HGS1006) in Adult Subjects of Black Race With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01632241
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EMBRACE / 115471
- Conditions
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
- Keywords
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, African Continental Ancestry Group, Autoimmune Disease, Antibodies, Minority Groups, Black Race, African Americans, SLE
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 503 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK CompanyIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- 19 Feb 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Jul 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belimumab in adult patients of black race with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE; lupus).
Detailed description
Study participants receive stable standard therapy for lupus in addition to receiving either placebo (no active medicine) or belimumab. The controlled period of the study is 52 weeks. The random assignment in this study is "2 to 1" which means that for every 3 participants, 2 will receive belimumab and 1 will receive placebo. Participants who successfully complete the 52-week study may enter into a 6-month open-label extension. All participants in the open-label extension receive belimumab plus standard therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo plus standard therapy | Placebo comparator | Biological: Placebo plus standard therapy, Drug: Standard therapyPlacebo IV plus standard therapy; placebo administered on Days 0, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter through Week 48, with a final evaluation at Week 52 in the double-blind period. In the open-label extension period, placebo patients who opt to participate will receive belimumab 10 mg/kilogram (kg) IV every 28 days for an additional 6 months. |
| Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy | Experimental | Biological: Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy, Drug: Standard therapyBelimumab 10 mg/kg IV plus standard therapy; belimumab administered on Days 0, 14, 28, and then every 28 days thereafter through Week 48, with a final evaluation at Week 52 in the double-blind period. In the open-label extension period, patients who opt to participate will continue to receive belimumab 10 mg/kg IV every 28 days for an additional 6 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (23 listed)
- At least 18 years of age.
- Self-identified black race.
- Have a clinical diagnosis of SLE according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria
- Have active SLE disease defined as a SELENA SLEDAI score >= 8 at screening
- Have 2 unequivocally positive autoantibody test results defined as a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test [i.e., titer >= 1:80 by human epithelial cell line 2 (HEp-2) immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and/or positive enzyme immunoassay (EIA)] and/or a positive anti- double stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) (>= 30 international units [IU]/milliliter [mL]) serum antibody test as follows:
Key exclusion criteria (44 listed)
- Have received treatment with anti-B lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) [belimumab] at any time.
- Have received any of the following within 364 days of Day 0:
- Have required 3 or more courses of systemic corticosteroids for concomitant conditions (e.g., asthma, atopic dermatitis) within 364 days of Day 0. (Topical or inhaled steroids are permitted.)
- Have received any of the following within 90 days of Day 0:
- Have received any of the following within 60 days of Day 0:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo plus standard therapyPlacebo plus standard therapy | Biological | Placebo plus standard therapy |
| Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapyBelimumab 10mg/kg plus standard therapy | Biological | Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy |
| Standard therapyStandard therapy comprises any of the following (alone or in combination): corticosteroids, antimalarials, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and immunosuppressives; biologics and intravenous cyclophosphamide are not permitted. | Drug | Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy, Placebo plus standard therapy |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) Response Rate With the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index- 2K (SLEDAI-2K) Scoring for Proteinuria at Week 52 [DB Phase]
Time frame: Week 52
SRI response is defined as >=4 point reduction, from Baseline in safety of estrogen in Lupus National Assessment(SELENA)SLEDAI[SS] score (with modified SLEDAI-2K scoring for proteinuria [PU]), no worsening (increase of <0.30 points from Baseline) in Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) and no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group of SLE clinics(BILAG)A organ domain score [ODS] or 2 new BILAG B ODS compared with Baseline. Drop-outs and treatment failures were set to non-responders. Analysis performed using a logistic regression model for comparison between belimumab and placebo with covariates treatment group, Baseline SS score (with modified SLEDAI-2K scoring for PU) (<=9 versus [vs.] >=10), Baseline complement levels (low C3 and/or C4 vs. no low C3 or C4) and region (United States [US]/Canada vs. Rest of World). The Modified Intention-To-Treat (mITT) population comprised of safety population excluding participants who had any assessment at 3 sites (202196, 202513 or 107286).
Percentage of Participants Achieving a SRI Response Rate With the Modified SLEDAI-2K Scoring for Proteinuria at Week 24 of OL Phase
Time frame: Week 24 of OL phase (Week 76)
SRI response is defined as >=4 point reduction, from OL Baseline in SS score (with the modified SLEDAI-2K scoring for PU), no worsening (increase of <0.30 points from OL Baseline) in PGA and no new BILAG A ODS or 2 new BILAG B ODS compared with OL Baseline. For participants switching from placebo to belimumab 10 mg/kg IV in the OL phase, Baseline was defined as the last assessment at the end of the double-blind phase (i.e. Week 52) pre-OL treatment. For participants that received belimumab 10 mg/kg IV during the double-blind phase and continued to receive belimumab 10 mg/kg IV during the OL phase, Baseline was defined as Day 1 of the double-blind phase.
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (nSAEs) and Serious Adverse Event (SAEs) [OL Phase]
Time frame: Week 52 to Week 84
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that; results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, other situations judged by physician, is associated with liver injury and impaired liver function. Number of participants who had common nSAEs (>=5%) and any SAEs are presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Number of Participants With Severe AEs [OL Phase]
Time frame: Week 52 to Week 84
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with severe AEs have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation [OL Phase]
Time frame: Week 52 to Week 84
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Number of participants with AEs leading to treatment discontinuation have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade 3 or 4 for Hematology Parameters [OL Phase]
Time frame: Week 52 to Week 84
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of hematology parameters. The parameters assessed were activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets and prothrombin time. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life-threatening (Grade 4) according to Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (DMID [Modified from DMID Adult Toxicity Tables, 2001]) AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity Grade 3 or 4 for hematology parameters have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for Clinical Chemistry Parameters [OL Phase]
Time frame: Week 52 to Week 84
Blood samples were collected for the assessment of liver function and other chemistry parameters. The parameters assessed were alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT), bilirubin, albumin, creatinine, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia and urate. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life-threatening (Grade 4) according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for liver function and other chemistry parameters have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for Urinalysis Parameters [OL Phase]
Time frame: Week 52 to Week 84
Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine protein and protein/creatinine. Urine samples were collected for the measurement of urinalysis parameters by dipstick method. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life-threatening (Grade 4) according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity grade of 3 or 4 for urinalysis parameters have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 of Immunoglobulins [OL Phase]
Time frame: Week 52 to Week 84
Serum samples were obtained for the measurement of immunoglobulin G. Grading was assigned as mild (Grade 1), moderate (grade 2), severe (Grade 3) and potentially life threatening (Grade 4) according to DMID AE Severity Grading. Number of participants with worst toxicity grade of 3 or 4 of immunoglobulin G have been presented. For Safety, participants that completed DB and OL phase, an additional 8 weeks follow-up was conducted (Week 84).
12 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving SRI-SS Response Rate at Week 52 [DB Phase]
Time frame: Week 52
Percentage of Participants Achieving SRI-SS Response Rate With the SELENA SLEDAI for Scoring of Proteinuria at Week 24 of OL Phase
Time frame: Week 24 of OL phase (Week 76)
Time to First Severe Flare (as Measured by the Modified SLE Flare Index) up to 52 Weeks [DB Phase]
Time frame: Up to 52 Weeks
Time to First Severe Flare (as Measured by the Modified SLE Flare Index) [OL Phase]
Time frame: Up to Week 24 of OL Phase (Week 76)
Percent of Participants Whose Average Prednisone Dose Had Been Reduced by >=25% From Baseline to <=7.5 mg/Day During Week 40 Through 52, in Participants Receiving Greater Than 7.5 mg/Day at Baseline [DB Phase]
Time frame: Baseline and Week 40 through Week 52
Percent of Participants Whose Average Prednisone Dose Had Been Reduced to <=7.5 mg/Day in Participants Receiving Greater Than 7.5 mg/Day at Pre-belimumab Baseline (at Week 28 of OL Phase)
Time frame: OL Baseline and Week 28 of OL Phase (Week 80)
Number of Participants With nSAEs and SAEs [DB Phase]
Time frame: Up to 52 Weeks
Number of Participants With Severe AEs [DB Phase]
Time frame: Up to 52 Weeks
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation [DB Phase]
Time frame: Up to 52 Weeks
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade 3 or 4 for Hematology Parameters [DB Phase]
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for Clinical Chemistry Parameters [DB Phase]
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Worst Toxicity Grade of 3 or 4 for Urinalysis Parameters [DB Phase]
Time frame: Up to 52 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Sep 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- BackgroundEllen Ginzler, Luiz Barbosa, David D'Cruz, Richard Furie, Kathleen Maksimowicz-McKinnon, James Oates, Mittermayer Barreto Santiago, Amit Saxena, Saira Sheikh, Damon Bass, Susan Burriss, Jennifer Gilbride, James Groark, Michelle Miller, Amy Pierce, David Roth, Beulah Ji. EMBRACE: Phase 3/4, Randomized, 52-Week Study of Belimumab Efficacy and Safety in Patients of Black African Ancestry With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; DOI: 10.1002/art.41900 PMID: 34164944
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39208825Parodis I, Lindblom J, Levy RA, Zen M, Cetrez N, Gomez A, Oon S, Henning C, Khamashta M, Quasny HA, Chauhan D, Askanase A, van Vollenhoven R, Nikpour M. Attainment of remission and low disease activity after treatment with belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from five randomised clinical trials. Lancet Rheumatol. 2024 Nov;6(11):e751-e761. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00162-0. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39115551Nikolopoulos D, Cetrez N, Lindblom J, Parodis I. Neuropsychiatric involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus contributes to organ damage beyond the nervous system: a post-hoc analysis of 5 phase III randomized clinical trials. Rheumatol Int. 2024 Sep;44(9):1679-1689. doi: 10.1007/s00296-024-05667-5. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38775637Arends EJ, Zlei M, Tipton CM, Cotic J, Osmani Z, de Bie FJ, Kamerling SWA, van Maurik A, Dimelow R, Gregan YI, Fox NL, Rabelink TJ, Roth DA, Sanz I, van Dongen JJM, van Kooten C, Teng YKO. Disruption of memory B-cell trafficking by belimumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024 Sep 1;63(9):2387-2398. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae286.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38724182Rendas-Baum R, Chen WH, Gairy K, Anderson S, Henning C, Hammer A, Kosinski M. SF-36v2 and FACIT-Fatigue quality of life improvements with organ-specific SELENA-SLEDAI response and belimumab treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med. 2024 May 8;11(1):e001118. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2023-001118.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34531304Brunner HI, Abud-Mendoza C, Mori M, Pilkington CA, Syed R, Takei S, Viola DO, Furie RA, Navarra S, Zhang F, Bass DL, Eriksson G, Hammer AE, Ji BN, Okily M, Roth DA, Quasny H, Ruperto N. Efficacy and safety of belimumab in paediatric and adult patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: an across-study comparison. RMD Open. 2021 Sep;7(3):e001747. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001747.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34164944Ginzler E, Guedes Barbosa LS, D'Cruz D, Furie R, Maksimowicz-McKinnon K, Oates J, Santiago MB, Saxena A, Sheikh S, Bass DL, Burriss SW, Gilbride JA, Groark JG, Miller M, Pierce A, Roth DA, Ji B. Phase III/IV, Randomized, Fifty-Two-Week Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Belimumab in Patients of Black African Ancestry With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Jan;74(1):112-123. doi: 10.1002/art.41900. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site
Related trials for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Ascending Dose Study of DKB903 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Participants With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)
Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingPhase 4
Dapagliflozin in Active Lupus Nephritis
Lupus Nephritis (LN)
RecruitingObservational study
Electroencephalogram Recording in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingObservational study
Deciphering the Genetic Architecture of Autoimmune Diseases
Autoimmune Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial in Healthy Adult Participants and Adults With Autoimmune Diseases to Test How HBM7020 is Tolerated and How it Behaves in the Body
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
96 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard therapy and Standard therapy in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company at 96 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 23 inclusion and 44 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Sep 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 96 sites in United States, Brazil, United Kingdom, Colombia, South Africa and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Jul 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) Response Rate With the Modified Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index- 2K (SLEDAI-2K) Scoring for Proteinuria at Week 52 [DB Phase] (time frame: Week 52). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01632241, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Sep 2021.