AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast InfectionNCT01631461

Painful Breastfeeding and Bacterial or Yeast Infection

An observational study of Breast Infection, run by Göteborg University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of yeast and bacteria in women with breastfeeding pain and to identify signs and symptoms. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Breast Infection
How many people
136 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2006to Dec 2009
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Group 1 and 2: Selected from the breastfeeding receptions (n=2) at Sahlgrenska University hospital and Skövde hospital Group 3, controls: Selected from Primary health care clinics

Who may be able to join

  • scored pain > = VAS 4

Who cannot join

  • breastfeeding technique problems
  • clinical signs of mastitis
  • muscular pain
  • breast surgery
  • use of antibiotic or antifungal treatment during the last preceding week
  • temperature > = 37 degree Celsius

About this study

Official title: The Prevalence of Yeast and Bacteria in Women With Painful Breastfeeding and the Diagnostic Value of Signs and Symptoms

The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of yeast and bacteria in women with breastfeeding pain and to identify signs and symptoms.

Read the detailed description

Painful breastfeeding is one of the most common reasons for early weaning. Persistent pain associated with breastfeeding can sometimes be difficult to diagnose and is a source of frustration for the breastfeeding women as well as for healthcare providers.

The diagnosis of candida infection in breastfeeding women is generally based on signs and symptoms identified in case reports and without any culture. Breastfeeding pain has been described as superficial or deep in some studies. This deep pain syndrome as caused by candida or bacteria has been questioned. A few studies have cultured breast milk from women with deep breast pain and found Candida albicans infections or bacterial infections usually caused by Staphylococcus aureus. There still remains controversy and lack of evidence for candidiasis affecting the lactating breast as well as bacteria causing the pain. Ensured diagnostic methods are important due to the resistant problem with both antibiotics and antifungals. Only one study has described five key symptoms associated with candida. It was shiny, flaky nipple/areola, burning pain on the nipple/areola, non-stabbing pain or stabbing pain in the breast.

The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of candida and bacteria in women with superficial or deep breastfeeding pain and to identify signs and symptoms linked to candida or bacteria in breast milk and nipple/areola.

Keywords
pain, breast feeding, yeast, candida albicance, staphylococcus aureus, Signs and symptoms
Medical subject headings
Mastitis, Pain, Breast Feeding, Staphylococcal Infections, Signs and Symptoms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01631461
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1. Deep pain group1. Deep pain group; Pain in the breast
2. Superficial pain groupPain on the nipple and/or aereola
3. Control groupNo pain or other breastfeeding problems

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bacteria

    Occurrence of bacteria: yes/no

    Measured: Baseline (at admission)

  2. Yeast

    Occurence of yeast: yes/no

    Measured: Baseline (at admission)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Pain

    VAS

    Measured: Baseline (at admission)

  2. Signs

    Nipple areola: cracks, red/pink, flaky, shiny, blurred, swollen, itching, smarting

    Measured: Baseline (at admission)

  3. Bacteria at follow-up

    Occurence of bacteria: yes/no

    Measured: 2 weeks after baseline

  4. Yeast at follow-up

    Occurence of yeast: yes/no

    Measured: 2 weeks after baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2006
  3. Primary completionDec 2009
  4. Study completionDec 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
136 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01631461
Sponsor's protocol ID
PainBreastfeed
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
12 Jun 2012
Last updated
15 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Breast Infection, run by Göteborg University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bacteria (time frame: Baseline (at admission)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in