AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)CSWTSPB40NCT01631409

Estimation of the Long Term Effectiveness of Routine Use of Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy

An observational study of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), run by City Hospital No 40, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is dedicated to determination of the long term effectiveness of coronary heart disease (CHD) treatments - cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) in comparison with other kinds of medical and surgical treatment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD)
What is being tested?
Treatment of CHD risk factors, Aspirin, Isosorbide mononitrate, Atenolol, Enalapril. and PCA
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2013to Sep 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: There are 55 thousand adults live within the zone of responsibility of the hospital. From those there are approximately 2 thousand patients with CHD.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years and older.
  • Diagnosed or suspected CHD.
  • Willingness to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Inability of a patient to make an independent decision on participation in the study because of intellectual decline (article 29 of Helsinki Declaration)

About this study

Official title: Estimation of the Long Term Effectiveness of Routine Use of Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy in the General System of Noninvasive, Invasive, and Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease in the Conditions of a Large General City Hospital

This study is dedicated to determination of the long term effectiveness of coronary heart disease (CHD) treatments - cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) in comparison with other kinds of medical and surgical treatment. For that purpose the investigators will observe the patients with CHD who enrolled in this study in their routine course of treatment. But the investigators will not interfere with the patient treatment. Each participant will be followed-up for five years. The collected data will allow to determine if the particular method, CSWT, could really make any additional contribution to the more traditional methods of CHD treatment and if the CSWT is only temporarily effective or could exert the long term effect as well.

Read the detailed description

This study has been designed and is conducted in accordance with the requirements of Helsinki Declaration, 6th edition, STROBE Statement, CONSORT 2010 Statement, and the State Standard of the Russian Federation "Guidelines for Clinical Investigations of Medical Devices" (ГОСТ Р ИСО 14155 - 2008), which is authentic to International Standards Organization standard 141555 - 2003.

According to the American Heart Association (AHA) 2011 report Russia leaves behind all other countries in the coronary heart disease mortality rate. This particularly means that the current methods of CHD treatment, namely: (1) optimal medical treatment (OMT), which includes intensive lifestyle and pharmacological management, (2) maximal antianginal medical therapy (MAAMT), which includes the employment of at least two classes of anti-ischemic therapies, (3) percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCA), and (4) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are not satisfactory enough in the concrete conditions of Russia. This indicate the urgent necessity of search for the alternative methods of CHD treatment. One of those methods is cardiac shock wave therapy.

The method of CSWT is not that new. The first publication is dated back to 1999. Since then a score of various in vivo as well clinical investigations has been conducted up to phase III. As a result, it has been demonstrated that (1)the method is practically safe and well-tolerated, and (2)it effectively alleviates angina and improves ECG, ECHO, and cardiac nuclear tests. Meanwhile, it is still not clear: (1) how long the remission lasts, (2)if CSWT exerts any influence on such basic health indicators as life span and reduction of major cardiovascular (CV) events like myocardial infarction (MI), (3)the place of CSWT in the overall system of conservative and surgical treatment of CHD, and (4)the long term effect of combined employment of CSWT with invasive and surgical modalities.

One of the causes of the such a state of things is the form in which CSWT research so far has been conducted, namely, the clinical trial. The high cost of that type of investigations precludes long-term follow-up. Besides, the desire to make the experimental and control group more homogeneous in the parallel design using multiple inclusion/exclusion criteria dramatically decreases sample representativeness. The observational design is mostly free of the above-mentioned shortcomings and in some instances allows to obtain important results which even theoretically are not accessible for investigations with strict control and randomization because of ethical and pragmatic considerations.

The aim of this study is to estimate the long term effectiveness of routine use of cardiac shock wave therapy in the general system of noninvasive, invasive, and surgical treatment of ischemic heart diseases in the conditions of a large general city hospital. The study will be conducted in the City Hospital No 40, Saint Petersburg, Russia (about the hospital see the link at the bottom of the protocol). It is a more than thousand bed general hospital. There are 55 thousand adults live within its zone of responsibility. From those there are approximately two thousand patients with CHD.

The algorithm of treatment selection in the hospital. The treatment of all patients begins from OMT. When OMT is not effective MAAMT is administered. The medical therapy is conducted strictly individually. When MAAMT fails the patient is offered PCA or CABG. That is, the general ideology of CHD therapy in the hospital follows the conventional international guidelines. CSWT is offered mostly in two cases: (1)when the patient refuses to undergo PCA or CABG, (2)when PCA or CABG are contraindicated for the patient. That is CSWT is factually used as the second line, reserve method.

In the hospital, CSWT is routinely employed for three years in correspondence with the prevailed international scheme: 3 sessions a week every first week for three consecutive months, 9 sessions altogether according to the guidelines approved by the First deputy of Saint Petersburg health care committee chairman. The CSWT is implemented by device Cardiospec manufactured by Medispec Ltd., headquarters in Germantown, MD, USA. The zone of reversed myocardial ischemia for CSWT application is determined by ECHO.

For the current study there will be formed seven observational cohorts (0-VI) by both diagnoses and interventions. The algorithm of the cohort formation in the current study is graphically demonstrated in the Diagram (see the link at the bottom of the protocol). The enrollment in the study will continue for 3 year. Taking into consideration the current CHD morbidity rate in the region 6,5‰, that allows to expect an additional one thousand patients for the investigation. Each participant will follow-up for five years. So the total length of the study is eight years.

Being tested
Treatment of CHD risk factors, Aspirin, Isosorbide mononitrate, Atenolol, Enalapril., PCA, CABG, Cardiospec
Keywords
clinical research, coronary heart disease, cardiac shock wave therapy, ischemic heart disease, myocardial revascularization, observational research, prospective research
Medical subject headings
Coronary Disease, Myocardial Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Treatment of CHD risk factorsOther

    Also called Life style modification, sports, Zocor.

    Smoking cessation, low fat diet, body weight control, physical exercise program, and in some cases lipid-lowering medications, e.g. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaric acid-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, e.g. Simvastatin.

  • Aspirin, Isosorbide mononitrate, Atenolol, Enalapril.Drug

    Also called Halfprin 81, Nitrostat, Monoket, Tenormin, Vasotec, Norvasc.

    In the course of optimal medical treatment of Cohort I patient the life style modification is combined with one group of antianginal medications (e.g. Nitrates, Beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, Calcium antagonists) and lipid-lowering drugs (e.g. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors).

  • Aspirin, Isosorbide mononitrate, Atenolol, Enalapril.Drug

    Also called Nitrostat, Monoket, Tenormin, Vasotec, Norvasc.

    In the course of maximal antianginal medical therapy a Cohort II patient is provided with more than one group of antianginal medications (e.g. Nitrates, Beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, Calcium antagonists) combined with lowering-lipid drugs (e.g. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors).

  • PCAProcedure or surgery

    Also called e.g. coronary stenting

    Percutaneous coronary angioplasty

  • CABGProcedure or surgery

    Also called coronary artery bypass surgery

    Coronary artery bypass grafting

  • CardiospecDevice

    Also called noninvasive cardiac revascularization

    Cardiac shock wave therapy is implemented by device Cardiospec manufactured by Medispec Ltd.

  • Aspirin, Isosorbide mononitrate, Atenolol, EnalaprilDrug

    Also called Halfprin 81, Nitrostat, Monoket, Tenormin, Vasotec, Norvasc.

    In the course of maximal antianginal medical therapy a Cohort VI patient is provided with more than two groups of antianginal medications (e.g. Nitrates, Beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, Calcium antagonists) combined with lowering-lipid drugs (e.g. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors).

Study groups in NCT01631409
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 0Cohort 0 is allocated for the following two patient groups: 1. The patients with suspicion of angina although in whom the thorough investigation has not revealed CHD and the pain syndrome has been received the extracardiac interpretation (e.g. vertebral osteochondrosis, left side humeroscapular periarthritis, herpes zoster, intercostal neuralgia Tietze syndrome etc.) 2. The patients with subclinical manifestation of coronary atherosclerosis without angina (Class 0 angina, here and further is according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina Classification). This subgroup of the patients is recommended the proper diet, life style modification, lipid targeting medications in some cases, and no antianginal treatment.
Receives: Other: Treatment of CHD risk factors
Cohort IRepresents patients with Class 1 angina, who receive OMT.
Receives: Drug: Aspirin, Isosorbide mononitrate, Atenolol, Enalapril.
Cohort IIComprises the patients with Class 2-4 angina, they are on MAAMT. The cohort is further divided in two groups: 1. The patients for whom MAAMT is effective. 2. The patients for whom MAAMT is not effective or not sufficiently effective, although those patients have not received any invasive, surgical or CSWT interventions yet. They are those patients who then form cohorts III-VI.
Receives: Drug: Aspirin, Isosorbide mononitrate, Atenolol, Enalapril.
Cohort IIIConsists of patients already received PCA. They also continue various MAAMT.
Receives: Procedure: PCA
Cohort IVIncludes the patients after CABG. They also are on various MAAMT.
Receives: Procedure: CABG
Cohort VIncorporates the patients who have already underwent CSWT. They also receive individualized MAAMT.
Receives: Device: Cardiospec
Cohort VIThe cohort is composed of the patients who for various reasons have not been exposed to any intervention except MAAMT and continue to be on it. The algorithm of the cohort formation is graphically demonstrated in the Diagram "The logic tree of the cohort formation" (see the link at the bottom of the protocol).
Receives: Drug: Aspirin, Isosorbide mononitrate, Atenolol, Enalapril

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Outcome: death

    the detailed circumstances and diagnose are determined by documents

    Measured: within three years after the enrolment

  2. Outcome: major cardiovascular complications

    the detailed circumstances and diagnose are determined by documents

    Measured: within three years after the enrolment

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. The number of hospitalizations

    determined by documents

    Measured: within three years after the enrolment

  2. The number of hospitalization days

    determined by documents

    Measured: within three years after the enrolment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completionSep 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2021 (estimated)

Why it stopped: The study has been withdrawn due to organizational problems

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01631409
Sponsor's protocol ID
CSWT City Hosp No 40, SPB, Ru
Acronym
CSWTSPB40
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
24 Jun 2012
Last updated
8 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Coronary Heart Disease (CHD), run by City Hospital No 40, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Outcome: death (time frame: within three years after the enrolment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in