Antibody Mediated RejectionPhase 2NCT01630538
Cyclophosphamide Therapy for Refractory Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) in Kidney Transplants
A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide in people with Antibody Mediated Rejection, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The study hypothesis is that short-term low dose cyclophosphamide therapy will be effective in resolving inflammation in patients with late phase antibody-mediated rejection refractory to current standard of care treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Antibody Mediated Rejection
- What is being tested?
- Cyclophosphamide
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to 18 Jan 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a living or deceased donor kidney transplant
- Failed current standard of care for late antibody-mediated rejection
- Persistent de novo donor specific antibody and a concurrent biopsy with histologic evidence of acute antibody-mediated inflammation
- Adults with reproductive potential must agree to use approved methods of birth control while in the study
Who cannot join
- Leukopenia (WBC) < 3.0 x 109/L
- Creatinine Clearance less than or equal to 25 ml/min/1.73m2
- HCV or HBV positive
- BKV or CMV viremia assessed by PCR
- Any active infection
- Use of other investigational drugs within 4 weeks of study
Show all 12Show fewer
- Pregnancy/breast feeding/unwilling or unable to take birth control
- Active malignancy
- de novo DSA occurring equal to or greater than15 years after kidney transplant
- Screening biopsy with equal to or greater than cg2 on Banff criteria
- Cumulative/lifetime dose of cyclophosphamide, including anticipated total study dose (calculated according to Creatinine Clearance and mg/kg/day) equal to or greater than 36 g.
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would pose risk to the subject's safe participation in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Transplant Manitoba Adult Kidney Transplant Program, Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba
About this study
Official title: Phase II Pilot Study of Cyclophosphamide Therapy for Refractory Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation
The study hypothesis is that short-term low dose cyclophosphamide therapy will be effective in resolving inflammation in patients with late phase antibody-mediated rejection refractory to current standard of care treatment.
Read the detailed description
There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of de novo donor specific antibody-mediated rejection. Optimizing baseline immunosuppression (calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), anti-proliferative agent, and anti-inflammatory) is considered foundational but is insufficient. Pulse steroids are routinely used. A number of immunosuppressive approaches have been tried in uncontrolled trials. The strongest evidence, at least for early antibody-mediated rejection (< 6 months from transplant), exists for plasmapheresis, with or without low dose IVIg, or high dose IVIg alone. However, as noted in a recent FDA workshop, "while the literature suggests that [these agents] have evidence of efficacy for the management of acute antibody-mediated rejection, and could be considered as standard of care, treatment regimes have not been standardized or optimized." Moreover the evidence supporting efficacy of this approach in late, as opposed to early antibody-mediated rejection is distinctly lacking.
- Conditions
- Antibody Mediated Rejection
- Being tested
- Cyclophosphamide
- Keywords
- Transplantation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CyclophosphamideDrug
Also called Procytox
Cyclophosphamide 1.5 mg/kg orally daily for 180 days adjusted for renal function
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclophosphamide | Experimental | Cyclophosphamide 1.5 mg/kg orally daily for 180 days (26 weeks) adjusted for renal function. Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Microvascular inflammation
Histologic resolution of acute antibody-mediated inflammation in a 6 month post-treatment biopsy (Banff histology scores: g, v, ptc, C4d +ve)
Measured: month 6
Secondary outcomes (6)
titre of donor specific antibody (DSA)
Change in the level of de novo DSA between enrolment and at 6 and 12 months post-enrollment
Measured: 6 and 12 months
antibody-mediated tissue injury
Change in antibody-mediated tissue injury between the enrollment and post-treatment kidney transplant biopsy samples
Measured: month 6
Urine Albumin/Creatinine ratios
Change in urine albumin/creatinine ratio between enrolment and 6 and 12 month post-enrolment samples
Measured: month 6 and 12
Creatinine Clearance and estimated GFR
Evaluation of Creatinine Clearance, and estimated GFR using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKR-EPI) equation
Measured: month 6 and 12
Graft Survival
Measured: month 6 and 12
Patient Survival
Measured: month 6 and 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completion18 Jan 2018
- Study completion18 Jan 2018
Why it stopped: After March 2015, unable to enroll due to patients meeting exclusion criteria.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Antibody Mediated RejectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ManitobaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Manitoba
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Peter W Nickerson, MD, Principal investigator, University of ManitobaDavid N Rush, MD, Study chair, University of Manitoba
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01630538
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TMCT-01
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, Karpinski M, Ho J, Storsley LJ, Goldberg A, Birk PE, Rush DN, Nickerson PW. Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody post kidney transplant. Am J Transplant. 2012 May;12(5):1157-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04013.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
PubMed 22429309Archdeacon P, Chan M, Neuland C, Velidedeoglu E, Meyer J, Tracy L, Cavaille-Coll M, Bala S, Hernandez A, Albrecht R. Summary of FDA antibody-mediated rejection workshop. Am J Transplant. 2011 May;11(5):896-906. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03525.x.
PubMed 21521465
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Pilot Study of Cyclophosphamide Therapy for Refractory Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01630538
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TMCT-01
- Conditions
- Antibody Mediated Rejection
- Keywords
- Transplantation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: After March 2015, unable to enroll due to patients meeting exclusion criteria.
- Enrolment
- 4 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ManitobaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Jan 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study hypothesis is that short-term low dose cyclophosphamide therapy will be effective in resolving inflammation in patients with late phase antibody-mediated rejection refractory to current standard of care treatment.
Detailed description
There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of de novo donor specific antibody-mediated rejection. Optimizing baseline immunosuppression (calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), anti-proliferative agent, and anti-inflammatory) is considered foundational but is insufficient. Pulse steroids are routinely used. A number of immunosuppressive approaches have been tried in uncontrolled trials. The strongest evidence, at least for early antibody-mediated rejection (< 6 months from transplant), exists for plasmapheresis, with or without low dose IVIg, or high dose IVIg alone. However, as noted in a recent FDA workshop, "while the literature suggests that [these agents] have evidence of efficacy for the management of acute antibody-mediated rejection, and could be considered as standard of care, treatment regimes have not been standardized or optimized." Moreover the evidence supporting efficacy of this approach in late, as opposed to early antibody-mediated rejection is distinctly lacking.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclophosphamide | Experimental | Drug: CyclophosphamideCyclophosphamide 1.5 mg/kg orally daily for 180 days (26 weeks) adjusted for renal function. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with a living or deceased donor kidney transplant
- Failed current standard of care for late antibody-mediated rejection
- Persistent de novo donor specific antibody and a concurrent biopsy with histologic evidence of acute antibody-mediated inflammation
- Adults with reproductive potential must agree to use approved methods of birth control while in the study
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Leukopenia (WBC) < 3.0 x 109/L
- Creatinine Clearance less than or equal to 25 ml/min/1.73m2
- HCV or HBV positive
- BKV or CMV viremia assessed by PCR
- Any active infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CyclophosphamideAlso: ProcytoxCyclophosphamide 1.5 mg/kg orally daily for 180 days adjusted for renal function | Drug | Cyclophosphamide |
Primary outcome
Microvascular inflammation
Time frame: month 6
Histologic resolution of acute antibody-mediated inflammation in a 6 month post-treatment biopsy (Banff histology scores: g, v, ptc, C4d +ve)
6 secondary outcomes
titre of donor specific antibody (DSA)
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
antibody-mediated tissue injury
Time frame: month 6
Urine Albumin/Creatinine ratios
Time frame: month 6 and 12
Creatinine Clearance and estimated GFR
Time frame: month 6 and 12
Graft Survival
Time frame: month 6 and 12
Patient Survival
Time frame: month 6 and 12
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: After March 2015, unable to enroll due to patients meeting exclusion criteria.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Apr 2018.
- Background: PubMed 22429309Wiebe C, Gibson IW, Blydt-Hansen TD, Karpinski M, Ho J, Storsley LJ, Goldberg A, Birk PE, Rush DN, Nickerson PW. Evolution and clinical pathologic correlations of de novo donor-specific HLA antibody post kidney transplant. Am J Transplant. 2012 May;12(5):1157-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04013.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
- Background: PubMed 21521465Archdeacon P, Chan M, Neuland C, Velidedeoglu E, Meyer J, Tracy L, Cavaille-Coll M, Bala S, Hernandez A, Albrecht R. Summary of FDA antibody-mediated rejection workshop. Am J Transplant. 2011 May;11(5):896-906. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03525.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Antibody Mediated Rejection
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
A Study to Learn More About the Long-Term Safety and Effects of Felzartamab Infusions in Adults With Kidney Transplants Who Have Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) or Microvascular Inflammation (MVI) (TRANSCEND/TRANSPIRE LTE)
Antibody-mediated Rejection, Microvascular Inflammation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Sequential Daratumumab Followed by Telitacicept for the Treatment of ABMR After Kidney Transplantation-A Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Antibody-mediated Rejection, Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Siltuximab for the Treatment of Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Lung Transplantation
Antibody Mediated Rejection of Lung Transplant
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of SG301 for Renal AMR After Transplantation
Antibody Mediated Rejection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter W Nickerson, MD principal investigator
University of Manitoba
David N Rush, MD study chair
University of Manitoba
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide in people with Antibody Mediated Rejection, run by University of Manitoba at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: After March 2015, unable to enroll due to patients meeting exclusion criteria.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Microvascular inflammation (time frame: month 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01630538, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.