Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaPhase 2BRAINNCT01621880
Effect of Bevacizumab on Radiation-induced Brain Necrosis in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab and Corticosteroid in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Adverse Effect of Radiation Therapy, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Bevacizumab may have a better effect on brain necrosis caused by radiotherapy.This randomized trial aims to investigate whether bevacizumab may alleviate radiation-induced brain necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The effect will be compared with outcomes in patients receiving steroid therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Adverse Effect of Radiation Therapy, Brain Necrosis
- What is being tested?
- bevacizumab and Corticosteroid
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 112 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jun 2012to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have received radiotherapy for histologically confirmed nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
- Prior irradiation >/= 6 months prior to study entry.
- Radiographic evidence to support the diagnosis of radiation-induced brain necrosis without tumor recurrence.
- Age>/= 18 years. Because on dosing or adverse event data are currently not available on the use of bevacizumab in patients <18years old.
- No prior bevacizumab therapy.
- No evidence of very high intracranial pressure that suggests brain hernia and needs surgery.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Fertile women who are willing to take contraception during the trial.
- Routine laboratory studies with bilirubin </=upper limits of normal (ULN), aspartate aminotransferase (AST or SGOT) < ULN, creatinine <ULN, red-cell count >/= 4,000 per cubic millimeter; white-cell count >/=1500 per cubic millimeter, platelets >/= 75,000 per cubic millimeter; Hb >/=9.0. PT, APTT, INR in a normal range.
- If with history of seizures, patients should be on anticonvulsant therapy. However, preference will be enzyme-non-inducing anticonvulsants.
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
- The patient has no active bleeding or pathological condition that carries a high risk of bleeding; there is no evidence of serious or non-healing wound, ulcer or bone fracture.
Who cannot join
- Patients with any of the following should be excluded: 1) evidence of metastatic disease; 2)evidence of tumor invasion to major vessels(e.g. the carotid); 3) history of bleeding related to tumor or radiotherapy during or after the completion of radiation.
- Evidence of active central nervous system hemorrhage.
- History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation or intra-abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to study enrollment.
- inadequately controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 90 mmHg despite antihypertensive medication)
- Severe complications: 1) History of large vessel cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months; 2) Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months; 3) New York heart association grade II or greater congestive heart failure; 4) Serious and inadequately controlled cardiac arrhythmia; 5) Significant vascular disease (e.g. aortic aneurysm, history of aortic dissection); 6) Clinically significant peripheral vascular disease; 7) severe infection.
- Evidence of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy.
- Patients who have received steroid therapy for radiation-induced brain necrosis before the study.
- History of anaphylactic response to bevacizumab.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
About this study
Bevacizumab may have a better effect on brain necrosis caused by radiotherapy.This randomized trial aims to investigate whether bevacizumab may alleviate radiation-induced brain necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The effect will be compared with outcomes in patients receiving steroid therapy.
Read the detailed description
Radiation-induced brain necrosis is a severe complication of radiotherapy in patients with Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Current neuroprotective therapies show limited benefit in ameliorating this complication of radiotherapy. This study is a randomized, single blind clinical study. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether bevacizumab can alleviate radiation-induced brain necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and to compare the treating effect between bevacizumab and steroid.
- Being tested
- bevacizumab, Corticosteroid
- Keywords
- radiation-induced brain necrosis, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Bevacizumab, Methylprednisolone
- Medical subject headings
- Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Radiation Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bevacizumabDrug
Also called Bevacizumab(Avastin)
Patients receive bevacizumab 5mg/kg intravenously over 30-90 minutes on day1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CorticosteroidDrug
Also called methylprednisolone
Patients in the corticosteroid group were treated with intravenous pulsed-steroid therapy: methylprednisolone 500 mg daily intravenously for three consecutive days followed by oral prednisone 60 mg for five days and gradually tapered 15mg every 5 days. When the prednisone dose reached 30mg per day, it was tapered down more slowly (tapered 5mg every week), until a maintenance dose of 10mg per day was reached. The entire intervention lasted two months. At 2 months, prednisone was stopped.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Active comparator | Patients receive bevacizumab 5mg/kg intravenously over 30-90 minutes on day1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: bevacizumab |
| Corticosteroid | Active comparator | Patients in the corticosteroid group were treated with intravenous pulsed-steroid therapy: methylprednisolone 500 mg daily intravenously for three consecutive days followed by oral prednisone 60 mg for five days and gradually tapered 15mg every 5 days. When the prednisone dose reached 30mg per day, it was tapered down more slowly (tapered 5mg every week), until a maintenance dose of 10mg per day was reached. The entire intervention lasted two months. At 2 months, prednisone was stopped. Receives: Drug: Corticosteroid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With a Treatment Response
The primary outcome of the trial was the treatment response rate at two months. The definitions of response and progressive disease were based on both the radiographic changes and clinical symptoms. We defined response as both (1)a reduction in edema volume on FLAIR images by ≥25% and (2)no deteriorating symptoms. Progressive disease was defined as either (1)larger than 10% increase in the volume of the lesions; (2)appearance of any new lesion/site; or (3)clear clinical worsening.
Measured: At 2 months.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Percentage Change in Radiological Measures of Lesion Volume
T1 post-gadolinium imaging was used to measure the enhancement and T2-weighted FLAIR to measure the edema. For lesion measurements, radiologists used manual and semiautomatic approaches to identify the outline of the lesion, and the total volume was estimated with Volume Viewer 2 software(GE Healthcare, AW Suite2.0 6.5.1.z).
Measured: Change from baseline to evaluation at 2 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2012
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Yamei Tang, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
- Investigators
- Yamei Tang, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01621880
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012025
- Other IDs
- SYSN001
- Acronym
- BRAIN
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Luo S, Lai S, Wu Y, Hong J, Lin D, Lin S, Huang X, Xu X, Weng X. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis treatment based on real-world utility value in China. Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Sep;200(9):805-814. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02242-6. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
PubMed 38829437Xu Y, Rong X, Hu W, Huang X, Li Y, Zheng D, Cai Z, Zuo Z, Tang Y. Bevacizumab Monotherapy Reduces Radiation-induced Brain Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Aug 1;101(5):1087-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.068. Epub 2018 May 2.
PubMed 29885994
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Bevacizumab on Radiation-induced Brain Necrosis in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01621880
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BRAIN / 2012025
- Keywords
- radiation-induced brain necrosis, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Bevacizumab, Methylprednisolone
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 112 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Nov 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bevacizumab may have a better effect on brain necrosis caused by radiotherapy.This randomized trial aims to investigate whether bevacizumab may alleviate radiation-induced brain necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The effect will be compared with outcomes in patients receiving steroid therapy.
Detailed description
Radiation-induced brain necrosis is a severe complication of radiotherapy in patients with Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Current neuroprotective therapies show limited benefit in ameliorating this complication of radiotherapy. This study is a randomized, single blind clinical study. The primary aim of this study is to determine whether bevacizumab can alleviate radiation-induced brain necrosis in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and to compare the treating effect between bevacizumab and steroid.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bevacizumab | Active comparator | Drug: bevacizumabPatients receive bevacizumab 5mg/kg intravenously over 30-90 minutes on day1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Corticosteroid | Active comparator | Drug: CorticosteroidPatients in the corticosteroid group were treated with intravenous pulsed-steroid therapy: methylprednisolone 500 mg daily intravenously for three consecutive days followed by oral prednisone 60 mg for five days and gradually tapered 15mg every 5 days. When the prednisone dose reached 30mg per day, it was tapered down more slowly (tapered 5mg every week), until a maintenance dose of 10mg per day was reached. The entire intervention lasted two months. At 2 months, prednisone was stopped. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients must have received radiotherapy for histologically confirmed nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
- Prior irradiation >/= 6 months prior to study entry.
- Radiographic evidence to support the diagnosis of radiation-induced brain necrosis without tumor recurrence.
- Age>/= 18 years. Because on dosing or adverse event data are currently not available on the use of bevacizumab in patients <18years old.
- No prior bevacizumab therapy.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with any of the following should be excluded: 1) evidence of metastatic disease; 2)evidence of tumor invasion to major vessels(e.g. the carotid); 3) history of bleeding related to tumor or radiotherapy during or after the completion of radiation.
- Evidence of active central nervous system hemorrhage.
- History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation or intra-abdominal abscess within 28 days prior to study enrollment.
- inadequately controlled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 90 mmHg despite antihypertensive medication)
- Severe complications: 1) History of large vessel cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months; 2) Myocardial infarction or unstable angina within 6 months; 3) New York heart association grade II or greater congestive heart failure; 4) Serious and inadequately controlled cardiac arrhythmia; 5) Significant vascular disease (e.g. aortic aneurysm, history of aortic dissection); 6) Clinically significant peripheral vascular disease; 7) severe infection.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bevacizumabAlso: Bevacizumab(Avastin)Patients receive bevacizumab 5mg/kg intravenously over 30-90 minutes on day1. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. | Drug | Bevacizumab |
| CorticosteroidAlso: methylprednisolonePatients in the corticosteroid group were treated with intravenous pulsed-steroid therapy: methylprednisolone 500 mg daily intravenously for three consecutive days followed by oral prednisone 60 mg for five days and gradually tapered 15mg every 5 days. When the prednisone dose reached 30mg per day, it was tapered down more slowly (tapered 5mg every week), until a maintenance dose of 10mg per day was reached. The entire intervention lasted two months. At 2 months, prednisone was stopped. | Drug | Corticosteroid |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With a Treatment Response
Time frame: At 2 months.
The primary outcome of the trial was the treatment response rate at two months. The definitions of response and progressive disease were based on both the radiographic changes and clinical symptoms. We defined response as both (1)a reduction in edema volume on FLAIR images by ≥25% and (2)no deteriorating symptoms. Progressive disease was defined as either (1)larger than 10% increase in the volume of the lesions; (2)appearance of any new lesion/site; or (3)clear clinical worsening.
1 secondary outcome
Percentage Change in Radiological Measures of Lesion Volume
Time frame: Change from baseline to evaluation at 2 months.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38829437Luo S, Lai S, Wu Y, Hong J, Lin D, Lin S, Huang X, Xu X, Weng X. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab for cerebral radiation necrosis treatment based on real-world utility value in China. Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Sep;200(9):805-814. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02242-6. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29885994Xu Y, Rong X, Hu W, Huang X, Li Y, Zheng D, Cai Z, Zuo Z, Tang Y. Bevacizumab Monotherapy Reduces Radiation-induced Brain Necrosis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Aug 1;101(5):1087-1095. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.068. Epub 2018 May 2.
Related trials for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Docetaxel and SX-682 in Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Salivary Gland Carcinoma, and Advanced Prostate Cancer
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of BMS-986016 (Relatlimab) to the Usual Immunotherapy After Initial Treatment for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
P-MUC1C-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Biopsy Decision Model for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Based on Serological Markers and Endoscopic Features
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPC)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
VMD-928 Monotherapy and in Combination With Pembrolizumab to Treat TrkA Overexpression Driven Solid Tumors or Lymphoma
Head and Neck Carcinoma, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yamei Tang, Ph.D principal investigator
Department of Neurology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing bevacizumab and Corticosteroid in people with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma and Adverse Effect of Radiation Therapy, run by Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Nov 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With a Treatment Response (time frame: At 2 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01621880, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2019.